See other Israel/Zionism Articles
Title: Is Crystalk and Goldi-Lox the same person?
Source:
Self
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 31, 2006
Author: FormerLurker
Post Date: 2006-07-31 15:24:17 by FormerLurker
Ping List: *Plamegate* Subscribe to *Plamegate*
Keywords: None
Views: 1206
Comments: 118
From looking over some of "Crystalk"'s postings today on LP, I get the distinct impression that he/she/it thinks itself the forum owner. As Goldi-Lox has been strangely silent as of late, where Crystalk posts 24/7, I wonder what is really going on.... 6. To: Pravoslav (#5) You should be banned, but I will just bozo you. Crystalk posted on 2006-07-31 13:45:43 ET Reply Trace Why don't you hold it to say five ARTICLES a day for the time being? 15. To: Zeta (#12) Why don't you hold it to say five ARTICLES a day for the time being? Unlimited comments. Crystalk posted on 2006-07-31 08:50:02 ET Reply Trace
You should be banned, but I will just bozo you.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-59) not displayed.
.
.
.
#60. To: Morgana le Fay (#59)
I also told you to keep it quiet if you recall.
I am not gay.
Interesting. I know Stone is someone I would be sorely tempted to punch in the nose if I met him and he talked the trash in the flesh he does online. And that is rare for me to get that pissed off at age 52 after over ten years of posting in political forums.
sorry. did i blow it?
ok
"As a small faction of corporate fascists and racist supremacists hijack the U.S. government unto a Mid-East power grab for oil, land and geopolitical hegemony… the kind men among mankind must seize the moral high ground.”
What specifically were you banned for? Hi honway, good to see you here on the other side of the darkness. There were a few things I think caused my banning, the least of which may be that Goldi isn't even really Goldi, depending on the day of the week. Specifically, I hadn't posted on LP for a week or so, as the FRetards were flocking there and were simply making it hard to have a decent conversation about anything. I saw a few attacks from some of them, and saw that Boot Hill had pinged Goldi and others trying to make you out to be a coward for not responding as fast as they liked, so I responded that you had in fact responded and stated the facts, contrary to what Goldi was saying. After that, I came under attack on various threads by Margueritte, liberator, Apokalipsis, Crystalk, and various other blood thirsty shills whenever I tried to inject some reason into their blood dance over the UN observers that were killed, or the deaths of innocent children. They tag teamed me, and I grew sick of the attack, so I told them what I thought of them, where these people proclaim themselves to be Christians, yet speak and act in such a way as to be totally contrary to what Jesus tried to teach. Eventually, liberator stated that he wanted Kofi eliminated, and I said to him he might want to watch out for the Secret Service due to his comments. I pinged Fred and asked him if he might know anyone interested in those sorts of comments. It was sort of a joke, but also an attempt to slap some sense into this idiot that was suggesting an assassination against UN Secretary General Kofi. Goldi, or someone on her account, gave me the following messages... Are you the snot who called them on one of our other members? You are SO out of here. BANNED !! Of course, I had also posted material that demonstrated the true nature of Israeli antagonization of US Marine positions during the 1982-1984 mess in Lebanon, as well as comprehensive material on Pakistan's involvement in 9/11.
I think Crystalk probably gets a hard-on everytime he sees your pic.
I think Cynicom was on to something in theorizing that Goldi may have handed the reigns of the forum over to the likes of Crystalk and others that she "trusts". In fact, for the majority of the time on that forum, Goldi was virtually non-existant, and posted only on certain topics. All hell could be breaking loose, and she wouldn't be there to reign in the forum as needed. She may have delegated certain functions over to those she thought "worthy". VERY POOR judgement if such is the case here.
People can claim anything they want. Their words and deeds identify who they really are.
That's also a possiblity. Neil, any input on this?
Hey Trace21231, how's Hollywood these days?
Did you post on LP??? If so, it became quite obvious there was an agenda. I'm the neocon shill that all the libs hate so much. In fact 7 put me on bozo. Which is why you were bozod there, and now #4 on my list here. And I'm no Lib. All you whores can say is "If you aren't for us, you're a Lib..or a terrorist..or some other name..." Adios 8289
"Freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in ...into an unbearable hell and a choking life." This has happened a couple of times when people have posted spoof threads, sometimes about Goldi herself, and they have stayed up for hours or days. It was pretty obvious that no one had the controls.
.
Thanks for that information. I did not know until today you were banned. Ironically, it is posters like you that increased the number of people visiting LP. Neil created a very unique platform for an exercise in the free of speech. It is sad to see that vision fail.
Should be: Neil created a very unique platform for an exercise in the freedom of speech.
Truly it is. I see that buckeroo has defended me many times against the shills that now inhabit that place that was once free. Please thank him for me.
That's why I found it odd that I was banned within hours of what I had posted..
It is sad to see that vision fail. Its not failure.. it just has a new 'address' ;)
And honway, don't be modest, much of it was due to you as well...
Hopefully Zipporah, this forum can attract those interested in truth. Thing is, the attack against you has already begun, not here in the forum, but on the outside where lies and smears abound.
Fully expected.. of course they have to discredit this forum.. they dont want LP posters coming here.. the propaganda war is in full swing.. let them rant.. those who have a clue will ignore such nonsense.. but thanks for the heads-up.
No, I've never met Goldi face to face. The assuption is reasonable, but she was not living near me when the LP idea was first conceived, and hasn't since.
Neil, in your heart, do you think the person running LP right now is the person you knew back when you developed the forum and spoke with her as a peer?
Sure. LP had almost no financial backing to start. 25 bucks for the domain name (1) and some borrowed bandwidth from SAPF and that was it. Without knowing whether the LP venture would succeed, I wanted to go into in conservatively and only expand as clearly warranted. No one had money to throw away. The attraction was FR's huge success in getting people to donate a quarter mil per year. I thought there'd be ample demand for an honest discussion forum to earn a livelihood, but that never happened. I think that requires a forum that caters to either R's or D's, or perhaps Conservatives (self proclaimed) or liberals....one of the mainstream groups. But my aim was for an honest forum that welcomed all views, and that's not a policy that makes many people feel good about donating. Start a pep rally and ban a few of the selected "bad guys" and it's a different story. But no, there was no heavy financial backer for LP. Unless you count me for having spent a good chunk of 6 months writing the software from pretty much scratch, but that would be it.
That truly sucks. You should have put a copyright on the software, then if there were an issue with money, I'm sure they'd be some relief. Apparently "Goldi" is now holding "fundraisers". I just hope we can attract people away from the beleagured site, and hopefully bring them here if they want truth. Perhaps you should go easier on the shills, as they do make for a funtime of slapping around, which is what many like to see...
LOL! Just a chuckle at the irony that I have met her in person and you haven't. Had the roles been reversed I'd of been spared the agony and you probably wouldn't have deferred to her.
some people on another forum gave me this picture of goldi lox. they said it was old and that she probably looks different now.
I'm slapping myself upside the head for laying my eyes upon that. Eghast, what horror and shame. No wonder she likes to keep herself hidden...
Man that smile is going to give me nightmares. Care to give a warning, next time?
Honestly, no. When we started I did not know who she was, but she was referred to me by a mutual acquaintence when she was complaining to that person about the atmosphere change in FR in post-911. People were getting banned for objecting to our participation in Afghanistan, and criticism of the WoT (so called) was being met with retribution. The idea then was to create an alternate forum to compete with FR by allowing people to speak their minds. I assumed from her association with our acquaintence and her displeasure with FR that she was very much pro-freedom & pro-liberty. But either I was wrong or she changed as she became more sympathetic toward invading Iraq. She took the position that we needed to defeat the terrorists first before we could work on the restoration of civil freedoms. I think she voted for Bush because he was far less evil than Kerry. Bought into the "wasted vote" syndrome and didn't want to vote 3rd party. As you probably know she's now called for Bush's impeachment for failing to secure the borders. She favors pulling out of Iraq now too. Says our work there is beyond done and it's time to leave. Of course I think her priorities are messed up. Certainly doesn't recognize the emperor attitude being a possible cause of the rest of the world being mad at us. Bottom line: I think she wants to be pro-freedom and believes she is, but that she fails to weigh principles properly. I don't think she's well anchored in what she believes and that she's subject to change her ideas over time, and that emotion plays a big part in what she believes. I assumed she was well anchored when we started out -- had no reason to assume otherwise -- but no, in my opinion, that's not the case.
I think she likes you.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers Thank you. As for the software, there's no question I own it. What LP is running is a very antiquated version of what's here. We had fundraisers shortly after LP went live. I orchestrated some myself. There's nothing wrong with that. I don't think so, anyway. Running forums does have a cost both with money and labor, and it's reasonable that participants at least help with the money part. Yes, the balance to sought in participation is the grand poobah question in forum management. You really want enough disagreement to keep it interesting, while maintaining some limits to prevent outright and persistent flaming that fills commentary with a 10 to 1 ration of mudslinging vs thoughtful content.
AAAGHH!! MY EYES!!!
"Freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in ...into an unbearable hell and a choking life." Useing this as a test of a photo site.
Pretty cute test. Have her give me a ping sometime... :)
http://pics6.cig.canon-europe.com/priv/A3DD1CA901BA7DC9BD11D202A70EA19C.jpg
And that is the secret. With you, Chris, and Zipporah at the helm, we have nothing to fear. We just need to put those that spread lies into their place, and I think there's enough people here to do just that. A massive bot attack could be twarted if need be.
here are the hills behind my house.
Beautiful area Morgana..
And BTW Tom, that is a beautiful picture as well. Lucky guy.
Comments (100 - 118) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latesthe told me that he was AKA Stone.
#61. To: Morgana le Fay (#59)
"i don't think trace has ever talked about his education. at least not on 4um. besides, he told me that he was AKA Stone."
“Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber.” Plato
#62. To: Trace21231 (#60)
#63. To: Ferret Mike (#55)
I'll try to find that for you.
#64. To: honway (#33)
That is news to me.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006 
#65. To: Fun and Happy Balls (#39)
I'm wondering if I should change my 4um name to "balls alert" to match my new "barf alert" nic over on LP. What do you think
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#66. To: Zipporah, Cynicom (#41)
IMO it's quite doubtful they are one and the same person.. But it is odd when there is someone who posts that often and speaks as if in authority ..makes one wonder what influence that person holds? Who knows.. I sure dont.. ;P
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#67. To: Ferret Mike (#42)
She is an ignorant bitch, but she claims Mensa membership. I believe there is a close association between Goldi and the pig called Crystalk, but they are not the same person.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#68. To: Ferret Mike, Neil McIver (#44)
He/she could be a financial backer of the originator of the forum's formation.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#69. To: Trace21231 (#60)
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#70. To: 82Marine89, CYNICOM, all (#20)
To: Cynicom
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
-OBL
"Prohibition...goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man's appetite by legislation and makes a crime out of things that are not crimes. A prohibition law strikes at the very principles upon which our govt was founded."
- Lincoln
#71. To: FormerLurker (#66)
All hell could be breaking loose, and she wouldn't be there to reign in the forum as needed.
#72. To: FormerLurker (#64)
#73. To: All (#72)
Neil created a very unique platform for an exercise in the free of speech.
#74. To: honway (#72)
It is sad to see that vision fail.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#75. To: ... (#71)
It was pretty obvious that no one had the controls.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#76. To: honway, Former Lurker (#72)
Neil created a very unique platform for an exercise in the free of speech.
#77. To: honway (#72)
Ironically, it is posters like you that increased the number of people visiting LP.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#78. To: Zipporah (#76)
Its not failure.. it just has a new 'address' ;)
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#79. To: FormerLurker (#78)
Hopefully Zipporah, this forum can attract those interested in truth. Thing is, the attack against you has already begun, not here in the forum, but on the outside where lies and smears abound.
#80. To: RickyJ (#30)
Oh, I just assumed since they both lived in Maryland at the time and started a web site together that they had met in person.
#81. To: Neil McIver (#80)
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#82. To: FormerLurker (#68)
He/she could be a financial backer of the originator of the forum's formation.
That's also a possiblity. Neil, any input on this?
#83. To: Neil McIver (#82)
But no, there was no heavy financial backer for LP. Unless you count me for having spent a good chunk of 6 months writing the software from pretty much scratch, but that would be it.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#84. To: Neil McIver (#80)
No, I've never met Goldi face to face.
#85. To: FormerLurker (#83)
#86. To: Morgana le Fay (#85)
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#87. To: Morgana le Fay (#85)
#88. To: FormerLurker (#81)
Neil, in your heart, do you think the person running LP right now is the person you knew back when you developed the forum and spoke with her as a peer?
#89. To: Morgana le Fay (#85)
#90. To: FormerLurker (#83)
Apparently "Goldi" is now holding "fundraisers".
I just hope we can attract people away from the beleagured site, and hopefully bring them here if they want truth. Perhaps you should go easier on the shills, as they do make for a funtime of slapping around, which is what many like to see...
#91. To: Morgana le Fay (#85)
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
-OBL
"Prohibition...goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man's appetite by legislation and makes a crime out of things that are not crimes. A prohibition law strikes at the very principles upon which our govt was founded."
- Lincoln
#92. To: IndieTX (#91)
#93. To: All (#92)
#94. To: tom007 (#92)
Useing this as a test of a photo site
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#95. To: All (#93)
#96. To: Neil McIver, christine, Zipporah (#90)
You really want enough disagreement to keep it interesting, while maintaining some limits to prevent outright and persistent flaming that fills commentary with a 10 to 1 ration of mudslinging vs thoughtful content.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#97. To: tom007 (#95)
#98. To: Morgana le Fay (#97)
here are the hills behind my house.
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#99. To: tom007 (#95)
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
.
.
.
