Here's a link to the post that "Goldi-Lox" posted banning honway
Goldi bans honway
Looks like LP had a bit too much exposure and truth on it for the elite, who apparently are now calling the shots in a ploy to destroy it.
#30. To: FormerLurker, Christine, Zipporah, Neill McIver (#0)
Connecting dots........ It appears that honway's article regarding the Khazars was pulled and she/it is using honway's 'obnoxiousness and lack of understanding of rules and regs and definitions' as an excuse.
And yet, scanning thru some of that shit, she/it clearly indicates she/it is aware that the site and its focus changes daily based on who is posting.
Very telling is the fact that in the article itself, there was a Lt. Col. who attended the meeting the writer was involved with, who was something like an 18 year teacher of history and head of some major institute of higher learning AND the Lt. Col SAID THAT HE HAD NEVER HEARD OF THE KHAZARS.
Hello, stupid one (that's the goldi one to all those in NYC)........if someone with that level of education and status in life doesn't know diddly squat about that group, it seems that would be news--like a new civilization had been found or something ! You know damned good and well if there was something found out about the alleged Atlantians (from the ''lost continent of Atlantis') there would be no problem posting that....
Quite bluntly, the reason would be due to the fact that Atlantis is not connected to jewry or zionism. Stupid one is too stupid to realize that the more that jewry or zionism is discussed, a better understanding of those people is gained by everyone....and everyone should be after the truth, regardless of which road it leads one down.
Refusal to allow any articles to mention, let alone discuss, topics such as how/where/when nations/races/ethnic groups devolved, especially in light of how they touch on current daily lives isn't going to make the truth go away. Granted she/it will not have to see it--there is nothing like willful blindness. Nothing quite like those who refuse to see......
I can't imagine why truthseekers want to hang out at places like tos1 and tos2-- they seem to cover 'truth AS THEY SEE IT', just as DU and others on the left side of the aisle cover 'truth AS THEY SEE IT'.
Our owners and Neil are to be congratulated on ACTUALLY believing in and practicing free speech. I can tell you that I don't agree with a number of things that go on here.....but the hardest thing to get thru the skull is that others are allowed to voice their opinion just as I am.
And while I have some disagreements, by being able to state my views, lurkers or just readers are able to see that there are differences. And there's a chance my 'view' of reality or truth willl cause them to think a little more about the subject at hand.
It's really interesting now that we can compare the number of 'views' with replies. This is interesting to look at. And I can tell you, it happens on other types of internet boards.
I have a pet equine-related forum that I visit and it's amazing that you'll see perhaps 4 people reply to a thread and read that there have been 108 views, or reads, of the article/joke/pics/whatever.
That's just one instance that I recall, but it's the standard rule, it seems...so we really do reach a lot more people than what we'd be led to believe if we were only looking at replies--even if you were to go thru and physically count the number of individual posters.
#129. To: rowdee, christine, Zipporah, Neil McIver (#30)
I can't imagine why truthseekers want to hang out at places like tos1 and tos2-- they seem to cover 'truth AS THEY SEE IT', just as DU and others on the left side of the aisle cover 'truth AS THEY SEE IT'.
Our owners and Neil are to be congratulated on ACTUALLY believing in and practicing free speech. I can tell you that I don't agree with a number of things that go on here.....but the hardest thing to get thru the skull is that others are allowed to voice their opinion just as I am.
And while I have some disagreements, by being able to state my views, lurkers or just readers are able to see that there are differences. And there's a chance my 'view' of reality or truth willl cause them to think a little more about the subject at hand.
Myself, I posted there in the idealistic hope of being able to influence some people who might truly be seeking the truth in matters where the truth is nowhere to be found in main stream news. As is apparent, there are many that desire to keep certain truths out of sight and out of mind. Some truths can be ridiculed and labeled conspiracy theories, where some can not. It is those that cannot be so easily dismissed that cause the powers that be great heartburn, requiring those speaking such truths to be silenced.
I agree with you wholeheartedly, that our forum hosts are to be congratulated for not allowing that to happen here.
Once upon a time I had that noble idea of attempting to dialogue with folks in order to see some changes occur due to reality be shone into the corners of life. Frankly, now I just say, screw most of them. They run off anyone that attempts to learn, i.e., lurkers.
At least here, views are challenged and extended or expounded upon without everything being hatred, and plain ol sour bilgewater by people who can't find their way out of a wet paper bag, let alone present any information of value beyond 'See Dick. See Dick read. See Spot. See Spot pee'.
The name calling is such a turn off........as are bad manners, etc. Daily life has enough rudeness and illmannered goofballs than to deal with it during leisure time.
Anyways, that is how I'm feeling about it nowadays.
The name calling is such a turn off........as are bad manners, etc. Daily life has enough rudeness and illmannered goofballs than to deal with it during leisure time.
It had become second nature in dealing with many of the bots there, as almost all of them without exception would label anyone that disagrees with them a KOOK, America-hater, Muzzie-lover, etc...
So I would just retaliate with a few choice words for them myself, but never to the extent or the level of depravity some of them have stooped to.