Title: Montana's Democrat Senate Candidate John Tester: "With laws passed like the Patriot Act, we need the 2nd Amendment now more than ever!" Source:
debate broadcast on C-SPAN URL Source:http://none Published:Oct 2, 2006 Author:John Tester Post Date:2006-10-02 02:08:43 by Arator Ping List:*Restore the Republic*Subscribe to *Restore the Republic* Keywords:Dem, Trumps, GOP Views:3099 Comments:87
Would a closet-gay pedophilic Pubbie ever say this?
2006 Montana Senate Race I was seriously livid when I read this article.
As I have been repeating ad nauseum for as long as I can remember, we have five extremely vulnerable seats this year - Montana, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Rhode Island, and Missouri.
In Ohio, the Republican is having a hard time winning because of a corrupt Republican Governor.
In Pennsylvania, the Republican is having a hard time because of the unpopularity of the President.
In Rhode Island, the Republican is trying to win re-election in a state that has so few Republicans that there isn't a last person to turn out the lights.
In Missouri, the Republican incumbent is competing for re-election in a state that has been for decades one of the most closely fought battlegrounds in the nation.
And then there is Montana.
The Democrats nominated a dangerous left-wing extremist with a funny name who thinks the Patriot Act has nothing to do with the War on Terror. The Democratic candidate is to John Kerry's left. He's probably to Ned Lamont's left. Meanwhile, the liberal internet fringe has been busy raising enormous sums of money for Tester.
But what does incumbent Republican Senator Conrad Burns do? Instead of annihilating Tester, like he should be, Burns makes gaffe after gaffe, stupid statement after stupid statement. One would hope that after being burned so many times, Burns would stop touching the stove. But today the Senator practically put both hands on at a Senate hearing.
Burns really should drop out of the race and let Mark Racicot run . . . blah, blah, blah . . .
No ........ I'd vote against the member of the gang more to the left. That would be your gang.
You know, sticking with the GOP (gays or pedophiles) despite their treason is almost akin to outing oneself as a closet homosexual/pedophile. Are you one? If not, why do you vote for a party led by them?
Tax cuts that really do stimulate the economy and through increased activity raises revenue ....... Judges that do not legislate from the bench (as much) ....... at least for now .......... I don't care which party starts going in the right/correct direction ............... I prefer to work within a framework instead of scrapping everything and anarchy. One is fooling oneself if they think the left would be more protective of what rights we have left.
Tax cuts that really do stimulate the economy and through increased activity raises revenue ....... Judges that do not legislate from the bench (as much) ....... at least for now .......... I don't care which party starts going in the right/correct direction ............... I prefer to work within a framework instead of scrapping everything and anarchy. One is fooling oneself if they think the left would be more protective of what rights we have left.
If the Gays Or Pedophiles have done so well for the past six years, why are 90% of thier ads negative attack ads? It seems like they would want to talk about their record in office if they have done as well as you say. Why are they desperately trying to keep their record out of the debate?
By the way, don't you have a little boy to diddle somewhere? What are you doing here?
Show me where I ever defended that type of behavior. It is you who want to turn things over to the party that are actually supported by the gay movement. I guess it is your goal to move to SF to become a cheerleader in the Cornhole Bowl?