[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: The Threat of Feminism The Threat of Feminism One of the philosophical pillars of political correctness is that all men -- and more specifically, all races, sexes and groups -- are 'equal'. This of course is such a monstrous lie that it could only be believed because its bigness -- as in the case of The King's New Clothes or Hitler's Big Lie -- makes it unimaginable that anyone would dare to assert it unless it were true. But it is more than a Big Lie -- it is rather a Grand Illusion which has been put over on us by a liberal media that has shut off debate so as to give the impression that not only are dissenters a marginal group, but are crazy as well. One of the most prominent fleurs du mal to sprout from the fetid fertility of political correctness is feminism. Feminism takes as its starting point the PC notion of male-female equality, and from this derives the notion that differences in men and women are cultural rather than biological, and thus that male-female equality would become evident if only the social conditioning of men and women into their customary social roles could be terminated. But feminism does not stop here; for not only do feminists believe that men and women 'are' equal, but that they SHOULD be -- a philosophy which is as silly as the women that believe in it, in view of the fact that if men and women ARE equal, then there is no reason to be concerned with whether this 'should' be. Of course it is actually of a piece with the dual Marxian beliefs that communism is inevitable, and also that it 'should' be imposed with ruthless force. In philosophy this kind of reasoning is identified with the Naturalistic Fallacy. The evil of feminism is that it teaches women to hate men while teaching men that they should be like women. The feminist mistake here is precisely the fallacious reasoning just mentioned: Because the equality that 'is' (or, rather, ISN'T) conflicts with the equality that 'should' be, feminists turn their wrath on men instead of their own failed syllogisms -- or, rather, SILLYGISMS. For this reason, people with half a brain would laugh feminism off the intellectual stage; but since political correctness has been adopted as an official state religion almost everywhere in the West, the druggies, the TV junkies, the dumbed-down products of the publik skoolz, and the other members of the XXX generation have absorbed feminism by osmosis because they have never been exposed to an alternative, and because even if they had, their thinking has been sufficiently disabled as to make their brains impenetrable. The result has been an uncritical intellectual shallowness that allows the implanting without resistance of New World Order nonsense and other ideas subversive of rational behavior. Besides driving a sort of permanent wedge between men and women, the evil of feminism is that it destroys what might be called the culture of manhood. From time immemorial, boys have learned from their fathers and other males in their community how to 'be a man', with this knowledge being passed on from one generation to the next. Some cultures have formal rites of initiation in which a boy is admitted to adulthood, many of which require the candidate to complete some task or set of tasks as proof that he is worthy of adult status. Our own culture does not have such formal rites, but it is said that teenagehood is the most painful time of life (an assertion which is credible if statistics on suicide are to be believed), and we may think of this difficult time as a period of initiation into adulthood. But whatever the case, it has been a tradition in most cultures that part of a boy's initiation involves learning how to fight, ie, learning how to fulfill the man's role as warrior in protecting his family and community. In the last 50 years or so, however, the West has become so rich and bloated that the male role as warrior has been largely forgotten, and feminists have taken advantage of this by arguing that they too can be warriors -- a proposition which is true in a sense if -- as in the present day -- no real warriors are needed. The result, however, is that feminists, in their attempt to 'be warriors' -- have dumbed down the training of real warriors by first entering the military as men's 'equals', and then -- when it is proved that they are not equal -- insisting that standards be lowered so that they can make the grade. This has happened everywhere that warriors are trained, and the result is that women are the military's 'Weak Link' (as one recent book has put it in its title), all while breezily ennobling the fantasy that even a big-tittied broad can become part of the military elite just like GI Jane. But of course all this was planned. It was planned because the goal was not to help feminists pretend they could be men, but rather to destroy the traditions and knowledge passed on from one generation of men to another about how to be a man, thereby insuring that males could no longer BE men, with the result that they could more easily be made slaves of the NWO. The men of America whipped the professional armed forces of the British Empire 200 years ago, but they did it because they were strong and tough, in spite of the fact that they were poorly equipped and often starving -- in short, because they were MEN. But now the men of America have little acquaintance with violence except as a threat from local negroes and school bullies, and even in these cases they are warned that self-defense is not permitted and that hitting a negro is 'racist', even if he is about to beat your head in and your brains out. The NWO does not want to have to deal with men who know what it means to be a man and will behave like one: men who have a sense of racial pride and community and will defend with their lives whatever threatens them. I am glad to see women be everything they can be, but one thing is certain: They cannot be men, and will end up destroying both men and themselves if they continue to try.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
umm, i don't think i actually know of any women who would want to be men!
love ruthie |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||