See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: What was Reagan doing at Bohemian Grove?
Source:
apfn
URL Source: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/Grove.htm
Published: Jun 10, 2006
Author: apfn
Post Date: 2006-06-10 20:34:26 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 630
Comments: 49
(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-5) not displayed.
.
.
.
#6. To: Itisa1mosttoolate, lodwick (#5)
up the irish!
Quit bogarting that peace, Herbert!
Nixon sure knew how to let his hair down, didn't he?
the one closed to who appears to be reagan on the left side could pass for Dennis DeConcini. On the right hand side, dark hair, the guy could pass for, oh geeze..........shit........brain fart.........hell, the guy who does 60 minutes....seems like it starts with a M but its not Morton Kondrake. GEeze.......
the one with the western cut jacket, across from the standing speaker, could be cap weinberg(er).
the one next to the far left one makes me think of bobby ray inman. That's a weird eyebrow.
And the one sitting back in the shadows behind where those flags are hanging down is Javier Rodriquez Orlando Espinoza Ernesto Garcia y Diaz...he was from mexco! It's either him or the Columbian Coffee guy.....shit! I can't remember his name either! Is that bad, or what!
Great catches there - thanks. Does this crap never end?
Juan Valdez?
Dat be da man! :) Thank you very much. I just dread those moments!
I don't know how accurate I was, loddy. And NO, it seems like it never ends. :(
This post is not about who is there with him row. The answer is in reply #2. He nominated Dov S. Zakheim to positions in the Pentagon so he could do the planning and cordination for 911 "remote Controlled Planes".
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
"Blanking" sucks - I know all too well. That's why I enjoy Cash Cab, much more that I do Jeopardy, these days...the simpler, the better for me.
Morley Shafer?
"I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in -- and the West in general -- into an unbearable hell and a choking life." Reagan and the guy in the pink suit are sure giving each other the eye.
"I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in -- and the West in general -- into an unbearable hell and a choking life." So why not tell us up front what you're after........ I really can't be too impressed with that wikipedia stuff--if people can just add their own concept of info......even if there is some sort of 'review' board. And no, that doesn't mean I don't know anything about BG or S&B or NWO or a lot of the other 'stuff'.
BTW, sorry I messed up your thread. I was just trying to help you figure out who was there........
That doesn't quite seem right, either, Indie....is Safer the one that does 60 Minutes? Crap.....I can picture the guys face and everything......
I know he used to...I never watch it...
"I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in -- and the West in general -- into an unbearable hell and a choking life." Do know about Ronnie, but Tricky Dick didn't like what he saw after the punch bowl ran dry...
It's been at least 12 years since I watched it (since I moved last time).... BTW, did a Google and it is Mike Wallace I was thinking of. Googled 60 Minutes and proceeded to look thru the articles; found a pic.
I think this photo was probably taken in mid 1960's before either nixon or reagan was elected president. so back then deconcini would've been a very young man and that's why it doesn't fit him.
Yep, but of course Mike Wallace, but isn't his real name. "Mike" is a Jew....
First you have to define "us". If by us you mean the nation and political entity known as the United States of America, well it's already dead -- as amply documented in Jethro Tull's "over 40" thread. Remnants live on, posting on internet discussion groups; the flotsam of their time can be found in antique shops. (But is flotsam that serves as an important reminder, and can be incorporated in a renewed, but different foundation.) It takes a long time for the nails and hair to stop growing. ( One word: "Makeovers." It is a non-tradeable domestic service...) If by us you mean yourself, the "over 40" thread commenters, and their friends and relatives, then both are huge problems, but the immediate threat is the Mexicans -- a subject on which some religious Zionists are in agreement with us. You must also define Zionism. Some say it is the same thing as the NWO. I disagree. When I say Zionism I mean support for the preservation of the state of Israel as an explicitly Jewish state. On that question I maintain steadfast agnosticism. At the last AMREN conference, David Duke raised (very politely) the Jewish Question. Conference speaker Guillame Faye's answer was that we have to be very acute in our strategy; we must fight on two different fronts, and not by the same means. For Faye, Jews are like "eskimos" -- they don't exist. There is nothing like the BNP in the US. Nick Griffin might know a thing or two. Speaking for myself, I was ready to consider the reality of race long before I was ready to consider the Question. Took a Polack on LF to show me I had a mental block to thinking about Jews in the same way as any other group. Took up residence in my lymph nodes or something. Even if Zionism is the bigger threat, you still would not have been able to get me to consider it without addressing other things first. ( Just to show you how oblivious I was: A secular Jewish fellow I knew in school dated and obviously loved this one shiksa; she loved him in return, and wanted to marry him. He demurred. I asked him about it, and he said that if he ever married, he wanted to marry a Jewish woman. Believe it or not, this genuinely puzzled me; after all, he didn't believe in a god, any more than I did. How could this matter? I pointed this out to him and he shrugged, but otherwise kept silent. What bothers me about that today is not his motive for not marrying a goy, which is obvious in hindsight and with which I sympathize, but the fact that he wasn't straight with me.) In principle, Zionists do not have to be enemies. They are nationalists, and therefore could even be allies against the NWO. Our sixty+ years of entanglement makes this difficult. Good fences do make good neighbors. I think on balance it is probably a strategic mistake to pay much attention to the plight of the Palestinians. The emphasis should be on the entanglement. If it were not for the entanglement, that particular conflict needn't be of any interest. Leftists emphasize the Palestianians as a means to erode the national character of Israel. More on AIPAC and USS Liberty; less on "social justice" and "democracy". ( American Jews comprise half the upper echelon of the Israeli political party for those poor Ethiopean Jews, so Israeli Zionists have good reasons for disentangling too! The "One Future" party might be taken as evidence that God exists, and he has a delicious sense of humor.) Highlighting the Palestinians might bring an end to this particular entanglement, but it leaves the principle of intervention untouched. It is just as likely that the entanglement will remain, but with a "reformed" Israel, stripped of its national character. Which would make it much harder for us to calmly but firmly assert our own interests, here in the US, because doing so would require at least some small amount of hypocrisy.
And reagan isn't real.......nor is nixon...............and it probably isn't bohemian at all.........more like gypsy! :)
Oh, well Nixon was very real, and indeed paid the price for it...even lived through retirement without SS men in his little NJ gated-community. Reagan was buried at dusk, with the sunset at the exact angle...very Hymiewood, if you'd ask me...Bohemian Grove was homo at the get go...
Great post, T. Dead on.
A brilliant post, indeed. One cannot assert American national prerogatives and at the same time deny same to Iraq, Iran or, yes, even Israel. This is why explicitly anti-Zionist paleos have always puzzled me. How can one seek to interfere in the affairs of another nation, even desiring that they no longer be a nation, and at the same time insist that America's national sovereignty be respected and preserved? Paleos must be about asserting and respecting the sovereignty of all nations while, at the same time, condemning and denying the usurped powers of all empires, even our own. Only in such a world can America (and every other nation) ultimately be free.
Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.
Paleos, if they're true to the ideology, should be isolationists and American nationalists. I'm not sure any exist at present.
That's what jumped out at me too, and the fact that Zakheim is an ordained rabbi, IOW, a Pharisee. Where did I read recently that troops have been coming through a tunnel from Russia to Alaska? I don't know, but it rang a bell. There was talk about building a bridge or a tunnel from Russia to Alaska. I remember seeing a picture of Reagan with a set of blueprints in his hands. I believe he was leaning toward a bridge. I just now tried to find some of this, but it appears to be cleansed from the web, or maybe I am just not looking in the right place. I just partially froze my computer trying. I found these however: http://www.nps.gov/a kso/beringia/beringiaprogram.htm http://www.nps.gov/a kso/beringia/whatisberingia2.htm It all gives new meaning to the quote about "the US being more comfortably merged with the Soviet Union". I guess they want to join the Ashkenazis in Russia with their brethren in America. UNITED STATES-RUSSIAN MERGER: A DONE DEAL? Charlotte Iserbyt October 16, 2003
thanks, good info.
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
http://www.wealth4freedo m.com/truth/13/NDODD.htm
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
Our biggest threat is the bush crime-family. In fact if we don't get rid of them they are going to get rid of us. You can't blame our past political lethargy on mexicans and/or jews. Now comes the pay off for all those years of allowing the elites to run roughshod over our lives, now comes the death kamps and the ovens.
Truthseeker
I remembered thinking that at the time. The whole "east to west" thing was another tip-off. Messianic, IMO. Reagan liked to entertain the Rabbi Schneerson. I just ran across a Jewish-looking gealogical record. Bush, Cheney, Nixon, REAGAN, Rockefeller, Roosevelt are all on it so far. [There are other genealogical records that reveal the same thing. They are all related.] http://www.holcom begenealogy.com/data/surname_index.htm President Ronald Wilson Reagan married Sarah Jane Mayfield on 26 January 1940 at Glendale, Long Beach Co., CA. President Ronald Wilson Reagan and Sarah Jane Mayfield were divorced on 28 July 1949.2 President Ronald Wilson Reagan married Anne Francis Robbins [Nancy Davis], daughter of Kenneth Seymour Robbins and Edith Luckett, In an unusual note, Reagan's two wives were 10th cousins through ancestors Robert White and his wife Bridget Allgar.
Thanks, I bookmarked it.
Truthseeker
Good link! I hadn't seen that particular page. Thanks!
No alcohol on the table? Are they having breakfast?
and this one http://www.nogw.com/
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
The backstroke?
Quit bogarting that peace, Herbert!
Comments (47 - 49) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#7. To: lodwick (#1)
Who the hell are the rest of those puds?
#8. To: lodwick (#1)
#9. To: lodwick (#1)
#10. To: lodwick (#1)
#11. To: lodwick (#1)
#12. To: rowdee (#10)
#13. To: rowdee (#11)
shit! I can't remember his name either!
#14. To: lodwick (#13)
#15. To: lodwick (#12)
#16. To: rowdee (#15)
#17. To: rowdee (#14)
I just dread those moments!
#18. To: rowdee (#8)
--Osama bin Laden
#19. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
--Osama bin Laden
#20. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#16)
#21. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#16)
#22. To: IndieTX (#18)
#23. To: rowdee (#22)
--Osama bin Laden
#24. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
“Yes, but is this good for Jews?"
#25. To: IndieTX (#23)
#26. To: rowdee (#8)
Dennis DeConcini.
#27. To: rowdee (#25)
“Yes, but is this good for Jews?"
#28. To: lodwick (#4)
In your opinion, are the Zionists or the Mexicans a bigger threat to us?
Now Doc, I admit that sounds mighty purty after a toke; but Rufus is just gonna take yer blunt, too.
#29. To: Eoghan (#27)
#30. To: rowdee (#29)
“Yes, but is this good for Jews?"
#31. To: Tauzero (#28)
#32. To: Tauzero, Jethro Tull (#28)
#33. To: Arator (#32)
How can one seek to interfere in the affairs of another nation, even desiring that they no longer be a nation, and at the same time insist that America's national sovereignty be respected and preserved?
#34. To: Tauzero (#28)
Great thoughts - thanks.
#35. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#16)
911 "remote Controlled Planes".
#36. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#35)
#37. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#35)
#38. To: lodwick (#4)
#39. To: loner (#38)
Here's a site for ya -
#40. To: Eoghan (#30)
#41. To: lodwick (#39)
#42. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#37)
#43. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
#44. To: lodwick (#39)
#45. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#44)
Even better - especially the Logan Act information. Thanks.
#46. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
What was Reagan doing at Bohemian Grove?
.
.
.