See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Woman Waving From WTC 1 Impact Area
Source:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc1_woman.html
URL Source: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc1_woman.html
Published: Sep 11, 2006
Author: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc1_w
Post Date: 2006-09-11 21:48:59 by Max
Keywords: Woman Waving From WTC 1 Impact, whatreallyhappened.com, WTC 1: There Was No Inferno
Views: 202
Comments: 13
Woman Waving From WTC 1 Impact Area This photograph taken from the WTC report shows the aircraft impact area of WTC 1... http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc1_woman.html ...it also shows a survivor looking out from the hole made by the aircraft impact: Zoom of above image - click for full size Enhanced image - click for full size A second photograph gives a better view of the woman and the lack of fire - click for full size Video #1 of woman Video #2 of woman The woman has been tentatively identified by her husband as Edna Cintron, an administrative assistant for Marsh & McLennan. Glass melts at 700°C, therefore an 800°C+ inferno burning at the core of WTC 1 would have shattered or melted all of the windows at the aircraft impact level. Video #2 proves the building did not contain a raging inferno as it shows many of the windows at the impact level are intact. Another survivor was also caught on film in the aircraft impact area of WTC 1: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc1_woman.html See also: WTC 1: There Was No Inferno The 9/11 WTC Collapses: An Audio-Video Analysis http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc1_woman.html What Really Happened
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Max (#0)
Yes, the goob story is all bullshit. Thanks for more documentation.
wow, this is the first time I've seen these pics - they're absolutely chilling. if the temps were that high to result in the collapse of the entire building, I don't see how there could possibly have been any survivors at that point.
"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."
Obviously the temperatures weren't that hot there. The steel was cool enough for her to touch with her hand. Fire did not bring those towers down.
God is always good! In the South Tower, the plane hit the 78th through 84th floor. There were people on those floors that survived.
Crimeny.
If we were really at war, the borders would be closed.
check out Uncle Bill's post here: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=34538&Disp=17#C17
She's wearing BAC heat resistance clothing.
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
Have you seen what BeABoozer has taken to doing on LP? Copying and pasting 9/11 Truth material, such as for example Hoffman's refutation of the new NIST FAQ page, and purporting to refute the refutation, invariably beginning each point with "ROTFLMAO!" Some day, he's gonna bust a gut. :P
no i HAVEN'T PLEASE SHOW ME
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
Why the NIST "Fact Sheet" Just Won't Do http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=157865 Why NIST hasn't Answered its own Questions http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=157859
Two words. Space Aliens.
#2. To: Max (#0)
#3. To: Max (#0)
(Edited)
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]
#4. To: Max (#0)
You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006
#5. To: Max (#0)
#6. To: mehitable, Uncle Bill (#2)
#7. To: Max (#0)
Woman Waving From WTC 1 Impact Area
#8. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#7)
She's wearing BAC heat resistance clothing.
#9. To: Peetie Wheatstraw (#8)
#10. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#9)
no i HAVEN'T PLEASE SHOW ME
#11. To: mehitable (#2)
wow, this is the first time I've seen these pics - they're absolutely chilling. if the temps were that high to result in the collapse of the entire building, I don't see how there could possibly have been any survivors at that point.
 | What's that Mr. Nipples? You want me to ask the nice lady about her rack?. |
#12. To: Peetie Wheatstraw (#10) (Edited)
I think you mean Jim Fetzer not Jim Hoffman. Honestly I don't know what to think about either of them anymore. The 9/11-truth movement IMHO has plants in it to mislead people away from the real perpetrators of 9/11. I think part of the truth will come out, and has been planned to come out even, but not the part about Israel's involvement.
God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]
#13. To: RickyJ (#12)
Sorry: I did mean Jim Fetzer. And as for your other point, you could be right: given the percentage of people (probably understated in the polls) that accept at least some premises of 9/11 Truth, who could be surprised that for every overt effort to discredit the movement, there's a covert effort to subvert it from within. However, there's still enough there in both guys IMHO to put people on the right track, at least initially. Past a certain point though, every responsible citizen has to think and judge the facts and presentations and arguments on his or her own.
I think you mean Jim Fetzer not Jim Hoffman. Honestly I don't know what to think about either of them anymore. The 9/11-truth movement IMHO has plants in it to mislead people away from the real perpetrators of 9/11. I think part of the truth will come out, and has been planned to come out even, but not the part about Israel's involvement.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest