[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

When Ideas Become Too Dangerous To Platform

The silent bloodbath that's tearing through the middle-class

Kiev Postponed Exchange With Russia, Leaves Bodies Of 6,000 Slain Ukrainian Troops In Trucks

Iranian Intelligence Stole Trove Of Sensitive Israeli Nuclear Files

In the USA, the identity of Musk's abuser, who gave him a black eye, was revealed

Return of 6,000 Soldiers' Bodies Will Cost Ukraine Extra $2.1Bln

Palantir's Secret War: Inside the Plot to Cripple WikiLeaks

Digital Prison in the Making?

In France we're horrified by spending money on Ukraine

Russia has patented technology for launching drones from the space station

Kill ICE: Foreign Flags And Fires Sweep LA

6,000-year-old skeletons with never-before-seen DNA rewrites human history

First Close Look at China’s Ultra-Long Range Sixth Generation J-36Jet

I'm Caitlin Clark, and I refuse to return to the WNBA

Border Czar Tom Homan: “We Are Going to Bring National Guard in Tonight” to Los Angeles

These Are The U.S. States With The Most Drug Use

Chabria: ICE arrested a California union leader. Does Trump understand what that means?Anita Chabria

White House Staffer Responsible for ‘Fanning Flames’ Between Trump and Musk ID’d

Texas Yanks Major Perk From Illegal Aliens - After Pioneering It 24 Years Ago

Dozens detained during Los Angeles ICE raids

Russian army suffers massive losses as Kremlin feigns interest in peace talks — ISW

Russia’s Defense Collapse Exposed by Ukraine Strike

I heard libs might block some streets. 🤣

Jimmy Dore: What’s Being Said On Israeli TV Will BLOW YOUR MIND!

Tucker Carlson: Douglas Macgregor- Elites will be overthrown

🎵Breakin' rocks in the hot sun!🎵

Musk & Andreessen Predict A Robot Revolution

Comedian sentenced to 8 years in prison for jokes — judge allegedly cites Wikipedia during conviction

BBC report finds Gaza Humanitarian Foundation hesitant to answer questions

DHS nabbed 1,500 illegal aliens in MA—


All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: Election 2008? Spare me already.
Source: MY Squash
URL Source: http://Me
Published: Sep 26, 2006
Author: Burkeman1
Post Date: 2006-09-26 03:49:08 by Burkeman1
Keywords: None
Views: 346
Comments: 9

We are turning the corner into 2007 in a couple of months and that means we will soon be inundated with an ever increasing volume of media pap about our empty ritualized Presidential elections, the goal of which is to get us to actually stand in line for 45 minutes one day in November 2008 and cast a statistically meaningless ballot for either one of two Beltway putupjob insiders with nary a real difference between them.

I barely participated in those threads during the last election and I have no intention of doing so this time around either. I thought I would save some time though for the rest of you and give you a summary of “election” and all the “issues” that our media will create around it and that we are supposed to care about.

For purposes of this article I am just going to assume that Hillary will be the Dem candidate and McCain will be the GOP candidate. I could be wrong- but it really doesn’t matter who the nominees are. They will be fully vetted DC insiders and made members of the Beltway mob.

The primaries will be the usual boring affairs with the staged excitement for the GOP being around the immigration issue. The anti immigration vote will be split among a field of 3 or 4 putupjobs and thus nullified. The issue will not feature much past the Republican primary as McCain gets the nod. The anti immigration candidates will be obvious putupjobs as they will barely have any money and they will barely make a pretense at running.

Among the Dems- the antiwar vote will be split among similar putupjobs and pro war Hillary will get the nomination.

The Iowa Caucus will determine the “winner” for all intent and purpose.

What can we expect the campaign to look like? What will the “issues” be? Here are a few:

“Independent groups” will spread ads and rumors about Hillary being either a rug muncher back in Wellesley College or a communist who met with the KGB in Moscow or both. This will be a low level third tier wing nutter media campaign in which they will bitch about the MSM not covering their “facts” because of its “liberal bias”.

“Independent groups” will spread rumors about McCain’s POW experience in Viet Nam. This will be the reverse SWIFT BOAT “issue”. GOPERS will feign shock that the DEMS are daring to question a veteran and DEMS will insist on the need for the “truth” to come out.

Hillary’s old scandals will resurface from time to time like the Cattle Futures. Whisper Campaigns about McCain’s bad temper and even sanity will be floated.

A major “issue” will be the media itself- as it once again “debates” its coverage and pretends to flog itself. We have heard this a million times. There will be some talk about the Green Party taking away votes from the Dems and the recriminations from liberals begging their base to not vote for Nader- another putupjob.

The debates will feature . . . boredom- as Hillary and McCain trade pre- written one liners about minute differences over the latest Mega Bills on education and health care before congress and attempt to make us believe that this or that tiny tax cut for this or that income level is some earth shattering world changing “issue” that we have to care about.

The media will then analyze the debates looking to see who smirked out of place or had the wrong demeanor at the wrong time and pronounce the winner.

Hillary will say she can do better on the war in Iraq- while McCain will say he can do better than her. The reichwing media will ignore Hillary’s pro war stance and insist she is just a commie who wants to destroy America. The Left wing media will ignore McCain’s big government votes and insist he wants to kill old people on medicare.

One of them will win. It doesn’t matter which.

So there- a thumbnail sketch of the great “election” to come. I won’t be on those threads much.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Burkeman1 (#0)

The debates will feature . . . boredom

Ah yes, another feather in the cap of the two-party sham. Set the qualifications so that they can only be achived by the two(so-called) major parties.
Think I'll plan on splitting firewood instead.

hammerdown  posted on  2006-09-26   4:20:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: hammerdown (#1)

Do you think if Hillary wins there will be ANY mention among all those chattering "political science experts" the MSM trots out to repeat the same idiotic bromides they always do- about just what a Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton succession means? Or will they will just ignore that obvious sign of ossification and Oligarchic control and blather away about this or that non existent "voter trend" and tell us "why" who won?

Burkeman1  posted on  2006-09-26   4:32:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Burkeman1 (#0)

Excellent wrap.

Thanks for sparing us the tedium.

Lod  posted on  2006-09-26   10:30:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Burkeman1 (#0)

Maybe Edwards but not Hillary.

Whoever it is, they are walking into a real mess.

"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country."

- Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers

robin  posted on  2006-09-26   10:43:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Burkeman1 (#0)

Great Post, Burkee. Accurate, too, I suspect.

the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2006-09-26   10:55:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Burkeman1 (#2)

Do you think if Hillary wins there will be ANY mention...about just what a Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton succession means?

Of course not. If at all, it'll be nothing more than a small talk quip across the panel, maybe in reference to a late night host pointing it out for them.

and blather away about this or that non existent "voter trend" and tell us "why" who won?

yes, with all the obfuscation of only the best Madison ave. has to offer.

hammerdown  posted on  2006-09-26   12:48:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Burkeman1 (#0)

I believe that it's going to be Giuliani for the GOPs. Hillary almost beat Giuliani in New York in 2000. Since then, Hillary worked hard to look more 'conservative' while Guiliani moved comfortably into the homo agenda and became one of the 2 favorite AIPAC boys but Newt tends to talk too much so Rudy would be AIPAC's #1 boy.

Would it matter whether Hillary or Rudy win? It might. Believe it or not, Hillary, like her hubby, is more likely to listen to the opinion polls and not likely to do really stupid things. Rudy, on the other hand, he knows that his days are numbered because he had dick cancer and he could die tomorrow so he would do whatever it takes to advance Israel's national interest because, if he does otherwise, he doesn't get any sugar from his Zionist mistress.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2006-09-26   12:59:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Burkeman1 (#2)

I, too, will make a prediction. The next planned winner of the presidency [along with his or her henchmen whores in the Capitol] will slam the last nail in the coffin that used to be the free and sovereign United States of America, and will be the one to usher in literal hell on earth in this country. You think we've lost freedom under bush, just wait. The next one will preside over nuclear False Flag "fat boy", or at least its aftermath. The next one will be the one to start the roundup of the red and blue lists and take them to the concentration camps. While bush is a minor inept demon, the next one will be taken to be beelzebub in the flesh.

In other words, how much more will the sheople take before taking up arms? If now now, when? When we are in chains or totally disarmed? [Patrick Henry]



***LEAP***

"I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. Government will lead the American people, and the West in general, into an unbearable hell and choking life.
-- Osama bin Laden
"A prohibition law strikes at the very principles upon which our govt was founded."
- Lincoln
All our liberties are due to men who, when their conscience has compelled them, have broken the laws of the land.
--William K Clifford

IndieTX  posted on  2006-09-26   13:16:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: robin (#4)

Whoever it is, they are walking into a real mess.

Yes, but a mess of their own making.

The Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims, and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-09-26   19:03:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]