[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

🚨BREAKING: We're All Going To Die If You Don't See What Biden Just Made Putin Do And It's Scary Poll Finds Ukrainians Want to End War, U.S. Pushes Zelensky to Bomb Russia and Expand Conscription Warren Buffett Indicator hits 202%, signaling overvaluation; 61% chance of recession by January. Sunny Hostin FUMES as she's FORCED to read legal note ON AIR minutes after SMEARING Matt Gaetz Gangs looting Gaza aid operate in areas under Israeli control, aid groups say Trans activist using the womens bathroom slides his phone under the stall to film a woman. Trump and the Constitution Is This The Secret Reason Why Long-Range Missiles Have Been Fired Deep Into Russian Territory? Rand Paul To Get New Position In Senate After GOP Takeover Fresh Science Finds that Plants Absorb 31% More CO2 than Previously Believed. CO2 Is Beneficial Israeli attacks on Gaza leading to increase in birth defects More than 200 children killed in Lebanon amid Israeli bombardment: UN FBI Director Loses His Cool When Trump's AG Reads Hunter Biden's Shocking Text Message The Judgment Fund: Democrats Secret Slush Fund for Ideological Payoffs SpaceX president says we could easily see 400 Starship launches in next four years Former agent unintentionally makes pitch for Kash Patel to run FBI: 'Extremely dangerous' A Once-In-A Decade Bomb Cyclone Will Dump Up To 20 Inches Of Rain On California Default Rates on Household Loans are SKYROCKETING More Trump appointments, Nancy Mace OCTUPLES DOWN, and more delish lib tears [Livestream starts at 0800 EST] The Link Between Blood Types And Risks of COVID-19, Cancer, And Other Diseases 50 Times Thrift Shops Delivered Comedy Gold, As Shared By “Ridiculous Thrifter” Sunny Hostin FUMES as she's FORCED to read legal note ON AIR minutes after SMEARING Matt Gaetz Gen. Flynn: Democrats Must Remove President Biden Now Which TV Networks Will Be Crushed By RFK Jr's Crackdown On Pharma Ad Spending Gallup: Public Support For Gun-Bans Craters Lefties Now Hate RFK JR So Much They are Drinking Seed Oils My Favorite 5 Legumes That Fight Cancer, Repair The Body & Boost Longevity | Dr. William Li Trudeau tells Parents to Prioritize CLIMATE CHANGE over their STARVING Children Musk Goes All In On 'Judge Dredd' Matt Gaetz, Notes 'Douchebag' Garland Never Brought Charges Germany to send 4,000 AI-guided drones to Ukraine.

Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: The Gemetriculator (An on line test for good and evil.)
Source: Gemetriculator
URL Source: http://homokaasu.org/gematriculator/
Published: Apr 13, 2005
Author: Mr. Ivin Panin
Post Date: 2005-04-13 21:33:58 by crack monkey
Keywords: Gemetriculator, evil.), line
Views: 607
Comments: 23

Here's a useful device that determines if a website (or a block of text) is good or evil. It returns the results on a percentage basis, e.g., 36% Evil and 64& Good.

You might want to cut and paste the quotes from your favorite Tos Bots to precisely quantify their evilness. We could then speak more intelligently of them, e.g., Trace, being 12.67% more evil than badeye, is blah, blah, blah, etc.

The site allows you to specify a url and then reports how evil the website is, again on a percentage basis.

Here is the link:

The Germatriculator

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

#1. To: crack monkey (#0)

I put yesterday's Market Wrap-Up into it. 25% evil, 75% good. Apparently I'm on the wrong side.

Indrid Cold  posted on  2005-04-13   21:43:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I typed in your screen name and it came back 1% evil/99% good.

I typed in my screen name and it came back 99% evil/1% good.

Sigh. I guess the thing works OK.

Esso  posted on  2005-04-13   21:44:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

My posts seem to come up about 50/50 good and evil. I guess that makes me impartial. I haven't stuffed a good LP thread into it yet. Parts of the "Who is your favorite Tos Bot" thread came up mostly good.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-04-13   21:45:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Trace21230 came back 99% Evil and 1% Good. Badeye was 50% evil and 50% good. Who would have guessed that one?

crack monkey  posted on  2005-04-13   21:48:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Knowing that I got the same score as that fag Trace makes me feel a lot better. Thanks. :P

Esso  posted on  2005-04-13   21:51:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

One of my posts came up 75% evil. I wouldn't want them all like that, but a few probably make me a more interesting person.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-04-13   21:54:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

My 'screen name' came back 1% evil; 99% good. No surprises here. :-)

who knows what evil  posted on  2005-04-13   21:55:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Goldi-lox is 50/50.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-04-13   21:57:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

OK, this is too weird. My postings regularly score under 10% evil, and often around 2 to 3% evil. My "worst" score was 15% evil, that was one out of seven different samples. Strange.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2005-04-13   22:58:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

And my name is 1% evil. Now I'm scared.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2005-04-13   23:00:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Interesting:

www.freerepublic.com: 35% evil, 65% good
www.libertyforum.org: 34% evil, 66% good
www.libertypost.org: 31%evil, 69% good
www.tos4truth.org: 8% evil, 92% good

Tauzero  posted on  2005-04-14   13:34:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

My blog came back with only 30% evil. It means I'm just not trying hard enough...

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2005-04-14   13:36:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Holy Crow, my Screen Name is 99% EVIL. Wow... I guess since my name is 99% evil, it means I don't have to apply myself.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2005-04-14   13:38:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

http://www.amren.com/ 24% evil, 76% good

http://www.democraticunderground.com/ 42% evil 58% good

Tauzero  posted on  2005-04-14   13:38:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

*fun ping*

Tauzero  posted on  2005-04-14   13:39:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

My blog came back with only 30% evil.

mine came back 22% evil. I'm heartbroken...

Continental Op  posted on  2005-04-14   13:41:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

My full Christian name came back at 1% Evil, 99% Good. Man... Talk about disbelief...

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2005-04-14   13:43:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

www.cato.org 40% evil, 60% good
www.mises.org 20% evil 80% good
www.whitehouse.gov 45% evil 55% good

Tauzero  posted on  2005-04-14   13:46:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Tom DeLay comes up 99% Evil and 1% Good. But I guess that's no surprise.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-04-14   13:51:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

www.subgenius.com 4% evil, 96% good

Tauzero  posted on  2005-04-14   14:02:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

http://bible.gospelcom.net/ 45% evil 55% good

Interesting. This is a multi-version bible online website.

Given how much the bible documents, describes and warns against evil as well as exhorts good, this is plausible.

Starwind  posted on  2005-04-14   16:14:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

this is plausible.

Well, then again, maybe not.

"The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost." -- Fed Governor Ben S. Bernanke before the National Economists Club in Washington, D.C., on November 21, 2002.

4% evil, 96% good

"time flies like a rocket but fruit flies like a bananna."

1% evil, 99% good

Starwind  posted on  2005-04-14   16:23:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

A sophisticated financial system, with its substantial array of instruments to unbundle risks, will tend toward a higher degree of leverage at any given level of perceived underlying economic risk. But the greater the degree of leverage in an economy, the greater its vulnerability to unexpected shortfalls in demand and to other miscalculations. Probability distributions that are estimated largely, or exclusively, over cycles excluding periods of panic will underestimate the probability of extreme price movements because they fail to capture a secondary peak at the extreme negative tail that reflects the probability of occurrence of a panic.

- Alan Greenspan

66% evil, 34% good

AdamSelene  posted on  2005-04-18   12:05:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]