See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Judicial Watch Releases 9/11 CITGO Video
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.judicialwatch.org/
Published: Sep 15, 2006
Author: Judicial Watch
Post Date: 2006-09-15 16:13:55 by honway
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 559
Comments: 18
Judicial Watch Releases 9/11 CITGO Video Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today released a videotape from the FBI that was taken from a CITGO gas station near the Pentagon. Many believed the video would show American Airlines Flight 77 striking the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. The videotape, which depicts views from the gas station's six security cameras, shows that the CITGO cameras did not seem to capture the actual attack. The tape was partially obscured by the FBI to protect the privacy of individuals captured on video in the CITGO convenience store. The FBI released the videotape as result a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act request and related lawsuit.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.
#11. To: All (#0)
I guess my basic question is, why would a business owner spend money to install and maintain a system that provides this kind of recording of the area? What could it possibly be used for?
#14. To: honway (#12)
I'd venture the original was of higher quality than this net reproduction can offer. But still, I see no reason why it was necessary to keep this video under wraps for 5 years. Any guesses to when the plane hit the pentagon in it?
I wrote to Judicial Watch asking them if they were told what equipment was used by the Citgo, or if they could get that information. From that I can tell if this a BS video or not. If the Citgo use a simples multiplexor, which is a waste of time and money, this is the best we can get. However, if they had a duplex multiplexor, then there is full size video of each individual camera and what the FBI did was play back the multiplexed video in a split screen format, record it that way onto another recorder, and release it. If I had make and model numbers, I can tell how we ended up with this useless video.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#12. To: All (#11)
Replies to Comment # 12. I guess my basic question is, why would a business owner spend money to install and maintain a system that provides this kind of recording of the area? What could it possibly be used for?
#16. To: honway (#12)
I guess my basic question is, why would a business owner spend money to install and maintain a system that provides this kind of recording of the area?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 12.