[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Dead Constitution See other Dead Constitution Articles Title: Experts See Lay's Death Erasing Conviction July 6, 2006, 4:13PM Experts See Lay's Death Erasing Conviction By KRISTEN HAYS AP Business Writer © 2006 The Associated Press HOUSTON — The death of Enron Corp. founder Kenneth Lay will likely cause his conviction to be erased from the record, experts said Thursday. ADVERTISEMENT The 64-year-old executive's sudden death Wednesday from heart disease allows his lawyers to ask the court to vacate his conviction for fraud and conspiracy in Enron's scandal that left thousands jobless and wiped out billions from investors. What will become of his money and assets, however, is still unclear. If his conviction is erased, that would thwart the government's effort to seize millions prosecutors say he gained from participating in Enron's fraud. The government wants $43.5 million. Prosecutors suggested he could apply his $5 million condominium and a $6.3 million investment toward that sum. During his criminal trial earlier this year, Lay said he has little else left and still owes his lawyers. But his assets could remain targets in civil litigation from shareholders and others, including possibly the Justice Department. What if any assets would be targeted hasn't been specified. Lay and former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling were convicted May 25 of fraud and conspiracy for lying to investors and employees about Enron's financial health before the company crashed into bankruptcy protection in December 2001. Lay was convicted of six counts of fraud and conspiracy, and Skilling was convicted of 19 of 28 counts of fraud, conspiracy, insider trading and lying to auditors. In addition, U.S. District Judge Sim Lake convicted Lay in a separate trial of bank fraud and lying to banks in his personal banking. Skilling is to be sentenced Oct. 23, and faces a government effort to seize nearly $140 million from him. Roma Theus, vice chairman of the corporate integrity and white collar crime committee of the Chicago-based Defense Research Institute and a former federal prosecutor, said that because an appeal was pending, Lay's convictions are abated. "The law views it as though he had never been indicted, tried and convicted," Theus said. Without that, the government cannot continue its efforts to seize Lay's assets through criminal courts, he said. David Berg, a Houston civil litigator, said all that's left is a bureaucratic process in which Lay's attorneys can file court papers, with Lay's death certificate, asking Lake to vacate the convictions. If Lake complies as expected, Lay would no longer be a felon. "His lawyers will move to set aside the conviction, and it'll be done. The slate is wiped clean," Berg said. Lay's lead lawyer, Michael Ramsey, declined comment Thursday, saying he would make no public statements until he conferred with Lay's family. But the Justice Department, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and suing shareholders can still pursue at least part of Lay's estate through civil courts. Berg said Lay's wife, Linda, legally owns half of Lay's estate, and at least her half _ if not part of his _ is exempt from seizure. During his trial, Lay testified that his net worth _ which reached about $400 million before Enron failed _ had fallen to a negative $250,000 and he still owed legal bills. The condominium he and his wife own in one of Houston's most exclusive high-rises had been frozen since he was indicted two years ago. Lay and Skilling are among defendants in a conglomerate of shareholder lawsuits. When they were convicted, William Lerach, attorney for the lead plaintiff, the University of California, said the two men likely would be left with nothing for shareholders to recover because of the government's aim to seize their assets. On Thursday, Lerach said the university hadn't decided whether to pursue its claim against Lay's estate. "Unlike the criminal area, where the criminal conviction disappears upon the death of the person, the civil liability does not disappear," he said. The university's litigation, filed weeks before Enron failed in 2001 and later joined by other lawsuits, originally named dozens of defendants. That list has been whittled to 21 _ 14 individuals, including Lay and Skilling; five banks and brokerages; former Enron auditor Arthur Andersen LLP; and Enron's former outside law firm, Vinson & Elkins LLP. So far, that litigation has secured more than $7 billion in settlements _ with interest _ mostly from banks. "Ken Lay is not the place to go to get restitution to the victims at this point," said Sam Buell, a former prosecutor. "If they're going to get anything, it's going to come from the deep pockets, like the banks." One of the original defendants, former Enron executive Cliff Baxter, committed suicide in January 2002. The litigation later dropped his estate as a defendant. Lay died early Wednesday while vacationing with his wife near Aspen, Colo. Dr. Robert Kurtzman, Mesa County coroner in Grand Junction, Colo., said an autopsy showed Lay had severely clogged coronary arteries. Funeral arrangements for Lay were pending Thursday. His family released a statement late Wednesday that said a memorial service would be held at Houston's First United Methodist Church, but a date had yet to be set.
Poster Comment: WMR SPECIAL REPORT on Ken Lay's death ALL ABOARD!: Conspiracy Theories Abound After Ken Lay's Death Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 14.
#1. To: robin (#0)
That's because Texas is a "debtor state", where it's very hard to suck assets out of someone. Also see Florida, and (I think) Michigan. Of course, if he's worth 400 brazillion dollars and left himself open to asset forfeiture, he's an idiot. Really foolish to fake his own death when Bush would've just pardoned him in 2 years anyway! Just kidding. Or am I? :)
Texas is indeed a debtor state, but this statement is true because Texas is also a community property state. An inheritance from Spanish law.
#15. To: aristeides (#14)
In a community property state, all debts contracted from the beginning of the marriage until the date of separation are community debts, and thus, each spouse is each equally liable for these debts. In most cases, this includes any unpaid balances on credit cards, home mortgages and automobile loan balances. Linky: http://www.legalzoom.com/law_library/pre-nuptials/community.html So if they can garnish one spouse's job to pay the other's judgment, I'd think the feds could take the house. Actually, I doubt the feds much care which state it's in.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||