[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Warning America About Palantir: Richie From Boston

I'm not done asking questions about the killing of Charlie Kirk.

6 reasons the stock market bubble is worse than anyone expected.

Elon Musk: Charlie Kirk was killed because his words made a difference.

Try It For 5 Days! - The Most EFFICIENT Way To LOSE FAT

Number Of US Student Visas Issued To Asians Tumbles

Range than U.S HIMARS, Russia Unveils New Variant of 300mm Rocket Launcher on KamAZ-63501 Chassis

Keir Starmer’s Hidden Past: The Cases Nobody Talks About

BRICS Bombshell! Putin & China just DESTROYED the U.S. Dollar with this gold move

Clashes, arrests as tens of thousands protest flood-control corruption in Philippines

The death of Yu Menglong: Political scandal in China (Homo Rape & murder of Actor)

The Pacific Plate Is CRACKING: A Massive Geological Disaster Is Unfolding!

Waste Of The Day: Veterans' Hospital Equipment Is Missing

The Earth Has Been Shaken By 466,742 Earthquakes So Far In 2025

LadyX

Half of the US secret service and every gov't three letter agency wants Trump dead. Tomorrow should be a good show

1963 Chrysler Turbine

3I/ATLAS is Beginning to Reveal What it Truly Is

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Man Tied to Enron Case Found Dead in London Park
Source: New York Times
URL Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/13/b ... 3bankers.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Published: Jul 13, 2006
Author: HEATHER TIMMONS
Post Date: 2006-07-13 11:43:13 by aristeides
Keywords: None
Views: 217
Comments: 16

Man Tied to Enron Case Found Dead in London Park

By HEATHER TIMMONS
Published: July 13, 2006

LONDON, July 12 — A British banker who provided evidence to the F.B.I. and the United States Department of Justice about Enron-related transactions has been found dead in an East London park, days ahead of the politically charged extradition of his former colleagues to Houston to stand trial.

The banker, who was identified by his former employer, Royal Bank of Scotland, as Neil Coulbeck, was found Tuesday by a passer-by in the park, which is in the Chingford neighborhood of London.

Scotland Yard confirmed Wednesday that a body had been found. It said the death was being treated as “unexplained” and that officers from its homicide and serious crime units were investigating. The man appeared to have committed suicide, the British Press Association said. Scotland Yard would not confirm that report.

On Thursday, American marshals plan to take into custody three British bankers who worked for NatWest Bank and fly them to the United States. The three were indicted on fraud charges in Federal District Court in Houston in 2002 in connection with transactions tied to Enron, the energy company that collapsed in 2001. Prosecutors say the three were involved with the sale of NatWest’s stake in an Enron asset that gave NatWest less profit than it should have had while personally benefiting the bankers and some Enron executives.

The three deny any criminal conduct, and the bank has not pressed charges against them.

The fate of the bankers — David Bermingham, Giles Darby and Gary Mulgrew — has ignited widespread outrage in Britain, where they are known as the NatWest Three. British politicians and business executives have criticized their transfer to the United States, asserting that zealous American prosecution of white-collar criminals after a spate of corporate fraud has gone too far.

Mr. Coulbeck, 53, provided evidence in the case against the bankers, said two people who worked on the prosecution’s case but who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they are no longer involved in it. Mr. Coulbeck had nothing to do with the approval or execution of the transactions in question, these people said, and Mr. Coulbeck was not questioned repeatedly.

From 2000 to 2001, Mr. Coulbeck was head of North American financial markets for NatWest’s corporate bank. Royal Bank of Scotland bought NatWest in 2000. Mr. Coulbeck took an early retirement from Royal Bank of Scotland in 2004, the bank said. His last job there was head treasurer.

“There is no evidence that Neil was involved in the approval of the transaction under investigation,” the bank said. The bank said Mr. Coulbeck was “a respected, capable and hard-working member of our senior management team.”

The political controversy surrounding the case centers on a treaty signed by the United States and Britain that permits either country to extradite citizens of the other while supplying limited evidence for a case. It was introduced as a tool to fight terrorism, but the United States has also used it to try to prosecute white-collar criminals.

On Tuesday, the House of Lords passed a resolution to overturn the treaty, and the treaty was debated Wednesday in Parliament. The controversy comes in part because the United States has not ratified the treaty, though it was signed into law in Britain in 2004.

It could be months before the United States ratifies the treaty. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee discussed it last year, and a hearing will be held July 19 to explore its impact on Irish-American activists.

The three former NatWest bankers have spent more than a year fighting their extradition, pleading with British courts to try them instead, but all their appeals have been denied. Dozens of British chief executives, politicians and human rights activists have asked their government to step in, but the Home Office has refused.

“The U.K. government has not protected its citizens enough,” said Mark Spragg, a lawyer for the three bankers. Britain has similar extradition agreements with other countries in Europe, but the United States should be treated as a special case because “those countries don’t try to assert jurisdiction over a number of financial crimes,” he said.

“If you send anything electronically and it goes through America, they can claim jurisdiction, which is not the same in Europe or Australia,” Mr. Spragg said.

Some of the evidence against the former NatWest bankers is in e-mail form, the people who worked on the prosecution’s case said.

British supporters of the bankers, and much of the British news media, say they are in danger of being put into prison cells next to murderers.

Prime Minister Tony Blair told Parliament on Wednesday that the three bankers would probably to be granted bail in Houston; some in Britain had considered that unlikely.

“American prosecutors will not oppose bail as long as the appropriate conditions are put in place,” he said.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.

#1. To: aristeides (#0)

this is probably not getting much publicity in the US but over here there is a large amount of coverage and various public people who are normally reticent are openly condemning the one-sided extradition arrangements and the unjust legal system in the US. its very strange to see "right-wing" business leaders marching and speaking alongside "left-wing" civil liberties activists to jointly decry this treaty.

its being lumped in with the questionable legality of the Iraq war, the maverick actions of the security services, the creeping growth of the police state and all that stuff. people are openly referring to "vice-president Blair", calling him a lackey of the Bush administration, calling him a traitor etc.

whether the men were guilty of fraud seems to be immaterial. its part of the growing unease that the "special relationship" between the US and the UK is causing too much grief and too much freedom is being sacrificed to feed the politicians' "war on terror". for example, i was stunned this morning when our postman, who is a quiet and uncontroversial man, actually suggested we should suspend diplomatic relations with the US until it stops being a rogue state and a threat to world peace. "Don't get me wrong," he said, "I've got nothing against Americans - just their rotten government." however, he did admit that the UK government is another bunch of rogues too. so that's sort of fair lol

is that the nature of the "special relationship" - that the people of the US and the UK are both cursed by bad governments?

what seems to really stick in people's throats about the case against these men is that the "crime" did not really affect anyone in the US - if it was fraud, the "victim" was a UK bank. whatever the technicalities of the case, it gives people the feeling that we are being bullied and exploited by the US legal system. and on top of the growing unease about the mess in Iraq and Afghanistan, together with the nagging doubts that 9/11 and 7/7 were genuine terrorist acts, there is a feeling that the UK should distance itself from the US.

i don't think that would help at all but i can understand why people are talking this way :(

ruthie  posted on  2006-07-13   13:17:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: ruthie (#1)

Thanks for the UK viewpoint ruthie.

We've posted a few threads here on this intrigue, the best info coming from UK papers.

Reports: British banker found dead [Enron]

Honours scandal reaches door of Downing Street

robin  posted on  2006-07-13   14:35:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: robin (#4)

umm, i forgot to add there's also references in the UK media to serious problems in the US Senate about the treaty originally signed by Ashcroft - it could mean that IRA members given "sanctuary" in the States could be extradited to Britain without the American courts having ANY say in whether there was a case to answer.

think about it. an extradition warrant served on a citizen by a foreign government and the country's legal system having NO powers to contest it...this is the reality in the UK right now, courtesy of that despicable man called Blair

ruthie  posted on  2006-07-13   16:52:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: ruthie (#5)

Is the treaty subject to review by the High Court and the House of Lords? Is it subject to review by the European Court of Human Rights?

aristeides  posted on  2006-07-13   17:13:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: aristeides (#8)

Is the treaty subject to review by the High Court and the House of Lords? Is it subject to review by the European Court of Human Rights?

umm, from what i understand, no it isn't subject to review as the House of Lords can't overrule the House of Commons due to a thing called the Parliament Act (stops the Lords from vetoing the Commons) and the treaty seems to be outside the scope of the Human Rights conventions.

my brother-in-law who is a lawyer (Scottish not English - they have a different system) thinks all of these things will have been looked at and tried. the only thing the English courts can do is make sure the paperwork is correct and the right people have been cited for extradition. they can't consider the reasons or the evidence. its more like the FBI says "trust us - we're right" and the courts say "okay, do you want them wrapped or take-away?".

the 3 men just extradited for example may get bailed but the cost of bail could be very high and they may have to stay in the US. the case may take up to 2 years before it can be heard in your court. all the evidence and witnesses are in the UK - not in the US. the men can't work in your country and have no means of income. if they can't afford legal representation they will get none.

and there's a subtle difference here too - the UK has no citizens, no constitutional rights. we are all loyal subjects of Her Majesty in whose name Her government makes and enacts laws. in other words, the government (Blair and his cronies) call the shots. the rest is just detail.

ruthie  posted on  2006-07-13   17:47:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: ruthie (#9)

the only thing the English courts can do is make sure the paperwork is correct and the right people have been cited for extradition. they can't consider the reasons or the evidence. its more like the FBI says "trust us - we're right" and the courts say "okay, do you want them wrapped or take-away?".

So was "V for Vendetta" a big hit in the UK?

robin  posted on  2006-07-13   17:50:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: robin (#10)

So was "V for Vendetta" a big hit in the UK?

umm, i don't know - please remember we have our own ready supply of "sheeple" as some people call them in this forum.

there's a surplus of stupid, indifferent, gullible, easily led humans on this side of the Atlantic too

otherwise, how do we end up with the rubbish governments like the Bush and Blair administrations? and then again, look at the state of the other European governments like France and Italy - the grass certainly isn't greener i can assure you!

ruthie  posted on  2006-07-13   18:04:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 11.

#13. To: ruthie (#11)

how do we end up with the rubbish governments like the Bush and Blair administrations?

The Knesset, and now the Kadima (translation: Forward party). I'm not certain Lord Levy actually broke the law, but if stressed, he could be Blair's Downing Street Memos times 10.

Eoghan  posted on  2006-07-13 21:56:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]