See other World News Articles
Title: Tucker Carlson: Guest says Big Bang is Nonsense
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FpcXw3Td4Ws
Published: Jan 27, 2025
Author: Horse
Post Date: 2025-01-27 04:01:25 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 8608
Comments: 316
Chamath Palihapitiya: Zuckerberg, Rogan, Musk, and the Incoming “Golden Age” Under Trump 0:00 The War Machine Takeover 3:22 Chamath’s Dark Passenger 19:47 The Emptiness of Silicon Valley Elites 27:06 Is the US at Risk of Losing Its Place as Leader of the Free World? 33:15 The Traps That Kill American Ingenuity 44:19 The Climate Agenda vs. Artificial Intelligence 59:34 Is There an Existing Healthcare System That Actually Works? 1:13:41 Origins of the All-In Podcast 1:20:57 How Chamath Changed Silicon Valley’s Perception of Donald Trump 1:41:40 Reacting to Mark Zuckerberg’s Joe Rogan Appearance 1:46:18 Elon Musk’s Role in the Trump Admin 1:56:34 Silicon Valley Needs God
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-157) not displayed.
.
.
.
#158. To: watchman (#124)
Which I say is evidence the Bible is not the WoG. When one is angry, one recovers from that emotional state. Anger is a state of weakness. At least that is what I argue. I expect you would agree that any person who suffers from overwhelming anger needs prayer. That on it's face is an admission that it is a state of weakness. Being just does not require one be subject to anger. Or the leaders would point to an incident in which people died and claim it was because God was angry. I maintain anger stems from weakness. And God is not weak.
The murder of innocent men, women, and children, theft of their possessions, destruction of their livestock, is EVIL and it is WRONG. It's like something Charles Manson would approve of. . . . Well said. It's where theology becomes less of a sound philosophy and more an art of making a square peg fit in a round hole.
They were utterly barbaric. According to those who wrote the history books about them, which were their enemies.
You beat me to it!
Does God have emotions?
Well, then, are any history books trustworthy? How does one know?
How do you define emotions? Emotions that are a result of the human mind functioning, no, God does not. God is not human.
God is not human. Humans have emotions, capable of love, hate, caring, anger, jealousy, etc. Did God not create us...or did God give us something He does not have? I believe God is a Person, perfect, in every way. Capable of love, anger, jealousy...but never allowing those emotions to become sinful. You're saying God is not even capable of love?
God is not human. God is not human and you are not God. So you couldn't know if God had emotions unless you read the Bible. Hypnotists who consult demons doesn't count. Of course God has emotions. God loves us. Your position is utterly ridiculous.
Did God not create us...or did God give us something He does not have? I believe God is a Person, perfect, in every way. Capable of love, anger, jealousy...but never allowing those emotions to become sinful. You're saying God is not even capable of love? Good points. You are making sense. I am going to do my best to respond to you in a different manner.
The BB may pay lip service to "God" but adamantly denies that He has intentionally instructed us on His method* of creation. As to rejecting God, try being a Christian professor (or student) in a secular university. You'll find out immediately who is narrow minded and vindictive. The so called big bang is the theory of ancient dumb people.
Even more so for the Theory of Evolution. More truth from you. The spirit of antichrist is rampant.
lol. how cute.
Yes it does.
And human beings and animals are much more complex than a statue. But you don't get it because you push your failed ideology.
You are such a deep thinker. Not. The account given in the Bible. Which is doubtful you even read.
The big bang is a theory that DOES fit into the biblical words of "let there be light". HOW that light was created is still a mystery and up to debate. No the Bible doesn't explain everything. It explains what God wanted us to know. IF WE TAKE THE TIME TO READ IT AND BELIEVE IT. Which you haven't. Your big bang theory doesn't fit into anything to do with the Bible. It doesn't even fit into anything scientific. It is a theory of ancient dumb people. No how light was created isn't up for debate. You can bad mouth what God said and pretend you are a God. But the truth is the truth.
Whatever that means. Who knows.
There is no room to accept that life evolved. When monkeys have sex they never produce people. When snails have sex they only produce snails. That goes for every other creature in our world without any exceptions. To believe otherwise or open your mind to the possibility is quite insane honestly. Every real scientist knows that.
Yes. That is what I think. Mike Winger has a video on that. He gave some examples of what some other theories of that means. I don't recall everything he mentioned. Maybe I will post it sometime. If I don't get banned for speaking my mind. I have a special set of rules. Like if someone insults me I'm not allowed to insult them back.
Some people can't admit they are sinners in need or redemption. They want to hold onto their sin.
You cannot be trusted to tell the truth. You just made up something about mistranslated texts. So you cannot be trusted. Take that to the bank.
He can't do that. Some people are not honest.
It has in fact been put in question here. Some of you all have said it is not possible that God preserved his word and their are errors in it. Some people thing God is not capable of that.
Do you think ancient Hebrews who wrote the bible would have known anything about those things? That is a lame. God didn't give us the recipe for Eggnog either. So what does that matter?
God didn't say not to mix Clorox bleach and Ammonia. So maybe that is good for us to breathe. That is basically what you just wrote. And no the Bible isn't silent on those matters it gave us a very clear description in Genesis chapter 1 and 2 of what happened. Even a third grader could understand it if they don't go adding stuff the the verses and making stuff up. That is even more reliable than bitcoin.
You just said evolution and the Big Bang are bullshit.
pretty sure means you don't know. I'm sure you think you are smart.
Everything in science says you are full of it. Birds have birds, people have people, turtles have turtles. What you say is a product of someone's imagination and you clinging to someone else's imagination as if it is a fact.
You have already proven that you are not to be trusted. Now you have doubled down on it. More wisdom to come tomorrow if I am not banned for speaking my mind. You know free speech and all.
But God killing some of his children out of anger or jealousy wouldn't be considered "sinful" right? But it would be for us?
I can't help but notice that you focus on "anger". Never mind that you believe a divine magic caused an explosion of creation, and this divine magic has left humanity to rot in useless existence. No, it's only God's anger that keeps you from acknowledging a Biblical God. Sure, you have many other issues...but it is the issue "anger" that concerns you most. Why "anger"?
You avoided my question. Anger is weakness. Bible says God has gotten angry. Repeatedly as you pointed out yourself. We surely agree that acting out of anger or jealousy to harm others is wrong. Now please give a rational theological explanation for why God can kill some of his kids out of anger and it's okay, but it's not for us. I don't think there is one. Any provided would be trying to put a square peg in a round hole. Does God hold us to a higher moral standard than he holds himself? It would seem so. So this is a flaw exposing the Bible as a work of man, not God. It paints us a picture of God that is clearly incorrect. Anger and jealousy are vices that we are called to grow out of. The NT is a good book overall and one reason is it clearly calls us to develop virtues and quash vices. Jealousy is a vice. I consider anger to be one also.
I told you. I laid it out for you concerning Amalek. Apparently my reasoned response did not register with you. Anger is actually required of us. Be angry...but not to the point of sin...don't hold on to anger.
I didn't find it reasoned at all. You described justification in the form of "the end justifies the means". Kill them now -- men, women and children -- a mass slaughter of human beings, so that the world will be a better place in the future. No it is not. Your quoted passage doesn't even say that. In fact it says the opposite in instructing that we should rid ourselves of anger before going to bed. The clearest inference is that IF we get angry, don't act on it, and cure yourself of it before nightfall. It is not described as a virtue at all. But somehow, God still struggles with this.
These are your words...not mine! Explain: what were God's options regarding the Amalakites? When you see injustice...and you feel nothing...no sense of righteous anger wells up in you...you are a sociopath. Humans are designed to feel anger, especially when they see injustice. Righteous anger motivates human beings to change things that are wrong. But you say being angry is bad?
I'm not the one who made the comparison genius. Projection as usual Stone. So tell me, do you think that the Torah was written in English? Or are you just to lazy to research the fact that the verse I discussed was mistranslated? As in a form of human? Are you one of those people who cling to the idea that the earth is flat?
Comments (198 - 316) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Yes. The Bible is filled with examples of God's anger.
And what could ever possibly happen that God couldn't recover from? What could ever happen that God would need to recover from?
Question not understood.
I say the concept of an angry or jealous God is inconsistent with the attributes you listed above.
His anger falls under the attribute of being just, requiring justice. And also love.
Nope. The leaders didn't have to tell the people of God's anger...everyone felt it immediately and personally. God would flat out kill scores of people until they came back into line.
But didn't God say we are made in His image? You have emotions because God has emotions.
#159. To: FormerLurker (#128)
Here is where I can't take people such as yourself seriously.
#160. To: watchman (#133)
Amalek means "those who lick blood"
#161. To: FormerLurker (#137)
The winner always gets to write history..
#162. To: Pinguinite (#158)
And God is not weak.
#163. To: Pinguinite (#160)
According to those who wrote the history books about them, which were their enemies.
#164. To: watchman (#162)
Does God have emotions?
#165. To: Pinguinite (#164)
Does God have emotions? How do you define emotions? Emotions that are a result of the human mind functioning, no, God does not.
#166. To: Pinguinite (#164)
, no, God does not.
#167. To: watchman (#165)
Humans have emotions, capable of love, hate, caring, anger, jealousy, etc.
#168. To: watchman (#7)
The BB denies that God has communicated to us, that He has told us clearly how He created the universe.
#169. To: watchman (#1)
So Tucker's guest is correct...the Big Bang Theory is nonsense...foolishness.
#170. To: FormerLurker (#14)
Tell me, where in the bible does it explain nuclear physics?
#171. To: Pinguinite (#6)
so it doesn't mean the BB theory is rejecting God.
#172. To: FormerLurker (#20)
You're the one that tried to compare the sculpture to the big bang.
#173. To: FormerLurker (#18)
but I trust the Biblical account... And what IS that account?
#174. To: FormerLurker (#24)
What it comes down to bro is that the bible does NOT explain EXACTLY how anything was created.
#175. To: Pinguinite (#33)
It could have been a divine event caused by the instant injection of mass that caused the creation of our universe. Some event outside of our universe that caused this universe to be created. In fact, I don't see how anyone believing in an ultimate supreme God could argue that our current universe contains God Himself. God MUST be beyond our universe.
#176. To: Pinguinite (#34)
You have no room to accept the possibility that there could have been divine power and design behind either the BB or Evolution?
#177. To: watchman (#36)
in THEIR own likeness A reference to the triune nature of God...Father, Son, Holy Spirit
#178. To: FormerLurker (#37)
Some can't think beyond what they are told.
#179. To: FormerLurker (#39)
You can't trust mistranslated texts from a few thousand years ago to be 100% accurate or complete.
#180. To: watchman (#42)
His Son (actually our Universe) Show me the verse that says that.
#181. To: Pinguinite (#41)
His ability is not in question.
#182. To: FormerLurker (#43)
Does God explain nuclear physics, chemistry, or math anywhere in the bible?
#183. To: Pinguinite (#51)
Where does the Bible say the BB & evolution did not occur? If the Bible is silent on those matters, then it's not contradicting those theories.
#184. To: Pinguinite (#59)
It's actually improper scientific method to start with the assumption that something is true, then proceed to search for evidence supporting that conclusion.
#185. To: FormerLurker (#63)
I'm pretty sure
#186. To: FormerLurker (#63)
In fact, if you look at skeletons of modern birds and compared them to skeletons of dinosaurs, they are quite similar. Which would mean modern birds are most likely descended from dinosaurs.
#187. To: FormerLurker (#64)
Then you should know that what I've said concerning the mistranslation of Genesis is an absolute fact,
#188. To: watchman (#165)
I believe God is a Person, perfect, in every way. Capable of love, anger, jealousy...but never allowing those emotions to become sinful.
#189. To: Pinguinite (#188)
(Edited)
anger
#190. To: watchman (#189)
Sure, you have many other issues...but it is the issue "anger" that concerns you most.
#191. To: Pinguinite (#190)
Now please give a rational theological explanation for why God can kill some of his kids out of anger
but it's not for us.
23 And be renewed in the spirit of your mind;
24 And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness.
25 Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour: for we are members one of another.
26 Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath:
#192. To: watchman (#191)
I told you. I laid it out for you concerning Amalek. Apparently my reasoned response did not register with you.
Anger is actually required of us.
#193. To: Pinguinite (#192)
(Edited)
You described justification in the form of "the end justifies the means".
Anger is actually required of us. No it is not.
Antisocial personality disorder, sometimes called 𝙨𝙤𝙘𝙞𝙤𝙥𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙮, is a mental health condition in which a person consistently 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙬𝙨 𝙣𝙤 𝙧𝙚𝙜𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙬𝙧𝙤𝙣𝙜...
#194. To: The_Rock (#172)
And human beings and animals are much more complex than a statue.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination 
#195. To: The_Rock (#187)
You have already proven that you are not to be trusted. Now you have doubled down on it.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#196. To: Pinguinite (#188)
I believe God is a Person
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#197. To: The_Rock (#186)
What you say is a product of someone's imagination and you clinging to someone else's imagination as if it is a fact.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
.
.
.