See other 9/11 Articles
Title: New Evidence suggests 'hijackers' had no plans to die
Source:
Loose Change Forum/NTSB reports
URL Source: http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_C ... orum/index.php?showtopic=10429
Published: Aug 13, 2006
Author: valis
Post Date: 2006-08-13 07:00:03 by valis
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: hijackers, return, airport
Views: 1174
Comments: 34
New evidence, albeit government evidence, suggests that there were indeed 'hijackers' (or someone playing hijackers)... that had no plans to die on 9/11. I bet they were a bit surprised ...to say the least. Of course, the government conspiracy theorists will say that manipulating his own agents was part of Tim Osman's master cave-hatched plan.
(2 images)
NTSB report, Air Traffic Control Recording-United Airlines Flight 93, Dec. 21, 2001"We will go back to the airport and have our demands so please remain quiet"
NTSB report, Air Traffic Control Recording-American Airlines Flight 11, Dec. 21, 2001"Nobody move please we are going back to the airport don't try to make any stupid moves"
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 27.
#2. To: valis (#0)
Um, what hijackers? Lewin and Avraham?
Good question. "Let's discuss the 9/11 hijackers" "Or were there hijackers?" - A rebuttal
"Let's discuss the 9/11 hijackers" If you want to discuss it then do so here, stop trying to hijack people to your site.
I have remained on the forum for a couple of years now, despite abrasivnesss to any and all the work from Scholars for 9/11 Truth that I have tried to share with those on this forum. I guess that will now change. I hope the collective gatekeepers here do not take this as a sign of victory, but simply as a sign that my resources are being wasted here.
Not likely since this forum didn't even start until January 2005. When you post far out material that clearly looks like disinfo material expect people to speak up, don't you care about the truth? That David Hawkins guy with his missiles in the elevator shafts theory was just too much. If you are trying to get people to believe theories that clearly are trying to discredit the 9/11 truth movement then yes I would definitely hope your resources are being wasted here. If you are not doing that, but instead are naively posting such material then why do you think your resources are being wasted here if you are being alerted to possible disinfo material? You do know there is plenty of disinfo material out there about 9/11, right? So why do you take it so personal when people point out they think an article is such material. Look, I don't know anything about you except what you have posted on LF and now here and a few other 9/11 forums that I have visited. Honestly from what I have read about theories you seem to be promoting leads me to not trust you as a genuine 9/11 truther. That's why I wanted to discuss the article here, I don't really trust you to have my IP address. Sorry if that offends you. I trust Christine and Zipporah, I could be wrong in doing so, but they have never given me a reason not to trust them.
#28. To: RickyJ (#27)
Sorry about giving you up. I guess you'll have to take one for the team. Now lay still while I go get a rope.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: Eoghan (#2)
Um, what hijackers?
http://valis.cjb.cc/hijackers.html
http://valis.cjb.cc/hijackers4.html
#5. To: valis (#3)
Good question.
#6. To: RickyJ (#5)
#27. To: valis, christine (#6)
I have remained on the forum for a couple of years now,
despite abrasivnesss to any and all the work from Scholars for 9/11 Truth that I have tried to share with those on this forum.
I guess that will now change. I hope the collective gatekeepers here do not take this as a sign of victory, but simply as a sign that my resources are being wasted here.
Replies to Comment # 27.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 27.