See other Editorial Articles
Title: Had Enough?
Source:
youtube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HiAw8qRcXI
Published: Sep 19, 2006
Author: StaceyForCongress
Post Date: 2006-09-19 22:18:34 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 295
Comments: 18
Had Enough?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
Ballsy! Wonder if they'll push for absentee ballots for this election too?
If we were really at war, the borders would be closed.
What did Iraq have to do with 911? Bush: "Nothing"
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
have you seen this? from here http://iwilltryit.com/menu.htm
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
The faster the Aryan Nation mob at Freedom4um are caged and chained, the better off we'll be. I’ll cheering when they are forced to behave. - Aaron
Whoopsie!!
If we were really at war, the borders would be closed.
Hey, that's an antisemetic link.
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
it sure is
The faster the Aryan Nation mob at Freedom4um are caged and chained, the better off we'll be. I’ll cheering when they are forced to behave. - Aaron
omg I'd never seen this.
If we were really at war, the borders would be closed.
Now I just want to do my patriotic duty and state without hesitation that George W. Bush is a DAMNED LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SOURCE: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030319-1.html Presidential Letter Text of a Letter from the President to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate March 18, 2003 Dear Mr. Speaker: (Dear Mr. President:) Consistent with section 3(b) of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107-243), and based on information available to me, including that in the enclosed document, I determine that: (1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic and other peaceful means alone will neither (A) adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq nor (B) likely lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq; and (2) acting pursuant to the Constitution and Public Law 107- 243 is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001. Sincerely, GEORGE W. BUSH Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Check out the Oreilly/Moore clip
Do I hear a fat lady singing?
Or this one: "Saddam Hussein and his weapons are a direct threat to this country," Bush said March 6 in a White House news conference. "The attacks of Sept. 11 showed what the enemies of America did with four airplanes. We will not wait to see what terrorists or terrorist states could do with weapons of mass destruction." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ??? For the sake of PERPETUAL WAR. Thanks for the link Uncle Bill..
If we were really at war, the borders would be closed.
Well well.. My comment is fit to post.
If we were really at war, the borders would be closed.
Where is that?? I must be missing it..
If we were really at war, the borders would be closed.
http://iwilltryit.com/MooreonFox1.h tm
Do I hear a fat lady singing?
I don't really like Michael Moore, but, he really did make O'Reilly look foolish in that one. lol
Do I hear a fat lady singing?
Great interview. And interestingly, BO* knowing there were no WMD now, still keeps to the script. Rather than changing course based on bad intel, he can't / won't / is too ignorant, to concede, no one's child should be sent to war based on this 'lie / mistake'. To continue to do so, is an act of genocide IMO. And there too, is a bigger point he must deliberately avoid. Why WOULD we continue, given that basis? He knows, and it shows. *BO... don't watch him anymore.. hands are too hairy, it's so distracting, I can't hear him. ;)
If we were really at war, the borders would be closed.
Thanks for the I will try it linkage - outstanding.
#2. To: jessejane (#1)
#3. To: jessejane (#1)
(Edited)
#4. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#3)
#5. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#2)
Bush: "Nothing"
#6. To: Dakmar (#4)
#7. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#6)
#8. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#3)
#9. To: jessejane, christine, Zipporah, robin, ALL (#1)
#10. To: jessejane (#8)
#11. To: jessejane (#8)
#12. To: Uncle Bill (#9)
(Edited)
"This is a man that we know has had connections with al-Qaida," he continued, referring to Saddam. "This is a man who, in my judgment, would like to use al-Qaida as a forward army. And this is a man that we must deal with for the sake of peace."
for the sake of peace."
#13. To: Uncle Bill (#10)
Bush vs. Bush
#14. To: Critter (#11)
Check out the Oreilly/Moore clip
#15. To: jessejane (#14)
#16. To: jessejane (#14)
#17. To: Critter (#15)
#18. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#3)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest