See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: Why Bush Won't Be Impeached
Source:
Rockwell
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 13, 2006
Author: Paul Craig Roberts
Post Date: 2006-10-13 10:34:25 by bluedogtxn
Keywords: None
Views: 131
Comments: 8
Bush’s Willing Legislators: The Case for Impeachment, and Why It Won’t Happen by Paul Craig Roberts by Paul Craig Roberts DIGG THIS The case for impeaching President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney is far stronger than the case against President Bill Clinton or the pending case that drove President Nixon to resign. With Republican control of Congress, especially of the House where impeachment must originate, it is hardly surprising that impeachment of the Republican Bush administration is a dead letter. What is surprising is that conservatives with a long tradition of adulation for the US Constitution and Bill of Rights have not been up in arms against the Bush regime’s all out assault on the foundation of America’s political system. Instead, the case for impeachment has come from the left-wing. This weakens the case, because it can be portrayed as a partisan political move instead of a last ditch attempt to save the Constitution. In Impeach the President: The Case Against Bush and Cheney, edited by Dennis Loo and Peter Phillips, left-wing professors, journalists, and activists present a 300-page twelve-count indictment. It is for the most part a sound indictment. A conservative American constitutionalist who loves his country can find little in the case for impeachment to which to take exception. Despite the strength of the case for impeachment, I do not think it will happen, because Bush has convinced Americans that his crimes against truth, the US Constitution, and the Geneva Conventions are necessary measures in the "war against terrorists." As long as Americans understand 9/11 as an attack on America by "Islamo-Fascism," the executive branch will have wide latitude in usurping liberty. Seymour Hersh in his book, Chain of Command, asks: "How did eight or nine neoconservatives redirect the government and rearrange long-standing American priorities and policies with so much ease? How did they overcome the bureaucracy, intimidate the press, mislead the Congress, and dominate the military? Is our democracy that fragile?" "How indeed?" ask the editors of Impeach the President. Their answer seems to be that the Democrats have been intimidated and "truth and facts have been barricaded off from reaching most of the American people." The editors have faith in the American people to do the right thing if only they can find out the truth. It is refreshing to see that the left-wing, unlike the neoconservatives, believes in the American system. However, as Claes Ryn indicates in his book, America the Virtuous, it would appear that the American system has been eroded over the decades by the rise of the new Jacobin ideology known as neoconservatism. Leon Hadar and William S. Lind point out that the Democrats are as neoconized as the neoconized Republicans. There is no difference. At a recent conference hosted by the journal, The National Interest, it was the Democrat, Will Marshall, president and founder of the Progressive Policy Institute who sounded like Richard Perle and William Kristol, not Republican Stefan Halper who served in the Reagan administration. Halper presented a devastating critique of Bush’s neocon foreign policy. The problem is not that the Democrats are intimidated. The problem is that the Democrats are part of the problem. The editors of Impeach the President indirectly acknowledge this fact when they report that Congress "looked the other way" when Bush acknowledged that he lied to cover up his felony of illegally spying on US citizens and declared the real criminal to be the NSA official who blew the whistle. Democrats, no less than Republicans, have permitted the Bush regime to violate the separation of powers and the rule of law. A branch of government that no longer defends its power, is a branch of government that no longer believes in its power. Just as the Reichstag faded away for Hitler, the US Congress has faded away for the Bush administration. Claes Ryn is correct when he says a change of mind has occurred. The Constitution and the political system based on it are on the ropes because the players no longer believe in it. They believe in executive power to act forcefully in behalf of "American exceptionalism." Civil libertarians rely on the judiciary to defend Constitutional rights, but the Supreme Court has been compromised by Bush’s appointments of Roberts and Alito, men who believe in "energy in the executive." Without support from Congress, the judiciary cannot protect civil liberty. With the passage of the recent detainee and spy bills, Congress has allied itself with the Bush regime against civil liberty. Beliefs are more important than institutions. Michael Polanyi wrote that if people believed in the principles of Stalinism, democracy would uphold Stalinism. If people believe in American hegemony, they will not complain when barriers to hegemonic actions are removed. If people believe fighting terrorism is more important than civil liberty, they will lose civil liberty. What America needs to refurbish is its beliefs. Without renewing our beliefs, we cannot renew our civil liberties and hold government accountable. October 13, 2006
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: bluedogtxn (#0)
I hope there is some ray of hope that these two travesties can be righted.
And who would impeach him...our complicit house of representative?
How did it happen?? NO one need look any further than the Congress vote of 325 to 6 vote of support for Israel. Anyone that does not comprehend that vote is not among the living.
I hope so, too. But the fact is that these things were done in domestic peacetime, when we don't really face a domestic threat from anyone. I know, the terra, the terra... But they are more of a nuisance than a tangible enemy; to the extent they are a tangible enemy, they are essentially permanent; ergo, so are the torture bill and the abrogation of the 4th Amendment. How do we get rid of them? Successful rebellion at the ballot box maybe? Because it's gonna have to be a successful rebellion somewheres.
the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.
that's the point of the post. no one will.
the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.
Here's the real reason why Bush won't be impeached. Bush Sr. and his ability to expose any and all skeletons you have hiding in your closet. To think that uncle creepy doesn't still have control, or power with the CIA, is naieve at best, and delusional at worst.
With the passage of the recent detainee and spy bills, Congress has allied itself with the Bush regime against civil liberty.
#2. To: bluedogtxn (#0)
#3. To: bluedogtxn (#0)
Seymour Hersh in his book, Chain of Command, asks: "How did eight or nine neoconservatives redirect the government and rearrange long-standing American priorities and policies with so much ease? How did they overcome the bureaucracy, intimidate the press, mislead the Congress, and dominate the military? Is our democracy that fragile?"
#4. To: Fred Mertz (#1)
I hope there is some ray of hope that these two travesties can be righted.
#5. To: angle (#2)
And who would impeach him...our complicit house of representative?
#6. To: bluedogtxn (#0)
 | What's that Mr. Nipples? You want me to ask the nice lady about her rack?. |
#7. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#6)
Agree absolutely. Flippin' nazis.
To think that uncle creepy doesn't still have control, or power with the CIA, is naieve at best, and delusional at worst.
the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal bread.
#8. To: bluedogtxn (#0)
Extradite him to The Hague.
I've already said too much.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest