See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Was the NIST Proof of Structural Damage to WTC 7 Photoshopped?
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/June2004WT ... Fire&CollapseAnalysisPrint.pdf
Published: Sep 15, 2006
Author: honway
Post Date: 2006-09-15 22:23:46 by honway
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 7756
Comments: 30
The FEMA Performance Study Group was the first formal investigation of the collapse of the World Trade Center Buildings. From the FEMA Report, Chapter 5: Years later, after independent investigators were focusing on the WTC 7 collapse, the NIST released the photo below as photographic proof there was significant structural damage to WTC 7. Since there was only one photo released, I thought that was odd. Please note that the damage to the southwest corner in the NIST released photo above is not consistent with the damage in the photo below. Note the two floors with smoke damage on the southwest corner, floors 29 and 30, in the photo above. Count down 15 floors below foor 29. That corner is missing in the NIST photo submitted as the proof there was significant structural damage to WTC 7 as a result of the collapse of the North Tower.
"According to the account of a firefighter who walked the 9th floor along the south side following the collapse of WTC 1, the only damage to the 9th floor facade occurred at the southwest corner."(emphasis added)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 29.
#21. To: honway (#0)
Why isn't anything ever mentioned about the damage to WTC 3, 4, 5, and 6 when NONE of them had total collapse - yet ALL of them sustained HUGE damage compared to 7???? So much for fires and pancaking!!! BULLSHIT, and we all know it!!!!
wow, i missed those first time around. excellent post.
#30. To: christine (#29)
All our hard work finding and posting in our 911 section at 4UM. You better brush up and go through our archives. There is some good stuff there. I'm very disappointed in you. WINK-WINK.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
WTC 3 after damage from collapse of Towers 1 and 2 
WTC 4. The fires in 4 were apparently HUGE compared to 1, 2, or 7 
Fires in WTC 5. Obviously much more intense than 1, 2, or 7 
Overhead view of buildings 5 and 6 showing huge holes caused by falling debris from 1 and 2 
Buildings 5 and 6 after collapses of 1 and 2
#29. To: innieway, Kamala (#21)
Replies to Comment # 29.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 29.