See other Editorial Articles
Title: I have a question for the forum
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 2, 2006
Author: richard9151
Post Date: 2006-10-02 11:15:18 by richard9151
Keywords: None
Views: 1474
Comments: 128
A few of you have read More Blonde Jokes II, and perhaps are beginning to see a little of where I am coming from. Fewer of you have read the posts, Who Controls the United States and Who Controls the United States Part 2. The next post that I put up will be, as I promised in More Blonde Jokes II, The Bar. This next post is, to me at any rate, an important post, and I need, if possible, a little feed back so I can finish tweaking the post. So, if you feel so inclined, please answer a couple of questions for me. (By all means, if you would rather answer in private, that is not a problem!) 1. Were you aware of any of the material contained in More Blonde Jokes II? 2. Specifically, were you aware of the Federal District States? 3. Were you aware of this? The sovereign 50 states of the Union of states. These states are foreign governments with respect to the United States. They are also referred to as "foreign countries" in 28 U.S.C. §297 and 26 CFR §1.911-2(h) and "foreign states" in 28 U.S.C. §1603. 4. Were you aware of this? ... our national government of the United States legislates for two distinct territorial jurisdictions. 5. Were you aware that George Washington signed the first ever Excutive Order, and what was contained in that Order? 6. Are you interested in learning about a solution to this problem? 7. I am going to establish a group within the forum. To this group I will ping when I post updates or new Posts that have to do with this subject; The Solution. Are you interested in my placing your name to be pinged? Without a yes answer to this question, I will not add your name to the list. I also reserve the right to not add your name to the list if I feel that is in the best interest of the group, and of 4um. A simple yes of no to the questions is fine. Thank you all, Richard
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: richard9151 (#0)
I'm all ears. uh, eyes.
Scary....
what's a yes of no
That is not a yes reply, my friend, and I will not put your name on the list without a specific yes to that question. I am going to be very hard nosed about this, for obvious reasons.
The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.
I had a general idea about this, but would welcome more detailed information. I thought that Lincoln was the first to use Executive Orders, under the War Powers Act, which I understand to still be in effect - and that we are the enemy. Thanks for your Blonde efforts.
It´s Monday.... don´t start on me! YES OR NO!!!! Better?
The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.
It would be to you, Jethro, because it involves learning and not just whining.
The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.
lodwick..... sometimes I wonder about you....... Would Blonde efforts be associated with Blonde moments? And you are correct; we are the enemy. However, please note this (from the post, More Blonde Jokes II); ... our national government of the United States legislates for two distinct territorial jurisdictions. And; ... The sovereign 50 states of the Union of states. These states are foreign governments with respect to the United States. They are also referred to as "foreign countries" in 28 U.S.C. §297 and 26 CFR §1.911-2(h) and "foreign states" in 28 U.S.C. §1603. This is what causes a lot of people problems with understanding; they do not understand, and many who learn never accept, that THEY LIVE IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY WITH RESPECT TO THE UNITED STATES. Yes, they are only RESIDENT within that foreign country, but... I am sure you understand that is only for purposes of jurisdiction and taxation. And remember, please, this is not my imagination, this is federal law.
The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.
Sure, I'd love to see what you have to say.
"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."
TITLE 28 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 297 § 297. Assignment of judges to courts of the freely associated compact states (a) The Chief Justice or the chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit may assign any circuit or district judge of the Ninth Circuit, with the consent of the judge so assigned, to serve temporarily as a judge of any duly constituted court of the freely associated compact states whenever an official duly authorized by the laws of the respective compact state requests such assignment and such assignment is necessary for the proper dispatch of the business of the respective court. (b) The Congress consents to the acceptance and retention by any judge so authorized of reimbursement from the countries referred to in subsection (a) of all necessary travel expenses, including transportation, and of subsistence, or of a reasonable per diem allowance in lieu of subsistence. The judge shall report to the Administrative Office of the United States Courts any amount received pursuant to this subsection. TITLE 28 > PART IV > CHAPTER 97 > § 1603 § 1603. Definitions For purposes of this chapter— (a) A “foreign state”, except as used in section 1608 of this title, includes a political subdivision of a foreign state or an agency or instrumentality of a foreign state as defined in subsection (b). (b) An “agency or instrumentality of a foreign state” means any entity— (1) which is a separate legal person, corporate or otherwise, and (2) which is an organ of a foreign state or political subdivision thereof, or a majority of whose shares or other ownership interest is owned by a foreign state or political subdivision thereof, and (3) which is neither a citizen of a State of the United States as defined in section 1332 (c) and (d) of this title, nor created under the laws of any third country. (c) The “United States” includes all territory and waters, continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. (d) A “commercial activity” means either a regular course of commercial conduct or a particular commercial transaction or act. The commercial character of an activity shall be determined by reference to the nature of the course of conduct or particular transaction or act, rather than by reference to its purpose. (e) A “commercial activity carried on in the United States by a foreign state” means commercial activity carried on by such state and having substantial contact with the United States. TITLE 26 > Subtitle A > CHAPTER 1 > Subchapter N > PART III > Subpart B > § 911 § 911. Citizens or residents of the United States living abroad (a) Exclusion from gross income At the election of a qualified individual (made separately with respect to paragraphs (1) and (2)), there shall be excluded from the gross income of such individual, and exempt from taxation under this subtitle, for any taxable year— (1) the foreign earned income of such individual, and (2) the housing cost amount of such individual. (b) Foreign earned income (1) Definition For purposes of this section— (A) In general The term “foreign earned income” with respect to any individual means the amount received by such individual from sources within a foreign country or countries which constitute earned income attributable to services performed by such individual during the period described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (d)(1), whichever is applicable. (B) Certain amounts not included in foreign earned income The foreign earned income for an individual shall not include amounts— (i) received as a pension or annuity, (ii) paid by the United States or an agency thereof to an employee of the United States or an agency thereof, (iii) included in gross income by reason of section 402 (b) (relating to taxability of beneficiary of nonexempt trust) or section 403 (c) (relating to taxability of beneficiary under a nonqualified annuity), or (iv) received after the close of the taxable year following the taxable year in which the services to which the amounts are attributable are performed. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00000911-- --000-.html
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Create the new PING list and give it an appropriate name in your "Setup" at the top of the page. You can add anyone who wants to be on the list or anyone can sign up any time.
“The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper
A good portion of it. I had never heard that exact story about the creation of the federal Districts used for the federal court system jurisdiction.
“The tendency of democracies is, in all things, to mediocrity, since the tastes, knowledge, and principles of the majority form the tribunal of appeal.” James Fenimore Cooper
It appears you have questions for the forum. No, I didn't read it. No, what are they? D.C.? That makes sense. States should be seperate governments with seperate laws, as long as they go by the Constitution of the USA. No. What problem is that? Yeah, go ahead ping me.
God is always good! yes
That is not a yes or no, comrade.
Will you please use the clift notes version please...
I'm not seeing that. Here's 28 USC 297, as per http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/....html ---
(a) The Chief Justice or the chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals
for the Ninth Circuit may assign any circuit or district judge of the Ninth
Circuit, with the consent of the judge so assigned, to serve temporarily as a
judge of any duly constituted court of the freely associated compact states
whenever an official duly authorized by the laws of the respective compact state
requests such assignment and such assignment is necessary for the proper
dispatch of the business of the respective court.
(b) The Congress consents to the acceptance and retention by any judge so
authorized of reimbursement from the countries referred to in subsection (a) of
all necessary travel expenses, including transportation, and of subsistence, or
of a reasonable per diem allowance in lieu of subsistence. The judge shall
report to the Administrative Office of the United States Courts any amount
received pursuant to this subsection.
Here's 26 CFR §1.911-2(h). Source: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/....TEXT With this definition, yn order to say the 50 states are foreign countries, you also have to show that the law says that the 50 states are "under the sovereignty of a government other than that of the United States". And here's 28 USC 1603, source: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/...html ---
§ 1603. Definitions
For purposes of this chapter—
(a) A “foreign state”, except as used in section 1608 of this title, includes a
political subdivision of a foreign state or an agency or instrumentality of a
foreign state as defined in subsection (b).
(b) An “agency or instrumentality of a foreign state” means any entity—
(1) which is a separate legal person, corporate or otherwise, and
(2) which is an organ of a foreign state or political subdivision thereof, or a
majority of whose shares or other ownership interest is owned by a foreign state
or political subdivision thereof, and
(3) which is neither a citizen of a State of the United States as defined in
section 1332 (c) and (d) of this title, nor created under the laws of any third
country.
(c) The “United States” includes all territory and waters, continental or
insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
(d) A “commercial activity” means either a regular course of commercial conduct
or a particular commercial transaction or act. The commercial character of an
activity shall be determined by reference to the nature of the course of conduct
or particular transaction or act, rather than by reference to its purpose.
(e) A “commercial activity carried on in the United States by a foreign state”
means commercial activity carried on by such state and having substantial
contact with the United States.
--- The last of these seems to come closest to what you say because "United States" is not defined to include the 50 states, BUT "foreign state" is not defined using the term "United States" at all. In any event, these definitions only apply to chapter 97 of Title 28 (and not the entire US code, of course).
Ya beat me to it.
I beat you to it without however supplying the most illuminating commentary. Thanx.
allready done, as Solution. Also my webpage under richard9151 The webpage has a statement of purpose and The Solution that I am aiming for.
The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.
Try me and see. Also, check out my web page and you will find the statement of purpose and The Solution.
The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.
My beef is what permits the Federal Zone to include an overlay of the 50 states, WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMED CONSENT OF THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS. And do not feed any B.S. about how they need to get informed. It takes years and years of study to begin to understand. If you do not understand what I mean, check out my webpage in 4um. Perhaps then you will begin to see.
The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.
This is one of the worst legal defintions I've ever seen.
The ADL is training the New Gestapo
Ahhh, perhaps you are beginning to see something of the problem! I put the link in the original post, More Blonde Jokes II, and you can use that to research and find the connections. Sinply put, you can not read the code, code, i.e., secret communications, without referencing ALL federal court cases which apply to that section of the code.
The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.
What problem is that? You are in this forum, and you ask, what problem is that? Are we being serious here, or, something else? You can check out my webpage on 4um and see what I consider to be the solution. And I have added you to the list.
The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.
That is because it is written in code (i.e., code, secret communications), in the code of the United States government.
The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.
It's loud and clear to me. 'We, the Law Owners, will arrogate everything to ourselves including the law.'
The ADL is training the New Gestapo
You catch on quick!.... Or, is it because you already understood? UMMMM?
The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.
If I may suggest... If you put your tag line in a reduced font size and/or different color, (preferably both) it would be more helpful to people reading your posts. I find myself starting to reread your tag line every time which is a bit annoying. That suggestion should probably be on the setup page.
You may, and I will think about that. I understand what you mean; however, I put the tag line as I did for the specific reason that you mentioned, so that it would be read each time. Nothing works like repeating something constantly, and if you understand that, you are better able to resist mind games. Like mine. The difference is, I will admit why I do things; most never will.
The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.
I have no illusions about their desires.
The ADL is training the New Gestapo
Or you could hardcode a sig template into the setup. You're a talented fellow in that and other regards.
The ADL is training the New Gestapo
Regarding your 'Solution'...have you sent this to Congressman Ron Paul's office?
Uh-huh. Well, you'll be quite successful at annoying people to the point they put you on bozo, which I'll do if you insist in keeping your tagline as is. Your honesty about being a willing utilizer of brain-washing techniques will buy you no sympathy from me. Hint: If you want to win sympathy and respect from people, don't do things that annoy them, and don't try to manipulate them. I think that's pretty good advice. I'll put you on bozo this evening if it remains unchanged. The choice is, of course, yours.
Circular definitions involving "United States" are not uncommon in the code. It makes you really appreciate the value of having a non-generic name for a country, which we don't have here. "Canada" and "Mexico" have unique singular names, but the USA does not.
Circular defintions are by nature confusing or deceptive. I'm not a wacky Coincidence Theorist. ; )
The ADL is training the New Gestapo
DickeyBird, If you're so ignorant as to assert that the U.S. Constitution was formed to give "democracy" to the District of Colombia (D.C.), why should anyone take anything you say seriously? D.C. was 'run' by a Congressional group, until around 1975. That's a long damned way from your assertion.
Shhhhhh....genius at work here. Richard_666 is about to save America from the safety of his coconut tree in Mexico City.
Why? I appreciate Ron Paul, but what can a single man accomplish? What is needed is people..... people who understand what has been done, and how to undo it, and until that happens, nothing will change, and no matter who is sent to DC, nothing can change. A very good start would be no more attorneys, but even that is not sufficient without the average American having knowledge of what is needed.
The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.
Thank you, Jethro, for noticing. Don´t know what I/we could do without your incitful comments.
The Talmudic Khazar-Jew dream; Christians killing Muslims and Muslims killing Christians. What could be better than that? Well, Whites killing non-Whites and non-Whites killing Whites, of course.
Comments (42 - 128) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestThe Solution.
#2. To: richard9151 (#0)
I am going to establish a group within the forum.
#3. To: richard9151 (#0)
A simple yes of no to the questions is fine.
#4. To: angle (#1)
I'm all ears. uh, eyes.
#5. To: richard9151 (#0)
#6. To: angle (#3)
what's a yes of no
#7. To: Jethro Tull (#2)
Scary....
#8. To: lodwick, christine, all (#5)
Thanks for your Blonde efforts.
#9. To: richard9151 (#0)
#10. To: richard9151 (#0)
What's your beef, chief??
#11. To: richard9151 (#0)
I am going to be very hard nosed about this,
#12. To: richard9151 (#0)
(Edited)
I am going to establish a group within the forum.
#13. To: richard9151 (#0)
Were you aware of this?
#14. To: richard9151 (#0)
I have a question for the forum
Were you aware of any of the material contained in More Blonde Jokes II?
Specifically, were you aware of the Federal District States?
The sovereign 50 states of the Union of states. These states are foreign governments with respect to the United States. They are also referred to as "foreign countries" in 28 U.S.C. §297 and 26 CFR §1.911-2(h) and "foreign states" in 28 U.S.C. §1603.
Were you aware of this? ... our national government of the United States legislates for two distinct territorial jurisdictions.
Are you interested in learning about a solution to this problem?
I am going to establish a group within the forum. To this group I will ping when I post updates or new Posts that have to do with this subject; The Solution. Are you interested in my placing your name to be pinged? Without a yes answer to this question, I will not add your name to the list. I also reserve the right to not add your name to the list if I feel that is in the best interest of the group, and of 4um.
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]
#15. To: richard9151 (#6)
#16. To: mehitable (#9)
#17. To: randge (#10)
#18. To: richard9151 (#0)
The sovereign 50 states of the Union of states. These states are foreign governments with respect to the United States. They are also referred to as "foreign countries" in 28 U.S.C. §297 and 26 CFR §1.911-2(h) and "foreign states" in 28 U.S.C. §1603.
§ 297. Assignment of judges to courts of the freely associated compact states
---
(h) Foreign country. The term ``foreign country'' when used in a
geographical sense includes any territory under the sovereignty of a
government other than that of the United States. It includes the
territorial waters of the foreign country (determined in accordance with
the laws of the United States), the air space over the foreign country,
and the seabed and subsoil of those submarine areas which are adjacent
to the territorial waters of the foreign country and over which the
foreign country has exclusive rights, in accordance with international
law, with respect to the exploration and exploitation of natural
resources.
#19. To: randge (#10)
#20. To: Neil McIver (#19)
(Edited)
#21. To: BTP Holdings, all (#12)
Create the new PING list and give it an appropriate name in your "Setup"
#22. To: Cynicom (#11)
#23. To: randge (#10)
What's your beef, chief??
#24. To: Neil McIver, richard9151 (#18)
(c) The “United States” includes all territory and waters, continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
#25. To: Neil McIver (#18)
I'm not seeing that.
#26. To: RickyJ (#14)
No, I didn't read it.
#27. To: AngelSpawn (#24)
This is one of the worst legal defintions I've ever seen.
#28. To: richard9151 (#27)
That is because it is written in code
#29. To: AngelSpawn (#28)
'We, the Law Owners, will arrogate everything to ourselves including the law.'
#30. To: richard9151 (#25)
#31. To: Neil McIver (#30)
If I may suggest...
#32. To: richard9151 (#29)
is it because you already understood?
#33. To: Neil McIver, christine, Zipporah (#30)
That suggestion should probably be on the setup page.
#34. To: richard9151 (#31)
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
#35. To: richard9151 (#31)
however, I put the tag line as I did for the specific reason that you mentioned, so that it would be read each time. Nothing works like repeating something constantly, and if you understand that, you are better able to resist mind games. Like mine.
#36. To: AngelSpawn (#24)
#37. To: Neil McIver (#36)
Circular definitions involving "United States" are not uncommon in the code.
#38. To: richard9151 (#0)
#39. To: All (#38)
#40. To: who knows what evil, all (#34)
Regarding your 'Solution'...have you sent this to Congressman Ron Paul's office?
#41. To: Jethro Tull (#39)
.
.
.