See other 9/11 Articles
Title: The Pentagon After 9/11 : If You Have Eyes, You Can See There Was No Jetliner
Source:
www.brasscheck.com
URL Source: http://www.brasscheck.com/videos/911/911pentagon.html
Published: Sep 17, 2006
Author: brasscheck.com
Post Date: 2006-09-17 13:39:58 by Mind_Virus
Keywords: None
Views: 418
Comments: 15
The Pentagon After 9/11 If You Have Eyes, You Can See There Was No Jetliner A picture I bet you've never seen before Where's the plane? No video this time, no long article either. None needed. When you see the Pentagon from this angle (a vantage I bet you've never seen before), the reality of the situation is undeniable. Whatever caused this section of the Pentagon to explode and catch fire was not a passenger jetliner. That's why you've seen photos of the Pentagon from every conceivable angle - except this one which lets you see what actually happened, and what didn't happen.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Mind_Virus (#0)
i've not seen a passenger jetliner in any photo or video from any angle of the Pentagon !
This is a considerable amount of damage to a building that was very sturdy, made of solid concrete. Just like with the Towers, I wonder if an energy study could be done of this damage. That is to say, could the impact and explosion of Flight 77 (if it had the weight, dimensions and fuel load, and were travelling at the speed on impact as in the official narrative) have supplied the quantum of energy sufficient to have caused the damage we see in this photo? If that quantum---even given the most generous assumptions about fuel load and speed at impact---is still too low to have allowed whatever impacted the Pentagon to punch through not just one but several rings of the Pentagon and to have vaporized the aircraft, then 9/11 Truth has a proof refuting the government account worth far more than what conflicting eyewitness accounts, doctored photos, and blurred videos can supply, IMHO.
I've seen this pic before. Except it wasn't cropped and it shows a mass of jumbled metal on the ground (outlined with red). This was taken I don't know how many days after 9/11. "We shall have world government whether or not you like it - by conquest or consent." - International financier and CFR member James Warburg Feb. 7, 1950
Here's a close-up of the cropped part. Is that luggage in there? "We shall have world government whether or not you like it - by conquest or consent." - International financier and CFR member James Warburg Feb. 7, 1950
It looks way big to be luggage to me...doesn't nearly everyone have black poly type luggage these days? It would have melted into little crispy-critters, seems to me. Look how much bigger that "stuff" is than the people standing around there. I heard yesterday that the strike occurred in the area that accountant types were working on trying to find the missing $2.3 - $2.6 trillion that Rummie copped to on 9.10.01.
I was joking about the luggage. The first line in the article from Brasscheck is "A picture I bet you've never seen before". But this is obviously from days after 911 and it has been cropped at that. In the close-up you see a group of hard hat topped white jumpsuit wearing dudes standing around some pile of debris they seem to be piling in that spot. That one guy sitting on one of those little tractors. The pile could be burned office junk or plane parts. Who knows. The article purports that this picture is some kind of evidence that there is no plane but I think it's crap!
"We shall have world government whether or not you like it - by conquest or consent." - International financier and CFR member James Warburg Feb. 7, 1950
Why is that rubble pile in that location, maybe 10 meters to the left of the impact area? (There appears to be a small lift truck working the pile---what's it doing?) Has it ever been identified as the remains of Fl. 77 to your knowledge? Or whatever it was that hit the Pentagon....
i don't see luggage or seats or anything else i could ID as a passenger jetliner.
I wonder what (if any) forensic tests were conducted on the material in that pile. I'm not holding my breath for the answer, because I doubt they would have been using that lift truck I see in the photo to move it around if they were treating it as forensic evidence....
AA 77 did it.
more pics at this site. Has anyone seen this? I can see the Ariel path marker, but I cannot see the Masonic all seeing eye. Can anyone else? pic from September 10, one day before.... ".....In this Image we can see an Ariel path marker in the grass. It is not easily seen on the ground but I am still looking for some ground pictures to back up this satellite picture. However it is a very compelling picture as the Masonic all seeing eye is visible here. The actual bottom part of the eye points at the impact point on the pentagon wall and in the approximate flight path that the object that hit the Pentagon took. What does this mean, well in Illuminati Symbology terms it is like a calling card I would say. Further if what we are seeing here is real then it gives credibility to the fact that the so called Terrorists were Patsies and this Ariel marking pattern may have been used to mark the impact point from the air where the pilot or object was suppose to hit the Pentagon. Those who do not know who and what the Illuminati are, I suggest that you download and watch David Icke's Lecture on the Illuminati. For two years I have been searching for a picture that would confirm the Satalite image and today a nice fellow found one and sent it too me. I find it amazing how blurred out the pics were. You can see the path marker and the outline of the eye as well, if you look closely enough! See part of the problem was that they covered up the grass with dirt and stones so fast that there were so few pictures available of the Grass as shown bellow...." "...Now this is important as we will see later there were some light poles knocked down and there is some discussion about the credibility aspects of the poles being knocked down. For now just realize that flight path matches the Ariel path marker, the All Seeing Eye embedded on the lawn...."
How about someone with a lot of money building a scale model of the Pentagon, or at least part of it, using the same materials as the original building? Then construct a scale model plane with the correct weight, dimensions and fuel load. Launch the sucker at the building at the exact velocity and angle, and see what happens. Mystery solved.
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
You are showing yourself to be completely ignorant by keep this fantasy of yours going. Learn some science and stop making a public fool of yourself.
God is always good! Personal attacks are meaningless. Show us eyewitnesses that saw whatever it was that hit the Pentagon, at least 25 that agree. Can you do that??? I doubt it. Print out their names and accounts for us to see. That seems fair.
Looks like the Murrah Building to me.
#2. To: Mind_Virus (#0)
#3. To: Mind_Virus (#0)
#4. To: Mind_Virus, lodwick, christine, Peetie Wheatstraw (#0)
A picture I bet you've never seen before
#5. To: All (#4)
#6. To: j.sulli (#5)
#7. To: lodwick (#6)
#8. To: j.sulli (#4)
#9. To: j.sulli (#5)
#10. To: christine (#9)
i don't see luggage or seats or anything else i could ID as a passenger jetliner.
#11. To: Mind_Virus (#0)
Whatever caused this section of the Pentagon to explode and catch fire was not a passenger jetliner.
#12. To: Mind_Virus, lodwick, christine, All (#0)
#13. To: Peetie Wheatstraw (#3)
I wonder if an energy study could be done of this damage. That is to say, could the impact and explosion of Flight 77 (if it had the weight, dimensions and fuel load, and were travelling at the speed on impact as in the official narrative)
#14. To: Cynicom (#11)
AA 77 did it.
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]
#15. To: RickyJ (#14)
Learn some science and stop making a public fool of yourself.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest