See other 9/11 Articles
Title: New Evidence suggests 'hijackers' had no plans to die
Source:
Loose Change Forum/NTSB reports
URL Source: http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_C ... orum/index.php?showtopic=10429
Published: Aug 13, 2006
Author: valis
Post Date: 2006-08-13 07:00:03 by valis
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: hijackers, return, airport
Views: 618
Comments: 34
New evidence, albeit government evidence, suggests that there were indeed 'hijackers' (or someone playing hijackers)... that had no plans to die on 9/11. I bet they were a bit surprised ...to say the least. Of course, the government conspiracy theorists will say that manipulating his own agents was part of Tim Osman's master cave-hatched plan.
(2 images)
NTSB report, Air Traffic Control Recording-United Airlines Flight 93, Dec. 21, 2001"We will go back to the airport and have our demands so please remain quiet"
NTSB report, Air Traffic Control Recording-American Airlines Flight 11, Dec. 21, 2001"Nobody move please we are going back to the airport don't try to make any stupid moves"
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
#2. To: valis (#0)
Um, what hijackers? Lewin and Avraham?
Good question. "Let's discuss the 9/11 hijackers" "Or were there hijackers?" - A rebuttal
"Let's discuss the 9/11 hijackers" If you want to discuss it then do so here, stop trying to hijack people to your site.
#6. To: RickyJ (#5)
I have remained on the forum for a couple of years now, despite abrasivnesss to any and all the work from Scholars for 9/11 Truth that I have tried to share with those on this forum. I guess that will now change. I hope the collective gatekeepers here do not take this as a sign of victory, but simply as a sign that my resources are being wasted here.
If you want to discuss it then do so here, stop trying to hijack people to your site. At least make an effort to cut and paste a few pertinent quotes from the material. Many of us are too busy to read the volumes which are associated with this subject. When there is a whole article, many of us will critique it. You know this is true as I've hit on one of your most recent posts as being disinfo. Even some of those who have "credentials" are not excepted from the possibility of being moles sent to distract and disrupt. We've seen it countless times since the money power corrupts to the bone. BTW, if I had a site like yours, I would promote it myself. But it takes some planning and you have to stroke folks a little to get them to click into any site. I see countless times where dozens of links are posted (not necessarily yours) with no editorial conmment whatsoever. I usually do not bother with such posts and at most I might click on one of the links to see if it is real or BS.
hey, Ricky, valis isn't trying to hijack. actually, he and we are linked to each other's websites. if you'll notice, ARG is listed as an ASSOCIATE and valis uses Freedom4um as his forum of choice so we've a partnership of sorts. he and his site are a valued resource.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: Eoghan (#2)
Um, what hijackers?
http://valis.cjb.cc/hijackers.html
http://valis.cjb.cc/hijackers4.html
#5. To: valis (#3)
Good question.
Replies to Comment # 5.
#15. To: RickyJ, valis, christine (#5)
"Let's discuss the 9/11 hijackers"
#17. To: RickyJ, valis (#5)
End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.