See other Religion Articles
Title: Americans are finally quizzing religious right's influence
Source:
houston chronicle
URL Source: http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/features/3127498
Published: Apr 12, 2005
Author: LEONARD PITTS JR.
Post Date: 2005-04-12 15:45:57 by hfrancis
Keywords: Americans, religious, influence
Views: 78
Comments: 6
It was about 25 years ago that a magazine article first called to my attention something called the Christian right. The story depicted a movement of religious fundamentalists who sought to restructure radically American life — mandating school prayer, creationism, censorship. I remember thinking the article was a little alarmist. ADVERTISEMENT Actually, it was prescient. That realization crept over me much as Christian fundamentalism has crept over American life: steadily. The movement — well-organized, well-funded and with true believer zeal — has made itself the primary ideological engine of the Republican Party, climbing to power from school boards to state legislatures to Congress to the White House. And along the way, books were burned and banned. Religion masquerading as science elbowed its way into classrooms. Legislation requiring recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance became law. Pharmacists, citing religious objections, refused to fill prescriptions for birth-control pills. A lawmaker suggested unmarried pregnant women be prohibited from teaching in schools. And that movement came to seem a scary thing, indeed. So you will understand the sense of disconnect I felt upon the release of a new Gallup Poll that suggests that people are becoming a little concerned about the power of the Christian right. The proximate cause of this ripple of anxiety — and it is, statistically speaking, only that — is the fight over removal of Terri Schiavo's feeding tube. The poll found that, by large margins, Americans disapproved of the way Congress and the president intruded upon the ordeal of that brain-damaged Florida woman and her family. Pollsters also found that Americans believe the GOP — the party of nonintrusive government — is more likely than the folks across the aisle to interfere in citizens' private lives. And 39 percent of us now say the religious right has too much influence over the Bush administration; 18 percent believe it has too little. As I said, a ripple. Thirty-nine percent is not exactly a majority. And for the record, another 39 percent think the Christian right has just the right amount of influence. Still, as USA Today points out, the new numbers represent a change from previous polls in which roughly equal numbers thought conservative Christians wielded too much power or too little. Now "too much" leads "too little" by two to one. I choose to believe it means people are beginning to have their doubts about the new American theocracy. Maybe they are looking at the theocracies of the Middle East and Africa and asking if these are really models to which we should aspire. Maybe they're realizing that for all its pious moralizing, the fundamentalist movement is less about right than self-righteousness, less about faith than intrusion and less about God than power. Yes, this is, as the fundamentalists are fond of saying, a Christian nation. Thing is, it's also a Jewish, Muslim, atheist, Hispanic and gay nation. The only way that works is if we inculcate respect for difference and, more to the point, respect for the laws and customs that protect difference. The Schiavo case offered an up-close and unpretty look at the sort of respect fundamentalists have for difference, in this case difference of opinion. And it wasn't hard to imagine yourself in the position of Schiavo's husband, making a hard, painful and private decision no one should ever be asked to make, only to find yourself intruded upon by an army of religious zealots eager to substitute their judgment for yours. And a government breaking its own rules to empower them. So a few more of us are wondering, worrying and saying, "Hey, wait a minute." I have just one question for them: What took you so long? lpitts@herald.com LEONARD PITTS JR. Miami Herald 1 Herald Plaza Miami, FL 33132
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: hfrancis (#0)
In my opinion, any group that seeks to impose its' religious beliefs upon the general population by means of legislation or by means of the sword is a dangerous cult. The founding fathers decided to keep religion out government because they had direct experience with medeival, superstitious, power hungry, religious nuts seeking to destroy the enlightenment and bring back the dark ages. They forsaw these types trying to establish a state religion.
The ACLU has more power to get their agenda's passed than the Christian right. Bout time the Christians started standing up for what they believe in which is their right if you didn't know.
Sounds like you've been listening to Rush: Strong statement. Inflamatory statement. And not a shred of fact to back it up. Raw opinion to tickle the heartstrings of the goobs who desperately wants to believe they're poor downtrodden victims. Bout time the Christians started standing up for what they believe in which is their right if you didn't know. Christians, and all other faiths, are free to believe anything they want. They are not free to force others to follow their beliefs. This is where the Fundamentalist Christians, the Fudamentalist Muslims, the Scientologists and the Mahara Ji cults get confused. If you want to pass laws to promote your religion, you're precisely the sort of cult that the founding fathers inserted the First Amendment to stop.
lock them all up in an arena with 50pound sacks of manure have the have a go at each other, solve their differences.
"Sounds like you've been listening to Rush: Strong statement. Inflamatory statement. And not a shred of fact to back it up." I don't listen to Rush but you're looney if you don't believe the ACLU doesn't have more power than any religious group. They have been able to get most of anything religious, things like the 10 commandments, nativity scenes moved out of public schools and government offices. There's your shred. "They are not free to force others to follow their beliefs." Of course their not free to do so nor can they. "A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still." You don't try to convince people to your opinion when you talk to somebody? Same thing. Maybe your just not man enough to be able to handle anybody elses views no matter what they are. Your anger is obvious. Why the anger? "If you want to pass laws to promote your religion." Nowhere in my previous post did I say ANYTHING about me wanting to pass laws promoting my religion. It's against the Constitution. I was just standing up for the rights of the Christians to speak their opinions freely. My bet is that you would take that right away from any religious people. Furthermore, my guess is you would do more than that.
The story depicted a movement of religious fundamentalists who sought to restructure radically American life — mandating school prayer, creationism, censorship. I remember thinking the article was a little alarmist.
#2. To: hfrancis (#0)
#3. To: crack monkey (#1)
#4. To: jwh_Denver (#3)
The ACLU has more power to get their agenda's passed than the Christian right.
#5. To: crack monkey (#4)
Fundamentalist Christians, the Fudamentalist Muslims, the Scientologists and the Mahara Ji
#6. To: crack monkey (#4)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest