See other Immigration Articles
Title: Lawmakers Agree to Spend $1.2 Billion on Tightening Border
Source:
NY Times
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 27, 2006
Author: By ERIC LIPTON
Post Date: 2006-09-27 00:01:45 by DeaconBenjamin
Keywords: Mexico, Fence, border
Views: 118
Comments: 8
WASHINGTON, Sept. 25 — House and Senate negotiators agreed Monday evening to spend $1.2 billion to install hundreds of miles of fence and vehicle barriers along the Mexican border as part of a $34.8 billion spending plan for the Department of Homeland Security for the coming year. The border security spending is just one of several major policy initiatives that Congressional leaders decided to insert into the annual appropriations bill. Others include a mandate for antiterrorism steps at high-risk chemical plants nationwide and the reorganization of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The biggest increase in spending in the bill, on which the House and Senate are expected to take final action on this week, is in the area of border security and immigration enforcement, which would get a total of $21.3 billion, an 11 percent jump over this year. This includes money to hire 1,500 new Border Patrol agents, increasing the force to 14,800, and to add 6,700 detention beds. The $1.2 billion for border security is designated for a traditional fence, vehicle barriers and a so-called virtual fence made up of cameras and sensors. That money could also be used to help build 700 miles of physical fence along a specific stretch of the Mexican border, a construction project that the House has already approved and the Senate is still considering. “It is a major step down the road on border security,” said Senator Judd Gregg, the New Hampshire Republican who is chairman of the Senate panel that oversees the budget bill. The bill also sets aside $4.34 billion for port security measures, including money for 450 new cargo inspection officers. That is up $600 million over the current year. The bill would also provide $178 million for new radiation screening equipment at domestic ports, among other initiatives. The chemical plant security rules — which neither the chemical industry nor environmentalists were satisfied with — would allow the homeland security secretary to require facilities that manufacture, store or use chemicals to conduct security assessments and then take any steps the owners decide are appropriate. The Homeland Security Department would have the power to inspect plants to determine if the measures are sufficient. While it could not mandate any specific safety improvement, it would have the power to shut down any plant that failed to honor the generic rules. The language is stronger than what Republican leaders in the Senate first endorsed, but Democrats said Monday that it remained far too friendly to the industry. “The threat of a chemical release, is real, real, very real,” said Senator Robert C. Byrd, Democrat of West Virginia, as he introduced an amendment he said would give Homeland Security the power to impose broader regulations. “We cannot afford to be so vulnerable.” But Republicans rejected that effort, saying that the agreed-upon language was strong enough to improve security, at least for now, because the regulations would expire in three years unless Congress reauthorized them. “This is the best proposal we can get,” Senator Gregg said just before a party-line vote rejecting Mr. Byrd’s proposal. “And in my opinion it is significantly better than nothing.” Democrats at the conference committee meeting Monday evening also tried to add about $1 billion in spending for areas including mass transit security, aviation explosives detection research and port security grants. “I challenge all of us not only to talk the talk on port security but walk the walk,” said Mr. Byrd, the minority leader of the appropriations panel, referring to the much-heralded recent action by Congress on a port security bill that called for a larger amount of grants. But with the Republicans holding a majority, each of the measures that Democrats proposed were defeated, one after the other, in party-line votes. The Federal Emergency Management Agency will continue to exist under the agreement, though some members of Congress had said it was so discredited it should be abolished and rebuilt from scratch. Under the agreement, the FEMA director would have a higher rank, still reporting to the secretary of homeland security, but serving as the president’s chief adviser on emergency management, in a manner similar to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the Pentagon. FEMA would also now oversee Homeland Security agencies that focus on preparing for a disaster, instead of just responding to them, and it would have an extra $30 million to hire up to 250 permanent disaster relief employees. Congressional negotiators also added a measure to the bill that would allow Americans to buy as much as a 90-day supply of prescription drugs in Canada, where they are less expensive, and then return home with them. Overall spending for Homeland Security under the bill would be up by $2.3 billion, or 7 percent, compared with the current fiscal year, which ends on Saturday.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: DeaconBenjamin (#0)
I thought I would never say that I am grateful for anything coming out of Washington but this is good news. It is a small down oayment on what we really need. I live in California. My boss was fired because there were too many white people working here. I was told this by his boss who is not white. The above action by Washington is too late to save California, but it will help the rest of America. Five years ago when I went to buy car insurance at AAA I was told I should leave the state because white people do not belong here.
The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie
You have got to be shitting me.
#2. To: Horse, *You Gotta Be Shitting Me* (#1)
Five years ago when I went to buy car insurance at AAA I was told I should leave the state because white people do not belong here.
 | What's that Mr. Nipples? You want me to ask the nice lady about her rack?. |
#3. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#2)
I used to run 20 man single resource wildfire crews, but if I went back, I'd be demoted to a squad boss as the job requires you know Spanish in Oregon or you are not worthy of the job. Many talented fire bosses have quit of are working for Mexican workers who have been promoted to run the crews and to supervise their old bosses.
#4. To: Ferret Mike, *You Gotta Be Shitting Me* (#3)
Again... You gotta be shitting me. I cannot believe we have people getting shitcanned because they HAVE TO LEARN SPANISH. How in the hell has it come to this in this country? English is the language of our forefathers, and now it's being usurped by people who do not have the education let alone ability to run their homelands? Good God. Then again, we as Americans get what we deserve don't we? Political correctness, and politicians who are unwilling to take a stand are going to be the death of The United States.
| What's that Mr. Nipples? You want me to ask the nice lady about her rack?. |
#5. To: DeaconBenjamin (#0)
How long is our Southern Border, do you think? WHY are taxpayers only being ALLOWED $1.2 for a fence along their LOOOONG southern border, when in 20003, US taxpayers GAVE $1.2 billion to ISRAEL to build theirs along their much smaller border in order to keep out the Palestinians from their homeland? Something doesn't add up. By the time the no-bid contractors get finished with the $1.2 Billion, we'll be lucky to get a mile of Sears fencing. From an August 4, 2003 article in the Washington Times by Arnaud De Borchgrave: "....Before Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon arrived in Washington for his eighth private meeting with President Bush, the White House focused on a major impediment to peace between Israelis and Palestinians. The $1.2 billion, 360-mile, 25-foot-high wall to be seeded with electronic sensors.....Seventy miles have been completed. Mr. Bush rightly concluded this wall would be an obstacle to the creation of a Palestinian state. It would have to stop, the president told the prime minister. Mr. Sharon made clear it was not negotiable. Construction would continue and It was being built to last. Besides, said the P.M., "Good fences make good neighbors." No one has bothered to ask yet whether the additional $1 billion Israel requested to its annual $3 billion grant in military aid will go to defraying the cost of fencing in the Palestinians...."
The $1.2 billion for border security is designated for a traditional fence, vehicle barriers and a so-called virtual fence made up of cameras and sensors. That money could also be used to help build 700 miles of physical fence along a specific stretch of the Mexican border, a construction project that the House has already approved and the Senate is still considering.
#6. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#5)
how will loose their homes http://www.aaroads.com/high-priority/table.html
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
#7. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#5)
NAFTA Super Highway Map October 2, 2006 This map is a conceptualization of the Super Highways now underway to connect the United States, Canada, and Mexico to help bring about the creation of a North American Union similar to the European Union The map's travel corridors show the desired routes of the new Super Highways as proposed by the North American Forum on Integration (NAFI) — a group of wealthy industrialists, academics, and politicians whose aim it is to break down barriers to the North American Union. The main actors in NAFI are members of the Council on Foreign Relations or related organizations based in Mexico and Canada. NAFI, whose first objective is to make "the public and decision-makers aware of the challenges of economic and political integration between the three NAFTA countries," is following the country-integration plan of the European Union. (Emphasis added.) That plan used the idea of "free trade" to make steps toward integration sound appealing to the public. Though the North American Union would devastate the American middle class, the Super Highways are being touted as facilitating free trade and bringing about prosperity in the three countries. NAFI's vision is being enacted right now. Eighty separate, but interconnected, "high priority corridors" are being initiated in the United States. To find a complete list of the 80 intended Super Highway projects, go to http://www.aaroads.com/high-priority/table.html. http://ww w.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/printer_4218.shtml
The mind once expanded by a new idea never returns to its' original size
#8. To: Itisa1mosttoolate, DeaconBenjamin (#7)
NAFTA FOR THE MILITARY [US, Canada, Mexico armed forces to be merged] Backing up Globalization with Military Might - Global Issues The Americas are not to escape this buildup of US-controlled military alliances. The US Army War College has urged a "NAFTA for the military "with joint ... http://www.g lobalissues.org/Geopolitics/Articles/Backing.asp The IMF/World Bank/GATT/NAFTA/WTO/ MAI/GATS/FTAA Military Colossus Cooperative Capitalism. A Blueprint for Global Peace and Prosperity. This book highlights sustainable development through economic democracy and democratic ... www.ied.info/books/cc/financialwarfare.shtml - **** WAR COLLEGE PROPOSES THAT A NAFTA MILITARY FORCE BE CREATED WITH ...Subtitle For centuries, New World Order leaders were stymied in their efforts to eliminate the nation-state, replacing it with 10 super nations. http://www.cuttingedge.org/News /n1311.cfm - ACERCA green paper 3: FTAAA 1997 Pentagon document stated that the purpose of the US military is "to protect ... substantial military aid from the US Just like under NAFTA in Mexico, ... http://www.asej.org/ACERCA/f taa/miltrade.htm Krystal Kyer: What Rhymes With NAFTA, But Smells Worse? CAFTA! to support military regimes and dictatorships in that region, more than anything else. ... If it is passed, the expansion of NAFTA will likely result in a ... http://www.counterpunch.org/kye r0912.html - NAFTA and military integration must be deliberately reversed ...For Canada's self-determination, NAFTA and military integration must be deliberately reversed as soon as possible. Rabindranath May 30, 2006 - 3:55pm ... http://vancouver.indymedia.org /?q=node/209 - THE NAFTA WAR Mexico's Zapatista rebels dared to defy a NAFTA-brokered sellout of their ... And the US responded as it always does to acts of war -- with military force. ... www.tc.umn.edu/~fayxx001/text/naftawar.html - E;F.Rudmin, NAFTA & History of US Military in Mx, Jul 23 Clearly NAFTA and the new US military operations in Mexico have a long history. They are not new. NAFTA is a 19th century treaty reworded for the 21st ... www.eco.utexas.edu/~archive/ chiapas95/1996.07/msg00426.html -
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest