See other Israel/Zionism Articles
Title: Is Crystalk and Goldi-Lox the same person?
Source:
Self
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 31, 2006
Author: FormerLurker
Post Date: 2006-07-31 15:24:17 by FormerLurker
Ping List: *Plamegate* Subscribe to *Plamegate*
Keywords: None
Views: 1359
Comments: 118
From looking over some of "Crystalk"'s postings today on LP, I get the distinct impression that he/she/it thinks itself the forum owner. As Goldi-Lox has been strangely silent as of late, where Crystalk posts 24/7, I wonder what is really going on.... 6. To: Pravoslav (#5) You should be banned, but I will just bozo you. Crystalk posted on 2006-07-31 13:45:43 ET Reply Trace Why don't you hold it to say five ARTICLES a day for the time being? 15. To: Zeta (#12) Why don't you hold it to say five ARTICLES a day for the time being? Unlimited comments. Crystalk posted on 2006-07-31 08:50:02 ET Reply Trace
You should be banned, but I will just bozo you.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 99.
#41. To: FormerLurker (#0)
IMO it's quite doubtful they are one and the same person.. But it is odd when there is someone who posts that often and speaks as if in authority ..makes one wonder what influence that person holds? Who knows.. I sure dont.. ;P
He/she could be a financial backer of the originator of the forum's formation. There is more then meets th eye here, because any sane person would have banned Crystalk and Quantrill long ago from any forum except perhaps a forum run by Don Black of Storm front.
That's also a possiblity. Neil, any input on this?
Sure. LP had almost no financial backing to start. 25 bucks for the domain name (1) and some borrowed bandwidth from SAPF and that was it. Without knowing whether the LP venture would succeed, I wanted to go into in conservatively and only expand as clearly warranted. No one had money to throw away. The attraction was FR's huge success in getting people to donate a quarter mil per year. I thought there'd be ample demand for an honest discussion forum to earn a livelihood, but that never happened. I think that requires a forum that caters to either R's or D's, or perhaps Conservatives (self proclaimed) or liberals....one of the mainstream groups. But my aim was for an honest forum that welcomed all views, and that's not a policy that makes many people feel good about donating. Start a pep rally and ban a few of the selected "bad guys" and it's a different story. But no, there was no heavy financial backer for LP. Unless you count me for having spent a good chunk of 6 months writing the software from pretty much scratch, but that would be it.
That truly sucks. You should have put a copyright on the software, then if there were an issue with money, I'm sure they'd be some relief. Apparently "Goldi" is now holding "fundraisers". I just hope we can attract people away from the beleagured site, and hopefully bring them here if they want truth. Perhaps you should go easier on the shills, as they do make for a funtime of slapping around, which is what many like to see...
some people on another forum gave me this picture of goldi lox. they said it was old and that she probably looks different now.
AAAGHH!! MY EYES!!!
Useing this as a test of a photo site.
http://pics6.cig.canon-europe.com/priv/A3DD1CA901BA7DC9BD11D202A70EA19C.jpg
And BTW Tom, that is a beautiful picture as well. Lucky guy.
There are no replies to Comment # 99. End Trace Mode for Comment # 99.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#44. To: Zipporah (#41)
"IMO it's quite doubtful they are one and the same person.. But it is odd when there is someone who posts that often and speaks as if in authority ..makes one wonder what influence that person holds? Who knows.. I sure dont.." ;P
#68. To: Ferret Mike, Neil McIver (#44)
He/she could be a financial backer of the originator of the forum's formation.
#82. To: FormerLurker (#68)
He/she could be a financial backer of the originator of the forum's formation.
That's also a possiblity. Neil, any input on this?
#83. To: Neil McIver (#82)
But no, there was no heavy financial backer for LP. Unless you count me for having spent a good chunk of 6 months writing the software from pretty much scratch, but that would be it.
#85. To: FormerLurker (#83)
#91. To: Morgana le Fay (#85)
#92. To: IndieTX (#91)
#93. To: All (#92)
#95. To: All (#93)
#99. To: tom007 (#95)
Replies to Comment # 99.
