[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Try It For 5 Days! - The Most EFFICIENT Way To LOSE FAT

Number Of US Student Visas Issued To Asians Tumbles

Range than U.S HIMARS, Russia Unveils New Variant of 300mm Rocket Launcher on KamAZ-63501 Chassis

Keir Starmer’s Hidden Past: The Cases Nobody Talks About

BRICS Bombshell! Putin & China just DESTROYED the U.S. Dollar with this gold move

Clashes, arrests as tens of thousands protest flood-control corruption in Philippines

The death of Yu Menglong: Political scandal in China (Homo Rape & murder of Actor)

The Pacific Plate Is CRACKING: A Massive Geological Disaster Is Unfolding!

Waste Of The Day: Veterans' Hospital Equipment Is Missing

The Earth Has Been Shaken By 466,742 Earthquakes So Far In 2025

LadyX

Half of the US secret service and every gov't three letter agency wants Trump dead. Tomorrow should be a good show

1963 Chrysler Turbine

3I/ATLAS is Beginning to Reveal What it Truly Is

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Judge Shot at Reno Courthouse
Source: Drudge Report
URL Source: http://www.kkoh.com/default.asp?area=mainnewsfullstory
Published: Jun 12, 2006
Author: KOH News Center
Post Date: 2006-06-12 17:53:49 by noone222
Keywords: None
Views: 1165
Comments: 99

--POLICE ARE CONTINUING TO SEARCH FOR A POSSIBLE SNIPER AFTER A JUDGE WAS APPARENTLY SHOT IN THE COURTHOUSE IN DOWNTOWN RENO. SPEAKING UNDER LOCKDOWN CONDITIONS, JUDGE JERRY POLAHA IDENTIFIED THE VICTIM AS FAMILY COURT JUDGE CHUCK WELLER. POLAHA SAID WELLER HAD BEEN SHOT IN THE CHEST WHILE ON THE THIRD FLOOR OF THE COURTHOUSE. THE SHOT IS BELIEVED TO HAVE COME FROM OUTSIDE THE BUILDING. POLAHA MENTIONED THAT IT'S NOT KNOWN IF THE SHOT WAS MEANT FOR WELLER, OR IF IT MIGHT SIMPLY BE A RANDOM GUNSHOT.


Poster Comment:

Family Court Judge ... was there a Reward ?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: noone222 (#0)

"A JUDGE WAS APPARENTLY SHOT..."

Is that illegal, now?

We should have made a fuss when they made killing abortion Doctors illegal.

What do they think the second amendment is for... deer hunters?

Adolf Hitler... "What luck for rulers that men do not think."

John F. Kennedy... "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

wakeup  posted on  2006-06-12   18:14:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: noone222 (#0)

whoever did it is gloating quietly to themselves over it now I bet. It was a well planned and successful hit I bet. and he got away. I bet the gun he used can't be traced and now he'll dispose of it.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-06-12   18:22:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: noone222, wakeup, Red Jones, Jethro Tull, hmmmmm, Esso (#0)

Inintended Consequence?

christine  posted on  2006-06-12   18:40:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: noone222 (#0)

POLAHA MENTIONED THAT IT'S NOT KNOWN IF THE SHOT WAS MEANT FOR WELLER, OR IF IT MIGHT SIMPLY BE A RANDOM GUNSHOT.

A random gunshot hitting inside the third floor of courthouse building? Yeah sure, and a red sleigh pulled by eight flying reindeer was spotted in the vicinity at about the same time.

Quit bogarting that peace, Herbert!

Dakmar  posted on  2006-06-12   18:57:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: noone222 (#0)

Judge Chuck Weller is 53 years old. He has practiced law for nearly thirty years, much of that in family law. He has previously hosted a local law-related radio show, and wrote a column for a Reno paper about the law.

Judge Weller ran, and won, against Elizabeth Cannon-Lynch, Pete Sferrazza, and Myra Sheehan in the 2004 elections for the judges seat.

Judge Weller once led opposition to a county bond issue to build a new county courthouse.

He graduated from Georgetown Law School in 1978.

Judge Weller Profile - KOLO TV

Sounds like someone really wants a new courthouse.

Quit bogarting that peace, Herbert!

Dakmar  posted on  2006-06-12   19:04:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: noone222 (#0)

Family Court Judge ... was there a Reward ?

Wanna bet he awarded the kids to the mother?

Freeper motto: "I read, but do not understand; I write, but make no sense."

YertleTurtle  posted on  2006-06-12   19:05:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: noone222 (#0)

Another report:

'Sniper' shoots US judge at court

A judge has been shot in the US state of Nevada, sparking a police hunt for a possible sniper. Family court judge Chuck Weller was standing near a window of the Washoe County court house in Reno when he was injured by a single shot.

There was no initial word if he was shot from inside or outside the court.

Mr Weller was rushed to hospital while police began a search of the area around the court, which is situated on the edge of Reno's casino district.

A police spokesman said Mr Weller was conscious at hospital and was speaking to his family.

A special operations SWAT team was sent to the area as police closed six blocks surrounding the court building to search for the attacker.

Mr Weller, 53, was elected to the judiciary in 2004 and previously offered legal advice on a local radio station and in a local newspaper, the Associated Press reports.

Brian S  posted on  2006-06-12   19:07:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: christine, all (#3)

Good news. Let it begin :)

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-06-12   19:18:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Jethro Tull (#8)

If there is just one skill in which to choose from in taking back the Republic, imho it is "above average" marksmanship...

Brian S  posted on  2006-06-12   19:23:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Brian S (#9)

Agree, or become a master at close quarter elimination.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-06-12   19:28:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Jethro Tull (#10)

become a master at close quarter elimination.

I just don't "move as fast" as I used to...

LOL!

Brian S  posted on  2006-06-12   19:32:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: christine (#3)

Inintended Consequence?

Inintended (is that a word ? ) ... hehehehe ... anyways, it was probably just a stray bullet that happened to find its way in the third floor window and the Judges chest .... har ... har ...

------------------------------------------------------------

Kennedy Assassination ... Bush (I) did it !

9-11 ... Bush (II) did it !

"Sarah if the American people ever find out what we have done to them, they will chase us down the streets and lynch us". [George H. W. Bush to Sarah McClendon]

noone222  posted on  2006-06-12   19:35:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: noone222 (#0)

Was this judge corrupt? Or, was he applying the law?

If he was corrupt, then there are other ways to remove him from office. Where those ways unsuccessful? If so, then the fault lies in the process and efforts should be focused on changing the process.

If he was applying the law, then this is murder. Efforts should have been directed toward changing the law. Perhaps an arguement could be made that those that passed the law were "fair game." Even then, efforts should have been directed toward changing the law.

I'm hard pressed to justify murder.

United States: Gonad-Free Zone

rack42  posted on  2006-06-12   20:54:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: rack42 (#13)

Was this judge corrupt? Or, was he applying the law?

If he was corrupt, then there are other ways to remove him from office. Where those ways unsuccessful? If so, then the fault lies in the process and efforts should be focused on changing the process.

If he was applying the law, then this is murder. Efforts should have been directed toward changing the law. Perhaps an arguement could be made that those that passed the law were "fair game." Even then, efforts should have been directed toward changing the law.

I'm hard pressed to justify murder.

I agree.

The American people can still take our country back without firing a shot, and I don't want to see this unless there is no other choice.

I don't want to lose my soul in the process of opposing their evil.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2006-06-12   21:00:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: HOUNDDAWG (#14)

There is something in the air, and it stinks...of death.

I'm disheartened to see it on this forum.

United States: Gonad-Free Zone

rack42  posted on  2006-06-12   21:08:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Jethro Tull (#8)

Good news. Let it begin :)

Great minds think alike....LOL>


Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in -- and the West in general -- into an unbearable hell and a choking life."
--Osama bin Laden

IndieTX  posted on  2006-06-12   22:04:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: IndieTX (#16)

Someone mentioned if this judge was administering justice.

My experience with the judicial system tells me noooooooo...

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-06-12   22:08:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: jethro tull (#16)

Great minds...LOL

Seriously, this guy must've really pissed someone off...i.e. totally destroyed their life. Family court. Must've removed an innocent man's children from him I'll guess....When TheSystem is corrupt, and people have NO WAY to remove oficials because TheSystem is RIGGED..judges who make immoral rulings which destroy innocent lives are indeed targets for the person whose life they ruined.

I believe a Founder stated something to the effect that when people no longer are allowed a peaceful means to make change, bad things will happen.

IMO, it IS too late to make change w/in TheSystem. There are enough "nutcases" out there that will seek other means instead of wait it out.


Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in -- and the West in general -- into an unbearable hell and a choking life."
--Osama bin Laden

IndieTX  posted on  2006-06-12   22:11:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: IndieTX (#18)

I believe a Founder stated something to the effect that when people no longer are allowed a peaceful means to make change, bad things will happen.

damned east coast hippies...

Quit bogarting that peace, Herbert!

Dakmar  posted on  2006-06-12   22:13:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Jethro Tull (#17)

"Judge" and "justice" are oxymorons.


Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in -- and the West in general -- into an unbearable hell and a choking life."
--Osama bin Laden

IndieTX  posted on  2006-06-12   22:14:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: IndieTX (#18)

IMO, it IS too late to make change w/in TheSystem.

Oh my yes. I worked in family court. These political hacks follow no law that I know of. They're two bit tyrants who wouldn’t know justice if they tripped over it. I agree. The American people have been too docile for too long. Since we’re only about one spin from completely sliding the crapper, I have no problem with some street justice.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-06-12   22:17:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: christine (#3)

Hopefully he's a good judge/gvmt employee now.

Good & dead.

Even a dog is smart enough to make the determination
between being stumbled over or being kicked.

Esso  posted on  2006-06-12   22:19:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: rack42 (#13)

If he was corrupt, then there are other ways to remove him from office. Where those ways unsuccessful? If so, then the fault lies in the process and efforts should be focused on changing the process.

fair enough..you make some good points...we don't know the facts in this case. however, unless and until you yourself have been a victim, yes VICTIM, of the injustice that goes on in american courtrooms every day by these black robed tyrants, i guess you won't understand the anger. change the laws? lol. when's the last time a law has been changed in favor of rights for we the people?

have you read John Ross's Unintended Consequences?

christine  posted on  2006-06-12   22:19:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: christine (#23)

hen's the last time a law has been changed in favor of rights for we the people?

10,000 BC?

tom007  posted on  2006-06-12   22:20:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: christine (#23)

have you read John Ross's Unintended Consequences?

Sitting right in my bookcase.

who knows what evil  posted on  2006-06-12   22:24:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: christine (#23)

however, unless and until you yourself have been a victim, yes VICTIM, of the injustice that goes on in american courtrooms every day by these black robed tyrants, i guess you won't understand the anger. change the laws? lol. when's the last time a law has been changed in favor of rights for we the people?

You obviously see the view of ex-cops Jethro Tull and I as well. My respect for you was already high and now just went up several more points.


Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in -- and the West in general -- into an unbearable hell and a choking life."
--Osama bin Laden

IndieTX  posted on  2006-06-12   22:26:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Jethro Tull (#8)

What's so good about killing a family court judge?

Is that something like killing ragheads or towelheads?

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-12   22:26:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: rack42 (#13)

murder or even attempted murder.

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-12   22:27:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Jethro Tull (#21)

...I have no problem with some street justice.

Who passed the law?

If there is injustice, then the people must act upon it.

If you think that "street justice" is the only way to deal with this, then we, the people, are in anarchy.

If that is the case, then the Constitution doesn't matter to you, and you, in my opinion, don't uphold it.

When will it be time for open warfare? I don't know. But this BS that you are pushing, ie, "street justice," doesn't seem to me consistent with supporting the US Constitution.

So, what should I conclude? You're a "plant?" You're "excited?"

I don't know. But I do know that your "way" isn't the "way."

United States: Gonad-Free Zone

rack42  posted on  2006-06-12   22:29:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: tom007 (#24)

The only think preventing the extermination of bad judges and government officials by uncontrolled anarchy, is the false belief that TheSystem still works. LOL. The few people that KNOW IT DOES NOT are the ones who have been victimized by it. Fortunately for the TYRANTS.


Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in -- and the West in general -- into an unbearable hell and a choking life."
--Osama bin Laden

IndieTX  posted on  2006-06-12   22:29:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: HOUNDDAWG (#14)

And this isn't even about taking the frickin country back!

Sheesh.....some dumbass gets pissed at a judge over some ruling.......and it is/was probably a temporary order at that.

My daughter happens to work in family court. And you can't begin to imagine the idiocy that comes to court between two grown up people. And she's only told me a handful of things.

Most go to court and never know when to STFU.

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-12   22:31:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: rack42 (#29)

When will it be time for open warfare? I don't know. But this BS that you are pushing, ie, "street justice," doesn't seem to me consistent with supporting the US Constitution.

The Constitution??? Shrub said it's a goddamned piece of paper. Judges, the POTUS and the Congress prove it everyday. It is dead. The only way to revive it according to Jefferson is with the blood of patriots and tyrants. Give that speech to Jefferson's ghost. The System is rigged and change can NOT be brought about within it.


Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in -- and the West in general -- into an unbearable hell and a choking life."
--Osama bin Laden

IndieTX  posted on  2006-06-12   22:32:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: rack42 (#15)

I'm sure glad there's a handful at least that don't go for wanton needless killing of human beings.

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-12   22:32:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: HOUNDDAWG (#14)

The American people can still take our country back without firing a shot, and I don't want to see this unless there is no other choice.

I don't want to lose my soul in the process of opposing their evil.

I vote for what you said.

Quit bogarting that peace, Herbert!

Dakmar  posted on  2006-06-12   22:33:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: rowdee (#27)

Is that something like killing ragheads or towelheads?

No. The above aren't involved in my life nor the destruction of this country via misguided judicial interpretation. IMO, judges should be treated as they treat us; guilty until proven innocent.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-06-12   22:33:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: All, rack42, jethro tull (#32)

The COnstitution is exactly what gives people the right to throw off tyranny with any means necessary and what TheStateInc hopes you'll forget/.


Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in -- and the West in general -- into an unbearable hell and a choking life."
--Osama bin Laden

IndieTX  posted on  2006-06-12   22:34:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: rowdee (#31)

Shooting at judges is exactly the kind of third world behavior I'm resisting.

Quit bogarting that peace, Herbert!

Dakmar  posted on  2006-06-12   22:34:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Jethro Tull (#35)

wanton killing of ragheads whine whine....

No. The above aren't involved in my life nor the destruction of this country via misguided judicial interpretation. IMO, judges should be treated as they treat us; guilty until proven innocent.

Whew. Some of the responses here are showing EXACTLY why the sheople have allowed themselves to be chained/. The American Revolution would never happen with today's jellyfish generation. Oh well, we lasted for 250 years...not a bad run.


Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in -- and the West in general -- into an unbearable hell and a choking life."
--Osama bin Laden

IndieTX  posted on  2006-06-12   22:36:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: rowdee (#33)

'm sure glad there's a handful at least that don't go for wanton needless killing of human beings.

They sure aren't the women who engage in or support infanticide.


Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in -- and the West in general -- into an unbearable hell and a choking life."
--Osama bin Laden

IndieTX  posted on  2006-06-12   22:37:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: IndieTX (#38)

Fear not IndieTX. It IS too late. We'll remain a genteel people right until the end. I'm convinced there is no insult we won't tolerate.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-06-12   22:40:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Jethro Tull (#35)

ROTF........like they run around shootin your ass, er chest up.

And you know know family court judges are not involved with the destruction of this country.....

They aren't working on guilty or innocent; they are attempting to arbitrate between mothers and fathers, husbands and wives, who can't get over their anger, generally, and 'get evenness', to equally divide or make arrangements for the rearing of their kids without the kids getting the short shrift.

Killing is killing, JT....whether it is a gangster, street thug, military, cops, or just a strung out pissed off citizen. It leads to more and more evil, not better.

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-12   22:41:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: IndieTX (#26)

thank you, Indie. the only time there is a potential for justice or fairness in a courtroom today is if one is involved in a case against a private entity in a matter in which the government has little or no interest in its outcome.

christine  posted on  2006-06-12   22:42:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: christine (#23)

...until you yourself have been a victim, yes VICTIM, of the injustice...

...i guess you won't understand the anger.

... have you read John Ross's Unintended Consequences?

I can't say that I understand the anger. But anger itself doesn't justify an act.

My parents divorced when I was 13. My mom married a guy shortly after I returned form my "tour." She shortly divorced him. She then remarried my dad without telling any of us (me and my brothers).

Can you say shock? Anger?

I know, not quite the same thing, but there were other things in the background; rather complicated.

Still, if you can present for me a "just murder," I'm listening.

I've not read "Unintended Consequences," but I've seen them ;)

United States: Gonad-Free Zone

rack42  posted on  2006-06-12   22:44:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: Dakmar (#37)

I would hope you are resisting, Dak.....

I don't get this killing frenzy..........sonofabitch!

I doan like the noise of a fucking NASCAR race, so I can just go in there and blow everyone to hell? I odoan like what a judge says about how the wifey and I are to split the pair of dogs we have, so I'll just off him and show him what I think! I doan like a congresscoward, so I should just go snuff him out--like that will get him to vote better!

Oh.......I know........once the world is conquered, we can just off all the green eyed, red haired guys.........do the wimmen later. Then we could target all those over 65...... Next, after a bit of time, we could decide we didn't like those over 60 and do them in. Oh wait........make that after we get rid of all the 'handicapped'==we all know what a pain in the ass they are--taking up space in a line, and getting all the good parking spots that we are entitled to.

Oh boy........this is starting to get to be some fun. Won't be long and we can see it in the eyes of all the people.........eyes that tell us there is no soul or conscience in them. Anything goes..........wheeeeeeeee.

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-12   22:46:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: rowdee (#33)

"The tree of liberty must be watered periodically with the blood of tyrants and patriots alike. It is its natural manure." - Thomas Jefferson

christine  posted on  2006-06-12   22:47:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: IndieTX (#38)

Please give me some citations where the Founding Fathers felt we should just arbitrarily run out and start killing people because we don't like the way they do a job or something. Thank you in advance.

Sheeple

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-12   22:47:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: IndieTX (#39)

THAT is something I do not support. I'm reached the point that I don't even want for the true, actual life of the mother to be an excuse.

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-12   22:49:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: rack42 (#43)

I've not read "Unintended Consequences

i highly recommend it..then we'll talk. ;)

christine  posted on  2006-06-12   22:51:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: christine (#45)

And your definition of tyrant? And patriot for that matter.

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-12   22:51:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: rowdee (#41)

"(Judge) "Weller uses whatever tactics to force you to submit to his imperial demands and tyrannical orders"

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-06-12   22:52:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: rack42, Jethro Tull, christine (#29)

"street justice," doesn't seem to me consistent with supporting the US Constitution.

Who in the existing government is supporting the constitution??? The Supreme court?

And if they are not, are not we actually under the rule of "insurgents", and not bound by law, as they have by their actions repudiated the law that protects the citizen from the power of the state?

I do not think the murder of officials is correct, but the system is increasingly manipulated as to make the political parties the kings of the system, and the individual citizens effectually powerless.

I somewhat know the system, I am a precient (sp, latin) captain in colorado springs, and was a delegate to the Republican convention here. Was walking the area Saturday with the candidate, house to bloody house.

Might not surprise too many, that the "rules" give an enormous amount of control the the party chiefs.

The judicial system is an effective lock out of taxpayer participation. The unelected Bar association calls the shots on the judges, and their club are the laywers allowed to have standing in the court.

Donno how much more RIGGED it can get than that. Bacically, it allows a select group of laywers to extract enormous wealth from the community the proport to "represent", yet there is in reality no representation and nearly no accountability. Them's the facts. From my own two eyes.

tom007  posted on  2006-06-12   22:52:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: christine, Jethro Tull, IndieTX (#45)

Lots of comments regarding this judge popping up in legal blogs around the net...NONE of them speak very highly of the judge...'tyrant' and 'out of control' are words I see associated with those comments.

who knows what evil  posted on  2006-06-12   22:54:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: Jethro Tull (#50)

where does this come from.......the blog of sosmeone who is upset with a ruling he made in a family court case?

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-12   22:54:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: All (#51)

From my own two eyes.

Guess should have said from "my one eye".

tom007  posted on  2006-06-12   22:55:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: who knows what evil (#52)

are any of the articles you're seeing from Horowitz site?

Quit bogarting that peace, Herbert!

Dakmar  posted on  2006-06-12   22:56:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: who knows what evil (#52)

Yes. I saw some comments that he's a son of oa bitch the way men get the short shrift...........and in the same comment area of the thread I was reading were comments from women bitching they were getting the short shrift.

GO figure.

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-12   22:57:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: rack42 (#15)

There is something in the air, and it stinks...of death.

I'm disheartened to see it on this forum.

No, but it's OK when the government does it in the form of Waco, Ruby Ridge, Rainbow Farm, Iraq, etc.

Until the government employees die for their actions, right or wrong, the country's dead.

That's exactly why the Founding Fathers put the Second Amendment in the Constitution.

The judge got what he had coming.

Even a dog is smart enough to make the determination
between being stumbled over or being kicked.

Esso  posted on  2006-06-12   22:58:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: rowdee (#53)

Someone? Apparently more than one, no? Read the links. He's a human trojan.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-06-12   22:58:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: who knows what evil (#52)

Lots of comments regarding this judge popping up in legal blogs around the net...NONE of them speak very highly of the judge...'tyrant' and 'out of control' are words I see associated with those comments.

I noticed. In lieu of rope and a tree, this works.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-06-12   23:01:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: who knows what evil (#52)

..."Weller, a Reno lawyer, was elected to the bench in 2004. He hosted a legal advice program on a Reno radio station from 1989 to 2002 and wrote a legal advice column in the Sunday Reno Gazette-Journal from 2000 to 2004. He once led opposition to a county bond issue to build a new courthouse."...

Found this little blurb about the guy at another site.

If the people don't like the guy, all they have to do is unelect him. Much more civil than trying to snuff someone out cause you don't like the color of their hair or whatever.

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-12   23:01:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: tom007 (#51)

I hear you.

I understand your frustration because I'm frustrated also.

So we have a choice.

You and I and everyone knows that choice.

Want to discuss the pros and cons of each choice on another thread?

United States: Gonad-Free Zone

rack42  posted on  2006-06-12   23:03:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: Jethro Tull (#58)

JT..........the bloggers are all over the place.........some say he hates men, others that he hates women........WTF? Who's right? The one that loses.........or the one who wins? And which is which?

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-12   23:03:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: Jethro Tull (#58)

I agree with you Jethro. I think the guy probably had it coming.

You know when we consider the law of the land and the constitution and such - we should also consider the whole idea of 'common law'. Under common law everyone must agree before it is a law. This is the type of law that we historically respect and works out for the benefit of the people.

The constitution is nice, but it is just a piece of paper and nobody pays any attention to what it says. especially supreme court, president, congress.

I think that common law is a similar concept to 'street justice'.

I say there's a happy sniper tonight who is toasting himself. he did such a good job planning it - unlikely he'll be caught.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-06-12   23:03:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: rack42 (#61)

So we have a choice.

You and I and everyone knows that choice.

We do?

I don't, canyou tell me what this choice is?

Thanks in advance.

tom007  posted on  2006-06-12   23:10:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: rowdee (#62)

They both might be right, Dee. He seems a full blown loon. And watch how quick they react to these harmless blogs. They'll claim the internet caused this rather than his rulings.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-06-12   23:10:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: Red Jones (#63)

The constitution is nice, but it is just a piece of paper and nobody pays any attention to what it says. especially supreme court, president, congress.

You've got this right. In some court rooms the word constitution can't be spoken. These thugs have been at the fulcrum of this nations destruction for decades. And BTW, I've never known one to be turned out by the voting public. Once appointed it's usually for life.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-06-12   23:15:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: Dakmar (#55)

are any of the articles you're seeing from Horowitz site?

No.

who knows what evil  posted on  2006-06-12   23:16:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: Jethro Tull (#65)

I'm looking forward to reading the news on whether he lives or not. so is the guy who pulled the trigger.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-06-12   23:17:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: IndieTX (#36)

The COnstitution is exactly what gives people the right to throw off tyranny with any means necessary and what TheStateInc hopes you'll forget.

Actually Indie, that right is inherent. Rights do not come from constitutions; constitutions might or might not respect rights.

'Tis true though the 2nd amendment is a nod in this direction.

We can debate what degree of provocation justifies open revolt; in one instance, for some freedom-loving men, it was a small thing, the last in a long train of abuses, with a pattern of growing tyranny.


Now Doc, I admit that sounds mighty purty after a toke; but Rufus is just gonna take yer blunt, too.

Tauzero  posted on  2006-06-12   23:28:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: noone222 (#0)

Family Court Judge ... was there a Reward ?

Virtue is its own reward.

Handcuffs are golden.


Now Doc, I admit that sounds mighty purty after a toke; but Rufus is just gonna take yer blunt, too.

Tauzero  posted on  2006-06-12   23:30:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: Jethro Tull (#65)

C'mon, JT........you can do better than saying 'he's a loon! In what respect is he a loon? Have you been reading any decisions he's made regarding property settlements, child custody issues, temporary orders?

Do you live in Reno?

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-12   23:36:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: Jethro Tull, Red Jones (#66)

What sort of constitutional issues would a family court judge be ruling on?

As for judges not being turned out, did he whup ass? Or have you ascertained that the incumbent opted not to run again?

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-12   23:38:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: rowdee (#53)

dee, are you aware that in child custody cases that it's not about what's fair and best for the children. the parent who makes the most money and is most able to pay child support is the one who loses custody. why? because the state makes a certain percentage of every child support dollar collected. further CPS is a huge government racket in which judges play their parts at destroying families and even using these children, in many cases, for their own sexual gratification. you can't vote these sons of bitches out.

where is the justice for Randy Weaver and his family? where is the justice for the Waco Davidians? where is the justice for Gordon Kahl and countless others?

can you read Unintended Consequences too? i really think it will change your perspective or at least help you to understand where i'm coming from.

christine  posted on  2006-06-12   23:43:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: Tauzero (#69)

We can debate what degree of provocation justifies open revolt; in one instance, for some freedom-loving men, it was a small thing, the last in a long train of abuses, with a pattern of growing tyranny.

exactly.

christine  posted on  2006-06-12   23:45:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: Dakmar (#37)

Shooting at judges is exactly the kind of third world behavior I'm resisting.

An arbitrary government is exactly the kind of third world institution the sniper (if that's what it was) was resisting.

If judges wish the respect they deserve under a regime of liberty and the rule of law, then they need to support such a regime, rather than undermine it.

The mock scandal cry of "Anarchy!" in defense of a system that has slipped its chains and is in fact itself lawless is either hypocrisy or blindness. IMO.


Now Doc, I admit that sounds mighty purty after a toke; but Rufus is just gonna take yer blunt, too.

Tauzero  posted on  2006-06-12   23:48:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: Jethro Tull (#50)

Excellent link from fathers unite...looks like my hunch may be correct.


Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in -- and the West in general -- into an unbearable hell and a choking life."
--Osama bin Laden

IndieTX  posted on  2006-06-12   23:53:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: Tauzero (#75)

An arbitrary government is exactly the kind of third world institution the sniper (if that's what it was) was resisting.

If judges wish the respect they deserve under a regime of liberty and the rule of law, then they need to support such a regime, rather than undermine it.

The mock scandal cry of "Anarchy!" in defense of a system that has slipped its chains and is in fact itself lawless is either hypocrisy or blindness. IMO.

Bingo.


Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in -- and the West in general -- into an unbearable hell and a choking life."
--Osama bin Laden

IndieTX  posted on  2006-06-12   23:54:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: christine (#73)

the parent who makes the most money and is most able to pay child is the one who loses custody. why? because the state makes a certain percentage of every child support dollar collected. further CPS is a huge government racket in which judges play their parts at destroying families and even using these children, in many cases, for their own sexual gratification. you can't vote these sons of bitches out.

Law firms who persue these cases are entitled to a "reasonable" portion of the child care payments.

And the law firms get to decide what is " reasonable". (That is wrtitten in the law which was written by, LAYWERS.)

So the downsized Dad, is now in effect an indetured servent to a law firm, forever, due to the compounding effects of interest. And the 20% cut taken out of the payments by the law firm.

It is deep corruption and is enough to make one act antisocial, as the system has been abusesively anti social to an individual.

tom007  posted on  2006-06-12   23:57:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: christine (#73)

Chrissie.......I will not condone taking the 'law' like this into our own hands!

Yes, where is the justice for Kahl, Weavers, et al? It sure as hell wasn't tied up with this judge. The two are not connected. Those are federal incidences.....and this guy is a county judge.

Not all child support is paid through the courts, so the 'rake-off' or 'skimming' doesn't necessarily wash. Generally, support payments are ordered to be paid THRU the court after a paying parent, for whatever reason, doesn't pay direct. The one parent due support could apply to a collection agency to collect for her. Of course, they would get paid for the service.

I love the broad brush being used to paint all these people. The terrorists among us, I guess. I just can't wrap it around me and use it to start killing the towelheads or jewboys or niggahs or wetbacks or congresscowards or bureaucrats or neighbors or city councilman or county commissionor or whatever happens to be the target of what ails this country.

I'm not ready to allow a husband to kick the little lady out of house without a dime or her clothes simply because the ol boy outweighs her or is stronger. I'm not ready to settle a pissing match with a neighbor with a bullet between the eyes. I'm not ready to have a bunch of wild-eyed, drug addled braindead anarchists join with a bunch of 'patriots' headed to DC to 'take care of bidness' and rule in my name! No Thanks........not anytime soon.

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-13   0:01:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: tom007 (#78)

Please provide some documentation on law firms getting a reasonable, or otherwise, portion of child support payments.

Dad, no doubt, has been ordered by the court to pay reasonable attorney fees for mother, or his own fees.

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-13   0:05:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: rowdee (#80)

Please provide some documentation on law firms getting a reasonable, or otherwise, portion of child support payments.

You can check it out easily if you wish. And the cut the Law firms are, usually, outrageous. Perpetual Debt is the end game of the system.

tom007  posted on  2006-06-13   0:12:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: IndieTX, Jethro Tull (#76)

Puleeze.........it appears these are all disgruntled loosers......how many of them know the law?

Do you honestly believe that a person, man or woman, who has been ordered to pay child support and some bills and to make spousal payments for a year or whatever while wifey poo gets some education to get a job is gonna go on a website for BAD JUDGES and talk about what a swell deal he got?

As for a judge using 'tactics'.......when you have a guy demanding that something be checked by a certain agency/group/person, and it has already been done, and then he keeps interrupting the judge and raising his voice in the demand and the judge informs he that if he wants this duplicitious work, he'll have to pay for it, the guy doesn't have a right to complain later about how the judge made him pay for it.

That is just one of the types of stupid things that go on in these courts and people later bitch about it.

You'd never get an honest assessment out of this type of person........and I will even proffer that it would be doubly bad if the man was a woman! No oone has a lock on being stupid or irrational or unable to make a fair judgement of what has occurred.

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-13   0:13:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: tom007 (#81)

You're the one who stated such as fact.

Have a good evening.

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-13   0:16:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: rowdee (#79)

I love the broad brush being used to paint all these people. The terrorists among us, I guess. I just can't wrap it around me and use it to start killing the towelheads or jewboys or niggahs or wetbacks or congresscowards or bureaucrats or neighbors or city councilman or county commissionor or whatever happens to be the target of what ails this country.

These are your allegations. I have not seen one mention of, other than yours.

"towelheads or jewboys or niggahs or wetbacks or congresscowards or bureaucrats or neighbors or city councilman or county commissionor "(rowdee coments).

Rowdee wrote" I'm not ready to allow a husband to kick the little lady out of house without a dime or her clothes simply because the ol boy outweighs her or is stronger. I'm not ready to settle a pissing match with a neighbor with a bullet between the eyes. I'm not ready to have a bunch of wild-eyed, drug addled braindead anarchists join with a bunch of 'patriots' headed to DC to 'take care of bidness' and rule in my name! No Thanks........not anytime soon."

Projecting just a little, Rowdee?????

tom007  posted on  2006-06-13   0:17:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: rowdee (#83)

You're the one who stated such as fact.

Have a good evening.

rowdee posted on 2006-06-13 00:16:01 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

Make sense, R.

It's a good thing. AT least try.

tom007  posted on  2006-06-13   0:20:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: rowdee (#82)

Puleeze.........it appears these are all disgruntled loosers......how many of them know the law?

"All disgruntled loosers"- So you have looked into all the cases here, huh, Rowdee? Already decided everythings OK??

You have exposed yourself as a royal government butt kissing ass.

tom007  posted on  2006-06-13   0:25:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: tom007 (#86)

it appears these are all disgruntled loosers

Try reading..........

rowdee  posted on  2006-06-13   0:45:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: rowdee (#41)

They aren't working on guilty or innocent; they are attempting to arbitrate between mothers and fathers, husbands and wives, who can't get over their anger, generally, and 'get evenness', to equally divide or make arrangements for the rearing of their kids without the kids getting the short shrift.

Judges violate, ignore, trample and shit on the CON-stitution daily. There are a million examples of this behavior, such as ordering one spouse to pay the other's attorney fees, which absolutely violates equal protection under the law.

I don't intend to get into a dialogue concerning Family Court Judges or Family Court "policies" ... but when you consider a Judge ordering people to a counselor or therapist [the rapist] that tells the nice folks everything is confidential, and then is ordered by the Judge to divulge the info ... the 5th Amendment has been circumvented ...

There are a myriad of causes for divorce ... Judges and lawyers do nothing to rectify the situation in a civil manner, they inflame it. "They" are simply there to be certain that the State and the Attorneys get their cut first !

Christine's point "when have you ever seen them change the law to benefit the people" is right on. There may have been a time when this country enjoyed relevant fairness, but that time has passed. Writing the congress or the state legislators is pissing in the wind.

I have to agree with Jethro Tull and Indie TX ... kill em all and let God sort em out !

------------------------------------------------------------

Kennedy Assassination ... Bush (I) did it !

9-11 ... Bush (II) did it !

"Sarah if the American people ever find out what we have done to them, they will chase us down the streets and lynch us". [George H. W. Bush to Sarah McClendon]

noone222  posted on  2006-06-13   4:01:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: rowdee (#60)

First let me say that the Family Courts are an abomination. They see too many cases and become callous. They play favorites with attorneys, and suck whatever equity existed in a family out of it through $250.00 per hour attorneys that drag things out for as long as the couple can be made angry.

Judges are simply lawyers with total immunity. They are not held accountable for their treachery ... and should be.

This one unfortunate judge may serve as an example to the rest. There's no such thing as a good Judge when they all know the score and keep their mouths shut.

------------------------------------------------------------

Kennedy Assassination ... Bush (I) did it !

9-11 ... Bush (II) did it !

"Sarah if the American people ever find out what we have done to them, they will chase us down the streets and lynch us". [George H. W. Bush to Sarah McClendon]

noone222  posted on  2006-06-13   4:19:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: rowdee, christine (#79)

Chrissie.......I will not condone taking the 'law' like this into our own hands!

We the people are the government / law. Our collective apathy has led to this totalitarian police state, complete with sanctimonious phoney judges and lawyers.

Many people that work within this system are ignorant of the law or others rights, they simply do what they're told to do. There are others in this system that don't give a shit about the law or our rights, they're in it for a profit.

The Family Courts have winners and losers ... generally the family loses and the lawyers win. The system is run like a drive through at McDonalds, kaching ... kaching.

Rowdee, let me say that millions of people die every day, some are murdered justifiably, and others are innocent. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi people have been murdered that were absolutely innocent of any crime at all. Had a few congress creeps the balls to stop the dictator this wouldn't be happening at all.

I don't see any reason to become overly alarmed at this judge's shooting.

Do you think there might be a closer adherence to their Constitutional Oath of Office if 50 Senators were reduced to worm food ?

------------------------------------------------------------

Kennedy Assassination ... Bush (I) did it !

9-11 ... Bush (II) did it !

"Sarah if the American people ever find out what we have done to them, they will chase us down the streets and lynch us". [George H. W. Bush to Sarah McClendon]

noone222  posted on  2006-06-13   4:49:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: rack42 (#15)

There is something in the air, and it stinks...of death.

Well I think you should get used to it. Americans have been living in a false state of security for 150 years, that the American Government has made sure no one else enjoys. This false state of security is rapidly degenerating into a full blown police state, complete with S.W.A.T. / Hostage Rescue / Internal C.I.A. / Homeland Security Troops / FEMA etc.,

You're right about the stench, death is on our door step. However, the death squads will be provided by you, at your taxpayer expense, through your tithes to government by your taxpayer supported government drones.

I have finally realized that everyone doesn't come to the same conclusions at the same time. Patience is necessary on the part of those with knowledge and study is necessary for those without it.

Most of us grew up believing that the U.S. was always the good guy. The historical record proves this is untrue. Many just refuse to study the facts because they don't want to be exposed to this truth because it would demand they respond in an appropriate manner. Usually, we have to be personally attacked before we wake up to the tyranny of our own government.

That's not the worst of it. The force of arms used to humble the world at large is being aimed within now. The American people have become the latest target of the U.S. Govt. ... and the truly regrettable thing about this situation is that Americans will be abusing / incarcerating and killing Americans ... for a paycheck.

------------------------------------------------------------

Kennedy Assassination ... Bush (I) did it !

9-11 ... Bush (II) did it !

"Sarah if the American people ever find out what we have done to them, they will chase us down the streets and lynch us". [George H. W. Bush to Sarah McClendon]

noone222  posted on  2006-06-13   5:19:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: Tauzero, Dakmar, All (#75)

Shooting at judges is exactly the kind of third world behavior I'm resisting.

The mock scandal cry of "Anarchy!" in defense of a system that has slipped its chains and is in fact itself lawless is either hypocrisy or blindness. IMO.

The Haitian President, Baby Doc, used to put rubber tires around the necks of his third world enemies and set them on fire ... this is third world behavior that I will resist with every fiber of my being.

I agree with the response: The mock scandal cry of "Anarchy!" in defense of a system that has slipped its chains and is in fact itself lawless is either hypocrisy or blindness. IMO.

I prefer unorganized anarchy to an over funded, militarily superior, legally supported fascist state.

------------------------------------------------------------

Kennedy Assassination ... Bush (I) did it !

9-11 ... Bush (II) did it !

"Sarah if the American people ever find out what we have done to them, they will chase us down the streets and lynch us". [George H. W. Bush to Sarah McClendon]

noone222  posted on  2006-06-13   5:28:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: rack42 (#13)

Was this judge corrupt? Or, was he applying the law?

If he was applying the law, then this is murder.

Efforts should have been directed toward changing the law.

Applying the law of averages to this Judge ... he was corrupt.

This was murder irrespective of the Judges decisions. It may have been justifiable homicide as opposed to murder 1 ... (assuming the Judge died).

Much effort by many people has been made towards restoring justice in this country. These efforts are ignored for the most part by the system, which twists and perverts the intent of the laws for its own purposes.

Writing letters to congress, or letters to Judges, or letters to the editor are useless wastes of time and paper. Protests are being stifled and people are being oppressed. Sooner or later the inability to obtain any semblance of justice will produce bloodshed. Maybe this shooting "is" the necessary "effort" !

I don't believe that anyone other than the shooter and the Judge know exactly what brought this about, at this time.

------------------------------------------------------------

Kennedy Assassination ... Bush (I) did it !

9-11 ... Bush (II) did it !

"Sarah if the American people ever find out what we have done to them, they will chase us down the streets and lynch us". [George H. W. Bush to Sarah McClendon]

noone222  posted on  2006-06-13   5:55:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: noone222 (#93)

Writing letters to congress, or letters to Judges, or letters to the editor are useless wastes of time and paper. Protests are being stifled and people are being oppressed.

that is for sure.

IMHO the failure of man is on display for all to see. IMHO those who expect that democracy will self-correct are fools.

Red Jones  posted on  2006-06-13   6:14:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: Red Jones (#94)

IMHO those who expect that democracy will self-correct are fools.

America was founded by criminals in the first place, but some of the founders (Patrick Henry) demanded that we be a Democratic Republic based upon fundamental principles that deny the majority any ability to restrict the rights of the minority.

De-mob-ocracy is an avalanche of ignorance uncontrollably gathering mass to the detriment of freedom.

You're exactly correct ... anyone that expects democracy to self-correct is a fool !

------------------------------------------------------------

Kennedy Assassination ... Bush (I) did it !

9-11 ... Bush (II) did it !

"Sarah if the American people ever find out what we have done to them, they will chase us down the streets and lynch us". [George H. W. Bush to Sarah McClendon]

noone222  posted on  2006-06-13   6:26:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#96. To: rowdee (#82)

Puleeze.........it appears these are all disgruntled loosers......how many of them know the law?

How many judges do? How many care?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-06-13   9:08:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#97. To: Esso, christine, Zipporah, rowdee (#57)

Until the government employees die for their actions, right or wrong, the country's dead.

That's exactly why the Founding Fathers put the Second Amendment in the Constitution.

The judge got what he had coming.

"The killing of non combatants during peace time is murder."___Jeff Cooper

If you wish to declare war then proceed, fine. But, sniping some low level govt functionary is not the act of an honorable warrior or constitutional revolutionary.

It is no different than when a bunch of thugs "equalize" things by murdering someone for a Rolex, all the while telling themselves that they are "victims" of a "racist system."

This type of self serving rationale will always be there to "justify" good old fashioned greed.

I happen to own a tack driving .30 06 rifle, too, But I'm not going to use it against the first govt lackey who tells me no. There are people out there who would shoot me for less, and, feel justified in doing so. I'm not going to sign off on that.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2006-06-13   11:20:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#98. To: HOUNDDAWG (#97)

If you wish to declare war then proceed, fine. But, sniping some low level govt functionary is not the act of an honorable warrior or constitutional revolutionary.

This is an admirable opinion, yet seems to ignore the fact that the average American is under attack by his/her own govt. that has thusfar failed to "DECLARE" war, opting instead to use taxpayer dollars to build a police state complete with crooked, luciferian, judges to implement their stealth attacks.

There shouldn't be any doubt that Americans today are under a vicious attack by their own government upon their liberty, their property and even their religious freedom.

Guerilla Warfare could easily become the only feasible option left when the enemy is as large as the police/military complex of the U.S. Whether or not any type of warfare is truly honorable can be debated.

This particular instance concerning the Reno Judge may not even qualify because it appears that the subject of investigation may be simply addressing personal grievances.

While America is being looted into bankruptcy by the elected leadership, Americans are happy to pay their tribute to its continuation and their own further oppression. Un-fucking-believable !

------------------------------------------------------------

Kennedy Assassination ... Bush (I) did it !

9-11 ... Bush (II) did it !

"Sarah if the American people ever find out what we have done to them, they will chase us down the streets and lynch us". [George H. W. Bush to Sarah McClendon]

noone222  posted on  2006-06-15   7:18:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#99. To: noone222, bluegrass, Zipporah, christine, rowdee, robin, Diana (#98)

This is an admirable opinion, yet seems to ignore the fact that the average American is under attack by his/her own govt. that has thusfar failed to "DECLARE" war, opting instead to use taxpayer dollars to build a police state complete with crooked, luciferian, judges to implement their stealth attacks.

There shouldn't be any doubt that Americans today are under a vicious attack by their own government upon their liberty, their property and even their religious freedom.

Guerilla Warfare could easily become the only feasible option left when the enemy is as large as the police/military complex of the U.S. Whether or not any type of warfare is truly honorable can be debated.

This particular instance concerning the Reno Judge may not even qualify because it appears that the subject of investigation may be simply addressing personal grievances.

While America is being looted into bankruptcy by the elected leadership, Americans are happy to pay their tribute to its continuation and their own further oppression. Un-fucking-believable !

Your thoughts are duly noted.

Would you please read them again and tell me if you still believe that you've sufficiently documented a case to justify premeditated, cold blooded murder?

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2006-06-15   9:17:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]