[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

USDOT moves to pull $4 billion from failed California high-speed rail;

America's Energy Shift: From Coal To What? (1950–2024)

THE REAL REASON WHY OPEC WANTS LOWER OIL PRICES

Détente? Musk Hints At Path Forward On BBB; Trump Team Schedules Friday Call

Tucker Carlson WARNS Trump that Neo-cons are trying to END his presidency by going to war with Iran

DR. IMMANUEL FURIOUSLY CLAIMS RFK JR. IS “DANCING AROUND” THE DANGERS OF COVID-19 MRNA VACCINES

AOC (& Bernie Sanders) Back Zohran After Cuomo Debate COLLAPSE

14 FOODS that SUCK the SUGAR from Your BLOOD

Musk 'Yes' On Trump Impeachment; Will 'Immediately' Decommission SpaceX Dragon & Doubles Down On Epstein Claims

Musk drops bombshell linking Trump to Epstein files, claims Epstein docs hidden to protect Trump

Musk To 'Immediately' Decommission SpaceX Dragon After Trump Threat, Doubles Down On Epstein Claims

Eye-opening device: Self-powered AI synapse mimics human vision, achieves 82% accuracy

This Is Israel

Rogan warns quantum breakthrough could wipe out encryption overnight, digital money vulnerable

Protesters Clash With Feds During Twin Cities Drug and Money Laundering Bust [WATCH]

A Warrior's Homecoming: Trumps Push to End Veteran Homelessness

Trump Administration Rescinds Biden-Era Guidance Forcing Hospitals To Perform Abortions

Supreme Court Dismisses Mexico Lawsuit Against U.S. Gun Manufacturers

YouTube has stopped working on 5 popular phones - so, is your device on the list?

POSOBIEC BOMBSHELL: U.S. INTEL HID UKRAINIAN DRONE ATTACK FROM THE PRESIDENT

Soldiers on US-Mexico border hunt drones with air defense radars typically used in combat

Pentagon Awards $5 Billion Virginia Sub Contract to Boost Production

Trump to Use Emergency Powers to Boost U.S. Critical Minerals Industry

Palestinian Red Crescent details medics account of 15 colleagues slaughter

Trump fires slew of pro-Israel officials in America First 'course correction'

British Airways cancels all flights to Israel until August

Majority of British people support arms embargo on Israel

Chaos at major airport as ground stop halts ALL planes just weeks after tech meltdown

Scott Ritter: Trump Needs to Decide Whether He Supports Russia or Terrorism

Texas moves to label popular snacks as unsafe for human consumption.


Pious Perverts
See other Pious Perverts Articles

Title: Limbaugh defends pedophilia
Source: Libertee Lost
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 3, 2006
Author: Mehitable posted it over there without h
Post Date: 2006-10-03 11:32:44 by bluedogtxn
Keywords: None
Views: 1554
Comments: 70

From the October 2 broadcast of The Rush Limbaugh Show:

LIMBAUGH: I'm just thinking out loud here. What if somebody got to the page and said, you know, we want you to set Foley up. We need to do a little titillating thing here. Keep it and save it and so forth. How would you get a kid to do that? Yeah, who knows? You threaten him or pay him. There's any number of ways given the kind of people that we're dealing with and talking about here.

Now, folks, I don't want to be misunderstood here. I'm not trying to mount any kind of a defense. That's a bad word. I'm not trying to get into a defense of what Mark Foley did. Please don't misunderstand. I'm just telling you that the -- the -- the orgy and the orgasm that has been taking place in the media since Friday and with the Democrats is -- it's all coordinated, and it's all -- it's all oriented toward the election. There's no concern about the kid -- no concern about the children.

There is -- there is -- there's not even any real problem with what Foley did, as we've discussed.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 31.

#1. To: All (#0)

We need to do a little titillating thing here. Keep it and save it and so forth. How would you get a kid to do that?

Anyone who can describe a teenage boy as "tittilating" ought to be in prison.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2006-10-03   11:36:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: bluedogtxn (#1)

Anyone who can describe a teenage boy as "tittilating" ought to be in prison.

Same thing for the CDA that would defend them.

It Is A Republic  posted on  2006-10-03   11:44:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: It Is A Republic (#5)

Same thing for the CDA that would defend them.

Well, I appreciate the sentiment, but this is still the United States of America, and the GOP hasn't quite gotten around to outlawing defense attorneys, reversing the presumption of innocence or doing away with jury trials; but give them time. Your budding little GOP Stalinists will soon have the police state you long for, given time.

bluedogtxn  posted on  2006-10-03   11:57:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: bluedogtxn (#10)

There is a difference in trying to get someone a fair trial and trying to get them off on a technicality. Most CDAs are snakes!!!!

It Is A Republic  posted on  2006-10-03   12:06:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: It Is A Republic, bluedogtxn, aristeides, Minerva (#12)

There is a difference in trying to get someone a fair trial and trying to get them off on a technicality. Most CDAs are snakes!!!!

I'm not sure what Foley will be charged with exactly.

Age of consent in DC is 16.

Foley's IM's/email's, while "tittilating" to quote El Rushbow, are not showing Foley to be offering the intern $ for sex.

And as to the issue of sexual harrassment, Foley was not the employer of the interns.

So even though Foley is a disgusting perv with pedophile potential, who deserved to be forced out of Congress, what laws did he break?

I'm playing devil's advocate...

scrapper2  posted on  2006-10-03   12:55:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: scrapper2 (#30) (Edited)

Age of consent in DC is 16.

Foley's IM's/email's, while "tittilating" to quote El Rushbow, are not showing Foley to be offering the intern $ for sex.

And as to the issue of sexual harrassment, Foley was not the employer of the interns.

Utterly irrelevant. This is what FR is pushing out now.

Foley was soliciting sex with a minor on the internet under the applicable Federal Law. Foley was the acting supervisor of the intern. Money for sex is just another red herring from FreeRepublic. If you solicit a kid for sex, it is not necessary for money to change hands to support the charge.

Minerva  posted on  2006-10-03   12:59:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 31.

#40. To: Minerva (#31)

Utterly irrelevant. This is what FR is pushing out now.

Foley was soliciting sex with a minor on the internet under the applicable Federal Law. Foley was the acting supervisor of the intern. Money for sex is just another red herring from FreeRepublic. If you solicit a kid for sex, it is not necessary for money to change hands to support the charge.

I am not sure what FR "is pushing."

I was simply being curious about what charges a federal prosecutor could level against Foley and win in court.

a) Was Foley actually soliciting sex from a minor on the internet?

I'll grant you that Foley made some very suggestive lurid comments, but did Foley actually "solicit sex?"

In one case - as listed in this article - even the parents of the page did not want any action taken against Foley at the time. And the kid involved thought the communications from Foley were "creepy" but that was the extent of it.

b) This July the FBI received copies of the emails that Foley sent the Louisiana teenager in 2005 but the FBI chose NOT to pursue an investigation. Why do you think the FBI would not jump on this??? - perhaps because there was not enough evidence re: any crime being committed???

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- dyn/content/article/2006/10/02/AR2006100200333.html

"FBI Knew in July About Foley E-Mails to Teen" October 03, 2006 Washington Post

"...The FBI acknowledged yesterday that it did not begin an investigation in late July after receiving copies of e-mails sent in 2005 by then-Rep. Mark Foley (R-Fla.) to a Louisiana teenager..."

c) Foley was not an "acting supervisor" of the interns. Where did you read that to be the case?

d) Get your self-righteous shorts un-twisted. I am not a mindless freetard. I am not defending Foley's actions. I am only "putting out there" the possibility that it will be hard to prosecute Foley on any criminal charges and win. And this will not be because a wiley CDA is using technicalities to get Foley off. It may be that Foley's actions, while reprehensible, are not breaking any laws. Kapeesh?

scrapper2  posted on  2006-10-03 13:35:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Minerva (#31)

I thought they changed the meaning of age of consent to mean being only with those within your age range under 18?

Destro  posted on  2006-10-03 14:49:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 31.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]