[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
War, War, War See other War, War, War Articles Title: White House Targets Conspiracy Theorists As Terrorist Recruiters White House Targets Conspiracy Theorists As Terrorist Recruiters 'Strategy for winning the war on terror' says world contaminated, corrupted by misinformation Paul Joseph Watson/ http://PrisonPlanet.com | September 7 2006 RELATED:Bush Releases Updated National Strategy For Combating Terrorism A document cited by President Bush in his recent speech at the Capital Hilton Hotel on how to 'win the war on terror' cites conspiracies as one of the wellsprings of terrorism and threatens to "address" and "diminish" the problems they are causing the government in fulfilling their agenda. On Tuesday Bush referred to the strategy paper as "an unclassified version of the strategy we've been pursuing since September the 11th, 2001," that takes into account, "the changing nature of this enemy." The document says that terrorism springs from "subcultures of conspiracy and misinformation," and that "terrorists recruit more effectively from populations whose information about the world is contaminated by falsehoods and corrupted by conspiracy theories. The distortions keep alive grievances and filter out facts that would challenge popular prejudices and self-serving propaganda." The terminology echoes President Bush's speech (video below) to the UN General Assembly on November 10th 2001 in which he stated, "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th, malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty." This is an outright threat to the 9/11 truth movement and is meant to have a chilling effect on freedom of speech. It is also a callous reminder that the administration that has been the progenitor of the most heinous and deliberate campaign to mislead and lie to its own people is so transfixed by its own hubris that it has the temerity to accuse others of propagating deceptive information. This is the same administration that deliberately included the Niger yellow cake fraud in a state of the union speech to sell a war - knowing that the information was completely bogus. How dare they threaten us with the very defining characteristic of their black legacy and equate us with terrorists? This is a direct assault on the alternative media and a continuation of the twilight zone rhetoric that saw the administration attempt to link its critics with Fascists and Hitler appeasers. The only fascists that should really concern us are not imaginary 'Blogofascists' or 'Islamofascists' but the Neo-Fascist slugs that occupy the White House and their cheerleading sycophants in the mainstream media and congress. This is by no means the first time political enemies of the state have been smeared as terrorist sympathizers. Alex Jones' 2001 documentary film 9/11: The Road to Tyranny featured footage from a FEMA symposium given to firefighters and other emergency personnel in Kansas City in which it was stated that t he founding fathers, Christians and homeschoolers were terrorists and should be treated with the utmost suspicion and brutality in times of national emergency. We have highlighted previous training manuals issues by state and federal government bodies which identify whole swathes of the population as potential terrorists. A Texas Department of Public Safety Criminal Law Enforcement pamphlet gives the public characteristics to identify terrorists that include buying baby formula, beer, wearing Levi jeans, carrying identifying documents like a drivers license and traveling with women or children. A Virginia training manual used to help state employees recognize terrorists lists anti-government and property rights activists as terrorists and includes binoculars, video cameras, pads and notebooks in a compendium of terrorist tools. Shortly after 9/11 a Phoenix FBI manual that was disseminated amongst federal employees at the end of the Clinton term caused waves on the Internet after it was revealed that potential terrorists included, "defenders of the US Constitution against federal government and the UN, " and individuals who "make numerous references to the US Constitution." Lawyers everywhere cowered in fear at being shipped off to Gitmo. In May we broke the exclusive of a nationwide FEMA program which is training Pastors and other religious representatives to become secret police enforcers who teach their congregations to "obey the government" in preparation for a declaration of martial law, property and firearm seizures, and forced relocation.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 40.
#20. To: Artisan (#0)
(Edited)
It is a well known fact that the so-called patriot movement, as well as the white seperatist movements, are heavily infiltrated with undercover government enforcers from various agencies. Therefore it is only logical that the government would also have enforcers posing as anti-government radicals on web- based political forums such as this one. It has also been proven (to my satisfaction anyway) that government enforcers masking as members of the patriot movement and the white seperatist movement instigate trouble by taking leadership or quasi-leadership positions in the above groups and then lead members into breaking the law. This allows the government to imprison potential troublemakers while furthering the career of the enforcer(s). Therefore, IMHO, it would be wise to be wary of posts advocating violence against the government. If you see such postings, my suggestion would be to not respond. It could be a government enforcer attempting to bait a trap. If the above article is correct (and I have my doubts as to Alex Jones, Prison Planet, Infowars) then the government will be actively pursuing those who do not toe the line. Also. If the government is going to begin going after people, I do not see it taking place until after the November elections.
If they lose the elections, will they have the power? If they win the elections, will they have the need?
Considering a large portion of the electorate believe the government was somehow involved in 9/11, there may be a large backlash if Bush begins rounding up people before the elections. This move may cause people to vote who do not normally vote, and I doubt these votes will be for the GOP. Then again, logic isn't a Bush strong point.
There are no replies to Comment # 40. End Trace Mode for Comment # 40.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||