[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Cancer Starves When You Eat These Surprising Foods | Dr. William Li Megyn Kelly Gets Fiery About Trump's Choice of Matt Gaetz for Attorney General Over 100 leftist groups organize coalition to rebuild morale and resist MAGA after Trump win Mainstream Media Cries Foul Over Musk Meeting With Iran Ambassador...On Peace Vaccine Stocks Slide Further After Trump Taps RFK Jr. To Lead HHS; CNN Outraged Do Trump’s picks Rubio, Huckabee signal his approval of West Bank annexation? Pac-Man Barron Trump Big Pharma-Sponsored Vaccinologist Finally Admits mRNA Shots Are Killing Millions US fiscal year 2025 opens with a staggering $257 billion October deficit$3 trillion annual pace. His brain has been damaged by American processed food. Iran willing to resolve doubts about its atomic programme with IAEA FBI Official Who Oversaw J6 Pipe Bomb Probe Lied About Receiving 'Corrupted' Evidence “We have complete data. Not complete, because there’s some data that was corrupted by one of the providers—not purposely by them, right,” former FBI official Steven D’Antuono told the House Judiciary Committee in a Musk’s DOGE Takes To X To Crowdsource Talent: ‘80+ Hours Per Week,’ Female Bodybuilders vs. 16 Year Old Farmers Whoopi Goldberg announces she is joining women in their sex abstinence Musk secretly met with Iran's UN envoy NYT D.O.G.E. To have a leaderboard of most wasteful government spending In Most U.S. Cities, Social Security Payments Last Married Couples Just 19 Days Or Less Another major healthcare provider files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy The Ukrainians have put Tulsi Gabbard on their Myrotvorets kill list Sen. Johnson unveils photo of Biden-appointed crossdressers after reporters rage over Gaetz nomination sted on: Nov 15 07:56 'WE WOULD LOSE' War with Iran: Col. Lawrence Wilkerson Israeli minister says Palestinians should have no voting or land rights The Case For Radical Changes In US National Defense: Col. Douglas Macgregor Biden's Regulations Legacy Costs Taxpayers $1.8 Trillion, 800 Times Larger than Trumps Israeli Soldiers are BUSTED! Al Sharpton and MSNBC Caught in Major Journalism Ethics Fail in Accepting Kamala's Campaign Money ABC News in panic mode to balance The View after anti-Trump panel misses voter sentiment The Latest Biden Tax Bomb

Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: The Gemetriculator (An on line test for good and evil.)
Source: Gemetriculator
URL Source: http://homokaasu.org/gematriculator/
Published: Apr 13, 2005
Author: Mr. Ivin Panin
Post Date: 2005-04-13 21:33:58 by crack monkey
Keywords: Gemetriculator, evil.), line
Views: 555
Comments: 23

Here's a useful device that determines if a website (or a block of text) is good or evil. It returns the results on a percentage basis, e.g., 36% Evil and 64& Good.

You might want to cut and paste the quotes from your favorite Tos Bots to precisely quantify their evilness. We could then speak more intelligently of them, e.g., Trace, being 12.67% more evil than badeye, is blah, blah, blah, etc.

The site allows you to specify a url and then reports how evil the website is, again on a percentage basis.

Here is the link:

The Germatriculator

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

#1. To: crack monkey (#0)

I put yesterday's Market Wrap-Up into it. 25% evil, 75% good. Apparently I'm on the wrong side.

Indrid Cold  posted on  2005-04-13   21:43:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I typed in your screen name and it came back 1% evil/99% good.

I typed in my screen name and it came back 99% evil/1% good.

Sigh. I guess the thing works OK.

Esso  posted on  2005-04-13   21:44:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

My posts seem to come up about 50/50 good and evil. I guess that makes me impartial. I haven't stuffed a good LP thread into it yet. Parts of the "Who is your favorite Tos Bot" thread came up mostly good.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-04-13   21:45:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Trace21230 came back 99% Evil and 1% Good. Badeye was 50% evil and 50% good. Who would have guessed that one?

crack monkey  posted on  2005-04-13   21:48:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Knowing that I got the same score as that fag Trace makes me feel a lot better. Thanks. :P

Esso  posted on  2005-04-13   21:51:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

One of my posts came up 75% evil. I wouldn't want them all like that, but a few probably make me a more interesting person.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-04-13   21:54:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

My 'screen name' came back 1% evil; 99% good. No surprises here. :-)

who knows what evil  posted on  2005-04-13   21:55:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Goldi-lox is 50/50.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-04-13   21:57:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

OK, this is too weird. My postings regularly score under 10% evil, and often around 2 to 3% evil. My "worst" score was 15% evil, that was one out of seven different samples. Strange.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2005-04-13   22:58:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

And my name is 1% evil. Now I'm scared.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2005-04-13   23:00:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Interesting:

www.freerepublic.com: 35% evil, 65% good
www.libertyforum.org: 34% evil, 66% good
www.libertypost.org: 31%evil, 69% good
www.tos4truth.org: 8% evil, 92% good

Tauzero  posted on  2005-04-14   13:34:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

My blog came back with only 30% evil. It means I'm just not trying hard enough...

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2005-04-14   13:36:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Holy Crow, my Screen Name is 99% EVIL. Wow... I guess since my name is 99% evil, it means I don't have to apply myself.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2005-04-14   13:38:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

http://www.amren.com/ 24% evil, 76% good

http://www.democraticunderground.com/ 42% evil 58% good

Tauzero  posted on  2005-04-14   13:38:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

*fun ping*

Tauzero  posted on  2005-04-14   13:39:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

My blog came back with only 30% evil.

mine came back 22% evil. I'm heartbroken...

Continental Op  posted on  2005-04-14   13:41:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

My full Christian name came back at 1% Evil, 99% Good. Man... Talk about disbelief...

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2005-04-14   13:43:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

www.cato.org 40% evil, 60% good
www.mises.org 20% evil 80% good
www.whitehouse.gov 45% evil 55% good

Tauzero  posted on  2005-04-14   13:46:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Tom DeLay comes up 99% Evil and 1% Good. But I guess that's no surprise.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-04-14   13:51:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

www.subgenius.com 4% evil, 96% good

Tauzero  posted on  2005-04-14   14:02:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

http://bible.gospelcom.net/ 45% evil 55% good

Interesting. This is a multi-version bible online website.

Given how much the bible documents, describes and warns against evil as well as exhorts good, this is plausible.

Starwind  posted on  2005-04-14   16:14:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

this is plausible.

Well, then again, maybe not.

"The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost." -- Fed Governor Ben S. Bernanke before the National Economists Club in Washington, D.C., on November 21, 2002.

4% evil, 96% good

"time flies like a rocket but fruit flies like a bananna."

1% evil, 99% good

Starwind  posted on  2005-04-14   16:23:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

A sophisticated financial system, with its substantial array of instruments to unbundle risks, will tend toward a higher degree of leverage at any given level of perceived underlying economic risk. But the greater the degree of leverage in an economy, the greater its vulnerability to unexpected shortfalls in demand and to other miscalculations. Probability distributions that are estimated largely, or exclusively, over cycles excluding periods of panic will underestimate the probability of extreme price movements because they fail to capture a secondary peak at the extreme negative tail that reflects the probability of occurrence of a panic.

- Alan Greenspan

66% evil, 34% good

AdamSelene  posted on  2005-04-18   12:05:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]