[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Colbert LOSES IT, Tells Trump GO F YOURSELF After His Show IS NUKED The question is WHY? I am the Witness is back online Harley-Davidson Las Vegas and Byrna: Power. Freedom. Common-Sense Protection ELON MUSK: EUROPE IS ON TRACK FOR "WIDESPREAD SLAUGHTER" Fight breaks out on Virgin Atlantic flight from Montego Bay, Jamaica to London Heathrow. Caitlin Johnstone: Israel's Depravity Will Always Find New Ways To Shock You Gen Z Is Returning To Religion. Why? Nashville ICE Crackdown: 300,000 Criminal Aliens Deported Under Trump! ICE Troops EMPTY ‘Migrant Suburb’... WHOLE TOWN Deported in 2 Hours The U.S. Is the #1 Buyer of Sex With Children—Here’s Why No One Talks About It We Are Not Prepared to Confront China Former Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg blew $80 BILLION on DEI grants The Coming $187 BILLION Revolution in Healthcare Courtesy of AI "Effective Immediately": Shipping Line Suspends EV Cargo Due To Lithium Battery Fire Concerns Century Heat Scorches China: 158℉ Ground, Glass Explodes, ACs Bursting into Flames Gaza Isn't Starving, It Is Being Starved "Plan On It!" Martin Armstrong Sees '100% Chance Of Nuclear War' The Fed Pours Jet Fuel On The Inequality Gap Mag 7 Quake off the coast of Northern California Making Sense of Elon Musk's Plans. Ode to the Jeffrey Epstein Files (🔥 Just Forget About It!) – AI Parody Song ‘We are the big tent party of freaks and misfits.’ Deutschland Unter Allen! Inbound: Earth Changes, Inflation, Food Riots, Civil Wars What REALLY brought down Building 7? Firefighters expose the truth of 9/11 Locusts Descending on Ukraine Seven Reasons Why PBS And NPR Deserve To Be Defunded Why the U.S. Buys So Much Nuclear Fuel From Russia | WSJ Another No News Day

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Explosions on 911
Source: www.youtube.com
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3Ih
Published: Sep 1, 2006
Author: www.youtube.com
Post Date: 2006-09-01 03:58:45 by honway
Keywords: None
Views: 377
Comments: 9

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

#1. To: All (#0)

http://www.911blogger.com/node/2392

Submitted by Mintaka on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 7:18am.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I of a video of an explosion caught on tape along with the firefighters reactions. This happened at approximately 10.15am.

honway  posted on  2006-09-01   4:03:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

http://www.911blogger.com/node/2392

Setting the record straight Submitted by Mintaka on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 9:55pm.

I recorded this on Sept 11 2002 from a program on SBS. The program was about a French team documenting NY firefighters. I have waited four years thinking someone would have put it out on the net and all the time seeing numerous eyewitness videos talking about explosions with nothing to back it up.

Get it out there, do some homework, those officers must appear in other footage. At least one must be willing to come forward.

After seeing the Google video now I know why Jeff Rense, Mike Rivero and Alex Jones don't want to touch it.

honway  posted on  2006-09-01   4:06:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

As the counter reaches 4 seconds in the video of the collapse of the South Tower,note what happens to the North Tower near the impact area.

honway  posted on  2006-09-01   4:24:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJBEoThPUf8

New BBC Footage Mentions Low Explosion and Shows North Tower

honway  posted on  2006-09-01   4:52:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country."

- Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers

robin  posted on  2006-09-01   6:25:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You'll never see/read in the press/media.

The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2006-09-01   6:37:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I saw a show on PBS about Skyscrapers last night. In one segment a group of engineers studied the WTC collapse to gather insight for future skyscraper design. They determined that the collapses were not caused by loss of floor integrity, known as the "pancake effect" lauded in the official version, but by damage to support column beams. That, to me, is damning evidence. They did not go so far as to say the collapses were not caused by the plane crashes into the towers but I would think that begs the question, what caused the support beams to collapse, and then, how could that completely bring down the entire structure... in three buildings?

I will try to record the show when it is aired again. There is some good footage of the design of the WTC, the piece with the engineers, and also some segments with Larry Silverstein.

It is beyond question that the official version of events on 9/11 were a series of deceptions. There are so many discrepancies and outright falsehoods in every event of that day that a full independent investigation is warranted and should be demanded by the American people. The only question left is when? Our future is at stake, and the linchpin is what happened on that fateful day in September of 2001.

lightmind  posted on  2006-09-01   10:55:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

"explosions" everywhere explosions. hmmmmm.

christine  posted on  2006-09-01   11:04:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

They determined that the collapses were not caused by loss of floor integrity, known as the "pancake effect" lauded in the official version, but by damage to support column beams.

That is consistent with the video recording of the collapse of the North Tower.

The North Tower featured a massive 360 foot high TV antenna added in 1978.

The antenna mast was mounted to the core columns.
The antenna mast moving downward was the first indication of collapse.

The key problem with the official version is explaining how a sufficient number of the core columns were heated to a critical temperature that resulted in failure. An office fire initiated by jet fuel does not explain it,imo.

Even the NIST has rejected the pancake theory.

honway  posted on  2006-09-01   14:57:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]