Title: Tucker Carlson: Guest says Big Bang is Nonsense Source:
[None] URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FpcXw3Td4Ws Published:Jan 27, 2025 Author:Horse Post Date:2025-01-27 04:01:25 by Horse Keywords:None Views:7973 Comments:316
Chamath Palihapitiya: Zuckerberg, Rogan, Musk, and the Incoming “Golden Age” Under Trump
0:00 The War Machine Takeover
3:22 Chamath’s Dark Passenger
19:47 The Emptiness of Silicon Valley Elites
27:06 Is the US at Risk of Losing Its Place as Leader of the Free World?
33:15 The Traps That Kill American Ingenuity
44:19 The Climate Agenda vs. Artificial Intelligence
59:34 Is There an Existing Healthcare System That Actually Works?
1:13:41 Origins of the All-In Podcast
1:20:57 How Chamath Changed Silicon Valley’s Perception of Donald Trump
1:41:40 Reacting to Mark Zuckerberg’s Joe Rogan Appearance
The Big Bang theory basically embodies the very words of Genesis: "Let there be light". Does in not?
Why would you denigrate any scientific explanation for whatever method by which our universe was created? Is it a foregone conclusion that the creation of the universe was done with some form of divine magic that can never be understood in any way?
The big bang theory begins with matter already in existence, super compressed by gravity, which then explodes.
Not necessarily. And in fact, I don't think that's the theory at all as it implies a super compressed mass pre-existed the BB. Given the current belief that space and time are related, I understand the BB theory to mark the creation of both.
It is reasonable to believe the universe was created by some means, and it could have been created by some event that happened in an alternate dimension, something outside of this universe. We could call that event an act of God, which is fine, so it doesn't mean the BB theory is rejecting God.
But in any event, & more to the point, we can agree we DO exist and the universe we are in DOES exist. If the BB theory is eventually rejected by scientific community and an alternate theory put int its place, would you necessarily reject that theory as well, just because it is a product of man?
Also, why does being wrong in scientific understanding of a matter equate to rejecting God? We are all wrong about various things in life.
why does being wrong in scientific understanding of a matter equate to rejecting God?
The BB denies that God has communicated to us, that He has told us clearly how He created the universe.
The BB may pay lip service to "God" but adamantly denies that He has intentionally instructed us on His method* of creation.
As to rejecting God, try being a Christian professor (or student) in a secular university. You'll find out immediately who is narrow minded and vindictive.
And in fact, I don't think that's the theory at all as it implies a super compressed mass pre-existed the BB.
From NASA.gov...
The big bang is how astronomers explain the way the universe began. It is the idea that the universe began as just a single point, then expanded and stretched to grow as large as it is right now—and it is still stretching!
--https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/big-bang/en/
At NASA, they describe the universe beginning from a single point.
NASA, by the way, told us they went to the moon...but can't go back again because they lost the data on how they did it.
A few years ago we were told to "trust the science".
Well, I rejected the science, for many reasons, none of them particularly Biblical.
I rejected the science because I did not trust the ethics of the scientists, nor did I trust the intentions of those who were behind the scientists...the CDC, the pharmaceutical companies, the WHO, etc.
And I reject the Big Bang theory for pretty much the same reasons :)
It is reasonable to believe the universe was created by some means, and it could have been created by some event that happened in an alternate dimension, something outside of this universe. We could call that event an act of God, which is fine, so it doesn't mean the BB theory is rejecting God.
Exactly Neil.
Some people still think the earth is flat and the stars don't exist, because it doesn't mention anything otherwise in the bible.
I don't think that's the theory at all as it implies a super compressed mass pre-existed the BB.
I am entertaining the theory that there have been an infinite number of Big Bangs, where all matter clumps up due to gravity over time (think black holes, etc) until it reaches critical mass, much like atomic bomb.
Then the Big Bang.
Matter is hurled into matterless dimension aka empty space, which must exist simply because it exists. If it had matter it would not be matterless, now, would it?
Matter expands into empty space until intertia from Big Bang is overcome by gravity.
Then the entirety of matter starts condensing, once again becoming a singular collection of matter, primed to explode.