See other Pious Perverts Articles
Title: The "Mark Foley Republicans" (Goldi, Boteye) Work To Defend House Pervert
Source:
Liberty Post
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/ ... gi?ArtNum=160858&SC=1&EC=40#C1
Published: Oct 3, 2006
Author: Liberty Post
Post Date: 2006-10-03 11:15:01 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 1028
Comments: 54
Entertaining thread indeed with War, mehitable, Don and anothers exposes these neocon perverts for power. Just a sample of what can be found on this thread: 8. To: GO65 (#0) I'm telling you, this is a Pelosi power grab gambit. Mark my words. She is in it for power ONLY, and will do what she can to destroy anyone to get it. She needs to be WATCHED. Closely. That woman is Very VERY DANGEROUS. Goldi-Lox posted on 2006-10-03 10:01:22 ET Reply Trace Anyon3e that bothered to read last months Time Magazine article about Pelosi should be very afraid. Badeye Where is the victim? Where is the crime? Doesn't an ACT have to happen to make a crime? And then there's the Consitution: Innocent until PROVEN guilty. No one has even been Charged, and you've held the trial, convicted and found him guilty. Now you want capital punishment??? Foley Quit. He's gone. What are YOU squawking about? Goldi-Lox posted on 2006-10-03 10:08:39 ET When I was 16, I got a "pass" from a gay woman in my neighborhood. I ignored her, and she went away. Should I go back now, and have her removed from her job, put in jail, and have her boss castrated? Goldi-Lox posted on 2006-10-03 10:17:56 ET
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-1) not displayed.
.
.
.
#2. To: Fred Mertz (#1)
I normally don't bring other forums crap to this forum but this one was just to amazing to let go unnoticed.
Moldi Lox: "When I was 16, I got a "pass" from a gay woman in my neighborhood." That's the last pass she's ever gotten in her life.
The ADL is training the New Gestapo "I am not in here so many years using my own name because I am in the business of lying to anyone anyplace on the Internet I've been." Ferret Mike As a participant in those threads (I think mine was the one with Limbaugh in the title), I can't tell you how shocked I am at the defense of this pervert and the apparent cover-up by Hastert, et all, by some of these LP people, including Goldi. I had not expected this from them. I don't know what they think it means to be a conservative. I guess it's all about party politics rather than morality or principle to them. The threads are astounding and revealing.
"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."
And a fine job you and others are doing on that thread, indeed. Expose these creeps. Sunlight destroys "slime"...
Thanks, Brian. I have to take a break and do some work, lol. But I also have to try to calm down. I have actually been shaking with rage this morning over this. I think these people really don't have any idea of how ANGRY this makes people - the idea that our children, or little brothers and sisters or nephews - everyone's got SOME young person in their life, could be vulnerable to such an evil predator as this, and a whole system is in place to enable and protect his behavior. I feel like I'm going to blow a gasket. They're really exposed themselves. and so have Drudge, Limbaugh, Coulter, et al. I am now boycotting Drudge and urge everyone else to do so.
"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."
They know exactly what it means to be conservative. It means you swallow your pride and defend some fifty year old faggot by saying "Nothing really happened. If it did happen, it was no big deal. If it was a big deal, then the Democrats did it, too." The defenses are so predictable they are trite. Like: "He's not a pedophile, he's just a fag who likes to boff teen age boys." Power above everything.
the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.
Two out of three ain't so bad.
After reading some of that thread I think I need some Oxycontin pills. Bravo for posting your passionate, proper points of view.
You're absolutely right. They try to belittle all moral values by making power the only issue. But power has to serve a moral purpose otherwise, it's wielded by the devil. These people are the devil on earth.
"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."
Thanks, Fred. I think I need a gin and tonic, lmao. I can't tell you how upset I have been reading these remarks - how much they have horrified me. And from people who call themselves "conservatives". They are destroying our movement and defaming our name. Most genuine conservatives would tar and feather these sons of bitches.
"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."
We must put a stop to the revisionism of Pedophilia Deniers. Jail them.
Jail them. Yep. Impeach and jail them.
the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.
i posted a link to this on anohter thread. in a way it is funny, but in a way it is really scary. it shows you just how blind and nutty these people are. and what double standards they are capable of holding when their own party is being gored.
Remember, free speech is a privilege, not a right. In time of war speech should be censored and even prosecuted if it crosses the line. ~ Aaron on LP
Does this mean the GOP will rethink passing legislation designed to take away rights under the guise of passing laws to protect 'the children'? Michael Savage and Drudge went on the radio both pretty much saying that this hunt for child predators has turned into a new witch hunt and Drudge said that hitting on teens is not that big a crime. How the family values turn, my, oh my.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
i am wondering where It Is a Republic is this morning.
Remember, free speech is a privilege, not a right. In time of war speech should be censored and even prosecuted if it crosses the line. ~ Aaron on LP
I was surprised at Savage, frankly, as I heard him defending Foley the other night. It shocked me, but I've heard that Savage - like Drudge, like Limbaugh - is gay and apparently this is normal behavior to them. It gives one pause when reflecting on the norms of the gay community.
"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."
Probably turning some pages.
"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."
Ditto - very scary mindset - and what scares me even more of it that it is unresponsive to any reasoned argument. They turn forums into mobs.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
What they've demonstrated is that they have true moral blindness. They didn't actually care what Clinton did with Lewinsky or what Foley has done, or would have done, with the pages. They just care about the power - it's so naked now. They've truly revealed themselves as the moral slugs they are at heart.
"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."
It means they hunker down and pray their name doesn't come up on some pageboy's list.
the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.
The most repressive regimes are usually run by those that are repressed sexually themselves i.e. people who have issues. But I am glad you can corroborate what Savage said. I pretty much did a classic comedy spit take when I heard it. I guess in this '1984' like society things like what you believe in can change overnight and no one is supposed to notice.
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
You have SO nailed it. (Rum and coke is the true drink of the harvest season...enjoy!)
I find it funny all those child internet protection laws and bills were the brainchild of Foley. Projecting his twwisted views on America?
"The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom
Projecting his twwisted views on America? Well, it is funny how one's obsessions can affect one's work... Like the closet drunks passing prohibition statutes; sort of a form of self- loathing...
the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.
I want to say thank you for bringing to light just what a weird bunch of sick people dwell over there. It is a shame she, the owner, lost her own son. Perhaps having something like this happen to her own child would open her eyes-- -so long as it is someone else's kid, a different time, a different place, it doesn't seem to matter like it does when it is your own precious flesh and blood Johnny or Susie. They can't seem to realize that it is "their" party that has made all these laws regarding what constitutes attempts to entice youngsters on the internet! Foley, having served 12 years, would have been in on much of it, for God's sake! They have defined 'who' the victim is of 'crime'--and it includes not having actual physical contact! I would bet you money that if old threads about those homeland (in)security guys getting caught over internet contacts with minors, you'd find that these self=same defenders of all that is 'constitutional, so to speak', would be all for nailing their butts to the cross. And whether they want to believe it or not, at age 16 or 17, a teenager is still a kid. They do not have the emotional maturity to make lifetime committments to girlfriends or boyfriends, let alone same sex relationships. They can't sign binding contracts. They can't get their ears pierced legally--(but they can abort a human being). The attitude of 'he resigned--move on' is just precious. By that reckoning, Benedict Arnold could have just quit the military and walked away with a "no harm, no smarm'.
Truer words are only found in the Bible. And no doubt, the Bible, probably Proverbs, has something that addresses this very thing. Your words make me really sad....because they indict our whole nation. :( It just depends upon who is in power as to which name goes in the 'they did it, too' spot.
They have so bastardized the word 'conservative' that I refuse to call myself that.
Well, they are parts of the Standard Shill Scandal Defenses: (Here's my partial list) 1. It didn't happen. 1a. Look at the source, he's (partisan, unreliable, dishonest, a traitor) 2. If it happened, it's no big deal. 3. If it happened and it's a big deal, it was isolated and we didn't know about it. 4. If it happened, was a big deal and we knew about it, there was no cover up. 5. If it happened, was a big deal, we knew about it and we covered it up, the other side does it just as much as we do. 6. If it happened, was a big deal, we knew about it, we covered it up, and the other side doesn't do it, it's because we were set up by the other side. 7. It's all a conspiracy by the other side. 8. Both sides are just as bad. 9. The other side is worse. 10. We did it, we're really sorry, but the other side is making a bigger deal about it than it is. 11. It was bad, but look over there! That's something REALLY bad! Keep this list handy. On it you will find just about every shill defense offered by the shills of each party when a scandal breaks. You can even write up your own defenses
the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.
Exactly........and you've hit a HOME RUN! It is about being in power--screw the rightness or wrongness. It's the "R" that is all important....to those slugs.
It only took a short while to cross the line from party hack to psychopath. These fools are surely possesed by evil.
To believe the world is only as you think it is, is stupid. ~Don Juan Matos, Journey to Ixtlan, Carlos Casteneda
LOL.........funny but true. I used to have a list of some 25 or 26 comments of a nature similar to this. It got to the point where one would just type #9 as a response or a partial response.
I did almost the same thing, I was so shocked to hear him defending that pervert. So Mike Savage is going on my boycott list as well as Drudge.
"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."
Ya know, rowdee, today was an ugly day. It really opened my eyes about some very ugly people on LP. I don't get involved in forum wars generally, and I know there has been anger back and forth here, but I've tried to be fair to everyone. I have to say, seeing them defend this pervert today has really removed the scales from my eyes. Frankly, I have no great desire to post anything over there now as I feel like I need a shower. These are not just people I disagree with on some political matters. These are people who defend a great moral evil, who are willing to allow children to be victimized as long as they don't lose any political power over it. Well I remember what Jesus said: 6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."
I even went as far as to block his site from my router. There should be a boycot of the sponsors of his radio show.
"First I'm gonna bother everybody I meet, and then I'll probably go home and get drunk."
I agree completely. Maybe when I get home tonight I'll start writing the sponsors.
"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."
Wow! So 16 year olds are fair game now? What will Goldi approve of next?
"If there’s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country." - Daniel Ellsberg Author, Pentagon Papers How ironic can you get? Saying, without so much as a shred of proof that Pelosi is behind this because all she cares about is "power" and then dismissing this perv's actions because it would lesson the Power of your fake faction? The two party fraud indeed has a powerful hold over people when they start excusing the behaviour of old drunken queens trying to troll for teen boys on the internet.
amen. i can't help but think that the timing of this is suspect--immediately following the detainee/torture legislation. they'd much rather we be arguing/discussing/debating sex crimes which keep us divided...rather than uniting on a common issue which effects all of us in a dire way.
Actually I do think this is a uniting issue because the overwhelming majority of Americans have the same reaction to the Foley issue that we do, and it really shows up the Repubs and Bush supporters as being ...well...depraved, frankly. I mean, I hate to characterize a whole party as depraved, but that's what it looks like to me. Not that the Dems are much better, but we're stuck between that rock and a hard place. This may have been a calculated issue, but I think it's gonna backfire.
"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."
maybe so..
I am not defendng anyone, but I do think this is political. In other words, I would make a bet that there is an extraordinary amount of this type of crap going on in Congress. Either members hanging out with prositutes, doing illegal drugs, underage sex and so forth. I'd be willing to bet it is epidemic. And a Republican has been served up. Which is fine with me, but I'm sure that he isn't the only one, and I am sure it isn't limited to Republicans. My own thought on this is that it is part of the same process that finds Bob Woodward attacking the administration. Their poll numbers had started to rise again and the talk of the Democrats getting the Congress was really waning. Someone wants the Bush Administration to take it on the chin (as against the other faction of the oligarchy) and the only way to do that without calling out the actual lies - like Iraq, the shredding of our alleged freedoms and so forth - is to come up with another version of that girl that went missing in Aruba. In other words a titillating scandal that can be played against the Republicans, without rocking the establishment boat. I'll bet there are some Democrats shaking in their boots right now wondering if Rove is going to find their e-mails.
Comments (43 - 54) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: Brian S (#0)
#4. To: Brian S (#0)
#5. To: mehitable (#4)
As a participant in those threads
#6. To: Brian S (#5)
#7. To: mehitable (#4)
I can't tell you how shocked I am at the defense of this pervert and the apparent cover-up by Hastert, et all, by some of these LP people, including Goldi. I had not expected this from them. I don't know what they think it means to be a conservative.
#8. To: Brian S (#0)
Should I go back now, and have her removed from her job, put in jail, and have her boss castrated?
There is more than one Institute. There is more than one Island. There is no outside world to which we can flee -- or if there is, it is just a bigger Institute, or a synthesis. The fact that all Institutes are prisons, and all Islands mostly lies, does nothing to reduce the danger of contamination.
#9. To: mehitable (#6)
(Edited)
#10. To: bluedogtxn (#7)
#11. To: Fred Mertz (#9)
#12. To: bluedogtxn (#7)
There is more than one Institute. There is more than one Island. There is no outside world to which we can flee -- or if there is, it is just a bigger Institute, or a synthesis. The fact that all Institutes are prisons, and all Islands mostly lies, does nothing to reduce the danger of contamination.
#13. To: Tauzero (#12)
We must put a stop to the revisionism of Pedophilia Deniers.
#14. To: Brian S (#2)
#15. To: bluedogtxn, burkeman1 (#7)
#16. To: bluedogtxn (#7)
They know exactly what it means to be conservative. It means you swallow your pride and defend some fifty year old faggot by saying "Nothing really happened. If it did happen, it was no big deal. If it was a big deal, then the Democrats did it, too."
#17. To: Destro (#15)
#18. To: Morgana le Fay (#16)
i am wondering where It Is a Republic is this morning.
#19. To: Morgana le Fay (#14)
i posted a link to this on anohter thread. in a way it is funny, but in a way it is really scary. it shows you just how blind and nutty these people are. and what double standards they are capable of holding when their own party is being gored.
#20. To: Destro (#19)
#21. To: Destro (#15)
Does this mean the GOP will rethink passing legislation designed to take away rights under the guise of passing laws to protect 'the children'?
#22. To: mehitable, burkeman1 (#17)
I was surprised at Savage, frankly, as I heard him defending Foley the other night. It shocked me, but I've heard that Savage - like Drudge, like Limbaugh - is gay and apparently this is normal behavior to them. It gives one pause when reflecting on the norms of the gay community.
#23. To: mehitable (#11)
Most genuine conservatives would tar and feather these sons of bitches.
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
#24. To: bluedogtxn (#21)
#25. To: Destro (#24)
find it funny all those child internet protection laws and bills were the brainchild of Foley.
#26. To: mehitable (#4)
#27. To: bluedogtxn (#7)
I had not expected this from them. I don't know what they think it means to be a conservative. They know exactly what it means to be conservative. It means you swallow your pride and defend some fifty year old faggot by saying "Nothing really happened. If it did happen, it was no big deal. If it was a big deal, then the Democrats did it, too."
#28. To: mehitable (#11)
And from people who call themselves "conservatives". They are destroying our movement and defaming our name. Most genuine conservatives would tar and feather these sons of bitches.
#29. To: rowdee (#27)
Your words make me really sad....because they indict our whole nation. :( It just depends upon who is in power as to which name goes in the 'they did it, too' spot.
#30. To: mehitable (#20)
What they've demonstrated is that they have true moral blindness. They didn't actually care what Clinton did with Lewinsky or what Foley has done, or would have done, with the pages. They just care about the power - it's so naked now. They've truly revealed themselves as the moral slugs they are at heart.
#31. To: Brian S (#0)
#32. To: bluedogtxn (#29)
#33. To: Destro (#22)
I pretty much did a classic comedy spit take when I heard it.
#34. To: rowdee, all (#26)
#35. To: mehitable (#6)
I am now boycotting Drudge and urge everyone else to do so.
#36. To: orangedog (#35)
#37. To: Brian S (#0)
#38. To: Brian S (#0)
#39. To: mehitable, all (#20)
What they've demonstrated is that they have true moral blindness. They didn't actually care what Clinton did with Lewinsky or what Foley has done, or would have done, with the pages. They just care about the power - it's so naked now. They've truly revealed themselves as the moral slugs they are at heart.
#40. To: christine (#39)
#41. To: mehitable (#40)
Actually I do think this is a uniting issue because the overwhelming majority of Americans have the same reaction to the Foley issue that we do,
#42. To: mehitable (#6)
.
.
.