[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
9/11 See other 9/11 Articles Title: Timeline Profile: Christine Todd Whitman Profile: Christine Todd Whitman Positions that Christine Todd Whitman has held: EPA administrator Christine Todd Whitman actively participated in the following events: December 3, 1999 Governor of New Jersey Christine Todd Whitman announces that her state has joined the federal governments lawsuits (see November 3, 1999) against several mid-west and southeast utility companies for allegedly releasing tens of millions of illegal emissions in violation of the New Source Review section of the Clean Air Act. Governor Whitman says: Weve done much here in New Jersey to ensure that our residents can breathe clean air. All of our efforts are fruitless, however, if New Jerseyans must breathe the dirty air coming into our state from mid-west coal-burning power plants. This legal action will require that these power plants clean up their emissions and stop polluting our air. [Reuters, 12/6/1999; New Jersey, 12/3/1999] Entity Tags: Christine Todd Whitman March 27, 2001 EPA administrator Christie Todd Whitman tells reporters that the Bush administration has no interest in implementing the Kyoto Protocol. [BBC, 3/28/2001; Associated Press, 3/28/2001; Environmental News Network, 3/28/2001; CBS News, 3/28/2001; CNN, 3/29/2001] The treaty would require 39 industrialized nations to cut emissions of six greenhouse gasescarbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulphur hexafluorideto an average of 5.2 percent below 1990 levels by the period 2008-2012. The US would be required to reduce its emissions by about 7 percent. The protocol will not go into effect until it has been ratified by countries that were responsible for at least 55 percent of the worlds carbon emissions in 1990. [BBC, 3/29/2001; BBC, 9/29/2001] The United States is the worlds largest polluter and therefore its refusal to support the treaty represents a significant setback. In 1990, the US was responsible for 36.1% of greenhouse emissions. [BBC, 6/4/2004] The Bush administration complains that the treaty would harm US economic interests and that it unfairly puts too much of the burden on industrialized nations while not seeking to limit pollution from developing nations. [BBC, 3/29/2001] Entity Tags: Christine Todd Whitman, Bush administration May 15, 2001 EPA administrator Christine Todd Whitman tells the Senate Environmental and Public Works Committee that she doesnt know of any proposal to drop the governments lawsuits against several utility and energy companies for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act. Her statement is in response to a question from Senator Hillary Clinton who noted that there were reports (see After January 22, 2001) of an internal White House debate over the suits. [US Congress, 5/15/2001, pp. 31-32 ; Reuters, 5/15/2001, pp. 31-32] In 1999, the EPA had accused the companies of illegally releasing tens of millions of tons of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions (see November 3, 1999). Entity Tags: Hillary Rodham Clinton, Christine Todd Whitman July 26, 2001 Testifying before a subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, EPA administrator Christine Whitman names several Clean Air Act programs that the Bush administration is considering eliminatingincluding New Source Review, which requires power companies to install state-of-the-art pollution controls whenever they are building new plants or adding additional capacity to existing ones. [US Congress, 7/26/2001] Entity Tags: US Congress, Christine Todd Whitman September 7, 2001) EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman tells residents at a town hall meeting in Libby, Montana, a designated Superfund Site where the EPA is remediating asbestos contamination (see (August 2001)), It has never been our plan to look to you to pay for any part of this cleanup, including the cleanup of residential properties. [Environmental Protection Agency, 9/7/2001] Entity Tags: Christine Todd Whitman September 13, 2001 EPA Administrator Christie Whitman announces that the EPA is monitoring levels of airborne contaminants in and around the area of Manhattan. She says that samples so far are reassuring about potential exposure of rescue crews and the public to environmental contaminants. The tests found either no asbestos or very low levels of asbestos. In Brooklyn, which is directly in the WTC smoke plumes path (see 9:59 a.m. September 11, 2001 and 10:28 a.m. September 11, 2001), she says that levels of lead, asbestos and volatile organic compounds in air samples ... were not detectable or not of concern. [Environmental Protection Agency, 9/13/2001] However, her statements contradict results from transmission electron microscopy (TEM) tests that were conducted the previous day (see (September 12, 2001)). Entity Tags: Christine Todd Whitman, Environmental Protection Agency September 14, 2001 EPA administrator Christine Todd Whitman is quoted by Newsweek saying that the smoke plume at the World Trade Center disaster site is not a health problem. She says: We have found particulate matter in the air, but other than being an irritant to those people who are out there breathing it deeply thats why people are wearing protective gear and masks it is not a problem for the general population. [Jenkins, 7/4/2003 ] Entity Tags: Christine Todd Whitman, Environmental Protection Agency September 15, 2001 EPA administrator Christine Todd Whitman says with regard to Manhattans air quality, [T]here is no reason for concern. She says that her agency is regularly sampling airborne particles and that findings indicate that most locations have an asbestos level of less than one percentthe amount above which the EPA considers a material to be asbestos-containing but notes that the highest recorded reading so far was 4.5 percent (see (Between 10:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. September 11, 2001)). [Newsday, 9/16/2001] But the EPA is wrong to use the one percent level as if it were a safety benchmark (see (September 12, 2001)). Furthermore, its test results are not accurate, as they are based on the outdated polarized light microscopy (PLM) testing method which is incapable of identifying fine fibers and which cannot reliably detect asbestos when it is present in concentrations below one percent (see November 20, 1990). Entity Tags: Environmental Protection Agency, Christine Todd Whitman September 18, 2001 EPA Administrator Christie Whitman announces that results from further air and drinking water monitoring near the WTC site and the Pentagon indicate that there are few significant risks to public health. We are very encouraged that the results from our monitoring of air quality and drinking water conditions in both New York and near the Pentagon show that the public in these areas is not being exposed to excessive levels of asbestos or other harmful substances, she says. Most of the 62 dust samples taken by the agency contained less than one percent of asbestos. [Environmental Protection Agency, 9/18/2001] The EPA incorrectly uses the one percent level of ambient asbestos as if it were a safety benchmark (see (September 12, 2001)). Moreover, the test results Whitman cites are based on the less sensitive and outdated polarized light microscopy (PLM) testing method which is incapable of identifying ultra-fine asbestos fibers and which cannot reliably detect asbestos when present in concentrations below one percent (see November 20, 1990).Whitmans statement also observes that where asbestos levels have exceeded the EPAs one percent level of concern, the EPA has operated its 10 High Efficiency Particulate Arresting (HEPA) vacuum trucks to clean the area and then resample. She adds that the trucks have also cleaned the streets and sidewalks in the Financial District in preparation for ... return to business. [Environmental Protection Agency, 9/18/2001] However, it is later discovered that the contractor hired to clean the streets failed to equip the vacuum trucks with the required HEPA filters. [New York Daily News, 8/14/2002; Kupferman, 2003 ] Entity Tags: Environmental Protection Agency, Christine Todd Whitman September 21, 2001 EPA Administrator Christie Whitman assures New Yorkers that environmental conditions in Manhattanboth inside and outsideare safe, and provides a summary of the tests that have so far been performed on the citys air and drinking water. Water - Whitman says: As we continue to monitor drinking water in and around New York City, and as EPA gets more comprehensive analysis of this monitoring data, I am relieved to be able to reassure New York and New Jersey residents that a host of potential contaminants are either not detectable or are below the Agencys concern levels. Results we have just received on drinking water quality show that not only is asbestos not detectable, but also we can not detect any bacterial contamination, PCBs or pesticides. She does say however that following one rainstorm with particularly high runoff, we did have one isolated detection of slightly elevated levels of PCBs (see September 14, 2001). Outdoor air - Whitman says that outdoor air sampling does not indicate the existence of significant public health risks. This claim is based on results obtained using the outdated polarized light microscopy (PLM) testing method (see September 12, 2001) which is incapable of identifying ultra-fine fibers and which cannot reliably detect asbestos when present in concentrations below one percent (see November 20, 1990). Even though Whitman denies a significant risk to public health, she does say seven samples taken at or near Ground Zero have had marginally higher levels of asbestos that exceed EPAs level of concern, and that her agency has done a total of 101 dust samples, of which 37 were slightly over the one percent asbestos. Whitman does not mention that the EPAs level of concern is not a safety benchmark (see (September 12, 2001)) but rather the detection limit of the polarized light microscopy (PLM) testing method (see November 20, 1990). Indoor air - Whitman claims, New Yorkers and New Jerseyans need not be concerned about environmental issues as they return to their homes and workplaces. But the EPA has no data indicating that indoor air is actually safe. The only indoor tests that have been conducted by the EPA were in the EPAs Region 2 offices located in the Federal Building and a few neighboring buildingsand the results from several of these tests were positive for chrysotile asbestos (see September 13, 2001-September 19, 2001). [Environmental Protection Agency, 9/21/2001; Office of US Congressman Jerrold Nadler, 4/12/2002 ] Entity Tags: Environmental Protection Agency, Christine Todd Whitman (September 28, 2001) National Ombudsman Robert Martin sends a memorandum to EPA Administrator Christie Whitman suggesting that the agency implement the recommendations in the General Accounting Offices July 2001 report (see July 27, 2001). He advises against a proposal under consideration that would move his office to the Office of Inspector General (OIG). He argues that doing so would not increase the ombudsmans independence and notes that the ombudsmans mission is very different than the OIGs. [US Congress, 6/25/2002; Environmental Protection Agency, 11/26/2001 ] Entity Tags: Robert J. Martin, EPA Office of Inspector General (OIG), General Accounting Office, Christine Todd Whitman October 3, 2001 EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman and John Henshaw, US Department of Labor Assistant Secretary for OSHA, announce that their two agencies have found no evidence of any significant public health hazard to residents, visitors or workers beyond the immediate World Trade Center area. But later in the statement, they acknowledge that to date, Of 177 bulk dust and debris samples collected by EPA and OSHA and analyzed for asbestos, 48 had levels over 1 percent, the level EPA and OSHA use to define asbestos-containing material. Additionally, they say that out of a total of 442 air samples EPA has taken at Ground Zero and in the immediate area, only 27 had levels of asbestos above the standard EPA uses to determine if children can re-enter a school after asbestos has been removed.... [Environmental Protection Agency, 10/3/2001] Entity Tags: Christine Todd Whitman, John L. Henshaw (October 31, 2001) EPA Administrator Christie Whitman continues to reassure the public regarding environmental conditions in Lower Manhattan and says: Those of us in government and the media share an obligation to provide members of the public, in a responsible and calm manner, with the information they need to protect themselves and their families from any environmental hazards that may result from the attacks on the World Trade Center. [New York Daily News, 10/31/2001] Entity Tags: Christine Todd Whitman Morning November 27, 2001 EPA Administrator Christie Todd Whitman announces that the National Ombudsman Office will be relocated to the EPA Office of Inspector General (OIG) and that control of all National Ombudsman cases will be likewise transferred to the OIG. She claims the change will give the ombudsman more independence and the impartiality necessary to conduct credible inquiries. [Environmental Protection Agency, 11/27/2001] The planned change would give the EPA OIG authority to exercise editorial control over the ombudsmans comments if they concern criminal investigations. [Associated Press, 4/8/2002] Additionally, under the plan the EPA OIG would decide which cases are investigated. Decisions regarding budgets and staff would also be handled by the OIG. [Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 4/23/2002] Ombudsman Robert Martin vehemently objects to the plan, telling The Washington Post in an interview that putting his office under the OIG would effectively dissolve the national ombudsman function at the EPA. I translate that as the IG is taking over my cases. Theyre going to review and determine whether complaints citizens have made have merit, Martin explains. Theyre going to be doing my job. [Washington Post, 11/29/2001; Associated Press, 4/8/2002] Entity Tags: Christine Todd Whitman, Robert J. Martin, EPA Office of Inspector General (OIG) Afternoon November 27, 2001 EPA ombudsman Robert Martin writes to EPA Administrator Christie Whitman criticizing her decision (see (September 28, 2001)) to transfer his office to the Office of Inspector General (OIG). Martin challenges her assertion that this would result in greater autonomy, noting that the IOG had previously interfered with [a]... National Ombudsman investigation of the Marjol Batter Site. [Environmental Protection Agency, 11/26/2001 ] Entity Tags: Robert J. Martin, EPA Office of Inspector General (OIG), Christine Todd Whitman November 28, 2001 EPA Administrator Christie Todd Whitman, appearing before Congress, states: Under the provisions of PDD 62, signed by President Clinton in 1998, the EPA is assigned lead responsibility for cleaning up buildings and other sites contaminated by chemical or biological agents as a result of an act of terrorism. This responsibility draws on our decades of experience in cleaning up sites contaminated by toxins through prior practices or accidents. Her deputy, Linda Fisher, will repeat this to Congress a week later (see December 5, 2001). [US Congress, 4/12/2002] Entity Tags: US Congress, Christine Todd Whitman December 7, 2001 Eighteen United States Congressional representatives write to EPA Administrator Christie Whitman requesting that she refrain from transferring the National Ombudsmans office to the EPAs Inspector General until after Congressional hearings on the issue have been held in early 2002. Nine additional Congressional representatives write to Whitman on December 19 (see December 7, 2001). [US Congress, 6/25/2002] Entity Tags: EPA Office of Inspector General (OIG), Christine Todd Whitman December 19, 2001 Nine US Congressional representatives write to EPA Administrator Christie Whitman asking that she refrain from transferring the National Ombudsman office. Eighteen Congressional representatives have already submitted the same request to Whitman (see Afternoon November 27, 2001). [US Congress, 6/25/2002] Entity Tags: Christine Todd Whitman January 10, 2002 EPA National Ombudsman Robert Martin and the Government Accountability Project (GAP) file a lawsuit challenging EPA Administrator Christie Whitmans plan to relocate the ombudsmans office to the EPA Office of Inspector General (OIG) (see Morning November 27, 2001). [Associated Press, 1/10/2002] Entity Tags: Robert J. Martin, Christine Todd Whitman, Government Accountability Project (GAP) January 11, 2002 US Federal District Court Judge Richard W. Roberts issues a temporary restraining order preventing EPA Administrator Christie Whitman from implementing a plan (see Morning November 27, 2001) to transfer the ombudsmans office and investigative files to the EPAs Office of Inspector General (OIG). The restraining order will expire in early April (see April 6, 2002). [Salon, 1/14/2002; US Congress, 6/25/2002] Entity Tags: Richard W. Roberts, Christine Todd Whitman April 12, 2002 US District Judge Richard W. Roberts vacates a temporary restraining order (see January 11, 2002) against the EPA, which had prevented the agency from transferring the function of the EPAs national ombudsman to the Office of Inspector General (OIG) (see Morning November 27, 2001). The case is referred to the United States Office of Special Counsel. Within hours, EPA Administrator Christie Todd Whitman and the EPA Office of Inspector General move to implement the planned changes (see Morning November 27, 2001) to the EPA National Ombudsman office. [US Congress, 6/25/2002] Entity Tags: EPA Office of Inspector General (OIG), Christine Todd Whitman, Richard W. Roberts April 22, 2002 On Earth Day, Robert Martin resigns from his position as the EPA national ombudsman in protest of the EPAs decision to curb his autonomy by placing his office under the jurisdiction of the EPA Office of Inspector General (OIG). Martin believes EPA administrator Christie Todd Whitmans decision to relocate jurisdiction of the office was caused by Martins criticisms (and those of his chief investigator, Hugh Kaufman) of her potential conflicts of interest in respect to a Denver Superfund Site, the Marjol Battery site in Throop, PA, and his criticism of the EPAs response to environmental consequences following the World Trade Center attack in Lower Manhattan. In his letter of resignation, Martin accuses the EPA of concealing data regarding WTC toxic substances from residents, workers, and students in Lower Manhattan. [US Congress, 6/25/2002; Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 4/23/2002] Entity Tags: Christine Todd Whitman, Hugh Kaufman, Robert J. Martin
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
[Register]
|