Title: Montana's Democrat Senate Candidate John Tester: "With laws passed like the Patriot Act, we need the 2nd Amendment now more than ever!" Source:
debate broadcast on C-SPAN URL Source:http://none Published:Oct 2, 2006 Author:John Tester Post Date:2006-10-02 02:08:43 by Arator Ping List:*Restore the Republic*Subscribe to *Restore the Republic* Keywords:Dem, Trumps, GOP Views:3102 Comments:87
Would a closet-gay pedophilic Pubbie ever say this?
2006 Montana Senate Race I was seriously livid when I read this article.
As I have been repeating ad nauseum for as long as I can remember, we have five extremely vulnerable seats this year - Montana, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Rhode Island, and Missouri.
In Ohio, the Republican is having a hard time winning because of a corrupt Republican Governor.
In Pennsylvania, the Republican is having a hard time because of the unpopularity of the President.
In Rhode Island, the Republican is trying to win re-election in a state that has so few Republicans that there isn't a last person to turn out the lights.
In Missouri, the Republican incumbent is competing for re-election in a state that has been for decades one of the most closely fought battlegrounds in the nation.
And then there is Montana.
The Democrats nominated a dangerous left-wing extremist with a funny name who thinks the Patriot Act has nothing to do with the War on Terror. The Democratic candidate is to John Kerry's left. He's probably to Ned Lamont's left. Meanwhile, the liberal internet fringe has been busy raising enormous sums of money for Tester.
But what does incumbent Republican Senator Conrad Burns do? Instead of annihilating Tester, like he should be, Burns makes gaffe after gaffe, stupid statement after stupid statement. One would hope that after being burned so many times, Burns would stop touching the stove. But today the Senator practically put both hands on at a Senate hearing.
Burns really should drop out of the race and let Mark Racicot run . . . blah, blah, blah . . .
Is anyone else delighted that the GOP seems about to implode? Having been swept up in the initial Free Republic purge, then leaving Goldi and her Zionist freaks behind some time ago, I must admit this rash of recent news is music to my ears.
November predictions anyone?
I think the House is gone and the Senate is a possible loss.
The biggest problem is not the Repubs. but the fact the opposition is more bankrupt and leaderless. There is nothing to push them in another direction. Perhaps a loss will wake them up. The loss in '94 did not help the left.
You are in denial. They are their own biggest problem, so don't blame the competition.
Time to dump all the turds in the sandbox. You sprinkle some sand on your turds and call them almond roca if you want to, but it's still a turd. Bring in more sand to cover the smell... changes nothing, still a turd down there. Imagine if you will, a turd-free Congress. Even cleaning 1/3 of the sandbox, is better than letting it reek from filth. Turd rotation is not the answer either.
it should not be a competition .......... just against the other side ......... partisan gang like attitudes .......... that is lazy thinking and dangerous for the nation ..........
it should not be a competition .......... just against the other side ......... partisan gang like attitudes .......... that is lazy thinking and dangerous for the nation ..........
Aren't you getting dizzy with the spin? You have the lazy thinking here. Paid by the post are ya?
Well there you go.. typical shill response. LOL!! So, you support turds of any political smell, as long as you keep the status quo. Now that's a platform to draw to. Are you so bent on partisan politics that you can't possibly imagine people wanting their political systems to be as clean as possible? Are you denying the polls that reflect 70-75% of the American people are unhappy with the performance of Congress. To extrpolate your response, would suggest that they are all then, paid by a Madrassa. (What an IDIOTIC comment). You know, it's a weak, pathetic slam on American voters across the nation. I believe both parties actually know the people are a little miffed. You might find that out too, and when you do, ask yourself, what would make them happy? Now that's a novel idea. Perhaps you'll be surprised to find out that our reps do know what their constituents want, but for reasons perhaps you can supply, do not vote the will of those who put them in office.
90% of all Republican ads this year are negative. They sound just like you. Spewing mindless hate at anyone who disagrees with them.
Do you think you can bully us into your world or blindness, hatred and perversion?
90% of all Political ads this year are negative. They sound just like you. Spewing mindless hate at anyone who disagrees with them.
There are 2 parties. The party of Barney Frank, Gary Studds and the party of Foley. The ones who claim to be different from those parties are Independents Jeffords and Sanders who caucus with the Rats and Libertarian Paul who caucuses with the Pubbies. Your attack on the more conservative of the two parties put you on the left or part of a tiny fringe group with absolutely no chance of changing anything. Why did Paul go with the pubbies? That was/is his best chance of making a difference in the way he wants to go. Same for Jeffords and Sanders who are part of the Barney Frank, Gary Studds gang. Barney Frank (my lover and I have a homosexual whorehouse in our basement but I don't know anything about it) is still there while Studds served a good while past the revelation of a 10 year affair with a young page. As decadent as Foley is, he was forced to resign on less decadence than either of the Rats. Do you see a difference? Probably not.