See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: POLL: Do you believe President Bush's actions justify impeachment? - YES - 273,537 responses
Source:
MSNBC
URL Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904/
Published: Jul 29, 2006
Author: Staff
Post Date: 2006-07-29 02:04:53 by Uncle Bill
Keywords: Impeach, Bush, Socialist
Views: 295
Comments: 23
Do you believe President Bush's actions justify impeachment? * 273,537 responses Yes, between the secret spying, the deceptions leading to war and more, there is plenty to justify putting him on trial. - 87% No, like any president, he has made a few missteps, but nothing approaching "high crimes and misdemeanors." - 4.3% No, the man has done absolutely nothing wrong. Impeachment would just be a political lynching. - 7.2% I don't know. - 1.8% 
Karl, have you seen this? Karl? Karl?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22.
#5. To: Uncle Bill (#0)
Yes, between the secret spying, the deceptions leading to war and more, there is plenty to justify putting him on trial. 87% No, like any president, he has made a few missteps, but nothing approaching "high crimes and misdemeanors." 4.3% No, the man has done absolutely nothing wrong. Impeachment would just be a political lynching. 7.1% I don't know. 1.8% ++++ Ya gotta love those one point eight percenters...
If you don't vote for the GOP, you're giving this country over to the liberals. COMPASSIONATE SOCIALISM: The Ideology Of George W. Bush - Links GOP/Bush 2004 Party Platform - Limited Taxes, Limited Spending, Federal Government Should Be Limited And Restricted To The Functions Mandated By The U.S. Constitution GOP.Com | 1 Sep 2004 | By Serfdom Facilitators of the GOP http://www.gop.com/media/2004p l at form.pdf "We believe that good government is based on a system of limited taxes and spending. Furthermore, we believe that the federal government should be limited and restricted to the functions mandated by the functions of the United States Constitution. The taxation system should not be used to redistribute wealth or fund ever-increasing entitlements and social programs." "I want to apologize for spending way too much of your money, we need to get our act together. If we don’t turn it around, we’ll pay in 2006. We have tripled and quadrupled the number of earmarks on our watch. Shame on us." We're sorry we're faster spending socialists than the Democrats, but please vote for us anyway.
If you don't vote for the GOP, you're giving this country over to the liberals. 123 posted on 07/30/2006 3:17:52 PM PDT by Howlin - Source COMPASSIONATE SOCIALISM: The Ideology Of George W. Bush - Links GOP/Bush 2004 Party Platform - Limited Taxes, Limited Spending, Federal Government Should Be Limited And Restricted To The Functions Mandated By The U.S. Constitution GOP.Com | 1 Sep 2004 | By Serfdom Facilitators of the GOP http://www.gop.com/media/2004p l at form.pdf "We believe that good government is based on a system of limited taxes and spending. Furthermore, we believe that the federal government should be limited and restricted to the functions mandated by the functions of the United States Constitution. The taxation system should not be used to redistribute wealth or fund ever-increasing entitlements and social programs." "I want to apologize for spending way too much of your money, we need to get our act together. If we don’t turn it around, we’ll pay in 2006. We have tripled and quadrupled the number of earmarks on our watch. Shame on us." Sen. Lindsey Graham, Republican- S.C. - Source. Uncle Bill, I remember you from FR. Good to see you. The graphic reminded me of something Bush said on his run for 2nd term.. "there is something happ'nin' in the 'hinterlands'. Yep... WE thought it was a groundswell of support for a WarTime President intending to protect the homeland. What we did not know, is that the 'hinterland' was code for killing fields. The Decider.... shall take advantage of the benevolence and goodness of the hinterlanders... to trick them into service of country, when in fact.. there is no one in government that dare call us sovereign.. or a country of Americans only.......... or a country of laws, when they run to the aid of those in their ranks that refuse to be held by such. McKinney as an example. Jefferson Davis - Democrat Louisiana, another. Frist, another/HCap. Many many others............. We are not under a government at all.. But such is the illusion our idiots in the media are tasked to keep alive. There are only two rings in the circus.... repeat after me.. Says Paula Pawn. But she makes good money.. That will keep her warm...
I call smirk, the Decideror - for whatever that's worth. Condi is now Condelusional. Cheers, JJ.
Condi is now Condelusional. the Decideror--- Hehehe!!! Perfect. I can do a Bush impression.. when ah'm really consherned 'bout somthin. .. maybe later.. But Condelusional!! LOL!!! Last one I heard for the Seckatary of Rice.. was: KindaSleezyRice. Sortahfitz... eh? Especially today when I read she said, the loss of innocent children was 'regrettable'. That says a lot. Using that logic, 9/11 was what? When innocents are slaughtered, and it's regrettable.. What would genocide be? A bad hair day? She has those a lot.
That says a lot. Using that logic, 9/11 was what? When innocents are slaughtered, and it's regrettable.. Sort of on a par with Madame Halfbright talking about the bombing and sanctions of Iraq which killed half a million children. She has those a lot. Heaven forbid she should run out of dekinking solution on a road trip. ;0)
There are no replies to Comment # 22. End Trace Mode for Comment # 22.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestAs of 9:09am -
#7. To: lodwick, christine, Zipporah, robin, OKCSubmariner (#5)
123 posted on 07/30/2006 3:17:52 PM PDT by Howlin - Source 
Sen. Lindsey Graham, Republican- S.C. - Source.
#10. To: Uncle Bill (#7)
To: lodwick, christine, Zipporah, robin, OKCSubmariner
#11. To: jessejane (#10)
The Decider
#13. To: lodwick (#11)
The Decider I call smirk, the Decideror - for whatever that's worth.
#22. To: jessejane (#13)
Especially today when I read she said, the loss of innocent children was 'regrettable'.
What would genocide be? A bad hair day?
Replies to Comment # 22.