[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Activism
See other Activism Articles

Title: Goldi-Lox: maybe it'll be a tiny Nuke, THAT would be a good thing.
Source: ElPee
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=159955#C5
Published: Sep 25, 2006
Author: Goldi-Lox
Post Date: 2006-09-25 15:53:45 by FormerLurker
Keywords: None
Views: 582
Comments: 50

5. To: mehitable (#3)

I have mixed feelings. I don't want to see anything happen to New York, but it's one way to get rid of the UN.

If all the New Yorkers clear out, maybe it'll be a tiny Nuke, and only the UN will be impacted.

THAT would be a good thing.

I too would like the UN gone. But not New Yorkers.

Goldi-Lox  posted on  2006-09-25   12:20:30 ET  Reply

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0) (Edited)

Here we have the forum owner of LibertyPost stating that it would be a good thing to set off a nuclear device in New York city. How special.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2006-09-25   15:54:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: FormerLurker (#1)

She's been pimping how much she hates the awful UN for years. Yawn. Reactionary bullshit.

The pubbies use the UN for all purposes: Whipping boy when the world criticizes them; misdirection when their own corruption starts to stink; and, legitimization when they want to something clearly illegal.

This bullshit about how they want the US out of the UN is just that. They LOVE the UN.

the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2006-09-25   16:02:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: FormerLurker (#0)

Hilarious.

Now, if she would only live in NY when it happens...

What's that Mr. Nipples? You want me to ask the nice lady about her rack?.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2006-09-25   16:05:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: bluedogtxn (#2)

The pubbies use the UN for all purposes: Whipping boy when the world criticizes them; misdirection when their own corruption starts to stink; and, legitimization when they want to something clearly illegal.

This bullshit about how they want the US out of the UN is just that. They LOVE the UN.

Exactly. The neo-con-artists love to use the UN as an excuse for committing their acts of war, but pretend to desire its destruction when they need to score some political points.

Powell's argument could be divided into two main tracks. The first centered on the premise that Iraq had to face the penalties for having flouted numerous Security Council resolutions. "Last Nov. 8, this council passed Resolution 1441 by a unanimous vote," the secretary said. "The purpose of that resolution was to disarm Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction. Iraq had already been found guilty of material breach of its obligations, stretching back over 16 previous resolutions and 12 years."


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2006-09-25   16:38:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#3)

Hilarious.

Now, if she would only live in NY when it happens...

Now that WOULD be poetic justice, wouldn't it..


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2006-09-25   16:39:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: bluedogtxn (#2)

She's been pimping how much she hates the awful UN for years. Yawn. Reactionary bullshit.

It makes her appear to be a "Patriot" to those that don't know her well.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2006-09-25   16:40:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: FormerLurker (#1)

If the Bush administration used small nukes to bring down the World Trade Center, Goldi is not going to be one to object.

Katrina was America's Chernobyl.

aristeides  posted on  2006-09-25   16:45:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: bluedogtxn (#2)

I wonder why they're not applauding Chávez's call to set up a new UN outside the U.S.

Katrina was America's Chernobyl.

aristeides  posted on  2006-09-25   16:46:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: aristeides (#8)

wonder why they're not applauding Chávez's call to set up a new UN outside the U.S.

Wouldn't that be fucking hilarious?

the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2006-09-25   16:49:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: FormerLurker (#0) (Edited)

If the US every stops worshiping the Lox and Bagels bunch, they will do away with NYC...

“Yes, but is this good for Jews?"

Eoghan  posted on  2006-09-25   17:13:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: FormerLurker (#0)

Personally I think it's shameful that the Moderator of a political discussion forum makes such an irresponsible remark.

Come on - she's a Mod - how can she possibly expect posters to respect the rules of her forum if she herself makes such a careless if not dangerous comment? Shish...what was she thinking???

scrapper2  posted on  2006-09-25   17:21:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: FormerLurker (#0)

Goldi doesn't like the UN.

Diana  posted on  2006-09-25   17:45:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: FormerLurker (#4)

The neo-con-artists love to use the UN as an excuse for committing their acts of war, but pretend to desire its destruction when they need to score some political points.

Which has no bearing at all on whether its destruction would be a bad thing...

I can't recall prominent neocons calling precisely for that though.

I think the worst/best Kristol has ever said about the UN is that he would be "open" to US withdrawal.


I hate it when they ain't been shaved.

Tauzero  posted on  2006-09-25   17:50:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: FormerLurker, all (#0)

Did anyone notice that the article in which Goldi has posted contains a prediction, based upon Biblical "scholarship," that the UN Plaza will be struck tomorrow?

It might be interesting to check the source website on the 27th, to see how the the failure at prophesy has been rationalized.

leveller  posted on  2006-09-25   20:57:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: FormerLurker (#1)

Here we have the forum owner of LibertyPost stating that it would be a good thing to set off a nuclear device in New York city. How special.

Who owns it now?

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]

RickyJ  posted on  2006-09-25   21:07:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: FormerLurker (#0)

maybe it'll be a tiny Nuke

Ahhh, the "gift" that just keeps on giving.

dizzy bitch.

;)

Brian S  posted on  2006-09-25   23:04:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: FormerLurker, mehitable (#0)

Uh.. is she dealing with a full deck?

Zipporah  posted on  2006-09-25   23:06:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Zipporah (#17)

Uh.. is she dealing with a full deck?

She also wants to "Double the damn troop strength, and then FINISH THE JOB.(In Iraq)...

The jewish year festivities must have really "enlightened" her, eh?

/chuckle

Brian S  posted on  2006-09-25   23:13:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Brian S (#18)

She also wants to "Double the damn troop strength, and then FINISH THE JOB.(In Iraq)...

OH glad you qualified that with (In Iraq) I mighta gotten that confused with something else she needs or er wants :P

Zipporah  posted on  2006-09-25   23:19:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Zipporah (#19) (Edited)

something else she needs or er wants

Most likely needs and wants, judging by her posts as of late.

/chuckle

Brian S  posted on  2006-09-25   23:22:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Brian S (#18)

She also wants to "Double the damn troop strength, and then FINISH THE JOB.(In Iraq)...

The jewish year festivities must have really "enlightened" her, eh?

LOLOLOL

In 1947, the UN created a perpetual war and named it Israel.

wbales  posted on  2006-09-25   23:25:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Zipporah (#17)

Uh.. is she dealing with a full deck?

She was psycologicaly erratic a year or more ago. Doubt much has changed

tom007  posted on  2006-09-25   23:30:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Diana (#12) (Edited)

Goldi doesn't like the UN.

I don't think Goldi likes me either, does this mean I'm a target of her insanity as well?

Sane people don't around wishing death upon people they don't like.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]

RickyJ  posted on  2006-09-25   23:31:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Brian S (#20)

Must likely needs and wants, judging by her posts as of late.

/chuckle

'splains a lot :P

Zipporah  posted on  2006-09-25   23:32:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: tom007 (#22)

She was psycologicaly erratic a year or more ago. Doubt much has changed

well what sorta kinda did it for me.. were the racist remarks.. calling for the deaths of an entire race of people.. hmm sounds kinda sorta too nazi-esque:P

Zipporah  posted on  2006-09-25   23:34:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Zipporah (#25)

calling for the deaths of an entire race of people.. hmm sounds kinda sorta too nazi-esque:P

But she's not a racist, get it?

I am getting close to asking all Orthodox Jewish folks to leave, and get on the Promised Land, already.

tom007  posted on  2006-09-25   23:38:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: tom007 (#26)

No?? Gosh..hmm maybe I need to find out how Merriam-Webster defines it.. now what was that quote again about the Palis? :P

Main Entry: rac·ism
Pronunciation: 'rA-"si-z&m also -"shi-

Function: noun
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
- rac·ist /-sist also -shist/ noun or adjectiv

Zipporah  posted on  2006-09-25   23:44:40 ET  (2 images) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: bluedogtxn (#2)

This bullshit about how they want the US out of the UN is just that. They LOVE the UN.

Exactly. The pretzels the wingnutters have to contort themselves into over the UN is hilarious and a major example of their disconnect from basic reality.

The wingnutter line on the UN is that it is a hotbed of anti Americanism and communists that can't be trusted on anything. And yet- the same Federal government they worship and adore (when their guys are in office) funds fully half of the UN- owns more than half of the delegates to the UN and uses it more often than not to successfully provide slender cover for their acts of aggression and wars.

Now- when a country points out the misuse of the UN to provide cover for US acts of aggression- the reichwingers fall all over themselves saying that "even the UN said . . "

Your average reichwinger is so effing stupid that he thinks the UN leads the US around and not the other way around. Point out to them that the US basically pays the UN bills and they shrug and mumble about "communists" in the US government or some such nonsense. Such controlled boobs.

Burkeman1  posted on  2006-09-25   23:48:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: RickyJ (#23)

Post #269 was deleted

Here's what it said.

Post #11

To: wirestripper

Oh, "Bush was interested in finishing the old man's business."

It is SUCH a shame that Bush doesn't have a domestic CIA group to take this guy out.

269 posted on 03/31/2004 7:37:07 PM EST by Miss Marple


The communist compassionate conservative contract club (CCCCC)


From Here:

If you recall last Sunday night's 60 Minutes, in which Clark first made his claims, Deputy National Security Advisor Steve Hadley essentially accused Clarke of lying about an alleged encounter between Clarke and President Bush just after 9/11. In this encounter, the president supposedly pressed Clarke to investigate Saddam's possible ties to the attacks.

Hadley was quickly tripped up by the fact that CBS had two sources who confirmed that the encounter had occurred, including one who was in fact present during the discussion.

The White House has kept calling Clarke a liar until today. From CBS this evening ...

Retracted White House statements do little to boost public trust. CBS News Correspondent Jim Stewart reports, until today, the Bush administration denied a meeting had taken place between the president and Clarke, during which Bush allegedly instructed Clarke to investigate Saddam Hussein and Iraq after Sept. 11.

The White House today reversed that comment, and staff members now tell reporters, "We are not denying such a meeting took place. It probably did."

So they called him a liar. But it seems they either had no evidence or their evidence turned out to be wrong.

Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation

Uncle Bill  posted on  2006-09-25   23:54:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: FormerLurker, All (#0)

Goldi-Lox NYC

Nostalgia  posted on  2006-09-26   0:13:46 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Zipporah (#17)

I think she was joking, Zip. I hope so anyway. I was joking so I assumed she was.

"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."

mehitable  posted on  2006-09-26   9:40:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Burkeman1 (#28)

Such controlled boobs.

Exactly. Unfortunately, the "loyal opposition" party in this country is a bunch of boobs, too, if slightly less controlled.

Try posting something true, like "gays suck" over on DU and watch how quickly you get banned.LOL.

the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2006-09-26   10:06:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: mehitable (#31)

"I think she was joking, Zip. I hope so anyway. I was joking so I assumed she was."

Nope. She doesn't joke about stuf like that. She works for a firm that makes money on war, and is influenced by what she learns and knows of war from there. This is no drill, this is no joke.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-09-26   10:20:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: aristeides (#7)

If the Bush administration used small nukes to bring down the World Trade Center, Goldi is not going to be one to object.

That's a fact. On the thread I was banned, she entertained the idea of helping terrorists fly airliners into the UN building. Seems like she would be more than happy to help in any sort of terror act in this country that would benefit the nation that has her true allegience.

From UN SPYING FOR HEZBOLLAH ?


75. To: out damned spot (#0)

If the terrorists strike here again, and choose New York, can we point them to the UN Building?

It would not bother me in the least if the terrorists flew an aircraft into THAT building. It's an abomination on our soil.

I'd just want all the people to escape the building unharmed.

Once the building was destroyed, maybe they'd re-build it over in Europe somewhere.

Goldi-Lox  posted on  2006-07-27   09:57:57 ET  Reply   Trace



You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2006-09-28   14:33:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: scrapper2 (#11)

Personally I think it's shameful that the Moderator of a political discussion forum makes such an irresponsible remark.

Many are disgusted by her recent words and actions, including me.

Come on - she's a Mod - how can she possibly expect posters to respect the rules of her forum if she herself makes such a careless if not dangerous comment? Shish...what was she thinking???

She doesn't appear to be dealing from a full deck these days, that's for sure.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2006-09-28   14:35:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Diana (#12)

Goldi doesn't like the UN.

It's one thing not to like it, but she chimed in with the blood dancers that were celebrating the deaths of the UN observers when killed by Israeli bombardment. I bet they'd still celebrate privately if it had been US troops serving as UN observers.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2006-09-28   14:37:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Tauzero (#13)

I can't recall prominent neocons calling precisely for that though.

It's not so much the prominent ones that do it, it's their surrogates such as Goldi-Lox, Marguerite, liberator, and other fanatics that do.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2006-09-28   14:42:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: leveller (#14)

It might be interesting to check the source website on the 27th, to see how the the failure at prophesy has been rationalized.

Didn't see her prediction. I'd be interested in taking a peek though if you have a link.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2006-09-28   14:43:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: RickyJ (#15)

Who owns it now?

Her, from what she claims.


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2006-09-28   14:43:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Brian S (#16)

Ahhh, the "gift" that just keeps on giving.

That's for sure..


You appear to be a major trouble maker...and I'm getting really pissed. - GoldiLox, 7/27/2006

FormerLurker  posted on  2006-09-28   14:44:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 50) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]