[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

How Elon Musk’s DOGE Will Work "Republican Caesar" - Legacy Media Meltdown Over Trump's Triumphant UFC Appearance Fetterman Defends Democrats Counting Invalid Votes In PA Senate Race Trump's Plans For Russia And The Middle East | Victor Davis Hanson US soldier who raped and killed girl, 14, says I didnt think of Iraqis as humans Climate Psychosis DEBUNKED! Antarctica Sea Ice Has Slowly Increased Since 1979 FED pulls half of credit available from BTFP, engineering a potential banking crash Joe Rogan slams FBI: 12 informants in kidnapping plot, 2 fools manipulated. Preview of new border security under TRUMP WHAT did Epstein's biographer just say? "He's not a pedophile, just liked underage prostitutes." Israeli 'Cardboard Dome' missile malfunctions in Eilat, Israel Matt Gaetz “I think that the reason we are as involved in Ukraine...." MINDY ROBINSON TESTIFIES ♕ ON ELECTION FRAUD IN NEVADA BEING IGNORED Biden awkwardly stands in back of APEC photo with China's Xi Jinping front and center Declassified docs expose ObamaÂ’s involvement in Russian Collusion hoax conspiracy to sabotage Trump. 5 Alarming Signs the Economy Is Crumbling While Stocks Defy Gravity While Mexican Leader Was Congratulating Trump, Pentagon Fails 7th Audit In Row, Aims For Clean Audit In 2028 High Alert! A Trump wave is about to DESTROY the Deep State in DC. President Trump’s Signature Dance Takes Over the NFL (Video) FAKE NEWS FAIL: New York Times “Fact Check” of Important RFK, Jr. Claim Medicare Raided to Fund Green Agenda: Premiums Set to Spike Visualizing How Trump Realigned The Political Landscape GOD BLESS THE USA - TRUMP MUSIC VIDEO 10 Things You MISSED About Trump's Assassin In "Major Policy Shift" Biden Authorizes Ukraine's Use Of US Missiles To Hit Targets Inside Russia MSG ERUPTS Into USA Chants As Trump PULLS UP With Elon Musk And THE AVENGERS To UFC 309! Preschool teacher-turned-soldier brings down Russian missile with Igla system Sunday Morning Futures With Maria Bartiromo 11/17/24 | BREAKING FOX NEWS November 17, 2024 Sadhguru's Message to America After Donald Trump's Election Victory

Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: The Gemetriculator (An on line test for good and evil.)
Source: Gemetriculator
URL Source: http://homokaasu.org/gematriculator/
Published: Apr 13, 2005
Author: Mr. Ivin Panin
Post Date: 2005-04-13 21:33:58 by crack monkey
Keywords: Gemetriculator, evil.), line
Views: 586
Comments: 23

Here's a useful device that determines if a website (or a block of text) is good or evil. It returns the results on a percentage basis, e.g., 36% Evil and 64& Good.

You might want to cut and paste the quotes from your favorite Tos Bots to precisely quantify their evilness. We could then speak more intelligently of them, e.g., Trace, being 12.67% more evil than badeye, is blah, blah, blah, etc.

The site allows you to specify a url and then reports how evil the website is, again on a percentage basis.

Here is the link:

The Germatriculator

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

#1. To: crack monkey (#0)

I put yesterday's Market Wrap-Up into it. 25% evil, 75% good. Apparently I'm on the wrong side.

Indrid Cold  posted on  2005-04-13   21:43:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I typed in your screen name and it came back 1% evil/99% good.

I typed in my screen name and it came back 99% evil/1% good.

Sigh. I guess the thing works OK.

Esso  posted on  2005-04-13   21:44:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

My posts seem to come up about 50/50 good and evil. I guess that makes me impartial. I haven't stuffed a good LP thread into it yet. Parts of the "Who is your favorite Tos Bot" thread came up mostly good.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-04-13   21:45:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Trace21230 came back 99% Evil and 1% Good. Badeye was 50% evil and 50% good. Who would have guessed that one?

crack monkey  posted on  2005-04-13   21:48:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Knowing that I got the same score as that fag Trace makes me feel a lot better. Thanks. :P

Esso  posted on  2005-04-13   21:51:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

One of my posts came up 75% evil. I wouldn't want them all like that, but a few probably make me a more interesting person.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-04-13   21:54:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

My 'screen name' came back 1% evil; 99% good. No surprises here. :-)

who knows what evil  posted on  2005-04-13   21:55:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Goldi-lox is 50/50.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-04-13   21:57:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

OK, this is too weird. My postings regularly score under 10% evil, and often around 2 to 3% evil. My "worst" score was 15% evil, that was one out of seven different samples. Strange.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2005-04-13   22:58:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

And my name is 1% evil. Now I'm scared.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2005-04-13   23:00:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Interesting:

www.freerepublic.com: 35% evil, 65% good
www.libertyforum.org: 34% evil, 66% good
www.libertypost.org: 31%evil, 69% good
www.tos4truth.org: 8% evil, 92% good

Tauzero  posted on  2005-04-14   13:34:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

My blog came back with only 30% evil. It means I'm just not trying hard enough...

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2005-04-14   13:36:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Holy Crow, my Screen Name is 99% EVIL. Wow... I guess since my name is 99% evil, it means I don't have to apply myself.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2005-04-14   13:38:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

http://www.amren.com/ 24% evil, 76% good

http://www.democraticunderground.com/ 42% evil 58% good

Tauzero  posted on  2005-04-14   13:38:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

*fun ping*

Tauzero  posted on  2005-04-14   13:39:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

My blog came back with only 30% evil.

mine came back 22% evil. I'm heartbroken...

Continental Op  posted on  2005-04-14   13:41:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

My full Christian name came back at 1% Evil, 99% Good. Man... Talk about disbelief...

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2005-04-14   13:43:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

www.cato.org 40% evil, 60% good
www.mises.org 20% evil 80% good
www.whitehouse.gov 45% evil 55% good

Tauzero  posted on  2005-04-14   13:46:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Tom DeLay comes up 99% Evil and 1% Good. But I guess that's no surprise.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-04-14   13:51:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

www.subgenius.com 4% evil, 96% good

Tauzero  posted on  2005-04-14   14:02:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

http://bible.gospelcom.net/ 45% evil 55% good

Interesting. This is a multi-version bible online website.

Given how much the bible documents, describes and warns against evil as well as exhorts good, this is plausible.

Starwind  posted on  2005-04-14   16:14:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

this is plausible.

Well, then again, maybe not.

"The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost." -- Fed Governor Ben S. Bernanke before the National Economists Club in Washington, D.C., on November 21, 2002.

4% evil, 96% good

"time flies like a rocket but fruit flies like a bananna."

1% evil, 99% good

Starwind  posted on  2005-04-14   16:23:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

A sophisticated financial system, with its substantial array of instruments to unbundle risks, will tend toward a higher degree of leverage at any given level of perceived underlying economic risk. But the greater the degree of leverage in an economy, the greater its vulnerability to unexpected shortfalls in demand and to other miscalculations. Probability distributions that are estimated largely, or exclusively, over cycles excluding periods of panic will underestimate the probability of extreme price movements because they fail to capture a secondary peak at the extreme negative tail that reflects the probability of occurrence of a panic.

- Alan Greenspan

66% evil, 34% good

AdamSelene  posted on  2005-04-18   12:05:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]