[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

US Bunker Buster's "Weak Spot" Revealed? China Finds Attack Tactic to ‘Stop’ Bomb That Hit Iran "This is an EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENT" CIA MKULTRA Whistleblower sounding the alarm Burn Brown Fat With Food Cartels Moving to Canada For Fentanyl (And other reason) Bees Benefit from Mushrooms, You Could Too Top 11 SWAT Operations in History Inside 'Return to the Land': The group making a whites-only community in Arkansas Ana Kasparian: Epstein Cover-Up, Israel Strikes Gaza Church, & the Great American Political Shift McDonald's McHire AI Bot Just Exposed The Personal Data Of 64 McMillion People I think your EV is charged now. You can go ahead and unplug it. Gen-Z Can't Answer the Most Basic Questions - OUR EDUCATION SYSTEM IS A JOKE. Your car is spying on you, but here is how you can stop it. The Real Reason Why Brigitte Macron Is So Worried...(Candace Owens) Arsenic tested in food. For the First Time! Russia Uses Italmas Drones to Attack Ukraine Leaked Hospital Images Reveal Netanyahu’s TRUE Condition! First Net-Negative Immigration in Decades Lefties Losing It: Democrats go from bad to worse "The Russia hoax is even worse than I thought" Journalist Matt Taibbi on CIA cover-up Harvard is the Favorite School Red China's Leaders for their Kids Lefties Losing It: If only there was a sign Hillary suffered from ‘psycho-emotional problems’ Apparently Hulk Hogan has died 10 Economic Facts That Nobody Can Deny Obama May Be Tried for Treason !!!, 4772 Largest U.S. Power Grid Issues "Max Generation Alert" Paul Joseph Watson: GO AD FREE This Doesn't End Well Visualizing Health Insurance As A Share Of Median Income By US State Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron Sue American Political Commentator Candace Owens Putin was about to drop a BOMBSHELL on Hillary Clinton, Tulsi Gabbard reveals The Toxic Combination Of Illinois' Sanctuary Status And The SAFE-T Act

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Explosions on 911
Source: www.youtube.com
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3Ih
Published: Sep 1, 2006
Author: www.youtube.com
Post Date: 2006-09-01 03:58:45 by honway
Keywords: None
Views: 381
Comments: 9

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

#1. To: All (#0)

http://www.911blogger.com/node/2392

Submitted by Mintaka on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 7:18am.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I of a video of an explosion caught on tape along with the firefighters reactions. This happened at approximately 10.15am.

honway  posted on  2006-09-01   4:03:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

http://www.911blogger.com/node/2392

Setting the record straight Submitted by Mintaka on Thu, 08/31/2006 - 9:55pm.

I recorded this on Sept 11 2002 from a program on SBS. The program was about a French team documenting NY firefighters. I have waited four years thinking someone would have put it out on the net and all the time seeing numerous eyewitness videos talking about explosions with nothing to back it up.

Get it out there, do some homework, those officers must appear in other footage. At least one must be willing to come forward.

After seeing the Google video now I know why Jeff Rense, Mike Rivero and Alex Jones don't want to touch it.

honway  posted on  2006-09-01   4:06:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

As the counter reaches 4 seconds in the video of the collapse of the South Tower,note what happens to the North Tower near the impact area.

honway  posted on  2006-09-01   4:24:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJBEoThPUf8

New BBC Footage Mentions Low Explosion and Shows North Tower

honway  posted on  2006-09-01   4:52:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country."

- Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers

robin  posted on  2006-09-01   6:25:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You'll never see/read in the press/media.

The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size

Itisa1mosttoolate  posted on  2006-09-01   6:37:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I saw a show on PBS about Skyscrapers last night. In one segment a group of engineers studied the WTC collapse to gather insight for future skyscraper design. They determined that the collapses were not caused by loss of floor integrity, known as the "pancake effect" lauded in the official version, but by damage to support column beams. That, to me, is damning evidence. They did not go so far as to say the collapses were not caused by the plane crashes into the towers but I would think that begs the question, what caused the support beams to collapse, and then, how could that completely bring down the entire structure... in three buildings?

I will try to record the show when it is aired again. There is some good footage of the design of the WTC, the piece with the engineers, and also some segments with Larry Silverstein.

It is beyond question that the official version of events on 9/11 were a series of deceptions. There are so many discrepancies and outright falsehoods in every event of that day that a full independent investigation is warranted and should be demanded by the American people. The only question left is when? Our future is at stake, and the linchpin is what happened on that fateful day in September of 2001.

lightmind  posted on  2006-09-01   10:55:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

"explosions" everywhere explosions. hmmmmm.

christine  posted on  2006-09-01   11:04:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

They determined that the collapses were not caused by loss of floor integrity, known as the "pancake effect" lauded in the official version, but by damage to support column beams.

That is consistent with the video recording of the collapse of the North Tower.

The North Tower featured a massive 360 foot high TV antenna added in 1978.

The antenna mast was mounted to the core columns.
The antenna mast moving downward was the first indication of collapse.

The key problem with the official version is explaining how a sufficient number of the core columns were heated to a critical temperature that resulted in failure. An office fire initiated by jet fuel does not explain it,imo.

Even the NIST has rejected the pancake theory.

honway  posted on  2006-09-01   14:57:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]