[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval,

China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap

Russia Moves to Nationalize Country's Third Largest Gold Mining Firm

Britain must prepare for civil war | David Betz

The New MAGA Turf War Over National Intelligence

Happy fourth of july

The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West

Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center

The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!

Lightning

Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building

Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge

Mister Roberts (1965)

WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]

I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump

This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back

MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE

RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism

FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: I have a question for the forum
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 2, 2006
Author: richard9151
Post Date: 2006-10-02 11:15:18 by richard9151
Keywords: None
Views: 1505
Comments: 128

A few of you have read More Blonde Jokes II, and perhaps are beginning to see a little of where I am coming from. Fewer of you have read the posts, Who Controls the United States and Who Controls the United States Part 2.

The next post that I put up will be, as I promised in More Blonde Jokes II, The Bar. This next post is, to me at any rate, an important post, and I need, if possible, a little feed back so I can finish tweaking the post. So, if you feel so inclined, please answer a couple of questions for me. (By all means, if you would rather answer in private, that is not a problem!)

1. Were you aware of any of the material contained in More Blonde Jokes II?

2. Specifically, were you aware of the Federal District States?

3. Were you aware of this?

The sovereign 50 states of the Union of states. These states are foreign governments with respect to the United States. They are also referred to as "foreign countries" in 28 U.S.C. §297 and 26 CFR §1.911-2(h) and "foreign states" in 28 U.S.C. §1603.

4. Were you aware of this?

... our national government of the United States legislates for two distinct territorial jurisdictions.

5. Were you aware that George Washington signed the first ever Excutive Order, and what was contained in that Order?

6. Are you interested in learning about a solution to this problem?

7. I am going to establish a group within the forum. To this group I will ping when I post updates or new Posts that have to do with this subject; The Solution. Are you interested in my placing your name to be pinged? Without a yes answer to this question, I will not add your name to the list. I also reserve the right to not add your name to the list if I feel that is in the best interest of the group, and of 4um.

A simple yes of no to the questions is fine. Thank you all, Richard

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-9) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#10. To: richard9151 (#0)

What's your beef, chief??

TITLE 28 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 297 § 297. Assignment of judges to courts of the freely associated compact states

(a) The Chief Justice or the chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit may assign any circuit or district judge of the Ninth Circuit, with the consent of the judge so assigned, to serve temporarily as a judge of any duly constituted court of the freely associated compact states whenever an official duly authorized by the laws of the respective compact state requests such assignment and such assignment is necessary for the proper dispatch of the business of the respective court. (b) The Congress consents to the acceptance and retention by any judge so authorized of reimbursement from the countries referred to in subsection (a) of all necessary travel expenses, including transportation, and of subsistence, or of a reasonable per diem allowance in lieu of subsistence. The judge shall report to the Administrative Office of the United States Courts any amount received pursuant to this subsection.

TITLE 28 > PART IV > CHAPTER 97 > § 1603 § 1603. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter— (a) A “foreign state”, except as used in section 1608 of this title, includes a political subdivision of a foreign state or an agency or instrumentality of a foreign state as defined in subsection (b). (b) An “agency or instrumentality of a foreign state” means any entity— (1) which is a separate legal person, corporate or otherwise, and (2) which is an organ of a foreign state or political subdivision thereof, or a majority of whose shares or other ownership interest is owned by a foreign state or political subdivision thereof, and (3) which is neither a citizen of a State of the United States as defined in section 1332 (c) and (d) of this title, nor created under the laws of any third country. (c) The “United States” includes all territory and waters, continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. (d) A “commercial activity” means either a regular course of commercial conduct or a particular commercial transaction or act. The commercial character of an activity shall be determined by reference to the nature of the course of conduct or particular transaction or act, rather than by reference to its purpose. (e) A “commercial activity carried on in the United States by a foreign state” means commercial activity carried on by such state and having substantial contact with the United States.

TITLE 26 > Subtitle A > CHAPTER 1 > Subchapter N > PART III > Subpart B > § 911 § 911. Citizens or residents of the United States living abroad

(a) Exclusion from gross income At the election of a qualified individual (made separately with respect to paragraphs (1) and (2)), there shall be excluded from the gross income of such individual, and exempt from taxation under this subtitle, for any taxable year— (1) the foreign earned income of such individual, and (2) the housing cost amount of such individual. (b) Foreign earned income

(1) Definition For purposes of this section— (A) In general The term “foreign earned income” with respect to any individual means the amount received by such individual from sources within a foreign country or countries which constitute earned income attributable to services performed by such individual during the period described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (d)(1), whichever is applicable. (B) Certain amounts not included in foreign earned income The foreign earned income for an individual shall not include amounts— (i) received as a pension or annuity, (ii) paid by the United States or an agency thereof to an employee of the United States or an agency thereof, (iii) included in gross income by reason of section 402 (b) (relating to taxability of beneficiary of nonexempt trust) or section 403 (c) (relating to taxability of beneficiary under a nonqualified annuity), or (iv) received after the close of the taxable year following the taxable year in which the services to which the amounts are attributable are performed.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00000911-- --000-.html

randge  posted on  2006-10-02   12:38:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: richard9151 (#0)

I am going to be very hard nosed about this,

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Cynicom  posted on  2006-10-02   12:44:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: richard9151 (#0) (Edited)

I am going to establish a group within the forum.

Create the new PING list and give it an appropriate name in your "Setup" at the top of the page. You can add anyone who wants to be on the list or anyone can sign up any time.

“The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper

BTP Holdings  posted on  2006-10-02   12:50:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: richard9151 (#0)

Were you aware of this?

A good portion of it. I had never heard that exact story about the creation of the federal Districts used for the federal court system jurisdiction.

“The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper

BTP Holdings  posted on  2006-10-02   12:54:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: richard9151 (#0)

I have a question for the forum

It appears you have questions for the forum.

Were you aware of any of the material contained in More Blonde Jokes II?

No, I didn't read it.

Specifically, were you aware of the Federal District States?

No, what are they? D.C.?

The sovereign 50 states of the Union of states. These states are foreign governments with respect to the United States. They are also referred to as "foreign countries" in 28 U.S.C. §297 and 26 CFR §1.911-2(h) and "foreign states" in 28 U.S.C. §1603.

That makes sense. States should be seperate governments with seperate laws, as long as they go by the Constitution of the USA.

Were you aware of this? ... our national government of the United States legislates for two distinct territorial jurisdictions.

No.

Are you interested in learning about a solution to this problem?

What problem is that?

I am going to establish a group within the forum. To this group I will ping when I post updates or new Posts that have to do with this subject; The Solution. Are you interested in my placing your name to be pinged? Without a yes answer to this question, I will not add your name to the list. I also reserve the right to not add your name to the list if I feel that is in the best interest of the group, and of 4um.

Yeah, go ahead ping me.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]

RickyJ  posted on  2006-10-02   13:04:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: richard9151 (#6)

yes

angle  posted on  2006-10-02   13:21:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: mehitable (#9)

That is not a yes or no, comrade.

angle  posted on  2006-10-02   13:23:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: randge (#10)

Will you please use the clift notes version please...

angle  posted on  2006-10-02   13:24:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: richard9151 (#0)

The sovereign 50 states of the Union of states. These states are foreign governments with respect to the United States. They are also referred to as "foreign countries" in 28 U.S.C. §297 and 26 CFR §1.911-2(h) and "foreign states" in 28 U.S.C. §1603.

I'm not seeing that.

Here's 28 USC 297, as per http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/....html

---

§ 297. Assignment of judges to courts of the freely associated compact states

(a) The Chief Justice or the chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit may assign any circuit or district judge of the Ninth Circuit, with the consent of the judge so assigned, to serve temporarily as a judge of any duly constituted court of the freely associated compact states whenever an official duly authorized by the laws of the respective compact state requests such assignment and such assignment is necessary for the proper dispatch of the business of the respective court.

(b) The Congress consents to the acceptance and retention by any judge so authorized of reimbursement from the countries referred to in subsection (a) of all necessary travel expenses, including transportation, and of subsistence, or of a reasonable per diem allowance in lieu of subsistence. The judge shall report to the Administrative Office of the United States Courts any amount received pursuant to this subsection.

---

Here's 26 CFR §1.911-2(h). Source:

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/....TEXT

    (h) Foreign country. The term ``foreign country'' when used in a 
geographical sense includes any territory under the sovereignty of a 
government other than that of the United States. It includes the 
territorial waters of the foreign country (determined in accordance with 
the laws of the United States), the air space over the foreign country, 
and the seabed and subsoil of those submarine areas which are adjacent 
to the territorial waters of the foreign country and over which the 
foreign country has exclusive rights, in accordance with international 
law, with respect to the exploration and exploitation of natural 
resources.

With this definition, yn order to say the 50 states are foreign countries, you also have to show that the law says that the 50 states are "under the sovereignty of a government other than that of the United States".

And here's 28 USC 1603, source:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/...html

---

§ 1603. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter— (a) A “foreign state”, except as used in section 1608 of this title, includes a political subdivision of a foreign state or an agency or instrumentality of a foreign state as defined in subsection (b). (b) An “agency or instrumentality of a foreign state” means any entity— (1) which is a separate legal person, corporate or otherwise, and (2) which is an organ of a foreign state or political subdivision thereof, or a majority of whose shares or other ownership interest is owned by a foreign state or political subdivision thereof, and (3) which is neither a citizen of a State of the United States as defined in section 1332 (c) and (d) of this title, nor created under the laws of any third country. (c) The “United States” includes all territory and waters, continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. (d) A “commercial activity” means either a regular course of commercial conduct or a particular commercial transaction or act. The commercial character of an activity shall be determined by reference to the nature of the course of conduct or particular transaction or act, rather than by reference to its purpose. (e) A “commercial activity carried on in the United States by a foreign state” means commercial activity carried on by such state and having substantial contact with the United States.

---

The last of these seems to come closest to what you say because "United States" is not defined to include the 50 states, BUT "foreign state" is not defined using the term "United States" at all. In any event, these definitions only apply to chapter 97 of Title 28 (and not the entire US code, of course).

Pinguinite.com

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-10-02   13:59:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: randge (#10)

Ya beat me to it.

Pinguinite.com

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-10-02   14:03:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Neil McIver (#19) (Edited)

I beat you to it without however supplying the most illuminating commentary.

Thanx.

randge  posted on  2006-10-02   14:32:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: BTP Holdings, all (#12)

Create the new PING list and give it an appropriate name in your "Setup"

allready done, as Solution.

Also my webpage under richard9151

The webpage has a statement of purpose and The Solution that I am aiming for.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   14:36:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Cynicom (#11)

Try me and see. Also, check out my web page and you will find the statement of purpose and The Solution.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   14:37:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: randge (#10)

What's your beef, chief??

My beef is what permits the Federal Zone to include an overlay of the 50 states, WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMED CONSENT OF THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS. And do not feed any B.S. about how they need to get informed. It takes years and years of study to begin to understand. If you do not understand what I mean, check out my webpage in 4um. Perhaps then you will begin to see.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   14:39:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Neil McIver, richard9151 (#18)

(c) The “United States” includes all territory and waters, continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

This is one of the worst legal defintions I've ever seen.

The ADL is training the New Gestapo

AngelSpawn  posted on  2006-10-02   14:40:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Neil McIver (#18)

I'm not seeing that.

Ahhh, perhaps you are beginning to see something of the problem! I put the link in the original post, More Blonde Jokes II, and you can use that to research and find the connections. Sinply put, you can not read the code, code, i.e., secret communications, without referencing ALL federal court cases which apply to that section of the code.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   14:46:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: RickyJ (#14)

No, I didn't read it.

What problem is that?

You are in this forum, and you ask, what problem is that? Are we being serious here, or, something else?

You can check out my webpage on 4um and see what I consider to be the solution.

And I have added you to the list.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   14:49:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: AngelSpawn (#24)

This is one of the worst legal defintions I've ever seen.

That is because it is written in code (i.e., code, secret communications), in the code of the United States government.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   14:50:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: richard9151 (#27)

That is because it is written in code

It's loud and clear to me. 'We, the Law Owners, will arrogate everything to ourselves including the law.'

The ADL is training the New Gestapo

AngelSpawn  posted on  2006-10-02   14:56:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: AngelSpawn (#28)

'We, the Law Owners, will arrogate everything to ourselves including the law.'

You catch on quick!.... Or, is it because you already understood? UMMMM?

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   15:05:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: richard9151 (#25)

If I may suggest...

If you put your tag line in a reduced font size and/or different color, (preferably both) it would be more helpful to people reading your posts. I find myself starting to reread your tag line every time which is a bit annoying.

That suggestion should probably be on the setup page.

Pinguinite.com

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-10-02   15:05:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Neil McIver (#30)

If I may suggest...

You may, and I will think about that. I understand what you mean; however, I put the tag line as I did for the specific reason that you mentioned, so that it would be read each time. Nothing works like repeating something constantly, and if you understand that, you are better able to resist mind games. Like mine. The difference is, I will admit why I do things; most never will.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   15:09:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: richard9151 (#29)

is it because you already understood?

I have no illusions about their desires.

The ADL is training the New Gestapo

AngelSpawn  posted on  2006-10-02   15:10:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Neil McIver, christine, Zipporah (#30)

That suggestion should probably be on the setup page.

Or you could hardcode a sig template into the setup. You're a talented fellow in that and other regards.

The ADL is training the New Gestapo

AngelSpawn  posted on  2006-10-02   15:11:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: richard9151 (#31)

Regarding your 'Solution'...have you sent this to Congressman Ron Paul's office?

Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org

who knows what evil  posted on  2006-10-02   15:21:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: richard9151 (#31)

however, I put the tag line as I did for the specific reason that you mentioned, so that it would be read each time. Nothing works like repeating something constantly, and if you understand that, you are better able to resist mind games. Like mine.

Uh-huh.

Well, you'll be quite successful at annoying people to the point they put you on bozo, which I'll do if you insist in keeping your tagline as is. Your honesty about being a willing utilizer of brain-washing techniques will buy you no sympathy from me.

Hint: If you want to win sympathy and respect from people, don't do things that annoy them, and don't try to manipulate them. I think that's pretty good advice.

I'll put you on bozo this evening if it remains unchanged. The choice is, of course, yours.

Pinguinite.com

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-10-02   15:34:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: AngelSpawn (#24)

Circular definitions involving "United States" are not uncommon in the code.

It makes you really appreciate the value of having a non-generic name for a country, which we don't have here. "Canada" and "Mexico" have unique singular names, but the USA does not.

Pinguinite.com

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-10-02   15:46:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Neil McIver (#36)

Circular definitions involving "United States" are not uncommon in the code.

Circular defintions are by nature confusing or deceptive. I'm not a wacky Coincidence Theorist. ; )

The ADL is training the New Gestapo

AngelSpawn  posted on  2006-10-02   15:48:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: richard9151 (#0)

DickeyBird,

If you're so ignorant as to assert that the U.S. Constitution was formed to give "democracy" to the District of Colombia (D.C.), why should anyone take anything you say seriously?

D.C. was 'run' by a Congressional group, until around 1975. That's a long damned way from your assertion.


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2006-10-02   15:58:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: All (#38)

Shhhhhh....genius at work here.

Richard_666 is about to save America from the safety of his coconut tree in Mexico City.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-10-02   16:07:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: who knows what evil, all (#34)

Regarding your 'Solution'...have you sent this to Congressman Ron Paul's office?

Why? I appreciate Ron Paul, but what can a single man accomplish? What is needed is people..... people who understand what has been done, and how to undo it, and until that happens, nothing will change, and no matter who is sent to DC, nothing can change. A very good start would be no more attorneys, but even that is not sufficient without the average American having knowledge of what is needed.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   18:08:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Jethro Tull (#39)

Thank you, Jethro, for noticing. Don´t know what I/we could do without your incitful comments.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   18:10:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: SKYDRIFTER (#38)

Look, one-legged-man, why would anyone listen to you? All you have to offer is nonsense; you cut and paste nonsense from newspapers, I assume, or breaking news on the net, but have you ever bothered to open a legal dictionary? Or, study some case law? Until you do, if I were you, I would shut-up. Your ignorance is showing.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   18:12:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Neil McIver (#35)

Naturally. Consider my choice made.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   18:14:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: AngelSpawn, Neil McIver, all (#37)

Circular defintions are by nature confusing or deceptive.

But of course, and well said. It is important to note that Congress uses one dictionary to write law, but the attorneys use another, Blacks Law Dictionary, to find the secrets hidden in the code; the definitions in Blacks change constantly due to the attorneys finding new definitions for the words used in the code, but the original dictionary used by Congress NEVER changes.

It is also interesting to note that Blacks Law Dictionary has a list of the English Monarchies Regnal Years on the last page of the book. That is something REALLY REALLY important to me, ya know?

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   18:23:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: richard9151 (#44) (Edited)

I know that I'm going to regret this, but I would suggest that you put your argument (whatever it is, and I'm not at all sure what it is) into a few concise paragraphs.

I am sure that what it is that you want to say requires yards and yards of background and my is time precious to me. But consider contextualizing all of this a bit and provide us with some sort of thesis supported by a few cogent supporting points. Pretend that you are writing the forward or preface to the book that you would write on the subject.

Tell us what your beef is. You will encounter a lot less hostility on this forum.

randge  posted on  2006-10-02   18:50:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: randge, all (#45)

but I would suggest that you put your argument (whatever it is, and I'm not at all sure what it is) into a few concise paragraphs.

Here it is, directly from my homepage on 4um;

Investigating the Solutions to the problems facing America! I am simply tired of talking about it, and I would like everyone who is a member of 4um who is also tired of talking about the problems facing America, to help me to do something about it!

To that end, I would suggest that no one is capable of doing something about these problems unless they have a firm idea of what the problem(s) is! For that reason, I have posted More Blonde Jokes II. The purpose of this post is to act as an educational tool, and to begin to judge where everyone is in knowledge of the actual legal basis of America´s problems.

But, and this is an extremely important point, I also intend that this post, More Blonde Jokes II, in a different format if neccessary, be used as an educational tool throughout America. For that reason, when you read More Blonde Jokes II (for the third or fourth time possibly), remember, this is not opinion; it is based on federal law, actions taken by Presidents of the United States, and factual papers which exist. And after you read the post, judge for yourself how the average American will react when he learns that he lives in a foreign country in regards to the United States!

The sovereign 50 states of the Union of states. These states are foreign governments with respect to the United States. They are also referred to as "foreign countries" in 28 U.S.C. §297 and 26 CFR §1.911-2(h) and "foreign states" in 28 U.S.C. §1603.

Please, your feedback is needed and appreciated. Richard

First post to be read in the educational series; More Blonde Jokes II

The Solution to the problems in America can only be addressed with a Constitutional Amendment. Understand, this Constitutional Amendment MUST be done by and through the people, for it will never be done if left to the attorneys and other mindless servants of the beast.

Constitution of the United States

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17;

17. To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards, and other needful buildings: And,

The new Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 shall read;

17. To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, SUBJECT ONLY TO THE RESTRICTIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards, and other needful buildings: And,

The words in all-in-capitals are the words to be added to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   18:59:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: randge (#45)

Nice try randge. It didn't take.

~~

jessejane  posted on  2006-10-02   19:08:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: richard9151, AngelSpawn, Neil McIver (#44) (Edited)

It is important to note that Congress uses one dictionary to write law,

Actually "Congress" is not a monolithic body that restricts itself to one particular source for the meaning of legal terms. They are lawyers themselves and doctors, businessmen, etc. Many terms are 'terms of art' that develop over time in society at large. Were there in fact a single source relied upon by Congress, there would not be so much effort expended by the courts archiving the minutes and notes of congressional deliberations to ascertain what Congress meant by any particular provision - "one dictionary to write law" (as you phrased it) used by Congress could be consulted, but alas, it does not exist.

but the attorneys use another, Blacks Law Dictionary, to find the secrets hidden in the code;

Actually there are many law dictionaries used by attorneys; e.g. Bouvier's is another widely referenced source, and then there are specialty dictionaries as well.

the definitions in Blacks change constantly due to the attorneys finding new definitions for the words used in the code, but the original dictionary used by Congress NEVER changes.

Black's changes (as do other dictionaries) when new terms of art come into use. For example, my 5th ed Black's (1979) does not have "Hedge Fund" defined, but the 7th ed (1999) does. Legal language evolves, legal dictionaires keep pace, no more, no less.

It is also interesting to note that Blacks Law Dictionary has a list of the English Monarchies Regnal Years on the last page of the book. That is something REALLY REALLY important to me, ya know?

If you were actually pursuing the derivation and basis for the meaning of some common law terms, many of which originate in English law, you'd have to pursue cites which reference British statutes, which cites identify the regnal year in which the source British statute was enacted. Obviously the US laws are not cited in this way and so a table of US presidents is not needed.

(The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)

Starwind  posted on  2006-10-02   19:14:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: richard9151 (#31)

the problem is, like Neil said, the tagline being the same size and color draws our attention away from the content of your individual posts. i don't think you want that, do you?

christine  posted on  2006-10-02   19:27:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: jessejane (#47)

I knew that I'd regret trying.

I fear we have our very own Newsie. Perhaps we should refrain from feeding him.

randge  posted on  2006-10-02   19:29:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (51 - 128) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]