See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: Goldi-Lox banned aristeides
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 24, 2006
Author: honway
Post Date: 2006-08-24 19:55:08 by honway
Keywords: None
Views: 7544
Comments: 354
Goldi-Lox has banned aristeides. I completely understood Goldi-Lox’s motivations for banning me. I frequently expressed the opinion on Libertypost that the Israeli lobby and Americans that place the interests of Israel above the interests of the United States are a threat to our nation and to our government as defined by the Constitution. However, banning an individual like aristeides defies explanation. Aristeides has honorably served his country in uniform and believes strongly in America. As an individual with an impressive educational background and professional expertise, he was able to post his insight and informed opinions on a variety of issues. He brings quality to a forum and that is what brings participants. You can watch CNN and FOX for 24 straight hours and not see one commentator or guest that matches the intellect or the gift for analysis that aristeides brings to the table. Fortunately, there is a forum that provides a meeting ground for individuals that love this great country and the United States Constitution. I look forward to continuing to learn from aristeides' contributions.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-221) not displayed.
.
.
.
#222. To: Cynicom (#218)
I think so too. I didn't see it's relevance either. Nor, at this point, do I see it on par with Arestides posting fate.
I wouldn't worry so much about 4Dumb. Once we get the hate laws through, that anti-Semitic hellhole will be shut down for good. It's about time some of these Americans start to get some understanding that this crap's not going to be tolerated much longer. Anybody caught badmouthing Israel is committing treachery and treason against the American government in a time of war, and that's the death penalty. When the Pres finally signs the capital punishment order for anti-Semitism, these haters aren't gonna know what hit 'em. posterboy posted on 2006-08-25 01:28:13 ET
Adults that have some social manners and understanding. I have heard all of such before and am neither impressed by or interested in reading such postings. Being most are adults, it is too much to ask for a little decorum? I find it difficult to believe anyone here would allow such language in their home by total strangers. That being the case, perhaps I am in the wrong forum.
I know that morale is bad among our troops and stress is high. No matter how many awful stories that come out of Iraq, I know there are still many decent Americans trapped in those uniforms; all ages, both genders, trying to serve their county honorably. The same could be said about Germans in WWII.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers Behold the future of LP I think it's dangerous when someone is banned in a secret way. It reminds me of the way things are done by the Bush administration...eg state secrets precedents and signing statements etc. Only transparency and accountability create trust. PS - I don't care what people post. Let it rip, I say. apple posted on 2006-08-26 11:05:48 ET Reply Trace apple should come here. OK, guys, i'm clicking on LP threads and i hear a female voice that says, "oh my god."
"Freedom4um" -- The Forum for Real Americans and where America and Americans are always First!
Vulgarity for the sake of vulgarity is a childs game. There are many forums where that is the expected and accepted norm. That is the place for such as the above.
It should have not been posted there, it need not be repeated here. A link would have sufficed. I have to agree with the growing consensus on this point.
Just for you, sweet cakes, I'll try the edit feature on dilluminati's posting.
Click that link on. Do you hear the words, "Oh my God"?
I agree that there are many decent men and women trapped in uniform doing a job that contradicts the mission they are actually supposed to be in uniform to accomplish; namely the defense and protection of the United States. In Iraq, they are working as Mercenaries for the Neo-Con agenda.
Agreed.
I wouldn't worry so much about 4Dumb. Once we get the hate laws through, that anti-Semitic hellhole will be shut down for good. It's about time some of these Americans start to get some understanding that this crap's not going to be tolerated much longer. Anybody caught badmouthing Israel is committing treachery and treason against the American government in a time of war, and that's the death penalty. When the Pres finally signs the capital punishment order for anti-Semitism, these haters aren't gonna know what hit 'em. posterboy posted on 2006-08-25 01:28:13 ET
off topic: palo is back at LP?
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers I cleaned it up for you and the Cynical Old Man too.
Thank you Fred. Your post and gentle gesture is very much appreciated. :)!!! ~jj
I wouldn't worry so much about 4Dumb. Once we get the hate laws through, that anti-Semitic hellhole will be shut down for good. It's about time some of these Americans start to get some understanding that this crap's not going to be tolerated much longer. Anybody caught badmouthing Israel is committing treachery and treason against the American government in a time of war, and that's the death penalty. When the Pres finally signs the capital punishment order for anti-Semitism, these haters aren't gonna know what hit 'em. posterboy posted on 2006-08-25 01:28:13 ET
oh yeah. For a while now...
Yes darling, and here is a lovely bunch of flowers and a UFO to thank you for asking about our sweet Miss Palo. ;-) that's perfect!
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers
thanks for working this out among you. that was a show of respect for each other. i love seeing that.
"Freedom4um" -- The Forum for Real Americans and where America and Americans are always First!
YES! i do hear that!
"Freedom4um" -- The Forum for Real Americans and where America and Americans are always First!
... got a bunch of lov-i-ly coconuts! Roll, roll, roll a ball A penny a pinch! LOL!
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers Do you suppose Marguerite is Goldi? Recall that Goldi was fond of making the sort of mindless, hate filled posts that Marguerite is famous for. Goldi's net wide famous Palestinian comments are an example. Goldi, as a forum owner, took an amazing amount of grief for letting her bitternesss, hate and bigotry bleed through into her posts - and she eventually shut up. Is the true Goldi now showing up in the guise of Marguerite?
.
I remember Merv Griffin singing that. He might have written it (g)
That thread on elPee (reply #219 here) is heating up.
Goldi is an American whose identity is well known to some people. Marguerite, on the other hand, makes obvious mistakes in English like "tractations," and explains the admitted fact that she has never listened to Limbaugh's show by the assertion that she lives in "Europe." So I don't think Marguerite is Goldi. On the other hand, that leaves open the possibility that she sometimes plays Goldi on LP.
From wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I've_Got_a_Lovely_Bunch_of_Coconuts
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers sounds fake How difficult is it to add mistakes.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers If Marguerite were Goldi, I don't see the point of her pinging Goldi to her complaint about my ragging her about the use of the nonword.
Ahhh.....so it wasn't Mervin. BTW, he's living in a castle in Ireland, last I heard
To make it look like someone else made a complaint against you, and that was reason enough to ban you. To appear as both accuser and judge might look unfair, and Goldi would need a trumped up charge to ban you. As I recall, the last time it was over using breaking news incorrectly. A mere technicality that everyone else was allowed, but not you. Clearly, you were considered a threat to someone. Congratulations.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers It was a word. Not a word I had ever seen but it was in most dictionaries I looked in. When you had not heard of it I knew it was either very old or very foreign. Perhaps it was your ragging after you were shown the word was legit (in some distant place perhaps) that you were targeted. Trac`ta´tion n. 1. Treatment or handling of a subject; discussion. A full tractation of the points controverted. - Bp. Hall.
"Don" thinks Marguerite is a guy...link in #219 thread. I've found it difficult to discern the gender of a poster unless they reveal it themselves. Heck, someone here thought aristeides was a female after all these years.
Another minor example of reasons she shouldn't be the owner/moderator of a website: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- THIS site is fully engaged and fully supporting 100% removal of all illegal immigrants. You got a problem with that, leave. Goldi-Lox posted on 2006-03-31 13:10:30 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Her great example of 'civility' continually shows through and reflects exactly why she shouldn't own or moderate a website...unless it was named something like, "Jewish Daily Forum" where only she and her ilk could post. FWIW, as I don't have a copy of the whole thread, I can't tell what it was about; I can only surmise that this "Burrito" person is for all forms of immigration--something I am totally against myself. What followed her name-calling was typical--a matter of piling on by lots of people. The guy responded with some comment and said not to call him Burrito. So then Nacho was proffered as well as others. You could expect this from 14 - 16 year olds.........she may well be that retarded, I don't know. But I do know she makes the rules and then she breaks the rules, and on the threads where she does this, it gives licenses for other posters to be first class azzholes....just like her.
Was it used in the proper context?
And I still think it was breaking news. It was author Jim Moore's report of his personal experience of discovering he was on the no-fly list. Goldi claimed that, because the report appeared on The Huffington Post, that meant it had to be classified as "Blog," which meant that it could not be Breaking News.
It's because aristeides makes so much sense! ;P (I think it was mehitable.) http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=33154&Disp=55#C55
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers A word that has almost never been used in English since the very Latinate author Thomas Hobbes in the 17th century is in my opinion almost as much of a nonword in the English language as a word that hasn't been used since Chaucer.
If so, then it should be temporary. Or maybe because you have a "prior" it will be longer ;P Someone should go over and count the # of the same technical violation made by the shills.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers jazzfan=veronica=marguerite=penacite=bypass. Here's a piece of history I bumped into: at: http://libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=31145&Disp=1489&Trace=on 1513. To: coteblanche, ben herbivore (#1471) The more I see of jazzfan's posts, the more I realize her interest in this site is to hurt it. She has an agenda and it has FR written all over it. Give me a break. It's the world WIDE web and there is room for many forums. I happen to like Goldi and I came here at her request and many of the articles I posted were enjoyed by other posters. I debated the Kennedy assassination issue and many others with people here, some of whom I agreed with, many with whom I did not. To think I came here to be part of some competition or pi**ing contest between FR and LP is nuts. And paranoid. And wrong. If Neil has seen fit to ban someone with an obviously anti-semitic agenda I say good on him. It does not hurt the site one bit, but instead elevates the discourse IMO. jazzfan posted on 2003-12-19 17:06:33 ET Reply Trace =========(and PRESTO!, jazz becomes veronica)================ 1622. To: NAFV (#1615) Too bad you can't exactly claim that anymore Goldi at least in terms of content and what the site will allow, eh? "We are NOT anti-semitic." I beg to differ. You personally are not, of course. 429 posted on 12/18/2003 12:40:37 PM CST by veronica Looks like veronica/jazzfan started working on Goldie off site. Even when she is rebuffed, she continues to return to the same theme over and over and will not give up, even on a free speech board like Liberty Forum where she hasn't a chance in hell of changing their policy. You have to admire her persistance, if nothing else. certified fool posted on 2003-12-19 20:35:38 ET Reply Untrace Trace
I wouldn't worry so much about 4Dumb. Once we get the hate laws through, that anti-Semitic hellhole will be shut down for good. It's about time some of these Americans start to get some understanding that this crap's not going to be tolerated much longer. Anybody caught badmouthing Israel is committing treachery and treason against the American government in a time of war, and that's the death penalty. When the Pres finally signs the capital punishment order for anti-Semitism, these haters aren't gonna know what hit 'em. posterboy posted on 2006-08-25 01:28:13 ET
IIRC, 'tractate' is a word used in the Talmud, as a part of their division of their renderings of various aspects of the law. It would seem to me, without checking this for certainty, that this Marguerite person is jewish, perhaps a friend or cohort of the site's owner....religious sisters, so to speak.
That suspension was temporary. The current one, however, appears to be permanent.
I don't think it will last, the natives are restless.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers
Comments (263 - 354) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestA link would have been sufficient.
#223. To: Fred Mertz (#220)
We're mostly adults here
#224. To: Pissed Off Janitor, Ferret Mike (#207)
#225. To: Fred Mertz, apple, Jethro Tull, ALL (#219)
To: leveller (#14)
#226. To: jessejane (#222)
I think so too.
#227. To: Fred Mertz (#220)
#228. To: jessejane (#222)
#229. To: christine (#225)
http://libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=156133&Disp=41#C41
#230. To: robin (#224)
#231. To: Cynicom (#226)
That is the place for such as the above.
#232. To: Jethro Tull (#229)
#233. To: Ferret Mike (#227)
#234. To: Fred Mertz (#228)
Just for you, sweet cakes, I'll try the edit feature on dilluminati's posting.
#235. To: robin (#232)
#236. To: robin (#232)
"off topic: palo is back at LP?"
#237. To: Ferret Mike (#236)
#238. To: robin, Ferret Mike, all (#236)
Did someone mention palo?
#239. To: Cynicom, jessejane, Fred Mertz, Ferret Mike (#226)
#240. To: Jethro Tull (#229)
#241. To: Jethro Tull (#238)
#242. To: aristeides (#215)
My banning happened a day or two after Marguerite complained to Goldi-Lox about my ragging her, Marguerite, for using the nonword "tractations."
#243. To: robin (#241)
#244. To: aristeides (#221)
#245. To: ... (#242)
#246. To: Jethro Tull (#243)
"I've Got a Lovely Bunch of Coconuts" is a well-known novelty song dating from the 1940s. It was composed in 1944 by Fred Heatherton, an English songwriter, and celebrates the traditional coconut shy of funfairs.
#247. To: aristeides (#245)
#248. To: robin (#247)
#249. To: robin (#246)
#250. To: aristeides, ... (#248)
#251. To: aristeides (#248)
ragging her about the use of the nonword.
#252. To: aristeides, robin (#248)
#253. To: ... (#242)
(Edited)
66. To: Sean Biro (#48)
Burrito,
#254. To: It Is A Republic (#251)
#255. To: robin (#250)
As I recall, the last time it was over using breaking news incorrectly.
#256. To: Fred Mertz, aristeides, mehitable (#252)
#257. To: Fred Mertz (#254)
(Edited)
#258. To: aristeides, ... (#255)
#259. To: aristeides (#248)
#260. To: It Is A Republic, aristeides (#251)
#261. To: robin (#258)
#262. To: aristeides (#261)
.
.
.