[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

These Are The U.S. States With The Most Drug Use

Chabria: ICE arrested a California union leader. Does Trump understand what that means?Anita Chabria

White House Staffer Responsible for ‘Fanning Flames’ Between Trump and Musk ID’d

Texas Yanks Major Perk From Illegal Aliens - After Pioneering It 24 Years Ago

Dozens detained during Los Angeles ICE raids

Russian army suffers massive losses as Kremlin feigns interest in peace talks — ISW

Russia’s Defense Collapse Exposed by Ukraine Strike

I heard libs might block some streets. 🤣

Jimmy Dore: What’s Being Said On Israeli TV Will BLOW YOUR MIND!

Tucker Carlson: Douglas Macgregor- Elites will be overthrown

🎵Breakin' rocks in the hot sun!🎵

Musk & Andreessen Predict A Robot Revolution

Comedian sentenced to 8 years in prison for jokes — judge allegedly cites Wikipedia during conviction

BBC report finds Gaza Humanitarian Foundation hesitant to answer questions

DHS nabbed 1,500 illegal aliens in MA—

The Day After: Trump 'Not Interested' In Talking As Musk Continues To Make Case Against BBB

Biden Judge Issues Absurd Ruling Against Trump and Gives the Boulder Terrorist a Win

Alan Dershowitz Pushing for Trump to Pardon Ghislaine Maxwell

Signs Of The Tremendous Economic Suffering That Is Quickly Spreading All Around Us

Joe Biden Used Autopen to Sign All Pardons During His Final Weeks In Office

BREAKING NEWS: Kilmar Abrego Garcia Coming Back To U.S. For Criminal Prosecution, Report Says

he BEST GEN X & Millennials Memes | Ep 79 - Nostalgia 60s 70s 80s #akornzstash

Paul Joseph Watson They Did Something Horrific

Romantic walk under Eiffel Tower in conquered Paris

srael's Attorney General orders draft for 50,000 Haredim amid Knesset turmoil

Elon Musk If America goes broke, nothing else matters

US disabilities from BLS broke out to a new high in May adding 739k.

"Discrimination in the name of 'diversity' is not only fundamental unjust, but it also violates federal law"

Target Replaces Pride Displays With Stars and Stripes, Left Melts Down [WATCH]

Look at what they are giving Covid Patients in other Countries Whole packs of holistic medicine Vitamins and Ivermectin


Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: Free Speech on Freedom4um
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://none
Published: Aug 18, 2006
Author: Christine
Post Date: 2006-08-18 12:01:37 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 16841
Comments: 173

It is time for me to address the issue of "free speech" on Freedom4um. My free speech means that I have 100% control over what I say and everyone else has 0% control over what I say. Now, I understand that there are consequences to exercising my right to free speech, but I still retain 100% control.

Free speech means that I have a right to express or spew thoughts and words of preference, love, hate, or anything with which another may disagree. That said, the rules or policies of this forum, which is my private property (see this forum's Mission Statement), are that members can exercise free speech as long as they (1) do not make a specific threat against an identifiable person or target, (2) earnestly debate or discuss the relevant issues that are part and parcel of this forum's reason-to-be. Let me remind you that these are rules for this forum and, as such, do not necessarily apply off of this forum, as public laws should, in most cases, be even less restrictive than private property rules and regulations.

Again, free speech on this forum means that people can express their love or hatred for anyone, any group, any race, any culture, or any thing, as long as they adhere to the two contingencies listed above. Everyone else on this forum is similarly at liberty to exercise their free speech right to challenge, debate, argue, or agree with the ideas and speech of another.

We will not censor speech as we abhor political correctness and authoritarianism as well as those thought-control and speech-control tyrants who would restrict another's speech. Any limitation on thought and speech constitutes the first level of the destruction of all remaining rights. Afterall, the framers of the Constitution believed that free speech was the most fundamental right to be protected which was the reason that they placed it FIRST in the Bill of Rights.

I do not say this lightly, but anyone who cannot handle the content of another's speech may not be suitable for this forum. Such a person may be better suited for a forum whose moderators control and steer the forum's ideas and speech in a given direction.

Many people have no concept of what Free Speech and Freedom really mean. Do you?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 154.

#114. To: All (#0)

I'm bumping this to the top because of some dissention taking place among some members regarding some posts by others which are being perceived as threatening. I haven't seen a post that I believe violates my contingency #1 in the particular thread (No specific threat against an identifiable person or target). This was first written in 2006. I would like to invite discussion about Free Speech on Freedom4um again.

christine  posted on  2008-03-27   2:14:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#121. To: ghostdogtxn, Jethro Tull, Critter, HOUNDDAWG, Brian S, Dakmar, Fred Mertz, noone222, wudidiz, Pissed Off Janitor, robin, Hayek Fan, Original_Intent, (#114)

I'm bumping this to the top because of some dissention taking place among some members regarding some posts by others which are being perceived as threatening. I haven't seen a post that I believe violates my contingency #1 in the particular thread (No specific threat against an identifiable person or target). This was first written in 2006. I would like to invite discussion about Free Speech on Freedom4um again.

the thread i am referring to is this one:

http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=76666&Disp=0

christine  posted on  2008-03-27   11:20:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#136. To: christine, Cynicom, lodwick, HOUNDDAWG, Jethro Tull (#121)

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-03-27   16:28:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#141. To: ghostdogtxn, Fred Mertz, Brian S (#136) (Edited)

thank you for your thoughtful response. i believe in order for a comment to qualify as a threat to government officials, it must be stated as an intent to perform a specific act against a named person or target. if you or anyone knows of a case that was prosecuted where this was not true, i would like to know about it.

JT cited the Watts vs the United States case here where the SC ruled that such speech is given the widest possible protection even if it implies physical threat.

christine  posted on  2008-03-27   17:37:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#145. To: christine (#141)

JT cited the Watts vs the United States case here where the SC ruled that such speech is given the widest possible protection even if it implies physical threat.

Unless you're drinking in a bar and telling a joke to a friend which concerns a burning bush. Then they send you to prison for 37 months.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2008-03-27   17:45:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#148. To: Hayek Fan (#145)

can you cite that specific case/name? i'm not familiar with it.

christine  posted on  2008-03-27   17:51:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#150. To: christine (#148)

can you cite that specific case/name? i'm not familiar with it.

'Burning Bush' comment draws prison term Man plans to appeal

CNN 12/06/02

Original Link: http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/12/06/burning.bush.ap (Removed from CNN website)

SIOUX FALLS, South Dakota (AP) -- A man who made a remark about a "burning Bush" during the president's March 2001 trip to Sioux Falls was sentenced Friday to 37 months in prison.

Richard Humphreys of Portland, Oregon was convicted in September of threatening to kill or harm the president and said he plans to appeal. He has said the comment was a prophecy protected under his right to free speech.

Humphreys said he got into a barroom discussion in nearby Watertown with a truck driver. A bartender who overheard the conversation realized the president was to visit Sioux Falls the next day and told police Humphreys talked about a "burning Bush" and the possibility of someone pouring a flammable liquid on Bush and lighting it.

"I said God might speak to the world through a burning Bush," Humphreys testified during his trial. "I had said that before and I thought it was funny."

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2008-03-27   17:55:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#154. To: Hayek Fan (#150)

A bartender who overheard the conversation realized the president was to visit Sioux Falls the next day and told police Humphreys talked about a "burning Bush" and the possibility of someone pouring a flammable liquid on Bush and lighting it.

To Tip, or not to Tip...

FOH  posted on  2008-03-27   18:01:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 154.

        There are no replies to Comment # 154.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 154.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]