[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Trump's Opportunity To Reset US-Iran Relations

Trump Nominates Pam Bondi For Attorney General After Gaetz Withdraws From Consideration

Judea Snarls: Donald Trump seeks to divide the State of Israel and Create a Palestinian State

Gaetz Withdraws From Consideration For Attorney General

TROUBLE OFF AIR MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow ‘takes $5m pay cut’

CNN’s Jake Tapper STORMS OFF as JD Vance ANNIHILATES Him Over Trump’s ‘Enemy Within’ Remarks!

🚨BREAKING: Hundreds of January 6th Political Prisoners Set FREE, DC Judges PANIC! Trump Pardon Soon

Tulsi Gabbard vs. Democrats and the Media!!

Gaetz Withdraws From Consideration For Attorney General

Putin Threatening Kiev Electricity

Netanyahu seeking a ban on formation of state committee of inquiry into Oct. 7

Dear DOGE: Milton Friedman Wanted to Cut Most of It

Chairman of Arab Americans for Trump claims to have received 100% promise of Palestinian State from President-elect

NASA makes surprising discovery at the end of our universe: 'It shouldn't exist'

TRUMP Begins Fight vs BIG TECH CENSORSHIP CARTEL

Why The U.S. Is Freaking Out Over China’s New Peru Port

Wire thefts leave Hacienda Heights residents without phone, internet service

Yale's Beyonce Course Highlights The Decline Of Higher Education (Tuition $67,250)

They are literally upset about getting rid of toxins in our food

Palestinian representative’s extraordinary reply to US envoy on ceasefire veto

Robert F Kennedy Jr Names Who Killed His Father with Sirhan Sirhan (CIA)

Biden Gets Real About Transgender Holocaust

Jaguar | Copy Nothing (Woke Car Ad Without a Aar)

ICC issues arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu for alleged Gaza war crimes

BIDEN ADMINISTRATION MOVES TO FORGIVE $4.7 BILLION IN LOANS TO UKRAINE

Hezbollah retains Fire for Fire strategy; takes Tel Aviv under ballistic missile barrage

In yet another escalation, Biden regime sending anti-personnel landmines banned in 150 Countries to Ukraine

DOJ Data Confirms Conservative Fears Biden Weaponized Justice System

Senate Votes Down Bernie Sanders's Efforts To Block Weapons Deals for Israel

Who's Jake Sullivan, the Man Who Reportedly Assembled 'Dream Team' to Destroy Nord Stream?


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Public Law 88-244, which follows Public Law 88-243 - the institution of the law- merchants Uniform Commercial Code. Are you shocked that the Pope is listed in this Public Law?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 18, 2024
Author: Liars and Thieves
Post Date: 2024-08-18 19:11:33 by AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt
Keywords: Treaty of Verona 1213
Views: 1628
Comments: 27

Public Law 88-244, which follows Public Law 88-243 - the institution of the law- merchants Uniform Commercial Code. Are you shocked that the Pope is listed in this Public Law?

Public Law 88-243 - the institution of the law- merchants Uniform Commercial Code.

PUBLIC LAW 88-243-DEC. 30, 1963

www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/88/hr5338/text

The end page of Public Law 88-243 (see (d) The following British statutes shall have no longer have any force or effect in the District of Columbia...) and following that, Public Law 88-244 (Rome) (also on December 30, 1963):

uscode.house.gov/statutes/pl/88/244.pdf


Poster Comment:

awww...isn't that quaint.

later.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.

#1. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#0)

We are all heavily involved with the UCC. Each one of us has an account there listed as UCC CONTRACT ACCOUNT.

The only way to get access to this account is to be the Secured Party. Then your claim takes Priority over all others.

I have my own Security Agreement on file with the Missouri Secretary of State - UCC DIVISION. I knew this old boy in Delaware who was making up those Security Agreements. But he recently passed away.

I told a guy I work with about getting his own Security Agreement, but it was not free. The guy was charging $400 in the form of four TOTALLY BLANK U.S. Postal Money Orders for $100 each. That sort of turned him off. But you get what you pay for. How much do you fork over to the IRS and State Department of Revenue every year?

Secretaries were doing a lot of the work. I have my copy of the filing here in the pile of papers on living room table. I need to look for it. It is in Manila Envelope.

Once I find it, I can start doing those Security Agreements myself. PM me if anyone is interested.

I sent an Assignment of Account to Missouri Dept of Revenue. They sent me the tax bill again. I wrote back to them ON THEIR TAX BILL: "THE ASSIGNMENT OF ACCOUNT IS THE PAYMET OF THE TAX. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO ZERO THE ACCOUNT. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN A DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST THE DIRECTOR." A Default Judgment is Treble Damages.

Guess what happened next? The State tax bill disappeared.

A little more background on this. On June 5, 1933, FDR abrogated the gold standard (Bankruptcy of the United States). FED GOV called in all the gold and gold certificates. If you had a Safety Deposit box at the bank. There was a Treasury Agent there to look at the contents when you came to open it. Many people kept gold in those boxes. If he spotted any he would seize it and write you a receipt.

As a remedy for FDR abrogating the gold standard, Congress passed HJR 192 which said the U.S. Government would pay all your lawful debts. Even though HJR 102 has been repealed, they must still offer the remedy and this is found in the U.S. CODE under the section that deals with money and banking.

I am just a little rusty on all the details because of the meningitis but this is the best I can do for now.

As I said earlier, if anyone is interested in getting their own Security Agreement, send me a PM. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2024-08-18   19:59:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 1.

#2. To: BTP Holdings (#1)

I sent an Assignment of Account to Missouri Dept of Revenue. They sent me the tax bill again. I wrote back to them ON THEIR TAX BILL: "THE ASSIGNMENT OF ACCOUNT IS THE PAYMET OF THE TAX. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO ZERO THE ACCOUNT. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN A DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST THE DIRECTOR." A Default Judgment is Treble Damages.

Guess what happened next? The State tax bill disappeared.

May I ask how recent this was?

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2024-08-20 10:45:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: BTP Holdings (#1)

A little more background on this. On June 5, 1933, FDR abrogated the gold standard (Bankruptcy of the United States). FED GOV called in all the gold and gold certificates. If you had a Safety Deposit box at the bank. There was a Treasury Agent there to look at the contents when you came to open it. Many people kept gold in those boxes. If he spotted any he would seize it and write you a receipt.

As a remedy for FDR abrogating the gold standard, Congress passed HJR 192 which said the U.S. Government would pay all your lawful debts. Even though HJR 102 has been repealed, they must still offer the remedy and this is found in the U.S. CODE under the section that deals with money and banking.

I am just a little rusty on all the details because of the meningitis but this is the best I can do for now.

You're doing great. I have to keep reviewing all this material to refresh my memory and I'm always on so many different tracks.

What you said about HJR 192 being repealed reminded me of an article I had read many years ago. The article went down, but fortunately someone saved it. I'll post it again now because I think it's instructive.

"Was HJR-192 Repealed ?

By: Kevin, of the family: Hines Page 1 of 4

Was HJR-192 Repealed ?©

An Analysis of the Facts, by: Kevin, of the family: Hines

"Was HJR-192 repealed?" I can't even count the number of times I've had gullible sovereigns asked me this question. They have blindly believed this patriot mythology without thinking it through. That's the problem: sovereigns who are too lazy to do any research or think through a rumor thoroughly before blindly believing anything they hear or read. Stop watching the NFL games on Sunday and start thinking things through!!!

First of all, "HJR-192" is the short name for "House Joint Resolution 192", so let's understand what a "resolution" is. A New Year's resolution applies to you, the one who made it, not to your next door neighbor or anyone else. You're the one who "resolved" to lose weight or quit smoking or exercise more, and your neighbor is not obligated to do what you resolved for yourself. "HJR- 192" is strictly a resolution that applies only to the members of Congress (who "resolved" it) and to its subjects. It can be modified at anytime by Congress if they so choose, just as you can modify your New Year's resolution if you so choose.

However, modifying a Public Law is a little different matter. The law in this instance, per the actual "Statutes at Large" books, is identified as: "Chap. 48, 48 Stat. 112". I went down to the SMU Law Library, found it, and photo-copied it for myself. It contains the very same wording as "HJR-192"; however, one is a resolution and one is a Public Law.

Kevin's Rule #4 - "Always do your own homework. Verify everything. Discern fact from error, truth from lies. Never act based on someone else's claims!!"

If I refer to "HJR-192", am I not telling the listener or reader that I am a subject of Congress, and that I am a citizen of the UNITED STATES?? Sorry, but that is the last thing I want to say. I can, however, say that the Federal Government has placed insufficient amounts of lawful money in general circulation, i.e., gold and silver coinage, thus, forcing me to "discharge" my debts with commercial paper, i.e., putting them off to a future point in time, and restricting my obligation as a sovereign to "pay" a debt.

Was HJR-192 Repealed ?

By: Kevin, of the family: Hines Page 2 of 4

I refer to the Federal Government's obligation to me as: "Chap. 48, 48 Stat. 112", not "HJR-192". The Federal Government took away my ability to pay a debt with lawful money, but that doesn't make me a subject of Congress or of the Federal Government, and thus, their resolution does not apply to me. However, their obligation to me under their Public Law does apply to me because there is insufficient lawful money in general circulation to meet the needs of the people, which includes me.

When the Federal Government took much of our lawful money out of general circulation in 1933, i.e., gold coins, thus leaving an insufficient amount of lawful money in general circulation to meet the needs of the people, i.e., only silver coins remaining, the Congress was required to give the people a remedy. Public Law: "Chap. 48, 48 Stat. 112" is that remedy. It states that the Federal Government will pay my debts, dollar for dollar. Note: It doesn't say that the government will pay for anything I desire to buy (like a car), only that it will pay my legitimate debts.

Most, if not all, of the State Constitutions require the State to pay its debts in gold and silver coin. By taking away a State Government's ability to comply with it's Constitutional mandate of paying its debts in gold and silver coin, the Federal Government involuntarily restricted a State Government's ability to function in a de jure capacity. The de jure States went into suspension after the following four acts were committed: (1) the taking of gold coins out of general circulation in 1933, (2) in 1964, the U. S. Mint ceased minting any more silver coins, (3) in 1968, Silver Certificates could no longer be redeemed for silver, and (4) on August 15, 1971, President Nixon closed the Gold Window, thus stopping the redemption of foreign-held dollars for gold. At that point in time, the U. S. Dollar was backed solely by the full faith and credit of the American people, and the States could no longer function in a de jure capacity while in a state of suspension.

The States went into suspension because the Federal Government involuntarily forced the State to pay its officers, judges, employees, etc. with something other than gold and silver coin, which was required by the State Constitution. This "something other than gold and silver coin" was nothing more than "fiat" money, or script, back by nothing but the labor of the people. Thus, Constitutionally, the States could no longer function in a de jure capacity because it no longer had the ability to pay its debts in the form mandated by its Constitution, i.e., contract with the people.

Was HJR-192 Repealed ?

By: Kevin, of the family: Hines Page 3 of 4

Since the Federal Government took away the gold coin money in 1933, thus causing the States to suspend operations by preventing them from honoring their obligation to pay their debts in gold and silver coin, then there had to be a remedy. "Chap 48, 48 Stat. 112" is the remedy, not just for the States, but also for the sovereign men and women who created the States. Until gold and silver coinage is reinstated in sufficient quantities for general circulation, that remedy cannot be repealed. Congress may have repealed some parts of "HJR-192", or even all of it, because "HJR-192" is merely a resolution for Congress and its subjects. However, the true remedy is provided to the people by Public Law: "Chap 48, 48 Stat. 112".

Until the State Governments come out of suspension, by the Federal Government's placing sufficient quantities of lawful money into general circulation, your remedy, pursuant to "Chap 48, 48 Stat. 112" cannot be repealed and will continue to be there. The remedy of the subjects/citizens found at "HJR-192" might not be there because their remedy is nothing but a resolution, but the remedy of the sovereign found at Public Law: "Chap 48, 48 Stat. 112" will still be there because a sovereign's remedy is Public Law.

If, as many uninformed sovereigns claim, the promise that the Federal Government will pay your debts, dollar for dollar, is no longer valid, then these sovereigns have no basis for claiming their remedy by using the 1099-OID process for the refund of out-of pocket funds expended to pay their debts. Either (1) you believe that the Federal Government repealed your remedy, and therefore, there is no 1099-OID refund process available to you, or (2) you believe the Government has an obligation to pay your debts, dollar for dollar, and therefore, the 1099-OID process for a refund is your remedy and you can use it to recover the funds you expended to take care of your debt obligations. You can't believe your remedy has been repealed, and then try to claim your remedy by asking for a refund using the 1099-OID process.

Now that you understand the difference between a resolution and a Public Law (and why your remedy was given to you), you may recall how a well-known "patriot attorney" who specializes in tax matters has worked hard to intentionally mislead sovereign men and women into believing that their remedy has been repealed. HOGWASH!!! He's talking about a subject's remedy by resolution, not a sovereign's remedy by Public Law. Please do your homework and think outside the box before disseminating patriot mythology to others, possibly causing them to stumble by your lack of research and knowledge. If you wish to continue arguing this ridiculous allegation without doing your homework, i.e., refusing to spend the time required in studying the monetary system in detail,

Was HJR-192 Repealed ?

By: Kevin, of the family: Hines Page 4 of 4

please do so privately, not on any public forum, so as not to mislead others with such mythology.

By: Kevin, of the family: Hines, a sovereign man,
with a common law copyright on this,
my private, intellectual property"

http://satcomm911.com/PDFS/-hjr-192-repealed.pdf

FED GOV called in all the gold and gold certificates. If you had a Safety Deposit box at the bank. There was a Treasury Agent there to look at the contents when you came to open it. Many people kept gold in those boxes. If he spotted any he would seize it and write you a receipt.

wow. I never heard that part before. Robbery in the bank. Hmmmm. Or was it?? I'm wondering. The banks thru duress came under the ownership of the private international bankers in The City of London via their agent the "Federal" "Reserve". So I suppose if you deposited your money inside their banks, where it was a "privilege" to have it be kept safe from the common, average street robber, they considered it a gift or something. I believe the Executive Order confiscating the gold only applied to "persons", those in the employ of the rogue government and those "persons" (i.e. unbeknownst to themselves, US CORPORATIONS) who declared themselves "U.S. citizens" (i.e. employees/slaves of the US GOVERNMENT/CORPORATION).

There's been so much deception, for so long and on so many fronts.

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2024-08-20 11:26:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]