[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Israelis SHOCKED The World Hates Them

Ghost Dancers and Democracy: Tucker Carlson

Amalek (Enemies of Israel) 100,000 Views on Bitchute

ICE agents pull screaming illegal immigrant influencer from car after resisting arrest

Aaron Lewis on Being Blacklisted & Why Record Labels Promote Terrible Music

Connecticut Democratic Party Holds Presser To Cry About Libs of TikTok

Trump wants concealed carry in DC.

Chinese 108m Steel Bridge Collapses in 3s, 16 Workers Fall 130m into Yellow River

COVID-19 mRNA-Induced TURBO CANCERS.

Think Tank Urges Dems To Drop These 45 Terms That Turn Off Normies

Man attempts to carjack a New Yorker

Test post re: IRS

How Managers Are Using AI To Hire And Fire People

Israel's Biggest US Donor Now Owns CBS

14 Million Illegals Entered US in 2023: The Cost to Our Nation

American Taxpayers to Cover $3.5 Billion Pentagon Bill for U.S. Munitions Used Defending Israel

The Great Jonny Quest Documentary

This story About IRS Abuse Did Not Post

CDC Data Exposes Surge in Deaths Among Children of Covid-Vaxxed Mothers

This Interview in Munich in 1992 with Gudrun Himmler. (Heinrich Himmler's daughter)

25 STRANGE Wild West Home Features You’ll Never See Again

Zionists DEMAND Megyn Kelly's Head!

Cash Jordan: Migrant Mob THREATENS Judge... ICE 'Instantly Deports' Courthouse of Illegals

Barricades placed outside Federal Building in Downtown L.A.

Hulk Hogan bombshell as cops investigate claim catastrophic medical error led to his death

Everything That's Wrong With The Leftist Media In One (Now Deleted) Post...

FBI Raids Warmonger John BoltonÂ’s Home and Office

BREAKING: John Bolton's home raided by federal agents

CDC Adviser Says Vote On RSV Antibody Was Based On Distorted Data

Dick Thinking for Dummies


Pious Perverts
See other Pious Perverts Articles

Title: Goldi-Lox: I Was Very Disappointed With Him (aristeides)
Source: ELPEE
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=157943#C20
Published: Sep 7, 2006
Author: Goldi-Lox
Post Date: 2006-09-07 19:57:01 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 10343
Comments: 189

20. To: Badeye (#17) I warned him publicly at least twice, and by email NOT to post anything that was in Arabic, or linked to an Arabic language site. He said it was done accidently, and would not do it again. In the last article he posted, (I deleted the thread), when I went to the link, it was AGAIN to an Arabic language site. That was it. Done. I won't be lied to. LP cannot tolerate that. We are at war...like it or not. There is no way for me or others who cannot speak Arabic to know whether or not there are messages between terrorists going on, and I won't be a party to that. It's too dangerous for all of us. When I warn someone about an action, and spell out the reason why, and they do it again, I don't have any other choice but to cut off their posting rights. I think I acted on behalf of the posting community here. We can't be associated in any way with those who are terrorists. I think he was doing a disservice to the site, and our members. I was very disappointed with him. Goldi-Lox posted on 2006-09-07 14:34:17 ET Reply Trace

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 128.

#120. To: Brian S (#0)

20. To: Badeye (#17) I warned him publicly at least twice, and by email NOT to post anything that was in Arabic, or linked to an Arabic language site. He said it was done accidently, and would not do it again. In the last article he posted, (I deleted the thread), when I went to the link, it was AGAIN to an Arabic language site. That was it. Done. I won't be lied to. LP cannot tolerate that. We are at war...like it or not. There is no way for me or others who cannot speak Arabic to know whether or not there are messages between terrorists going on, and I won't be a party to that. It's too dangerous for all of us. When I warn someone about an action, and spell out the reason why, and they do it again, I don't have any other choice but to cut off their posting rights. I think I acted on behalf of the posting community here. We can't be associated in any way with those who are terrorists. I think he was doing a disservice to the site, and our members. I was very disappointed with him. Goldi-Lox posted on 2006-09-07 14:34:17 ET Reply Trace

Maybe because I don't check my e-mails, I never saw her warnings, and consequently never made the response she claims I made. If she posted warnings to me on LP, it must have been in postings I never read.

The last posting I made was from Uruknet, which, as far as I can see, is in English. Its page includes one or two Arabic words at the top of the page, and those I did not include in my posting, because I had seen an earlier complaint from Goldi about including Arabic in a posting. (That was probably one of my earlier postings, although that complaint from her that I did see did not mention me in particular. That posting said she was worried about the posting of coded messages.)

aristeides  posted on  2006-09-08   9:50:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#126. To: aristeides, jessejane, Cynicom, Fibr Dog, add925, christine, Zipporah (#120)

Maybe because I don't check my e-mails, I never saw her warnings, and consequently never made the response she claims I made.

So she lied.

And as you point out, the "arabic" sourced thread she's complaining about was posted by someone else again, and is STILL up on LP.

You were just too effective.

robin  posted on  2006-09-08   10:22:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#127. To: robin (#126)

If I had had any idea that Goldi objected not just to posting Arabic language, but posting from a source that had Arabic in it, it would have been a simple matter to follow the article to its original posting on Global Research, and use that.

But I had no idea. Just look at my postings here after she banned me. I assumed it was because of the content of the article, not any "Arabic" content.

aristeides  posted on  2006-09-08   10:30:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#128. To: aristeides (#127)

it would have been a simple matter to follow the article to its original posting on Global Research, and use that.

lol!

It was of course the content, she just won't admit it.

Which reminds me, I recall another time she claimed a source was insufficient, when the original source was a newspaper from Lancaster, PA. The article was about how Smirk told the good folk in Lancaster county that he hoped God spoke through him. She had a real fit, claiming the source was questionable.

She never retracted anything she said, although proven wrong.

robin  posted on  2006-09-08   10:36:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 128.

        There are no replies to Comment # 128.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 128.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]