See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Bush Tacitly Implies WTC Controlled Demolition?
Source:
http://www.prisonplanet.com
URL Source: http://www.prisonplanet.com/article ... mber2006/180906bushimplies.htm
Published: Sep 18, 2006
Author: PJ Watson
Post Date: 2006-09-18 14:51:14 by Kamala
Ping List: *Alex Jones*
Keywords: None
Views: 472
Comments: 42
Bush Tacitly Implies WTC Controlled Demolition? Makes strange 'explosives in U.S. buildings' reference during torture speech Friday Paul Joseph Watson/Prison http://Planet.com | September 18 2006 During his speech Friday in which the President argued for the gutting of the Geneva convention and the legal classification of torture, Bush made a strange comment about explosives and their placement in U.S. buildings. Was this a tacit admission of 9/11 controlled demolition? Here's the quote in full from the White House website. "For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out." "That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high -- a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping." Click here for the audio. The onset of both towers' collapse began at high points in the buildings. Is Bush implying planted incendiary devices were responsible for their destruction? Comments on the meaning of what Bush said varied on the 911 Blogger website. "There is no way to spin this around to say, "yeah, we knew all along that there were explosives in those buildings." But I'd sure like to see him try it! Imagine all the left gatekeepers who have openly scoffed at the "bombs brought down the towers" theory, suddenly trying to come back around to support the new government spin!" "I think Bush is being set up to take the fall for 911," writes one, fearing Bush will be used as a higher level patsy to placate the burgeoning 9/11 truth movement. Ben Fountain and Scott Forbes, who both worked in the twin towers, are on the record as saying that there were numerous evacuations and power-downs of the twin towers in the weeks leading up to the attack - more so than would be usually expected for a high profile building. "How could they let this happen? They knew this building was a target. Over the past few weeks we'd been evacuated a number of times, which is unusual. I think they had an inkling something was going on," Fountain told People Magazine. In an online interview, Forbes said that the power down which took place the weekend before the attack was "unprecedented" and required a shutdown of the top 50 floors of the south tower - the reason for the shutdown was given as "re-cabling." "The power outage meant that many of the 'ordinary' building features were not operating, such as security locks on doors, cameras, lighting, etc." Forbes said the sight of strange men in overalls going in and out of the building with tools was highly unusual and that the "coincidence" of it occurring days before the attack was highly suspicious. There has been some speculation within the 9/11 truth movement that the evidence for controlled demolition having been used on both the towers and building 7 is so overwhelming that the government will eventually be forced to spin a whitewash and formulate a "limited hangout" that Al-Qaeda somehow managed to rig the buildings with explosives before the attack. In May 2002 the New York Daily News reported that Mohammed Atta was in Manhattan in the days before the attack and other outlets have also carried claims that the hijackers were in the twin towers asking directions and casing their target before September 11. Forbes is adamant that the "men in overalls" performing "re-cabling" operations were ethnically diverse and by no means largely Arab as would have to be the case if the government went with this story. Though Bush's quote is certainly interesting it is unlikely to represent an entree into a change of tack whereby the government admits controlled demolition but then pins the blame on its erstwhile patsies. To concede such gargantuan ground would undo the work of several massively funded government studies as well as the 9/11 Commission and it would only undermine further the credibility of the entire official story. The hubris and arrogance of the Bush administration ensures it does not do 'retractions' and you won't see one here. The survival of the official lie depends solely on its constant repetition and any deviation from that mould would result in catastrophe for the collaborators and conspirators who carried out 9/11. COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Kamala (#0)
"That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high -- a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping." So is he saying that this information was tortured out of the guy? Why then, dispute the claims of explosions?
If we were really at war, the borders would be closed.
Yeah, that was the plan should they be found out, imo. However, junior leads to cheney and he to the others. Gonna be quite the house of cards a crumblin. Look out below...stay outta the way.
Plenty of evidence to suggest the buildings were wired at the bottom...
The words "scorched earth" come to mind. If these guys were ever exposed and an enraged public suddenly started demanding heads, well, things would get ugly in a hurry.
"First I'm gonna bother everybody I meet, and then I'll probably go home and get drunk."
Bwahahahahahahahahaha!!!! This is just too good!!!! "Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high -- a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping." This may be the first time Bush has told the truth as a politician. He must be scared, or is sending a message to them.
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Trying to get ahead of the public knowledge curve, by planting the idea that the explosives were planted by al-Qaeda. That explosives were used is a foregone conclusion. All they have left are lies about WHO.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers I wonder if people are dying in record numbers as happened to people around the Kennedy assassination plot did? Bet you the figuring out that explosives caused this disaster means death to people who know too much. When it is a question of protecting the right necks, they are always willing to unprotected others that might know too much and be a danger to people in power. They don't just kill the revolutionaries after a successful revolution to get rid of troublemakers, they off assassins and their enablers too.
My guess is they have already been dealt with, barring the inner-circle; if they begin to suspect each other, it could get interesting.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers I'd like to see Bush go hunting with Cheney. Bush can bring the bottle, Cheney the firearms. I would only hope some innocent pheasants don't get in the line of fire.
Bush was really angry on Friday. Sometimes people act impulsively when they're really angry.
Katrina was America's Chernobyl.
lol! "If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers No, he's spinning. He knows we now know w/o a doubt that explosives were used. He cannot stop the truth of that, but he can LIE ABOUT WHO PLANTED THE EXPLOSIVES. That's all they've got now.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers Except he doesn't drive the train, he is in the caboose with a make believe throttle and brake. He is likely angry and hyped up about something that is going to be happening soon he knows is in the process of going down. He wasn't flown around after the 9-11 attacks to protect him from terrorists, it was to protect him until he was emotionally and verbally able to handle himself in public. If he had been in charge, he would have stormed out of that classroom photo opportunity. But he was supposed to present a picture of normalcy, and was to keep out of the big boy's way as they cooked false flag operations.
I like your "vibe" theory. I just wish it didn't look like it's about to be tested.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers Wrong. They have the finishing false flag ops to pull and a Martial law round- up to preform. An operation people like Watson and Jones and many others will die during the commission of it somehow. The scary thing is, they actually have another option. The question is, will they spring this option prematurely? Doubtful, as they need a good cover story for the round-up to sell the dumbest and most compliant ones left out of the mass arrests.
Oh, well of course they've always got the FEMA gulags, and yet another "Pearl Harbor event". Which, IMO, would be really stupid, but then, there it is.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers It must have been a shot across someone's bow. I posted here some time ago and at LP that Rumsfeld stated the damage to the Pentagon was done by missiles. I know he has stated that at least twice, maybe three times. The games they play. The tyranny they promote.
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
It's still on DoD website, I've posted that quote a few times too. In fact again quite recently. He's losing it.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers You know, the more I look at that T-shirt and watch his "Roast Garden" performance on Friday, I wonder if he's afraid they might try plan 'C'. Food tasters can only do so much.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers "He cannot stop the truth of that, but he can LIE ABOUT WHO PLANTED THE EXPLOSIVES." That's what I'm thinking too. Our answer should be Marvin Bush, Marvin Bush, Marvin Bush,......... If anybody here thinks that a bunch of terrorists just waltzed into the trade center towers and spent weeks planting the explosives I got news for them. No, it was the government doing it, or letting someone do it. If Larry Silverstein had a brain, he would be long gone by now with his traitorous billions. 8-)
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
They wanted their cake and to eat it too. A random crash of a large jetliner in an uncontrolled fashion into the Pentagon would have jeopardized Rummy and others in on the false flag operations. So they destroyed both planes heading to D.C. and used a substitute for the plane slated to hit the Pentagon. That way the right people were kept safe, and the hardened portion of the Pentagon was surgically hit.
Oh yeah, I agree. He may have already picked out a plastic surgeon in SA.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers Larry Silverstein should be shoved from a helicopter at the physical space the WTC observation deck was. And this should be videotaped for the victim's families to enjoy.
Marvin Bush and the part 3 of the 3 part video christine posted yesterday covers the mysterious noises and odd goings on before 9/11 at WTC. The supposed, "internet cable upgrade" that required the electricity to be turned off the weekend before. Hmmm, now that's a first. Electricity in internet cables, wow.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers Great idea, we could do a simple free fall in a vacuum experiment for all the highschool physics students. (That is, he should fall slightly slower than his 3 buildings collapsed). The insistance on the double-insurance collection because his lawyers proved that 2 planes = 2 terrorist events, (not to mention obtaining terrorist insurance in July 2001), was really over the top.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers Yes it was. Especially since the asbestos clean-up bill was going to be over a billion in an expensive to operate building not likely to ever see close to full occupancy any time soon. He knew what he was doing. The Bush crime family got their Pearl Harbor/burn the Reichstag event, and Larry made some big and bloody bucks.
i doubt Silverstein is the least bit concerned.
I wonder if the Sears Tower in Chicago has similar financial problems as the WTC had? It would be interesting to see how expensive it is to operate, see what the occupancy is, and if there are any liabilities as bad as asbestos abatement work in it's future.
He knew what he was doing. The Bush crime family got their Pearl Harbor/burn the Reichstag event, and Larry made some big and bloody bucks. Yes, that extra billion will come in handy. Not to mention the cost of the demolition. Even still, I see Silverstein as a lesser player in this staged event. Happy to oblige the devious planners, and with no sense of guilt that cannot be washed away with all those greenbacks.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers Maybe not now, but as more sheeple catch on, he will be. And then we will watch them arrest and charge some innocent Muslims who will be blamed for planting the explosives. Larry will have a tough time explaining his part, however. Just too convenient, too many coincidences.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers In the article I posted yesterday, Jeff Wells tells us that in the Guardian transcript, they changed "the design of the planned attacks" to "the plane attacks". More from Jeff Wells' article: Before we rush to judgement, believing Bush is letting it slip that the towers were demolished, watch the video. Bush isn't riffing here; he isn't straying from the prepared text. His remarks were crafted with care. So why would he be given such lines, which could so easily be construed by 9/11 skeptics as an inadvertant admission of controlled demolition? Perhaps because, as I believe was Rumsfeld's intention when he "misspoke" of a "missile" striking the Pentagon the very week Thierry Meyssan launched his "no plane" website, that's precisely where they want our attention, whether or not demolition is a fact. (And it will only be our attention, as the corporate press either don't have the ears or the stomach for it.) So here's the scene: the White House invoking invisible man Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to excite our imagination with an oddly-worded statement strongly suggestive of demolition, when our attention would be better rewarded by considering Khalid himself, his service to the ISI and the ISI's service to US intelligence. But Bush will never be written the words to encourage such thoughts. We are being manipulated folks, and we've seen it before. I think this is a Rovian tactic.
"We shall have world government whether or not you like it - by conquest or consent." - International financier and CFR member James Warburg Feb. 7, 1950
The real hijackers
It's a hijacking and a coup.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers I agree, we are being manipulated. I do think Rumsfeld slipped at the time. But Smirk's reading the script, IMO.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers I'm concerned that might work.
Deniers Go Nuts As Bush Mentions Explosives In WTC
So am I. But since the govt lied to the goobers about 9/11 for this long, maybe even they will scratch their chins and wonder a second before swallowing that line, hook and sinker.
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers A confession is never more reliable than the confessor's command of the language. Does Bush ever really know what he is saying?
Aside from Marvin Bush ... there's Dov Zakheim. Dov Zakheim, former Comptroller for the Pentagon had been the International CEO for Systems Planning, a company that designs and manufactures remote control flight devices. Systems Planning has a subsidiary named "Tri-Data" that I am informed did the clean up of the first WTC Bombing ... [No matter what I ain't buying a bunch of arabs did it].
"eventus stultorum magister" Fools must be taught by experience
Comments (41 - 42) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest"For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out."
#2. To: Kamala (#0)
Bush will be used as a higher level patsy
#3. To: Kamala (#0)
#4. To: angle (#2)
However, junior leads to cheney and he to the others. Gonna be quite the house of cards a crumblin. Look out below...stay outta the way.
#5. To: Kamala (#0)
George W. Bush - SOURCE: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-2.html
#6. To: Uncle Bill (#5)
(Edited)
#7. To: Kamala (#0)
#8. To: robin (#7)
#9. To: Ferret Mike (#8)
#10. To: robin (#9)
"My guess is they have already been dealt with, barring the inner-circle; if they begin to suspect each other, it could get interesting."
#11. To: Uncle Bill (#5)
#12. To: Ferret Mike (#10)
I'd like to see Bush go hunting with Cheney. Bush can bring the bottle, Cheney the firearms. I would only hope some innocent pheasants don't get in the line of fire.
#13. To: Uncle Bill (#5)
#14. To: aristeides (#11)
"Bush was really angry on Friday. Sometimes people act impulsively when they're really angry."
#15. To: Ferret Mike (#14)
#16. To: robin, IndieTX (#13)
"He cannot stop the truth of that, but he can LIE ABOUT WHO PLANTED THE EXPLOSIVES. That's all they've got now."
#17. To: Ferret Mike (#16)
#18. To: aristeides (#11)
#19. To: Uncle Bill (#18)
#20. To: Ferret Mike (#12)
#21. To: robin (#13)
#22. To: Uncle Bill (#18)
"It must have been a shot across someone's bow. I posted here some time ago and at LP that Rumsfeld stated the damage to the Pentagon was done by missiles. I know he has stated that at least twice, maybe three times. The games they play. The tyranny they promote."
#23. To: Uncle Bill (#21)
If Larry Silverstein had a brain, he would be long gone by now with his traitorous billions. 8-)
#24. To: robin (#23)
"Oh yeah, I agree. He may have already picked out a plastic surgeon in SA."
#25. To: Uncle Bill (#21)
#26. To: Ferret Mike (#24)
(Edited)
#27. To: robin (#26)
"The insistence on the double-insurance collection because his lawyers proved that 2 planes = 2 terrorist events, (not to mention obtaining terrorist insurance in July 2001), was really over the top."
#28. To: Uncle Bill, robin, Ferret Mike (#21)
#29. To: christine (#28)
#30. To: Ferret Mike (#27)
Yes it was. Especially since the asbestos clean-up bill was going to be over a billion in an expensive to operate building not likely to ever see close to full occupancy any time soon.
And it was a losing piece of real-estate, lots of empty offices. The Port Authority was working at a net loss too apparently.
#31. To: christine (#28)
#32. To: Kamala, Uncle Bill, jessejane, angle, orangedog, Ferret Mike, robin, aristeides, christine (#0)
"Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high -- a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping."
#33. To: j.sulli (#32)
#34. To: Ferret Mike (#33)
#35. To: j.sulli (#32)
We are being manipulated folks, and we've seen it before. I think this is a Rovian tactic.
#36. To: robin (#13)
That's all they've got now.
#37. To: robin, all (#35)
Of course, Bush is referring to the planes themselves as "explosives" here. The part about "high enough" may be a little confusing at first, but I think his point is that if the buildings had been struck lower, it is possible that helicopter rescuers may have been able to pluck people off the roof and the sides of the building.
#38. To: angle (#36)
#39. To: aristeides (#11)
#40. To: Uncle Bill (#21)
.
.
.