[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

You’ve Never Seen THIS Side Of Donald Trump

President Donald Trump Nominates Former Florida Rep. Dr. Dave Weldon as CDC Director

Joe Rogan Tells Josh Brolin His Recent Bell’s Palsy Diagnosis Could Be Linked to mRNA Vaccine

President-elect Donald Trump Nominates Brooke Rollins as Secretary of Agriculture

Trump Taps COVID-Contrarian, Staunch Public Health Critic Makary For FDA

F-35's Cooling Crisis: Design Flaws Fuel $2 Trillion Dilemma For Pentagon

Joe Rogan on Tucker Carlson and Ukraine Aid

Joe Rogan on 62 year-old soldier with one arm, one eye

Jordan Peterson On China's Social Credit Controls

Senator Kennedy Exposes Bad Jusge

Jewish Land Grab

Trump Taps Dr. Marty Makary, Fierce Opponent of COVID Vaccine Mandates, as New FDA Commissioner

Recovering J6 Prisoner James Grant, Tells-All About Bidens J6 Torture Chamber, Needs Immediate Help After Release

AOC: Keeping Men Out Of Womens Bathrooms Is Endangering Women

What Donald Trump Has Said About JFK's Assassination

Horse steals content from Sara Fischer and Sophia Cai and pretends he is the author

Horse steals content from Jonas E. Alexis and claims it as his own.

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room

Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister

Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals

German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human'

Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism

Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago!

Heat Is Radiating From A Huge Mass Under The Moon

Elon Musk Delivers a Telling Response When Donald Trump Jr. Suggests

FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain?

Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish'

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest


World News
See other World News Articles

Title: Bush will authorise this month the State assassination of Hugo Chávez
Source: Axis of Logic
URL Source: http://www.axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_23158.shtml
Published: Oct 4, 2006
Author: Heinz Dieterich
Post Date: 2006-10-08 15:42:59 by robin
Keywords: None
Views: 842
Comments: 107

Bush will authorise this month the State assassination of Hugo Chávez
By Heinz Dieterich. Translated from Spanish by Ron Ridenour
Oct 4, 2006, 14:14

Bush will authorise this month the State assassination of Hugo Chávez

By Heinz Dieterich
Translated from the Spanish by Ron Ridenour

1. The price of his anti-diabolical discourse

Hugo Chávez’s United Nations speech was the culmination of magisterial international vanguard politics, which converted George Bush into the pariah of the worldwide institution. The price for this successful spectacle—which can not be understood without the proverbial audacity of Commander-in-Chief Fidel Castro—is the authorisation of State assassination by the White House.

2. Strategic change: the institutional entanglement of political assassination

The fascist government-in-formation will not use as its legal basis for the assassination the customary verbal formula applied by United States executives for such ends—“get rid of him”—rather, it will use the terminology, “Top secret presidential finding”.

Most probably it will use proxies; for example, death squads of the Israeli secret services, which habitually assassinate citizen “enemies” in other countries.

The decision of State assassination [of the president of Venezuela] constitutes a change in White House strategy, employed since 2003, which opted for a political war of annexation by wearing out, in order to impose upon the system the replacement of the president by the right-wing of the New Political Class (NPC). This strategy aspires to gradually capitalise upon the internal weaknesses of the revolution and avoid a civil war in Venezuela, which will inevitably be unleashed with the assassination of the popular president.

Not to repeat the consequences of the State assassination of the Colombian President Jorge Eliécer Gaitán, has been the slogan of the White House since the defeat of the 2002-3 oil coup d’état in Venezuela. Nevertheless, the incessant Latin American and worldwide diplomatic offensive of Hugo Chávez—which not only threatens the Monroe Doctrine but also “Manifest Destiny”, which has ruled for two centuries—has reached the point of no return. Chávez’s offensive is the equivalent of the decree of Bolívar’s “war to the death” against the Spanish empire 193 years ago.


3. How to achieve the assassination and avoid popular resistance

The change of US strategy—from containment policy towards Cuba and Venezuela, while breaking the weakest link of the chain, Bolivia—towards State assassination has to resolve the danger of social explosion. The White House calculation is to avoid a long civil war by making it appear that the assassination would be a natural death or an accident. The successful poisoning of Palestinian President Yasser Arafat is the model to emulate.

In September 2003, the Israeli security cabinet publicly declared its intention to assassinate Arafat. The then Vice-Premier Minister Ehud Olmert generated a public debate regarding this project by considering this method “legitimate”.

“The question is, by which manner do we put an end to Arafat,” said the Israeli State’s number two man. “Expulsion is one option; assassination is another possibility.” Israel’s problem in applying the option of the elimination of Arafat consisted of the dilemma, “ (it) is not a moral matter, rather to know if it is practical or not.”

Following that successful operation would the fascist presidents Ehud Olmert and George Bush doubt for one second that the “removal…of the obstacle to peace” is extremely “practical” and “legitimate”? That is to say, that Hugo Chávez is a peaceful oil rich and third world leader [and thus an “obstacle”, translator’s note].

4. Hugo Chávez’s great offensive has discovered his dangerous rear guard

With all the audacity and success of the Venezuelan president’s offensive one is reminded of the great offensive of Napoleon against Moscow. Napoleon only looked forward, dreaming of a decisive lightning war. He failed to construct a rear guard capable of detaining an eventual Russian counter-offensive. When such occurred, he was completely destroyed.

The dangerous dispersion of the Bolivarian forces in Venezuela presents a similar scenario. The Bolivarian union movement is divided into, at least, four major currents. Official Bolivarian political forces rest on three major parties. The peasants have, at least, two major groupings. The popular sector is not organised into an integral national structure, such as, for example, in Cuba. The consolidation of the Bolivarian project in the armed forces requires, at least, two to three more years. The Bolivarian means of communication are insufficiently efficient. Many strategic State ministries are inefficient; partly so because in the last three years there have been six changes of ministers and vice-ministers, making quality State management impossible.

The quantitative dispersion of the Bolivarian forces offends, because many have the habit of using factious power plays, which converts the revolution and the party into second place. Hugo Chávez wants to remedy this poor political practice by forming one united political party next year. Minister William Lara hopes to convert Channel 8 into a 24-hour news service like CNN. Who knows if they will succeed, because until now the State has not had the capacity to develop a system to detect revolutionaries to control the media and the vanguard, which is required for the future process.

A frontal confrontation with the most potent world power and its European Union accomplices, in these conditions, will only be victorious if they have the talent and the luck of Alexander the Great. Or if they extend the spirit, the work and the vanguard management capacity not only on the visible front but also in the Achilles Heel of the revolution.

© Translation Copyright 2006 by AxisofLogic.com


Heinz Dieterich Steffan is a German political analyst, living in Mexico. Well known for his apologetics, he collaborates with revolutionary media and adds his voice as a regular columnist to Axis of Logic. He is also a consultant to Venezuelan President, Hugo Chávez Frìas.


Poster Comment: Related threads:

ALVARO VARGAS LLOSA SENDS HUGO CHAVEZ TO DANTE'S INFERNO
posted 3 days ago by Stephen Lendma

Venezuela's Chavez says assassination attempt against him foiled
posted 7 days ago by Eoghan

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 28.

#3. To: robin (#0)

Hugo Chávez’s United Nations speech was the culmination of magisterial international vanguard politics, which converted George Bush into the pariah of the worldwide institution.

It was more of clown act; a pathetic appeal of mental masturbation that performed nothing more than a sense of personal acclaim based upon self aggrandising methods of obscure and silly rants designed to attract the attention of unintelligent humans.

Hugo needs a new speech writer.

buckeroo  posted on  2006-10-08   16:01:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: buckeroo (#3)

2. To: 82Marine89 (#0)

Anderson said he is hoping for leniency from the Army but isn't taking anything for granted.

I hope they hang him until he is dead with a broken neck.

buckeroo posted on 2006-10-01 22:13:27 ET Reply Trace

So you support murder of people who do not support U.S. policy? You want Army Spc. Darrell Anderson, 24, of Lexington who won a Purple heart in Iraq hung for opposing an illegal immoral war, do you support Bush hangong Hugo too?

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-10-08   16:24:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Ferret Mike (#5)

I support the death of anyone that does not fulfill their solemn, sworn oath. What is required to bring America back towards the founding anchors of our nation is credibility and dignity. Honour goes a long way towards ensuring that trash gets canned and not exalted.

buckeroo  posted on  2006-10-08   16:43:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: buckeroo (#6)

I support the death of anyone that does not fulfill their solemn, sworn oath.

oh boy..you ever heard of gleaning new information from experience, buck? good lord, in your world, anyone who's sworn an oath when ignorant and not fully informed should be killed, huh?

christine  posted on  2006-10-08   16:51:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: christine (#7)

I fulfilled not only my sworn oath but remain steadfast in determining that this two-headed political snake controlling Washington DC is absolved. Still, believing that anyone can skip away from their own oaths because they have a change of heart shows nothing more than a coward. Cowards are the first to be shot to death in any revolution anyway as they have no dignity other than the belief of that the world is their personal playground.

buckeroo  posted on  2006-10-08   16:58:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: buckeroo (#8)

If I were under official orders to be in the Armed Forces and in a combat zone, and my superior officer said, "Look, they are parachuting from that plane that is about to crash, fire them up!" and I absolutely refused, I would be disobeying the enlistment oath I quoted in my last post, but I would be obeying the Geneva convention accords. Do you agree?

hors de combat

Combatants who are hors de combat are out of the fight are and entitled to respect for their lives and physical and moral integrity. They are to be protected and treated humanely, without adverse discrimination. (Convention I Art. 3; Protocol I, Art. 4)

Attacking a person who is hors de combat is a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions. (Protocol I, Art. 85, Sec. 3)

Persons are hors de combat if they have been captured, if they have surrendered, or if they are unconscious or otherwise incapacitated provided that they do not attempt to fight or escape. (Protocol I, Art. 41, Sec. 2)

Parachutists who eject from a damaged aircraft cannot be attacked while they are descending. (Protocol I, Art. 42, Sec. 1)

Parachuters who have landed in hostile territory must be given a chance to surrender, unless they are clearly acting hostile. (Protocol I, Art. 42, Sec. 2)

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-10-08   17:12:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Ferret Mike (#11)

Mike, I don't agree with anything you say anymore. I saw a faggot thread wherein you attempted to drag me into here on 4um last week ... I don't play your stinking games, pal.

I state my opinions. If you don't like them, fine .. but don't talk shit behind my back. I really don't think you know what you are doing anymore. And more to the point, I don't fucking give a damn about your opine.

buckeroo  posted on  2006-10-08   17:19:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: buckeroo (#14)

How do I talk behind your back by posting something in open forum? Behind the back is done in E mail.

Be a man, admit you are wrong here. Don't whine, that's lame.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-10-08   17:22:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Ferret Mike (#15)

How do I talk behind your back by posting something in open forum?

You are so fucking clueless about your own self that you have to ask this question upon an open forum. Man, you are a spineless cretin worthy of no respect.

buckeroo  posted on  2006-10-08   17:33:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: buckeroo (#16) (Edited)

You bombastically call for the execution of Spec. Anderson. But you fail to take into account that oaths are protocols and that protocols supersede each other, much as local, state and federal laws when one at a higher level contradicts the other.

Now, is that so hard to understand?

Oops! My bad, another rhetorical question. ;-)

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-10-08   17:40:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Ferret Mike (#18)

You bombastically call for the execution of Spec. Anderson.

Why not? What good is he to society? He volunteered to fight for GWBush's war and then he decided he was a chicken-shit to continue his zeal. Do you know why?

I know why. He is a coward. He is a liar to everyone, from his parents and family to his friends and business acquaintances around him. He is the kind of asshole that talks shit behind other's backs. All the while, talking themselves up thinking they convince the world around them about their own righteousness.

He is a coward like you, pal.

buckeroo  posted on  2006-10-08   17:47:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: buckeroo (#20) (Edited)

"Why not? What good is he to society?"

How are you the final arbitrator of who is or is not 'good to society?'

"He volunteered to fight for GWBush's war and then he decided he was a chicken-shit to continue his zeal. Do you know why?"

Did he not volunteer for the Army? Did he swear an oath to disregard the Geneva Convention Protocols and to fight in wars he knew were illegal started by one George Walker Bush?

"I know why. He is a coward. He is a liar to everyone, from his parents and family to his friends and business acquaintances around him."

Cowards and scoundrels go to war when they know they are violating high principle ensconced in internationally recognized laws governing the conduct of war. I submit he is not only NOT a coward, he is a hero. I salute him. You could learn from him.

"He is a coward like you, pal."

I did go to an illegal and immoral war conducted on the order of one GHW Bush when I was in the U.S. Army, but I did not realize this was the case until after serving there. I would have also refused to go back.

I got out of active duty after that experience missing by days being frozen in my slot and having to make a decision about Gulf War I.

No Buck, if I were a coward, I Mike McCarthy of Eugene, Oregon -- well known in my local community -- would not be here openly talking in forum, be engaged in exercising pro-actively my political efficacy, and I would not have gone into the Army.

If I were a coward, I would have caved my first enlistment in the late 70s and taken an Article 15 when they decided to throw my politically annoying ass out. Instead I risked going to Leavenworth Federal Penitentiary by opting to go to Special Court Martial which I won.

Words are cheap, Buck. I have actions showing I am not a coward. I might add to I don't drink. I never hide in a bottle.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-10-08   18:07:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Ferret Mike (#24)

I did go to an illegal and immoral war conducted on the order of one GHW Bush when I was in the U.S. Army, but I did not realize this was the case until after serving there. I would have also refused to go back.

I got out of active duty after that experience missing by days being frozen in my slot and having to make a decision about Gulf War I.

No Buck, if I were a coward, I Mike McCarthy of Eugene, Oregon -- well known in my local community -- would not be here openly talking in forum, be engaged in exercising pro-actively my political efficacy, and I would not have gone into the Army.

If I were a coward, I would have caved my first enlistment in the late 70s and taken an Article 15 when they decided to throw my politically annoying ass out. Instead I risked going to Leavenworth Federal Penitentiary by opting to go to Special Court Martial which I won.

there ya go. the truth of the matter is, most of these guys don't have the intelligence to determine right from wrong much less courage. they just do what they're told no matter how heinous the deed.

christine  posted on  2006-10-08   18:16:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 28.

        There are no replies to Comment # 28.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 28.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]