[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

African Woman Protects Herself from Muggers

Cafe Owner Kicked Israelis out. Then This happened

The True COST of ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION explained - Edward Dowd

People are just starting to understand the economic impact of illegal migration on an economy.

Freight Fraud, Cargo Theft, Deadly Collisions - Ghost Carriers Are Growing National Security Threat

Hamas To Release American-Israeli Hostage As Goodwill Gesture To Trump

Targeted by the mind control programs of the evil ones (Pedos)

Ex-CIA agent gives his take on some of America's biggest historical events...

Asheville N.C. hit again. May 9th 2025

"No One is Prepared for What’s Happening in EUROPE

"This loss is permanent"

Daniela Cambone: The Great Taking Author Interview

Polar ice rebounds confound alarmist predictions: New studies highlight climates unpredictable dance

NBC: The United States, Europe and Ukraine have made a list of 22 conditions for ending the conflict

President Trumps Proposal to Eliminate Income Taxes: Can It Be Done?

Trump Still Does Not Understand What Russia Wants and Demands

Borrell: Half of bombs dropped on Gaza supplied by Europe

Surprise, Surprise: Bibi Discovers "Secret Iranian Nuclear Weapons Facility" in Iran

Report: Trump Delinks Saudi Nuclear Deal from Israeli Normalization

Lebanon's war-wounded and pregnant women face deepening healthcare crisis

Hordes of NATO military and elite PMCs suddenly went to the Kursk region

The Ukrainian Armed Forces will receive missiles for attacks on the rear, headquarters, airports of Russia

Minister o Defense Thousands of corpses on the border - a French breeding ground near Kiev was destroyed

Ivermectin Reverses Alzheimer's Disease

80% Of 'Liberal' Americans Want Elon Musk Thrown In Prison

Why Silver is Lagging Gold

Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver verbally and physically assaulted federal agents in New Jersey

Diana Ross & The Supremes - Reflections [Spain TV] [1967]

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Introduces Bill to REPEAL the USA PATRIOT Act Declares War on Surveillance State

Car Followed Home. Quick Thinking Driver Saved Himself


Activism
See other Activism Articles

Title: We Could Use a Guy Like Him Again
Source: Daily Kos
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 25, 2006
Author: bluedogtxn
Post Date: 2006-09-25 15:58:49 by bluedogtxn
Keywords: None
Views: 851
Comments: 44

We Could Use a Guy Like Him Again

I missed the interview, darn it; but I caught it on You Tube, so I guess that's almost as good as having seen it the first time.

bluedogtxn's diary :: :: No matter how the nutjobs spin it; and of course they will, they can't help themselves, I saw fighting President Clinton again, in his interview with Fox's Chris Wallace. The interview was obviously a set-up; a whack-job ambush intended to embarrass President Clinton, but it very seriously backfired on Wallace.

The narrative that has become the Rosetta Stone of the GOP'rs, that Clinton let Bin Laden go or didn't go after him or ignored him; that he did nothing about him... That whole sacred narrative was sliced to pieces in a moment, when President Clinton described the efforts undertaken to get Bin Laden, when he described what he'd have done had he had time to continue after Bin Laden...

And then, not to be satisfied with merely shredding the jaded image that Idiot Bush's sheep have of Clinton, or their faded memories, Clinton went on to unapologetically call FOX for their own bullshit.

I had my problems with President Clinton, but I think it is important to remember what it was like to have an intellectual heavyweight for a president. I think it is important to remember what it was like to have a real honest-to-goodness man in the White House, instead of a fratboy idiot.

So props to President Clinton for the reminder. I wish the biggest item on the national radar was what was going on under your desk.

I sure remember those days, and I'm sorry I took for granted how dang good they were.

Balanced budget, a nation at peace with the world, a booming economy (even in its bust), the simple working people respected by government...

Mister, we could use a guy like Bill Clinton again.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 14.

#3. To: bluedogtxn (#0)

Balanced budget,

More lies.

And Hillary was always the real brains of the outfit.

Tauzero  posted on  2006-09-25   16:31:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Tauzero (#3)

Balanced budget, More lies.

It came a hell of a lot closer to being balanced than it did under any Republican since Nixon.

Or do you still believe in the Tooth Fairy, Santa Clause and the "miracle of the Laffer Curve"?

bluedogtxn  posted on  2006-09-25   16:37:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: bluedogtxn (#4)

It came a hell of a lot closer to being balanced

Compared to what?

Not compared to projected obligations for various goobermint programs, notably Social Security and Medicare.

But then Santa Claus always did get a lot of votes.

Tauzero  posted on  2006-09-25   17:15:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Tauzero (#8)

Compared to what?

Compared to the federal budgets of Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II. That would be 17 years of Republican fiscal recklessness, although admittedly our present Idiot has taken the cake in the past five years.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2006-09-25   17:24:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: bluedogtxn (#11)

Compared to the federal budgets of Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II.

In what sense?

The budgets of those men were not very much worse at all.

Future obligations for welfare state spending simply cannot be met, and it is not the fault of Reagan, Bush I, Bush II -- or Clinton.

TANSTAAFL.

Tauzero  posted on  2006-09-25   17:32:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Tauzero (#13)

Future obligations for welfare state spending simply cannot be met, and it is not the fault of Reagan, Bush I, Bush II -- or Clinton.

TANSTAAFL.

While I fully support the application of Heinlein's famous Tanstaafl dictum, you need to look at the budgets in question. Reagan's first and second terms both saw an increase in expenditures (not just entitlement programs, either) relative to income. Bush I's term saw an increase also, although not as pronounced. Clinton's eight years saw the reverse; expenditures held much closer to flat; income from taxes increasing. Bush II's budgets are just flat out obscene if you have any sense of fiscal discipline or responsibility. They've ballooned the deficit incredibly, and most of it is NOT growth in entitlements.

It can be argued one way or the other whether Clinton actually balanced incomes to outlays; and a persuasive case can be developed either way. What can't be rationally argued is that there was a shred of fiscal responsibility in the spending policies of Reagan or Bush II. Bush I is a more difficult call, because had he another term, it is possible he could have brought spending under control.

The bottom line is that whether you like him, hate him or are indifferent to him, Clinton was much more fiscally responsible than the last 3 GOP'rs have been.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2006-09-25   17:49:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 14.

#15. To: bluedogtxn (#14)

Reagan's first and second terms both saw an increase in expenditures (not just entitlement programs, either) relative to income.

Absolutely.

Clinton's eight years saw the reverse; expenditures held much closer to flat; income from taxes increasing.

Bull market and short-term debt. (And on the second, the fedgov has a track record of doing exactly the wrong thing -- short term debt when rates are low, long term debt when rates are high. Good deal for bond buyers though...)

They've ballooned the deficit incredibly,

Absolutely. Irrelevant though to the long term picture.

On an actuarial basis / GAAP basis, there was never a Clinton surplus.

For FY 2004, the government had a $616 billion operating loss, for FY 2005 $760 billion.

and most of it is NOT growth in entitlements.

Plenty of other goodies to go around. And under the accounting rules the government makes the rest of us obey, entitlements swamp everything else.

Funny how that works.

Tauzero  posted on  2006-09-25 18:14:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 14.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]