4um: 911 Mysteries - DEMOLITIONS Video Part 1-3. No one could watch these and not be convinced that the WTC towers were brought down with EXPLOSIVES and that 911 is an INSIDE JOB

[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Title: 911 Mysteries - DEMOLITIONS Video Part 1-3. No one could watch these and not be convinced that the WTC towers were brought down with EXPLOSIVES and that 911 is an INSIDE JOB
Source: Google Video
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 17, 2006
Author: none
Post Date: 2006-09-17 11:06:49 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 5172
Comments: 86

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Poster Comment: The DVD can be purchased in quantity for low bulk rates here: http://www.911weknow.com/

Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 46.

#2. To: *9-11* (#0)

Watching Part 1 now, looks very good.

robin posted on 2006-09-17 11:30:35 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#6. To: All (#2)

"What happened to the core?"

robin posted on 2006-09-17 12:42:18 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#9. To: All (#6)

and what about all those squibs going off in advance of the falling building, insuring a freefall time?

pancaking it should have taken over 90 seconds, not 9.

robin posted on 2006-09-17 13:02:38 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#16. To: robin (#9)

pancaking it should have taken over 90 seconds, not 9.

Check this out, my lady. I recall reading somewhere that what ultimately convinced Prof. Steve Jones of the impossibility of the official story of the collapse, was precisely this sort of quantitative study of the amount of energy required for the Towers to collapse in the time they did and in the manner they did.

Peetie Wheatstraw posted on 2006-09-17 14:14:59 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#17. To: Peetie Wheatstraw (#16)

And the floors went around the core.

Where's the steel core?

robin posted on 2006-09-17 14:17:05 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#20. To: robin (#17)

And the floors went around the core.
Where's the steel core?

That's a question they always fudge on the government side, isn't it? Even if we accept the government contention, repeated ad nauseam by 911 Truth opponents as though it were a magic charm, that "steel loses half its strength at X degrees," how could the entire core have been heated to that temperature by fires, however intense, on some upper floors? From what I understand, there was a longer lasting fire that was at least as intense on a lower floor or floors in WTC 1 in 1975, and yet the core wasn't "weakened" so that the thing came down like a house of cards, was it?

Now that I'm on a "roll" :P....what about the 1993 WTC explosions? How much energy was released in that explosion or explosions compared to the maximum amount that could have been released by the impact of the planes and subsequent fires? (Gee, I wish I had taken more than one physics class...! They had a one year math and science requirement at Columbia but I just took "Calculus A"---or as we called it, "Dummy Calculus"---and Physics 101---or as we called it, "Poets' Physics"...:P)

Peetie Wheatstraw posted on 2006-09-17 14:29:28 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#38. To: Peetie Wheatstraw (#20)

what about the 1993 WTC explosions? How much energy was released in that explosion or explosions compared to the maximum amount that could have been released by the impact of the planes and subsequent fires?

I have been trying to find the "flame speed" for kerosene in what would have been it's partially atomized state after inpact just to compare it to the flame speed of TNT, wich the believers of the Official Fairy Tale ™ like to relate as being comparable to X number of tons of TNT.

The flame speed of a TNT explosion is 27,000 feet per second. I highly doubt that atomized kerosene comes withing 5% of that.

I searched and searched with google but haven't found anything on kerosene flame speed. Gasoline, yes, kerosene, no.

Critter posted on 2006-09-17 22:40:46 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#46. To: Critter (#38)

Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse?
"Controlled demolition would have required unimpeded access to the WTC, access to explosives, avoiding detection, and the expertise to orchestrate the deadly destruction from a nearby secure location. Such access before 9/11 likely depended on complicity by one or more WTC security companies. These companies focus on "access control" and as security specialist Wayne Black says, "When you have a security contract, you know the inner workings of everything." Stratesec, a now-defunct company that had security contracts at the World Trade Center and Dulles International Airport, should be investigated, among others, because of the strange coincidence that President Bush’s brother, Marvin P. Bush, and his cousin, Wirt D. Walker III, were principals in the company, with Walker acting as CEO from 1999 until January 2002 and Marvin reportedly in New York on 9/11. At least one report claims that a "power down" condition prevailed on September 8–9 (pdf, p. 45) at WTC to complete a "cabling upgrade," presenting an opportunity to plant explosives with low risk of detection."

Uncle Bill posted on 2006-09-18 0:25:38 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

Replies to Comment # 46.

#49. To: Uncle Bill (#46)

Everyone should also remember that there were crews in for the previous 3 to 4 months working on the alleged sprinkler systems, which is why they all seemingly and mysteriously failed to work.

TommyTheMadArtist posted on 2006-09-18 00:39:59 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

End Trace Mode for Comment # 46.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]