4um: 911 Mysteries - DEMOLITIONS Video Part 1-3. No one could watch these and not be convinced that the WTC towers were brought down with EXPLOSIVES and that 911 is an INSIDE JOB

[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Title: 911 Mysteries - DEMOLITIONS Video Part 1-3. No one could watch these and not be convinced that the WTC towers were brought down with EXPLOSIVES and that 911 is an INSIDE JOB
Source: Google Video
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 17, 2006
Author: none
Post Date: 2006-09-17 11:06:49 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 5210
Comments: 86

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Poster Comment: The DVD can be purchased in quantity for low bulk rates here: http://www.911weknow.com/

Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 57.

#36. To: christine, Honway, Uncle Bill (#0)

I just got to the part in Part3 where they discuss Marvin Bush and his security company, and I just now, for the first time, learned that they had performed 8 million dollars worth of security work in the WTC between 1996 and 2000.

I used to work for a company on Long Island and I had done work for companies in the WTC in the 80s. My old boss related a story to me sometime in 1995 or 96 I think, about how he lost the contract to do that work. It didn't make sense to him at the time, or to me, but now maybe it makes a little more sense.

He said that sometime during the process of finalizing agreements, he said to whomever he was working with at the Port Auhthority, something like, "Have your girl send it over..." or something like that, but he used the word girl referring to the guy's secretary.

The guy took huge offense to that, and my old boss blamed that on his not getting that contract. He's passed away in the mean time, but I am going to call his son tomorrow to get more info, like, how far along were they in the process? Did they win the bid and lose it? Stuff like that.

I would have run that job for them on a per diem, that's why we were discussing it. I had left Long Island to move to CT in 1986, but had stayed in touch with them.

This guy was very well connected in NYC. He handled a lot of specialized projects for Merill Lynch, Chemical Bank, Eastern Airlines, TWA, a couple of Israeli Banks, Bank Hapolim and Bank Leume(sp?), we did work for the Port Authority... he was connected with all sorts of retired FBI, CIA, Military people, working as security directors for all these places. He was IN with them, bigtime. And he losed an 8 million dollar job for saying "girl"?

We did things that nobody did at the time, or I should say, I did them, because he would tell them it could be done, and then come to me and say, we have to do this. LMAO!!! I made shit you wouldn't believe. In fact, I credit myself for making the first through the door video/intercom system ever. We unveiled it a security show in NY sometime around 1982. I made it AFTER he told Bank Hapolim that we could do it. lol.

Now I can't say that what happened to him is any kind of bombshell, because this started in 1996 and ended, it seems, even before Bush took office, but...

Wow, this is messed up. lol

Critter posted on 2006-09-17 22:32:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#45. To: Critter (#36)

Also interesting during that segment was the cousin of Bush.

Uncle Bill posted on 2006-09-18 0:16:33 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#47. To: Uncle Bill (#45)

Also interesting during that segment was the cousin of Bush.

All in the family. hehehe

Critter posted on 2006-09-18 0:28:36 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#51. To: Critter (#47)

"Petition for Relief Under Chapter 11 - On December 27, 2002 the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Commander Aircraft Company (the “Debtor”) filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the federal bankruptcy laws in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Under Chapter 11, certain claims against the Debtor in existence prior to the filing of the petitions for relief under the federal bankruptcy laws are stayed while the Debtor continues business operations as Debtor-in-possession. These claims are reflected in the June 30, 2004, 2004 balance sheet as “liabilities subject to compromise.” Claims secured against the Debtor’s assets (“secured claims”) also are stayed, although the holders of such claims have the right to move the court for relief from the stay. Secured claims are secured primarily by liens on the Debtor’s property, plant and equipment. Refer to the Company's most recent annual report on Form 10-KSB."

What are friends for

MARVIN BUSH EMPLOYEE'S MYSTERIOUS DEATH – Connections to 9/11
"A Houston businessman who worked closely with the Bush family over the years confided that Marvin Bush and Wirt Walker appear to have taken over the Saudi real estate investment and aircraft brokerage business once run out of Texas by Houston-based James Bath in association with Salem bin Laden, the late brother of Osama bin Laden, and Khalid bin Mahfouz. The source, who has dealt personally with the Bush family in Houston for a number of years, said there should be skepticism when looking at bizarre deaths like that of Champagne. The source speculated that Champagne might have happened upon some sensitive information the Bush family wanted kept secret.

Some observers wondered if Secret Service agents might have been able to assist Champagne when her car pinned her. According to the Secret Service in Washington, the agency only provides protection to presidential siblings if an Executive Order authorizes such action. A Secret Service spokesperson emphasized there is no current Secret Service protection for Marvin Bush. However, there remains a question why private security agents posted at the Bush compound could not have responded to Champagne's distress.

There are also questions concerning Champagne's actual place of residence. According to the Post story, Bush told police that Champagne resided at their compound, However, a phone call to the directory-listed residence of Bertha Champagne in Franconia, Virginia resulted in Mrs. Champagne's son answering the phone. He confirmed that his mother lived at the Franconia address but he was clearly uncomfortable and nervous in talking to the media about the circumstances surrounding his mother's death.

The Clinotn's and the Bush's = DEATH

Uncle Bill posted on 2006-09-18 0:48:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#55. To: Uncle Bill (#51)

Getting closer:

STRATESEC INC: Fails to Meet AMEX Continued Listing Guidelines

From: IBL Troubled Company Reprter

They were in SERIOUS trouble in 2003:

http://www.secinfo.com/dS7kv.2s.h tm#f2v

The Company is in litigation on two material lawsuits. The first is American Express versus STRATESEC, for non-payment in the amount of $556,449. The Company is challenging the amount owed. The second lawsuit is Frito-Lay versus STRATESEC for return of funds paid to STRATESEC on a terminated contract in the amount of $98,000. In addition, there is a judgment against the Company for $90,000 for non-payment to a subcontractor. The lawsuit was filed by Minority Contractors of Dallas, Texas. As of December 31, 2002, The Company has accrued $744,449 for settlement of these matters and approximately $8,000 for related legal fees

Critter posted on 2006-09-18 1:44:41 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

#57. To: Uncle Bill, All (#55)

CHANTILLY, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 4, 2002

STRATESEC Incorporated (AMEX:SFT) announced that it has redeemed and retired 2 million of its outstanding shares of common stock.

This reduces the company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock from 10.4 million shares to 8.4 million shares. The 2 million retired shares had been issued to Kamran Hashemi in connection with the STRATESEC, Incorporated merger with Security System Integration in December of 2000. By mutual agreement, Mr. Hashemi has terminated his affiliation with STRATESEC, Incorporated and returned the shares issued to him in return for which the company has dropped its claims against him pursuant to the merger agreement

Critter posted on 2006-09-18 1:56:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

Replies to Comment # 57.

#58. To: Uncle Bill, all (#57)

From the sales pitch to Stratesec shareholders for the acquisition of SSI:

SSI has in place contract vehicles with the federal government that allow it to provide systems and services to the government without having to go through a complete competition. These include a blanket contract with the General Services Agency (GSA) and a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) with the Army. Each of these open-ended contracts can be used by any government agency wishing to do business with SSI. As a result, the marketing and sales efforts of SSI are considerably less than would be necessary if the entire competition cycle had to be completed for every sale. SSI relies principally on its CEO and Project Engineers and Project Managers to market and sell its systems and services.

The principal clients of SSI are the United States Army, Air Force and Navy as well as the Department of Justice. SSI has completed more than 60 systems for its clients since mid-1998. The Army accounted for over 50% of its sales for the year 2000.

There are very few security system integrators doing business with the government that offer the full range of services and geographical coverage offered by SSI. Typically, there will be from one to five competitors on the projects on which SSI is bidding. There is no single dominant provider of the types of services that SSI provides to the government. One of the barriers to entry in this market is the requirement to be able to provide classified systems to the government. To provide classified systems the company must have personnel with the proper security clearances and the company's facility must be cleared by the appropriate agencies to protect sensitive information about the government systems. Due to the high demand for cleared personnel, the schedule for the government to do the appropriate investigations and grant clearances is several months long.

Isn't it grand to find that an Iranian national (maybe) has this unique arrangement with the US gov't and military to perform these non bid projects for millions of dollars. I wonder why Stratesec acquired SSI the year before 9/11 and terminated their relationship with Hashemi a year after 9/11?

Critter posted on 2006-09-18 02:09:42 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply

End Trace Mode for Comment # 57.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]