See other Activism Articles
Title: LIQUID TERROR: Training People To Act Like Subservient Slaves -Terrorists planned to mix liquids so why are they all being poured into airport bins?
Source:
inforwars.com
URL Source: http://infowars.net/articles/August2006/110806liquid.htm
Published: Aug 12, 2006
Author: Steve Watson
Post Date: 2006-08-12 15:04:04 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 313
Comments: 9
The latest terror plot facade is nothing more than an exercise to assess how subservient the general population has become and a primer to making permanent the panicked and ridiculous freedom crushing security measures we are seeing being rushed into implementation at the moment. Whilst the government is saying there is no going back on these measures and that they will become permanent, the media is bleating about rushing in biometric retina scanners and Orwellian behaviour sensing technology. This is the only way they can do these things without backlash and protest, just have a major terror alert and rush them through. How is it that people can still deny that our governments are forwarding a big brother control agenda? ID cards, Biometric databases, retina scanners, face scanning cameras, behaviour sensing machines. The list goes on. It has been proven over and over that these measures will not help prevent terrorism, the government itself has even admitted this, so why do they relentlessly push them? The latest mind bending terror stupidity has every passenger at airports pouring their potentially explosive liquids into bins inside the airports. How stupid can things get? How far does it have to go before people start asking simple questions about what they are being made to do in the name of security? If these liquids are potentially explosive what the hell is the good in pouring them all into large bins inside overcrowded airports and mixing them all together? The Asheville Citizen Times interviewed a mother who was forced to pour away her baby's milk: "I have mixed feelings about all this," Leoni said as she waited to board a flight for Miami at Asheville Regional Airport. "On the one side, I’m fine with the safety measures and the effects, but on the other hand, I had to pour out my baby’s milk this morning. They said I couldn't take it on board." And here she is pouring the potentially deadly milk into a vat of other potentially explosive dangerous liquids. The official counterterrorism statement told us that the plan involved mixing a sports drink with a gel-like substance to concoct explosives that could be ignited with an MP3 player or cell phone. The sports drink could be combined with a peroxide-based paste to form a potent explosive cocktail, counterterrorism officials said. If you believe the dodgy science that suggests that these liquids can be ignited by calling up your mom or whacking on a bit of Led Zeppelin on your MP3 player then they better clear the airports pretty smartish because those bins full liquids could go up any second. unless they are just bins full of baby milk and Dr Pepper that is. The Scientific American states: Furthermore, some chemicals can be mixed to create a toxic gas capable of killing people in an enclosed space such as an airplane. Great, marvelous, lets get mixing them in bins then! The XOPL blogger here is bang on the money and I couldn't put it any better: Sir, I'm going to have to take this bottle of water away from you since it might be a liquid explosive, and I'm going to have to mix it with all of these other bottles of possibly liquid explosive, and I'm going to have to dump them all in this trash can... together. Nevermind that the plot specifically mentions mixing chemicals and/or nitroglycerin... which explodes if handled too roughly. The only conclusion you can reach here is that airport security are not looking for terrorists because if they truly believed terrorists were attempting to board planes with liquids they wouldn't be mishandling the liquids in this way.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
#2. To: christine (#0)
Airport security is nearly killing people. Notice the baby hair color change, shirt change due to toothpaste gel fibers, but most significantly, the age acceleration from the shakedown security division to the liquid gel security stations. Notice these before and after photos, all within the 8 hour waiting period, in between the illegal alien security officers changing shift, the woman has aged a great deal, but yet, is optimistic, and still manages a smile:
next sequence...topless/braless old lady breast feeding infant.
And who, may I remind you, should we thank for the founding of our feast???
Just ask yourself "qui bono"? Who profits from these so-called acts of "terrorism"? Why the gov, of course!
#9. To: loner (#8)
Just ask yourself "qui bono"? Who profits from these so-called acts of "terrorism"? A handful of people want more power and $$.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#5. To: Uncle Bill, IndieTx (#2)
#7. To: christine, all (#5)
Next..topless lady breasfeeding infant......
#8. To: IndieTX (#7)
(Edited)
How is it that people can still deny that our governments are forwarding a big brother control agenda? ID cards, Biometric databases, retina scanners, face scanning cameras, behaviour sensing machines. The list goes on. It has been proven over and over that these measures will not help prevent terrorism, the government itself has even admitted this, so why do they relentlessly push them?
Replies to Comment # 8. How is it that people can still deny that our governments are forwarding a big brother control agenda? ID cards, Biometric databases, retina scanners, face scanning cameras, behaviour sensing machines. The list goes on. It has been proven over and over that these measures will not help prevent terrorism, the government itself has even admitted this, so why do they relentlessly push them?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.