See other 9/11 Articles
Title: New Evidence suggests 'hijackers' had no plans to die
Source:
Loose Change Forum/NTSB reports
URL Source: http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_C ... orum/index.php?showtopic=10429
Published: Aug 13, 2006
Author: valis
Post Date: 2006-08-13 07:00:03 by valis
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: hijackers, return, airport
Views: 1176
Comments: 34
New evidence, albeit government evidence, suggests that there were indeed 'hijackers' (or someone playing hijackers)... that had no plans to die on 9/11. I bet they were a bit surprised ...to say the least. Of course, the government conspiracy theorists will say that manipulating his own agents was part of Tim Osman's master cave-hatched plan.
(2 images)
NTSB report, Air Traffic Control Recording-United Airlines Flight 93, Dec. 21, 2001"We will go back to the airport and have our demands so please remain quiet"
NTSB report, Air Traffic Control Recording-American Airlines Flight 11, Dec. 21, 2001"Nobody move please we are going back to the airport don't try to make any stupid moves"
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 23.
#2. To: valis (#0)
Um, what hijackers? Lewin and Avraham?
Good question. "Let's discuss the 9/11 hijackers" "Or were there hijackers?" - A rebuttal
"Let's discuss the 9/11 hijackers" If you want to discuss it then do so here, stop trying to hijack people to your site.
hey, Ricky, valis isn't trying to hijack. actually, he and we are linked to each other's websites. if you'll notice, ARG is listed as an ASSOCIATE and valis uses Freedom4um as his forum of choice so we've a partnership of sorts. he and his site are a valued resource.
Abrassiveness? Yes. Worth my time here? No. http://freedom4um.com/cgi- bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=31574 "This is just a BS distraction." "Yep sure is. BTW, this is not the first time Valis has posted such BS. I highly suspect he/she is a disinfo agent." And on and on and on - Best of luck
There was only one "abrasive" post by one poster. The rest were honest critiques and not personal attacks. I would put the one poster you don't like on bozo and continue here. I've slipped and been much harsher than I meant to be a couple times, one of which was a post to 82marine89...for which I now apologize. I doubt rickyj meant it, and he could have been just on edge as we all are over the events in the world today and the dictator in office removing our freedoms. By saying that rocket engines in elevators and nukes in the basement makes our movement look foolish, nobody is attacking you personally, just the authors of that probable diversionary "disinformation." We all know 9-11 was a setup, and a 13 year old kid can see it was controlled demolition, which could have only been planned in advance with foreknowledge of the plot. We are not your enemy. I recommend you stay with us. There is not a better group of folks on the net than here on 4UM. If you want "abrasive," try BotCentral I or Botcentral II. I just hope this forum remains free of BOTS and doesn't degenerate into a cesspool of clowns and bozos like LP and FRaud have. I would also post at least excerps from articles and not just a string of links as another poster suggested. You can source your article/excerp with the link, but post something to read here. That is not a personal attack. That is a constructive suggestion aimed at helping you get your info out.
Ping to my apology marine for my unwarranted and unprovoked ad hominem of a week ago or so.
There are no replies to Comment # 23. End Trace Mode for Comment # 23.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: Eoghan (#2)
Um, what hijackers?
http://valis.cjb.cc/hijackers.html
http://valis.cjb.cc/hijackers4.html
#5. To: valis (#3)
Good question.
#17. To: RickyJ, valis (#5)
#18. To: all (#17)
(Edited)
#22. To: valis, christine, all, kamala, btp holdings, rickyj, 82marine89 (#18)
(Edited)
Abrassiveness? Yes. Worth my time here? No.
#23. To: 82marine89, christine (#22)
PING #22
Replies to Comment # 23.