[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval,

China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap

Russia Moves to Nationalize Country's Third Largest Gold Mining Firm

Britain must prepare for civil war | David Betz

The New MAGA Turf War Over National Intelligence

Happy fourth of july

The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West

Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center

The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!

Lightning

Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building

Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge

Mister Roberts (1965)

WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]

I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump

This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back

MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE

RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism

FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: I have a question for the forum
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 2, 2006
Author: richard9151
Post Date: 2006-10-02 11:15:18 by richard9151
Keywords: None
Views: 1498
Comments: 128

A few of you have read More Blonde Jokes II, and perhaps are beginning to see a little of where I am coming from. Fewer of you have read the posts, Who Controls the United States and Who Controls the United States Part 2.

The next post that I put up will be, as I promised in More Blonde Jokes II, The Bar. This next post is, to me at any rate, an important post, and I need, if possible, a little feed back so I can finish tweaking the post. So, if you feel so inclined, please answer a couple of questions for me. (By all means, if you would rather answer in private, that is not a problem!)

1. Were you aware of any of the material contained in More Blonde Jokes II?

2. Specifically, were you aware of the Federal District States?

3. Were you aware of this?

The sovereign 50 states of the Union of states. These states are foreign governments with respect to the United States. They are also referred to as "foreign countries" in 28 U.S.C. §297 and 26 CFR §1.911-2(h) and "foreign states" in 28 U.S.C. §1603.

4. Were you aware of this?

... our national government of the United States legislates for two distinct territorial jurisdictions.

5. Were you aware that George Washington signed the first ever Excutive Order, and what was contained in that Order?

6. Are you interested in learning about a solution to this problem?

7. I am going to establish a group within the forum. To this group I will ping when I post updates or new Posts that have to do with this subject; The Solution. Are you interested in my placing your name to be pinged? Without a yes answer to this question, I will not add your name to the list. I also reserve the right to not add your name to the list if I feel that is in the best interest of the group, and of 4um.

A simple yes of no to the questions is fine. Thank you all, Richard

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-22) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#23. To: randge (#10)

What's your beef, chief??

My beef is what permits the Federal Zone to include an overlay of the 50 states, WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMED CONSENT OF THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS. And do not feed any B.S. about how they need to get informed. It takes years and years of study to begin to understand. If you do not understand what I mean, check out my webpage in 4um. Perhaps then you will begin to see.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   14:39:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Neil McIver, richard9151 (#18)

(c) The “United States” includes all territory and waters, continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

This is one of the worst legal defintions I've ever seen.

The ADL is training the New Gestapo

AngelSpawn  posted on  2006-10-02   14:40:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Neil McIver (#18)

I'm not seeing that.

Ahhh, perhaps you are beginning to see something of the problem! I put the link in the original post, More Blonde Jokes II, and you can use that to research and find the connections. Sinply put, you can not read the code, code, i.e., secret communications, without referencing ALL federal court cases which apply to that section of the code.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   14:46:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: RickyJ (#14)

No, I didn't read it.

What problem is that?

You are in this forum, and you ask, what problem is that? Are we being serious here, or, something else?

You can check out my webpage on 4um and see what I consider to be the solution.

And I have added you to the list.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   14:49:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: AngelSpawn (#24)

This is one of the worst legal defintions I've ever seen.

That is because it is written in code (i.e., code, secret communications), in the code of the United States government.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   14:50:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: richard9151 (#27)

That is because it is written in code

It's loud and clear to me. 'We, the Law Owners, will arrogate everything to ourselves including the law.'

The ADL is training the New Gestapo

AngelSpawn  posted on  2006-10-02   14:56:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: AngelSpawn (#28)

'We, the Law Owners, will arrogate everything to ourselves including the law.'

You catch on quick!.... Or, is it because you already understood? UMMMM?

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   15:05:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: richard9151 (#25)

If I may suggest...

If you put your tag line in a reduced font size and/or different color, (preferably both) it would be more helpful to people reading your posts. I find myself starting to reread your tag line every time which is a bit annoying.

That suggestion should probably be on the setup page.

Pinguinite.com

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-10-02   15:05:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Neil McIver (#30)

If I may suggest...

You may, and I will think about that. I understand what you mean; however, I put the tag line as I did for the specific reason that you mentioned, so that it would be read each time. Nothing works like repeating something constantly, and if you understand that, you are better able to resist mind games. Like mine. The difference is, I will admit why I do things; most never will.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   15:09:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: richard9151 (#29)

is it because you already understood?

I have no illusions about their desires.

The ADL is training the New Gestapo

AngelSpawn  posted on  2006-10-02   15:10:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Neil McIver, christine, Zipporah (#30)

That suggestion should probably be on the setup page.

Or you could hardcode a sig template into the setup. You're a talented fellow in that and other regards.

The ADL is training the New Gestapo

AngelSpawn  posted on  2006-10-02   15:11:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: richard9151 (#31)

Regarding your 'Solution'...have you sent this to Congressman Ron Paul's office?

Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org

who knows what evil  posted on  2006-10-02   15:21:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: richard9151 (#31)

however, I put the tag line as I did for the specific reason that you mentioned, so that it would be read each time. Nothing works like repeating something constantly, and if you understand that, you are better able to resist mind games. Like mine.

Uh-huh.

Well, you'll be quite successful at annoying people to the point they put you on bozo, which I'll do if you insist in keeping your tagline as is. Your honesty about being a willing utilizer of brain-washing techniques will buy you no sympathy from me.

Hint: If you want to win sympathy and respect from people, don't do things that annoy them, and don't try to manipulate them. I think that's pretty good advice.

I'll put you on bozo this evening if it remains unchanged. The choice is, of course, yours.

Pinguinite.com

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-10-02   15:34:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: AngelSpawn (#24)

Circular definitions involving "United States" are not uncommon in the code.

It makes you really appreciate the value of having a non-generic name for a country, which we don't have here. "Canada" and "Mexico" have unique singular names, but the USA does not.

Pinguinite.com

Neil McIver  posted on  2006-10-02   15:46:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Neil McIver (#36)

Circular definitions involving "United States" are not uncommon in the code.

Circular defintions are by nature confusing or deceptive. I'm not a wacky Coincidence Theorist. ; )

The ADL is training the New Gestapo

AngelSpawn  posted on  2006-10-02   15:48:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: richard9151 (#0)

DickeyBird,

If you're so ignorant as to assert that the U.S. Constitution was formed to give "democracy" to the District of Colombia (D.C.), why should anyone take anything you say seriously?

D.C. was 'run' by a Congressional group, until around 1975. That's a long damned way from your assertion.


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2006-10-02   15:58:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: All (#38)

Shhhhhh....genius at work here.

Richard_666 is about to save America from the safety of his coconut tree in Mexico City.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-10-02   16:07:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: who knows what evil, all (#34)

Regarding your 'Solution'...have you sent this to Congressman Ron Paul's office?

Why? I appreciate Ron Paul, but what can a single man accomplish? What is needed is people..... people who understand what has been done, and how to undo it, and until that happens, nothing will change, and no matter who is sent to DC, nothing can change. A very good start would be no more attorneys, but even that is not sufficient without the average American having knowledge of what is needed.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   18:08:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Jethro Tull (#39)

Thank you, Jethro, for noticing. Don´t know what I/we could do without your incitful comments.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   18:10:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: SKYDRIFTER (#38)

Look, one-legged-man, why would anyone listen to you? All you have to offer is nonsense; you cut and paste nonsense from newspapers, I assume, or breaking news on the net, but have you ever bothered to open a legal dictionary? Or, study some case law? Until you do, if I were you, I would shut-up. Your ignorance is showing.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   18:12:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Neil McIver (#35)

Naturally. Consider my choice made.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   18:14:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: AngelSpawn, Neil McIver, all (#37)

Circular defintions are by nature confusing or deceptive.

But of course, and well said. It is important to note that Congress uses one dictionary to write law, but the attorneys use another, Blacks Law Dictionary, to find the secrets hidden in the code; the definitions in Blacks change constantly due to the attorneys finding new definitions for the words used in the code, but the original dictionary used by Congress NEVER changes.

It is also interesting to note that Blacks Law Dictionary has a list of the English Monarchies Regnal Years on the last page of the book. That is something REALLY REALLY important to me, ya know?

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   18:23:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: richard9151 (#44) (Edited)

I know that I'm going to regret this, but I would suggest that you put your argument (whatever it is, and I'm not at all sure what it is) into a few concise paragraphs.

I am sure that what it is that you want to say requires yards and yards of background and my is time precious to me. But consider contextualizing all of this a bit and provide us with some sort of thesis supported by a few cogent supporting points. Pretend that you are writing the forward or preface to the book that you would write on the subject.

Tell us what your beef is. You will encounter a lot less hostility on this forum.

randge  posted on  2006-10-02   18:50:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: randge, all (#45)

but I would suggest that you put your argument (whatever it is, and I'm not at all sure what it is) into a few concise paragraphs.

Here it is, directly from my homepage on 4um;

Investigating the Solutions to the problems facing America! I am simply tired of talking about it, and I would like everyone who is a member of 4um who is also tired of talking about the problems facing America, to help me to do something about it!

To that end, I would suggest that no one is capable of doing something about these problems unless they have a firm idea of what the problem(s) is! For that reason, I have posted More Blonde Jokes II. The purpose of this post is to act as an educational tool, and to begin to judge where everyone is in knowledge of the actual legal basis of America´s problems.

But, and this is an extremely important point, I also intend that this post, More Blonde Jokes II, in a different format if neccessary, be used as an educational tool throughout America. For that reason, when you read More Blonde Jokes II (for the third or fourth time possibly), remember, this is not opinion; it is based on federal law, actions taken by Presidents of the United States, and factual papers which exist. And after you read the post, judge for yourself how the average American will react when he learns that he lives in a foreign country in regards to the United States!

The sovereign 50 states of the Union of states. These states are foreign governments with respect to the United States. They are also referred to as "foreign countries" in 28 U.S.C. §297 and 26 CFR §1.911-2(h) and "foreign states" in 28 U.S.C. §1603.

Please, your feedback is needed and appreciated. Richard

First post to be read in the educational series; More Blonde Jokes II

The Solution to the problems in America can only be addressed with a Constitutional Amendment. Understand, this Constitutional Amendment MUST be done by and through the people, for it will never be done if left to the attorneys and other mindless servants of the beast.

Constitution of the United States

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17;

17. To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards, and other needful buildings: And,

The new Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 shall read;

17. To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, SUBJECT ONLY TO THE RESTRICTIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards, and other needful buildings: And,

The words in all-in-capitals are the words to be added to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17.

The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2006-10-02   18:59:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: randge (#45)

Nice try randge. It didn't take.

~~

jessejane  posted on  2006-10-02   19:08:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: richard9151, AngelSpawn, Neil McIver (#44) (Edited)

It is important to note that Congress uses one dictionary to write law,

Actually "Congress" is not a monolithic body that restricts itself to one particular source for the meaning of legal terms. They are lawyers themselves and doctors, businessmen, etc. Many terms are 'terms of art' that develop over time in society at large. Were there in fact a single source relied upon by Congress, there would not be so much effort expended by the courts archiving the minutes and notes of congressional deliberations to ascertain what Congress meant by any particular provision - "one dictionary to write law" (as you phrased it) used by Congress could be consulted, but alas, it does not exist.

but the attorneys use another, Blacks Law Dictionary, to find the secrets hidden in the code;

Actually there are many law dictionaries used by attorneys; e.g. Bouvier's is another widely referenced source, and then there are specialty dictionaries as well.

the definitions in Blacks change constantly due to the attorneys finding new definitions for the words used in the code, but the original dictionary used by Congress NEVER changes.

Black's changes (as do other dictionaries) when new terms of art come into use. For example, my 5th ed Black's (1979) does not have "Hedge Fund" defined, but the 7th ed (1999) does. Legal language evolves, legal dictionaires keep pace, no more, no less.

It is also interesting to note that Blacks Law Dictionary has a list of the English Monarchies Regnal Years on the last page of the book. That is something REALLY REALLY important to me, ya know?

If you were actually pursuing the derivation and basis for the meaning of some common law terms, many of which originate in English law, you'd have to pursue cites which reference British statutes, which cites identify the regnal year in which the source British statute was enacted. Obviously the US laws are not cited in this way and so a table of US presidents is not needed.

(The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)

Starwind  posted on  2006-10-02   19:14:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: richard9151 (#31)

the problem is, like Neil said, the tagline being the same size and color draws our attention away from the content of your individual posts. i don't think you want that, do you?

christine  posted on  2006-10-02   19:27:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: jessejane (#47)

I knew that I'd regret trying.

I fear we have our very own Newsie. Perhaps we should refrain from feeding him.

randge  posted on  2006-10-02   19:29:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: randge, richard9151 (#10)

This case discusses FSIA. Neither individual American citizens nor the various states are "foreign states". Filed assertions otherwise would most likely garner Rule 11 sanctions.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/01-593.ZS.html

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DOLE FOOD CO. et al. v. PATRICKSON et al. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 01—593. Argued January 22, 2003–Decided April 22, 2003

In 1947, the UN created a perpetual war and named it Israel.

wbales  posted on  2006-10-02   19:31:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: randge (#45)

into a few concise paragraphs.

Churchill preached brevity and simplicity.

Cynicom  posted on  2006-10-02   19:38:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: AngelSpawn (#33)

Or you could hardcode a sig template into the setup. You're a talented fellow in that and other regards.

Screw that, it forces everyone to conform. Neil was just making a suggestion for thew sake of readability. Sheesh!

The faster the Aryan Nation mob at Freedom4um are caged and chained, the better off we'll be. I’ll cheering when they are forced to behave. - Aaron

Dakmar  posted on  2006-10-02   19:40:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: All (#51) (Edited)

This issue was further discussed at the Appromattox Court House, Virginia, on April 9, 1865.

[Well before enactment of FSIA, BTW.]

In 1947, the UN created a perpetual war and named it Israel.

wbales  posted on  2006-10-02   19:40:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Cynicom (#52)

Churchill preached brevity and simplicity.

Don't forget eugenics, Churchill was a proponent. Which brings me to richard_666.

For the good of the human gene pool, can something be done with him?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-10-02   19:44:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: wbales, range (#51)

This case discusses FSIA. Neither individual American citizens nor the various states are "foreign states". Filed assertions otherwise would most likely garner Rule 11 sanctions.

Thank you, I'm bored to tears by legal mumbo-jumbo and even I managed to trudge far enough through this to understand that certain claims were based on presenting bits and pieces of legal documents taken completely out of context.

The faster the Aryan Nation mob at Freedom4um are caged and chained, the better off we'll be. I’ll cheering when they are forced to behave. - Aaron

Dakmar  posted on  2006-10-02   19:46:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Jethro Tull (#55)

The phenotype has been realized. The die is cast . . .

randge  posted on  2006-10-02   19:46:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: randge (#56)

Whoops, looked up your name to make sure spelling was right and forgot to actually fix it.

The faster the Aryan Nation mob at Freedom4um are caged and chained, the better off we'll be. I’ll cheering when they are forced to behave. - Aaron

Dakmar  posted on  2006-10-02   19:48:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: Jethro Tull (#55)

Don't forget eugenics,

Sometime you might check John Foster Dulles, now he was a really into eugenics.

Something MSM never mentions. (Course he was a cuzin to the Rockyfellers)

Cynicom  posted on  2006-10-02   19:50:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: Dakmar (#56)

taken completely out of context

completely

In 1947, the UN created a perpetual war and named it Israel.

wbales  posted on  2006-10-02   19:50:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: randge (#50)

I knew that I'd regret trying.

I fear we have our very own Newsie. Perhaps we should refrain from feeding him.

I try to read it all.. But, speaking for myself, it's a lot to digest. I don't get half of what is being said without being instructed to read it again dammit. So.. I'm moving on. I gave several pieces attention. Very informative, and I appreciate the time taken to put it together.. But in return, the reader should be allowed time to digest it, think, and discuss. If that opportunity is not afforded.. fine.. see how many rally to the call.

Sorry if it's rather a blunt analysis. That's just the way I see it.

"Foreign aid might be defined as a transfer from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries." ~~Douglas Casey - 1992

jessejane  posted on  2006-10-02   19:53:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: richard9151 (#23)

WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMED CONSENT OF THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS.

richard, therein lies the rub. while you are likely technically correct in what you've asserted (i believe you are as i've done some study on this), the fact of the matter is most americans would never understand it nor care. and until and unless there are a critical number who do care enough to do something about it (and i mean as in REVOLT), your solution isn't going to work. THEY have all the fiat currency and all the power to enforce THEIR corrupt system upon us and we have little choice but to comply and use it since they've taken the people's money. we have no real representatives. further, try arguing any of this in one of THEIR courts and see how far you get.

now, i do think you are on the right track as far as your effort to educate and i commend you for your energy and enthusiam, however, your message needs to be simplified.

you asked! ;)

christine  posted on  2006-10-02   19:53:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: Cynicom (#59)

Sometime you might check John Foster Dulles, now he was a really into eugenics.

(Just to be an LP type asshole):

Barbara Bush is in favor of killing babies!

The faster the Aryan Nation mob at Freedom4um are caged and chained, the better off we'll be. I’ll cheering when they are forced to behave. - Aaron

Dakmar  posted on  2006-10-02   20:00:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (64 - 128) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]