See other 9/11 Articles
Title: The Pentagon After 9/11 : If You Have Eyes, You Can See There Was No Jetliner
Source:
www.brasscheck.com
URL Source: http://www.brasscheck.com/videos/911/911pentagon.html
Published: Sep 17, 2006
Author: brasscheck.com
Post Date: 2006-09-17 13:39:58 by Mind_Virus
Keywords: None
Views: 448
Comments: 15
The Pentagon After 9/11 If You Have Eyes, You Can See There Was No Jetliner A picture I bet you've never seen before Where's the plane? No video this time, no long article either. None needed. When you see the Pentagon from this angle (a vantage I bet you've never seen before), the reality of the situation is undeniable. Whatever caused this section of the Pentagon to explode and catch fire was not a passenger jetliner. That's why you've seen photos of the Pentagon from every conceivable angle - except this one which lets you see what actually happened, and what didn't happen.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13.
#3. To: Mind_Virus (#0)
This is a considerable amount of damage to a building that was very sturdy, made of solid concrete. Just like with the Towers, I wonder if an energy study could be done of this damage. That is to say, could the impact and explosion of Flight 77 (if it had the weight, dimensions and fuel load, and were travelling at the speed on impact as in the official narrative) have supplied the quantum of energy sufficient to have caused the damage we see in this photo? If that quantum---even given the most generous assumptions about fuel load and speed at impact---is still too low to have allowed whatever impacted the Pentagon to punch through not just one but several rings of the Pentagon and to have vaporized the aircraft, then 9/11 Truth has a proof refuting the government account worth far more than what conflicting eyewitness accounts, doctored photos, and blurred videos can supply, IMHO.
How about someone with a lot of money building a scale model of the Pentagon, or at least part of it, using the same materials as the original building? Then construct a scale model plane with the correct weight, dimensions and fuel load. Launch the sucker at the building at the exact velocity and angle, and see what happens. Mystery solved.
There are no replies to Comment # 13. End Trace Mode for Comment # 13.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#13. To: Peetie Wheatstraw (#3)
I wonder if an energy study could be done of this damage. That is to say, could the impact and explosion of Flight 77 (if it had the weight, dimensions and fuel load, and were travelling at the speed on impact as in the official narrative)
Replies to Comment # 13.