Title: Why ALL Russian Weapons Are So BAD! Source:
[None] URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1IboDZPs8c Published:Jul 5, 2024 Author:The Military Show Post Date:2025-01-22 17:29:32 by BTP Holdings Keywords:None Views:1093 Comments:7
Russia boasts the world's second-largest army and an impressive arsenal, but the ongoing conflict in Ukraine tells a different story. Despite having a formidable array of tanks, artillery, and a powerful naval fleet, Russia struggles to secure a decisive victory over Ukraine. This discrepancy raises questions about the true effectiveness of Russian weapons. Are they as formidable as claimed, or is there a hidden frailty? Let's dive into the truth behind Russian military power!
Poster Comment:
Russia's first targets in Ukraine were the biolabs sent there from Ft. Detrick, Maryland.
They can fire a rocket artillery shell and hit a MOVING TARGET 47.22 milwa distant.
US cruise missile is subsonic at Mach0.7. Russia's is Mach 9.
Kinzhl missile is Mach 12 and digs a hole 98 feet deep where its target used to be.
Murmanks BN is an Electronic Warfare system we can only dream of. Iran now has it.
The Lancet 3 and Geran 3 drones are years ahead of anything we have.
The S-500 is 50 years ahead of the Patriot II system.
The Mig 41 can shoot down US missiles and jets. But we cannot fire a missile at it as it flies well above the range of our rockets.
The Russians have killed over 600,000 Ukrainian soldiers. The West has objectives on a map to take and hold. The Russians learned from the Mongolians. Kill the opposong army's soldiers. Give up territory to save your army and find a better spot to make a stand. Zelenski says he needs 200,000 European soldiers to keep the war going.
I went to college for 10 years full time. I read 350,000 pages of college level stuff the second time I went to college. At one time I read Greek and Japanese. I translated Albert Camus's L'Etranger. I can do triple Integrals. When I was 8 years-old, I independently figured out what a contrapositive was. What I did was to read "When we see Him, we shall be like him." I realized I could make a logically equivalent statement "You won't see Him until you are like Him."